球形弹丸正撞击碎片云头部形状的辨识

安凯

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2014)04-0404-05

球形弹丸正撞击碎片云头部形状的辨识

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)04-0404-05

安凯^,

山东航天电子技术研究所, 山东烟台 264003

基金项目: 国防科工局空间碎片“十二五”计划项目(k0201210)

详细信息

作者简介:
安凯(1957—), 男, 博士后, 研究员

中图分类号: O347;V423.42
计量
- 文章访问数: 3259
- HTML全文浏览量: 345
- PDF下载量: 475
- 被引次数: 18
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-12-26
- 修回日期: 2013-03-08
- 刊出日期: 2014-07-25

Head shape recognition of debris cloud producedby normal impact of spherical projectile

An Kai^,

Shandong Aerospace Electro-technology Institute, Yantai 264003, Shandong, China

More Information

Corresponding author: An Kai, ankai2007@163.com

摘要

摘要: 为了辨识碎片云头部形状，提出了对其形状进行边缘提取、利用二次函数进行边缘最优拟合、并根据拟合结果作出判断的方法。给出了二次函数对边缘的最优拟合算法。对来自不同文献的4幅碎片云图像，提取了他们头部的边缘曲线，进行了最优拟合和形状辨识。辨识结果显示，3幅图像的头部形状为抛物线，1幅图像的头部形状为椭圆。辨识结果表明，至少有一部分碎片云的头部形状是旋转抛物面, 而不是椭球面。
- 固体力学 /
- 辨识 /
- 边缘 /
- 头部形状 /
- 图像 /
- 拟合
Abstract: There are various models of the debris cloud produced by normal impact of spherical projectile, but a common ground of the models is that the head shape of the debris cloud is ellipsoidal. In order to identify the head shape of the debris cloud, a new method was presented, which extracts the edge of the debris cloud image, searches for the optimal quadratic function fitting of the edge, and then adjudge the head shape according to fitting results. The optimal fitting algorithm of quadratic function was given as well. Based on four of debris cloud images of references, the recognition was carried out after extraction of their head shape and the optimal quadratic function fitting, and the results show that there are three images with parabolic head shape, one image with elliptic head shape. Thus, the head shape of debris clouds includes not only the rotation ellipsoid, but also the rotation paraboloid.
- solid mechanics /
- recognition /
- edge /
- head shape /
- image /
- fitting

HTML全文

图 1 超高速撞击实验碎片云图

Figure 1. Debris clouds from hypervelocity impact experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 图像1的抛物线拟合结果

Figure 2. Parabola fitting result of image 1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 图像2的椭圆拟合结果

Figure 3. Ellipse fitting result of image 2

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 图像3的抛物线拟合结果

Figure 4. Parabola fitting result of image 3

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 图像4的抛物线拟合结果

Figure 5. Parabola fitting result of image 4

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(13)

[1]	Swift H F. Impact dynamics[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
[2]	Schonberg W P, Williamsen J E. Empirical hole size and crack length models for dual-wall systems under hypervelocity projectile impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 20(6): 711-722. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X9787457X
[3]	唐蜜, 柏劲松, 李平, 等.超高速撞击中影响碎片云形状因素分析[J].高压物理学报, 2007, 21(4): 425-431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2007.04.016 Tang Mi, Bai Jing-song, Li Ping, et al. Factors analysis of debris cloud's shape of hypervelocity impact[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2007, 21(4): 425-431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2007.04.016
[4]	Schäfer F K. An engineering fragmentation model for the impact of spherical projectiles on thin metallic plates[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 33(1): 745-762. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X06001667
[5]	贾光辉, 黄海.超高速撞击航天器二次碎片云能量特性分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2007, 33(3): 257-260. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5965.2007.03.002 Jia Guang-hui, Huang Hai. Characters on kinetics energy of debris cloud in spacecraft[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007, 33(3): 257-260. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5965.2007.03.002
[6]	张伟, 庞宝君, 贾斌, 等.弹丸超高速撞击防护屏碎片云数值模拟[J].高压物理学报, 2004, 18(1): 47-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2004.01.009 Zhang Wei, Pang Bao-jun, Jia Bin, et al. Numerical simulation of debris cloud produced by hypervelocity impact of projectile on bumper[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2004, 18(1): 47-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2004.01.009
[7]	胡震东, 黄海, 贾光辉.超高速撞击碎片云特性分析[J].弹箭与制导学报, 2006, 26(1): 747-749. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2006.01.237 Hu Zhen-dong, Huang Hai, Jia Guang-hui. The characteristics of debris cloud produced by hypervelocity impact[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2006, 26(1): 747-749. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2006.01.237
[8]	Poormon K L, Piekutowski A J. Comparisons of cadmium and aluminum debris clouds[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1995, 17(4): 639-648. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0734743X9599887W
[9]	Piekutowski A J. Formation and description of debris clouds produced by hypervelocity impact[Z]. NASA, 1996.
[10]	Castleman K R. Digital image processing[M]. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc, 1996.
[11]	安凯, 邢进生, 邱祖廉.模糊神经网络的二阶段变半径随机搜索算法[J].自动化学报, 2000, 26(5): 616-622. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-MOTO200005004.htm An Kai, Xing Jin-sheng, Qin Zu-lian. Two-stage random search algorithm of fuzzy neural network with variable radius[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2000, 26(5): 616-622. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-MOTO200005004.htm
[12]	Kundu P K. Fluid mechanics[M]. California: Elsevier Academic Press, 2004: 283-285.
[13]	Nakayama Y. Introduction to fluid mechanics[M]. Tokyo: Yokendo Co Ltd, 2000: 82-94.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(8)

1.	张柱柱，毛海涛，周圣林，焦鹏，胡文林，吴省均，刘军，张旸，沈沛，刘宇麟. 分离式霍普金森压杆试验中金属材料端面摩擦效应误差分析. 机械工程材料. 2024(02): 89-96 . 百度学术
2.	高波，冯家臣，彭刚，王绪财，王伟，陈春晓，张彬，卢振宇. 霍普金森装置校准高应变率标准样品研制. 力学与实践. 2024(03): 617-624 . 百度学术
3.	杜金飞，杜宇翔，贾永胜，孙金山，姚颖康，谢全民，范焜晖. 水-动力耦合作用下红砂岩变形破坏与能耗分析. 岩土力学. 2024(S1): 248-258 . 百度学术
4.	张蓉蓉，经来旺，马冬冬. 冻融和热冲击循环作用后红砂岩SHPB试验和本构模型研究. 振动与冲击. 2022(09): 267-275 . 百度学术
5.	陆杉，巫绪涛. 冲击载荷下砂岩SHPB实验的有限元模拟. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(11): 1517-1521 . 百度学术
6.	崔衡. 不同冲击荷载作用下粉砂岩动力学特性试验研究. 安徽建筑. 2021(11): 170-171 . 百度学术
7.	唐志强，李皋，石祥超，李泽，彭尧，包恒. 岩石单轴冲击加载破碎特征分析. 应用力学学报. 2019(05): 1076-1081+1258 . 百度学术
8.	袁璞，马芹永，马冬冬. 端面不平行对岩石SHPB测试结果的影响分析. 爆破. 2018(02): 26-31+106 . 百度学术