Review of pyroshock simulation andresponse prediction methods in spacecraft
-
摘要: 航天器火工冲击力学环境是由星箭分离、部组件展开等工作过程中的火工品起爆引起的作用于结构上的高频、高加速度量级的瞬态冲击响应,能对航天器上含有晶振、脆性材料等的精密电子设备造成致命损伤,是航天器需要经历的最苛刻的力学环境之一。本文中,对国内外航天器火工冲击地面试验方法和环境预示方法做了全面、详细的介绍,总结了这两个方面的研究进展,分析了我国在这两个方面与航天强国的差距。最后,从我国航天工程实际需求出发,提出了今后航天器火工冲击领域应重点开展的研究方向。Abstract: The pyroshock environment of satellite-rocket separation is the severest mechanical environment during launching, which is characterized by transient high acceleration and high frequency. While it does not necessarily cause a satellite any structural damage, pyroshock may incur most serious damages on a satellite's precision electronic equipments containing crystals and brittle materials, resulting in either the failure of the entire mission or even catastrophic accidents. Therefore, during the development of a new spacecraft, an accurate prediction of the pyroshock environment and a reasonable specification and determination for components are essential. In this paper, a research review of ground simulation test methods and the pyroshock response prediction is presented, and the technological gap between China and countries highly developed in field is pointed out. In addition to that, according to the requirements of China's domestic space engineering, the main research directions in the pyroshock are proposed.
-
图 1 典型火工爆炸式冲击模拟试验装置[11]
Figure 1. Ordnance-generated pyroshock simulator
图 2 2010年Alphabus卫星SHOGUN试验现场[12]
Figure 2. SHOGUN test spot for Alphabus in 2010
图 3 机械式冲击模拟试验装置示意图[11]
Figure 3. Resonant fixtures for MIPS
图 4 MIPS试验台原理图[9]
Figure 4. MIPS simulator
图 5 意大利研制的MIPS模拟试验装置[20]
Figure 5. A mechanical impulse pyroshock simulator in Italy
图 6 美国研制的可调节谐振梁装置[21]
Figure 6. A tunable resonant beam device in America
图 7 Walls结构响应路径衰减示意图[20]
Figure 7. Level decrease in the Walls-structure
表 1 试验外推方法比较
Table 1. Comparison of different extrapolations
方法 准确性 可操作性 控制参数 适用范围 经验模型法 预示精度较低 简便 距冲击源距离、冲击源类型、过连接面数目、材料和结构类型 任意型号适用 数据外推法 准确性较高 简便 结构构型、冲击源能量、距冲击源距离 新型航天器和参考航天器采用的火工品和结构构型相似 子结构路径外推法 准确性较高 相对复杂 传递路径上的连接数、距冲击源轴向距离、距冲击源径向距离 特定型号航天器 -
[1] Dynamic environmental criteria: NASA-HDBK-7005[S]. USA, 2001. [2] Pyroshock test criteria: NASA-STD-7003A[S]. USA, 2011. [3] Environment engineering considerations and laboratory tests: MIL-STD-810F[S]. USA: Department of Defense, 2000. [4] Filippi E. Pyroshock simulation using the alcatel etca test facility[C]//Launch Vehicle Vibrations. First European Conference. Toulouse: CNES, 1999. [5] Meoning C J. Pyrotechnic shock flight failures[C]//Institute of Environmental Sciences Pyrotechnic Shock Tutorial Program, 31st Annual Technical Meeting. 1985. [6] Mcgrath M B, Rader W P. Aerospace systems pyrotechnic shock data. Volume Ⅶ: Investigation of mass loading effects[R]. N71-19250, 1970. [7] Environment engineering considerations and laboratory tests[M]. USA: Department of Defense, 2000. [8] 丁继锋, 赵欣, 韩增尧, 等.航天器火工冲击技术研究进展[J].宇航学报, 2014, 35(12):1339-1349. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2014.12.001Ding Jifeng, Zhao Xin, Han Zengyao. Research development of spacecraft pyroshock technique[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2014, 35(12):1339-1349. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2014.12.001 [9] Piersol A G, Paez T L. Harris' shock and vibration handbook[M]. 6th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 2010. [10] 军用装备实验室环境试验方法第27部分: 爆炸分离冲击实验: GJB 150.27-2009[S]. 2009. [11] Lee J R, Chia C C, Kong C W. Review of pyroshock wave measurement and simulation for space systems[J]. Measurement, 2012, 45(4):631-642. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.12.011 [12] Http://Telecom.Esa.Int/Telecom/www/Object/Index.Cfm?Fobjectid=30565, Available. [13] Girard A, Pont C, Courau E. Very first results form pyroshock database for satellites[C]//European Conference on Spacecaft Structures, Materials & Mechenical Testing 2005. