Optimal microsecond time interval of urban tunnelpassing through complex strata
-
摘要: 以莞惠城际项目的“上软下硬”复合地层条件为依托,结合现场测试数据,采用理论与数值分析相结合的手段,开展城市隧道穿越复合地层中合理微差时间间隔的研究。研究结果表明:复合地层中微差爆破效果较好,第1、2炮适宜的微差时间间隔为50~70 ms;围岩条件相同,振动波形和主震相的持续时间均随着爆心距的增加而变长;而围岩条件变差时,振动波形更易出现波形叠加现象;随着微差时间间隔增加,第1、2炮产生的主震相逐渐分离,在0~35ms间降震率波动明显且整体上小于稳定降震率;在复合地层中,两测点爆心距相同时,成洞区上方测点受空洞效应影响显著,振速明显偏大。Abstract: In view of seismic-wave detection, laws of waveform change, and the vibration-reducing effect that different millisecond time intervals have on millisecond blasting in underground engineering, we conducted research on optimal microsecond time interval in the underground blasting for the construction of an urban tunnel passing through complex strata through theoretical and numerical analysis based on the so-called "a soft layer on top of a hard layer" soil condition found with the Guan-Hui inter-city expressway project and the related field test data. Our results show that the effect of millisecond blasting in the complex strata is preferable, the optimal microsecond time interval of the first and second guns is 50-70 ms; under the same surrounding rock conditions, the duration of the vibration waveforms and the main shock phases increase with the distance from the center of the explosion; meanwhile under the unfavorable surrounding rock conditions, the vibration waveforms are more likely to appear superimposed; with the increase of the microsecond time interval, the main shock phases of the first and second guns gradually separate, the vibration-reducing rate fluctuates significantly between 0 and 35 ms and is less than stable; in the complex strata, with the same distances from the center of the explosion at the two measuring points, the points above the hole area have significant influences with relatively greater vibration velocity.
-
表 1 不同围岩等级的波速
Table 1. Wave velocities of different levels surrounding rock
围岩等级 vP/(km·s-1) vS/(km·s-1) vR/(km·s-1) Ⅲ 2.5 1.47 1.35 Ⅳ 2.0 1.18 1.08 Ⅴ 1.5 0.88 0.81 Ⅵ 1.0 0.59 0.54 表 2 弹性波在不同围岩等级传播属性
Table 2. Transport properties of elastic waves of different levels of surrounding rock
围岩等级 R/m vP/(km·s-1) vS/(km·s-1) vR/(km·s-1) tP/ms tS/ms tR/ms (tR-tP)/ms ts/ms tw/ms Ⅲ 45 2.5 1.47 1.35 18 30.6 33.3 15.3 30 ≈100 Ⅲ 60 2.5 1.47 1.35 24 40.8 44.4 20.0 50 ≈100 Ⅵ 25 1.0 0.59 0.54 25 42.4 46.3 21.3 25 ≈100 Ⅵ 33 1.0 0.59 0.54 35 59.3 64.8 29.8 40 >100 表 3 微差时间间隔取值
Table 3. Values of microsecond time interval
围岩等级 R/m τmin/ms τ/ms τmax/ms Ⅲ 45 30 45.3 ≈100 Ⅲ 60 50 70.0 ≈100 Ⅵ 25 25 46.3 ≈100 Ⅵ 33 40 69.8 >100 表 4 模型力学参数
Table 4. Mechanical parameters of the model
岩体类型 岩体名称 E/GPa ν ρ/(t·m-3) 软岩层 黏土类地层 0.3 0.35 1.950 软岩层 饱和砂土 0.5 0.33 2.095 硬岩层 全风化混合片麻岩 0.7 0.33 2.300 硬岩层 弱风化混合片麻岩 1.5 0.31 2.350 表 5 各测点垂向最大振速(τ=200 ms)
Table 5. Maximum vibration velocitiesof measuring points
测点 vy/(mm·s-1) 第1炮 第2炮 1 14.3 10.0 2 11.2 8.5 3 10.6 7.6 4 7.3 5.8 5 3.4 2.4 6 2.2 1.9 -
[1] 孟丹, 朱崇钊.地铁隧道钻爆法施工影响下混凝土结构损伤预测方法研究[J].振动与冲击, 2014, 33(4): 173-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2014.04.031Meng Dan, Zhu Chongzhao. Damage prediction method of a concrete structure due to tunnel blasting excavations[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(4): 173-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2014.04.031 [2] He Chuan, Wang Bo. Research progress and development trends of highway tunnels in China[J]. Journal of Modern Transportation, 2013, 21(4) : 209-223. doi: 10.1007/s40534-013-0029-4 [3] 陈士海, 燕永峰, 戚桂峰, 等.微差爆破降震效果影响因素分析[J].岩土力学, 2011, 32(10): 3003-3008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.10.018Chen Shihai, Yan Yongfeng, Qi Guifeng, et al. Analysis of influence factors of interference vibration reduction of millisecond blasting[J]. Rock and Soli Mechanics, 2011, 32(10): 3003-3008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.10.018 [4] 高晓初, 吴从师, 宋新辉.露天矿台阶爆破合理微差间隔时间的研究与应用[J].爆炸与冲击, 1992, 12(4): 350-356. