全入射角度下平板冲击波的壁压载荷及局部空化特性

李海涛; 朱石坚; 陈志坚; 牟金磊

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0354-07

全入射角度下平板冲击波的壁压载荷及局部空化特性

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0354-07

1.
海军工程大学科研部，湖北武汉 430033
2.
海军工程大学舰船工程系，湖北武汉 430033

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51109216)

详细信息

作者简介:
李海涛(1979—), 男, 博士, 讲师

通讯作者:
Li Hai-tao, navy_lht@163.com

中图分类号: O383; U661.7
计量
- 文章访问数: 2860
- HTML全文浏览量: 267
- PDF下载量: 425
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-10-08
- 修回日期: 2013-07-17
- 刊出日期: 2014-05-25

Characteristics of wall pressure and cavitation on the plate subjected to underwater explosion shockwaves at any angle of incidence

1.
Office of Research & Development, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, Hubei, China
2.
Department of Warship Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, Hubei, China

Funds: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51109216)

摘要

摘要: 以平面波理论为基础，推导了无限平板在全入射角度下的冲击波壁压载荷计算公式，利用实验数据对壁压公式进行修正，提出了一种适用于计算有限尺度平板壁压的经验公式；分析了不同入射角度下壁压载荷的变化特性，初步研究了壁压载荷负压特性对平板局部空化的影响。结果表明：修正后的壁压曲线与实际壁压曲线吻合较好；入射角度的增大会加快壁压衰减过程，并使最低壁压的绝对值减小；随着药量或平板厚度的增加，壁压最低负压的绝对值增大，形成局部空化的能力增强；局部空化仅在一定条件范围内才会形成，空化范围受局部空化形成压力及冲击强度等因素的影响较大。
- 爆炸力学 /
- 平板壁压 /
- 水下爆炸 /
- 冲击波 /
- 局部空化 /
- 斜入射
Abstract: Wall pressure as a load parameter should be confirmed exactly, and then offered for investigating dynamic response of structure such as a plate subjected to underwater explosion.On the basis of plane shock wave hypothesis, a theoretical formula was deduced and proposed to calculate the wall pressure values of an infinite plate subjected to underwater explosion shockwaves at any angle of incidence.By using the wall pressure data derived from underwater explosion experiments, the theoretical formula of wall pressure was revised to be suitable for plates with finite dimensions.With the revised formula, the characteristics of the wall pressure on the plate were analyzed by considering various incidence angles, and the effects of the negative wall pressure values on local cavitation on the plate were discussed primarily.The results show that the wall pressure values derived from the revised formula agree well with those from the experiments.As the incidence angle increases, the wall pressure decays more rapidly, and the absolute value of the minimum wall pressure decreases.With the more explosive or the thicker plate, the absolute value of the minimum wall pressure is larger, and local cavitation takes place more likely.Local cavitation can only come into being in certain conditions, and the cavitation range will be affected by the factors such as cavitation pressure criterion, shock intensity, and so on.
- mechanics of explosion /
- plate wall-pressure /
- underwater explosion /
- shockwaves /
- local cavitation /
- oblique incidence

HTML全文

图 1 任意角度入射冲击波作用下的无限平板

Figure 1. Infinite plate subjected to an inclined plane shockwave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 函数f(α)计算值与实验值的比较

Figure 2. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results of f(α)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 冲击波壁压理论值和实验值的比较

Figure 3. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results of wall pressure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 相同冲击因子下入射角度对壁压曲线的影响

Figure 4. Effect of incidence angle on wall-pressure value

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 入射角度对同一点处冲击波压力衰减常数的影响

Figure 5. Effect of incidence angle on θ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同药量条件下入射角度对最小壁压值的影响

Figure 6. Effect of incidence angle on minimum wall-pressure value

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同板厚条件下垂直爆距对局部空化区域半径的影响

Figure 7. Effect of minimum stand-off distance on radius of local cavitation zone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同爆炸工况下冲击波壁压峰值实验值及理论值对比

Table 1. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results of wall pressure in test cases

