弹体侵彻干砂的数值模型

李杰; 李猛深; 李宏; 施存程

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0633-08

弹体侵彻干砂的数值模型

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0633-08

李杰^{1, 2},
李猛深^{1, 3, 4, ,},
李宏⁴,
施存程^{1, 5}

1.
中国人民解放军理工大学爆炸冲击防灾减灾国家重点实验室，江苏南京 210007
2.
南京理工大学机械工程学院，江苏南京 210094
3.
空军工程大学机场建筑工程系, 陕西西安 710038
4.
沈阳军区司令部工程科研设计所，辽宁沈阳 110162
5.
第二炮兵指挥学院，湖北武汉 430012

基金项目: 中国博士后科学基金项目(2013M541675，2014M552688);爆炸冲击防灾减灾国家重点实验室开放基金项目(DPMEIKF201301)

详细信息

作者简介:
李杰(1981—), 男, 博士, 讲师

通讯作者:
李猛深, lms200508@163.com

中图分类号: O385
计量
- 文章访问数: 2775
- HTML全文浏览量: 323
- PDF下载量: 402
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-04-04
- 修回日期: 2014-07-23
- 刊出日期: 2015-10-10

Numerical modeling of projectile penetration into dry sand

Li Jie^{1, 2},
Li Meng-shen^{1, 3, 4
, ,},
Li Hong⁴,
Shi Cun-cheng^{1, 5}

1.
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Explosion and Impact, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, China
2.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China
3.
Department of Airfield and Building Engineering, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
4.
Designing Institute of Engineering Research, Headquarters of Shenyang Military Area Command, Shenyang 110162, Liaoning, China
5.
The Second Artillery Command College, Wuhan 430012, Hubei, China

摘要

摘要: 基于砂粒的不可压缩性假设，利用球形空腔动态收缩模型和广义Mises强度准则推导了干砂的孔隙压密演化方程；根据Hugoniot冲击突跃条件和Grüneisen系数，推导了干砂考虑孔隙演化影响的状态方程；根据关联流动法则，得到了大变形时砂的弹塑性应力应变关系；基于动力有限元计算平台，采用上述模型分析了弹体高速侵彻干砂的作用过程。结果表明，该模型能够表征高速侵彻时砂的孔隙演化对应力应变状态的反向影响，能够较准确地反映高速侵彻作用下干砂的动力响应过程。
- 爆炸力学 /
- 孔隙压密 /
- 有限元 /
- 干砂 /
- 高速侵彻
Abstract: Assuming that sand grains are incompressible, a compaction equation for porous dry sand was derived by applying the dynamic systolic model of a spherical cavity and the generalized Mises strength criterion. Based on the Hugoniot jump condition and the Grüneisen parameter, the equation of state for dry sand was given by considering porous compaction. According to the associated flow rule, the elasto-plastic stress-strain relationships of dry sand under large deformation were obtained. By means of the dynamic finite element computing method, the above models were used to analyze the penetration process of dry sand by a projectile. The results show that the models can reflect the reverse influence of sand pore evolution on the stress-strain state in the high-velocity penetration process, and can accurately describe the dynamic response of dry sand under high-velocity penetration.
- mechanics of explosion /
- porous compaction /
- finite element /
- dry sand /
- high-velocity penetration

HTML全文

图 1 砂的孔隙演化等效模型

Figure 1. An equivalent model of pore evolution for sand

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 加卸载时砂的孔隙演化曲线

Figure 2. Pore evolution curves for sand under loading and unloading conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 弹体尺寸

Figure 3. Projectile dimensions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 弹靶的有限元模型片段

Figure 4. Parts of the finite element models for the projectile and target

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 一质量80.3 g的弹体侵彻速度与侵彻深度的关系

Figure 5. Velocity varied with penetration depth for a projectile with the mass of 80.30 g