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/10753Gao Xiaochu, Wu Congshi, Song Xinhui. An approach to reasonably selecting the delay interval of bench blasting and its use[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1992, 12(4): 350-356. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/10753 [5] 袁文华, 马芹永, 黄伟.楔形掏槽微差爆破模型试验与分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(增1): 3352-3356. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb2012z1100Yuan Wenhua, Ma Qinyong, Huang Wei. Model experiment and analysis of wedge-shaped cutting millisecond blasting[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(suppl 1): 3352-3356. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb2012z1100 [6] 孙军杰, 秋仁东, 徐舜华, 等.微差爆破引发黄土场地强地面运动特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增2): 3728-3738. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2011S2048.htmSun Junjie, Qiu Rendong, Xu Shunhua, et al. Characteristics of ground motion induced by a short delay blasting in loess field[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(suppl 2): 3728-3738. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2011S2048.htm [7] Zheng Junjie, Lou Xiaoming, Luo Depi. Vibration superposition in tunnel blasting with millisecond delay[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (English Edition), 2009, 17(1):42-46. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=0f2c1721bb495256af80ba4eeb0afc4b&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [8] 吴腾芳, 王凯.微差爆破技术研究现状[J].爆破, 1997, 14(1): 53-57. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10004-1011095865.htmWu Tengfang, Wang Kai. Summary of current studies on millisecond blasting technique[J]. Blasting, 1997, 14(1): 53-57. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10004-1011095865.htm [9] 陈炜昀, 夏唐代, 刘志军, 等.平面S波在非饱和土自由边界上的反射问题研究[J].振动与冲击, 2013, 32(1): 99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.01.021Chen Weiyun, Xia Tangdai, Liu Zhijun, et al. Reflection of plane-S-waves at a free boundary of unsaturated soil[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(1): 99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.01.021 [10] 李景龙, 李术才, 李廷春, 等.隧道下穿既有铁路爆破的稳定控制技术研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(增1): 3596-3600. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb2007z1155Li Jinglong, Li Shucai, Li Tingchun, et al. Research on construction control technology for blast in tunnel crossing existing railway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(suppl 1): 3596-3600. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb2007z1155 [11] 赵铮, 陶钢, 杜长星.爆轰产物JWL状态方程应用研究[J].高压物理学报, 2009, 23(4): 277-282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2009.04.007Zhao Zheng, Tao Gang, Du Changxing. Application research on JWL equation of state of detonation products[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2009, 23(4): 277-282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2009.04.007 [12] 姚勇, 何川.并设小净距隧道爆破振动响应分析及控爆措施研究[J].岩土力学, 2009, 30(9): 2815-2822. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.09.048Yao Yong, He Chuan. Analysis of blasting vibration response of parallel set small clear-distance tunnels and blasting control measures[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(9): 2815-2822. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.09.048 [13] 易长平, 卢文波.开挖爆破对邻近隧洞的震动影响研究[J].工程爆破, 2004, 10(1): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2004.01.001Yi Changping, Lu Wenbo. A study of the effect of blasting vibration on adjacent tunnel[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2004, 10(1): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2004.01.001 [14] 张袁娟, 黄金香, 袁红.缓冲爆破减震效应研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(5): 965-973. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb201105013Zhang Yuanjuan, Huang Jinxiang, Yuan Hong. Study of shock absorption effect of buffer blasting[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(5): 965-973. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb201105013