No.	m_e/kg	R/m	$\left(\sqrt{m_{\mathrm{e}}} / R\right) /\left(\mathrm{kg}^{0.5} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{-1}\right)$	m_p/(kg·m^-2)	α /(°)	p_wt/MPa	p_we/MPa	C_p
1	0.005	0.10	0.707	7.8	3	191.680	124.960	0.652
2	0.005	0.15	0.471	7.8	5	121.220	80.010	0.660
3	0.050	1.00	0.224	7.8	6	33.820	22.560	0.667
4	6.000	19.55	0.125	93.6	6	7.420	5.580	0.752
5	6.000	10.21	0.240	93.6	20	15.520	12.240	0.789
6	6.000	15.23	0.100	23.4	67	0.154	0.068	0.442
7	6.000	15.23	0.100	23.4	4	0.170	0.127	0.747
8	1.000	12.59	0.079	23.4	83	5.910	0.990	0.168
9	1.000	12.99	0.077	23.4	64	5.770	2.250	0.390
10	1.000	8.83	0.113	23.4	69	8.920	4.890	0.548
11	1.000	5.33	0.188	23.4	65	15.780	9.050	0.574
12	1.000	4.69	0.213	23.4	27	18.240	14.140	0.775
13	6.000	16.56	0.148	23.4	77	8.600	2.240	0.260
14	6.000	16.50	0.148	23.4	69	8.640	3.600	0.417
15	6.000	15.07	0.163	23.4	50	9.580	4.200	0.438
注：工况1~3、5~8、13~15为函数f(α)拟合样本点工况；工况4、9~12为考查点工况。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同爆炸工况下冲击波衰减常数实验值及理论值对比

Table 2. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results of θ in test cases

No.	m_e/kg	R/m	$\left(\sqrt{m_{\mathrm{e}}} / R\right) /\left(\mathrm{kg}^{0.5} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{-1}\right)$	m_p/(kg·m^-2)	α /(°)	θ_pt/μs	θ_pe/μs	ε/%
1	0.005	0.10	0.707	7.8	3	3.5	3.2	8.6
2	0.005	0.15	0.471	7.8	5	3.6	3.6	0.0
3	0.050	1.00	0.224	7.8	6	4.5	4.5	0.0
4	6.000	10.21	0.240	93.6	20	13.6	13.3	2.2
5	2.000	15.21	0.093	23.4	81	2.5	2.3	8.0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(8)

[1]	Jiang J, Olson M D. Rigid-plastic analysis of underwater blast loaded stiffened plates[J]. International Journal of Mechanic and Science, 1995, 37(8): 843-859. doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(94)00100-X
[2]	Makinen K. Cavitation models for structures excited by a plane shock wave[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1998, 12: 85-101. doi: 10.1006/jfls.1997.0120
[3]	Santiago L D. Fluid-interaction and cavitation effects on a surface ship model due to an underwater explosion[R]. California: Naval Postgraduate School, 1997.
[4]	金辉, 周学滨, 周华, 等.水下爆炸中自由场压力和船体壁压的测量与分析[J].海军工程大学学报, 2009, 21(5): 82-87. Jin Hui, Zhou Xue-bin, Zhou Hua, et al. Measurement and analysis of free-field pressure and ship hull pressure under water explosion[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2009, 21(5): 82-87.
[5]	程素秋, 樊宝顺, 薛飞, 等.水下非接触爆炸作用下舱段模型的动态响应[J].爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(4): 360-366. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2008.04.013 Cheng Su-qiu, Fan Bao-shun, Xue Fei, et al. Dynamical response measurement of a cabin model subjected to noncontact underwater explosion[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(4): 360-366. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2008.04.013
[6]	樊宝顺, 程素秋, 韩峰.舰船舱段模型在水下爆炸作用下的壁压分析[J].中国舰船研究, 2009, 4(5): 20-22. Fan Bao-shun, Cheng Su-qiu, Han Feng. Wall pressure analysis of cabin model subjected to underwater explosion[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(5): 20-22.
[7]	李海涛, 朱锡, 张振华.水下爆炸球面冲击波作用下船体梁的刚塑性动响应特性[J].工程力学, 2010, 27(10): 202-207. Li Hai-tao, Zhu Xi, Zhang Zhen-hua. Dynamic rigid-plasitc response of ship-like beam subjected to underwater spherical shockwaves[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(10): 202-207.
[8]	顾文彬, 苏青笠, 刘建青, 等.水下平面爆炸冲击波作用下空化区域形成及其特征[J].爆破, 2004, 21(4): 8-11. Gu Wen-bin, Su Qing-li, Liu Jian-qiang, et al. Formation process of cavitation region affected by underwater plane blast shock wave and its characteristics[J]. Blasting, 2004, 21(4): 8-11.