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 靶体在不同时刻的压力场

Figure 6. The pressure fields of the target at different times

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 砂的侵彻深度计算值与实验结果

Table 1. Test and computed results for penetration depths of sand

m/g	v_{p, 0}/(m·s^-1)	H_e/m	H_c/m	$\frac{{\left\| {{H_{\text{c}}} - {H_{\text{e}}}} \right\|}}{{{H_{\text{s}}}}}$/%
80.30	674	1.37	1.04	24.1
81.20	716	1.28	1.37	7.0
80.96	673	1.33	1.04	21.8
81.05	649	1.26	0.96	23.8
80.86	640	1.27	0.93	26.7
81.11	645	1.26	0.95	24.6
81.15	641	1.28	0.93	27.3
81.00	664	1.24	1.01	18.5
81.25	692	1.36	1.24	8.8
80.75	682	1.29	1.15	10.8
80.42	661	1.30	1.00	23.1
80.30	678	1.37	1.10	19.7
81.10	666	1.47	1.01	31.3

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	Allen W A, Mayfield E B, Morrison H L. Dynamics of a projectile penetration sand[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1957, 28(3): 370-376. doi: 10.1063/1.1722750
[2]	Allen W A, Mayfield E B, Morrison H L. Dynamics of a projectile penetration sand: Part Ⅱ[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1957, 28(11): 1331-1335. doi: 10.1063/1.1722645
[3]	Mesri G, Feng T W, Benak J M. Post densification penetration resistance of clean sands[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116(7): 1095-1115. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=refg15/ref15&dbid=16&doi=10.1139%2ft11-098&key=10.1061%2f(asce)0733-9410(1990)116%3a7(1095)
[4]	Goldman D I, Umbanhowar P. Scaling and dynamics of sphere and disk impact into granular media[J]. Physical Review E, 2008, 77(2): 021308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.021308
[5]	Collins A L, Addiss J W, Walley S M, et al. The effect of nose shape on the internal flow fields during ballistic penetration of sand[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(12): 951-963. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.002
[6]	Borg J P, Morrissey M P, Perich C A, et al. In situ velocity and stress characterization of a projectile penetrating a sand target: Experimental measurements and continuum simulations[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 51(1): 23-35. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X12001510
[7]	Forrestal M J, Norwood F R, Longcope D B. Penetration into targets described by locked hydrostats and shear strength[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1981, 17(9): 915-924. doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(81)90106-2
[8]	Forrestal M J, Luk V K. Penetration into soil targets[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1992, 12(3): 427-444. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(92)90167-R
[9]	Boguslavskii Y, Drabkin S, Juran I, et al. Theory and practice of projectile's penetration in soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(10): 806-812. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:10(806)
[10]	Salgado R, Mitchell J K, Jamiolkowski M. Cavity expansion and penetration resistance in sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(4): 344-354. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:4(344)
[11]	Savvateev A F, Budin A V, Kolikov V A, et al. High-speed penetration into sand[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 26(1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10): 675-681. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X01001324
[12]	Kotov V L, Balandin V V, Bragov A M, et al. Using a local interaction model to determine the resistance to penetration of projectiles into sandy soil[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 2013, 54(4): 612-621. doi: 10.1134/S0021894413040123
[13]	Onate E, Rojek J. Combination of discrete element and finite element methods for dynamic analysis of geomechanics problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 193(27/28/29): 3087-3128. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782504001215
[14]	Tong X, Tuan C Y. Viscoplastic cap model for soils under high strain rate loading[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(2): 206-214. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(206)
[15]	Dwivedi S K, Teeter R D, Felice C W, et al. Two dimensional mesoscale simulations of projectile instability during penetration in dry sand[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2008, 104(8): 083502. doi: 10.1063/1.2999391
[16]	Kharab A, Hudspeth R T, Guenther R B. Penetration of cylindrical projectiles into saturated sandy media[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2009, 49(5): 605-612. doi: 10.1007/s11340-008-9190-9
[17]	Carroll M M, Holt A C. Static and dynamic porecolapse relations for ductile porous materials[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1972, 43(4): 1626-1636. doi: 10.1063/1.1661372
[18]	Johnson J N. Dynamic fracture and spallation in ductile solids[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1981, 52(4): 2812-2825. doi: 10.1063/1.329011
[19]	Leppanen J. Dynamic behaviour of concrete structures subjected to blast and fragment impacts[D]. Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology, 2002: .