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2005. [14] Courau E, Roy P. Ariane 5 shock environment qualification for an earth observation satellite[C]//European Conference on Spacecraft Structure, Material & Mechanical Testing 2005. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2005. [15] Filippi E, Dolez F. Development of the alcatel etca pyroshock test facility[C]//European Conference on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing 1999. Braunschweig, Germany, 1999. [16] Filippi E, Attouoman H, Dolez B. Pyroshcok simulation using the alcatel etca test facility[C]//Launch Vehicle Vibrations. First European Conference. Toulouse: CNES, 1999. [17] Dilhan D, Piquereau A, Bonnes L. Definition and manufacturing of the pyroshock bench[C]//7th ESA/CNES International Workshop on Space Pyrotechnics ESTEC. 2008. [18] 刘斌, 吴江.用火工品产生中高量级冲击的试验技术研究[J].强度与环境, 2007, 34(3):8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3919.2007.03.002Liu Bin, Wu Jiang. A study of producing high level shock environment by pyrotechnic device[J]. Structure & Environment Engineering, 2007, 34(3):8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3919.2007.03.002 [19] Dilhan D, Cipolla V, Grzeskowiak H. Pyroshock generation[C]//European Conference on Spacecaft Structures, Materials & Mechenical Testing 2005. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2005. [20] Ali K, Juan F. Tunable beam pyroshock simulation system[C]//Spacecraft and Launch Vehicle Dynamic Environments Workshop. California, USA, 2007. [21] Benedetti M D, Garofalo G, Zumpano M, et al. On the damping effect due to bolted junctions in space structures subjected to pyro-shock[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2007, 60(12):947-956. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.11.011 [22] Himelblau H, Piersol A G, Wise J H, et al. Handbook for dynamic data acquisition and analysis. Appendix A: Pyroshock data acquisition and analysis[M]. Mt Prospect, IL: Institute of Environmental Sciences, 1994. [23] Evans M J, Neubert V H, Bement L J. Measurement, data analysis, and prediction of oyrotechnic shock from pin-pullers and separation joints[J]. Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 1987, 57(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23894381_Measurement_data_analysis_and_prediction_of_pyrotechnic_shock_from_pin-pullers_and_separation_joints [24] Smallwood D O. An improved recursive formula for calculating shock response spectra[J]. Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 1981, 51(2):211-217. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=97d8a3b9117c4662f9b75141bb3d9e86&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [25] Hughes W O, Mcnelis A M. Statistical analysis of a large sample size pyroshock test data set including post flight data assessment[R]. Cleveland, Ohio: Glenn Research Center, 2009. [26] Shi Q, Ando S, Seko H, et al. The summarization of pyroshock testing data and SRS level prediction methodology[C]//The 5th International Symposium on Environmental Testing for Space Programmes. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2004. [27] Ullio R, Marucchi-Chierro P C. Utlization of prediction methods in the shock environment evaluation[C]//The European Conference on Spacecraft Structure, Materials and Mechanical Testing 2001. Noofdwijk, The Netherlands, 2001. [28] Girard A, Courau E, Bugeat L P. Pyroshock database for satellites[C]//European Conferenc on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing 2000. Noordwijk, the Netherlands, 2000. [29] Zukas J A. Introduction to hydrocodes[M]. Elsevier, 2004. [30] 白金泽.LS-DYNA 3D理论基础与实例分析[M].北京:科学出版社, 2005. [31] 张雄, 王天舒.计算动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2007. [32] Mary S, Cipolla V, Courau E, et al. Shock propagation simulation using FEM software[C]//European Conference on Spacecaft Structures, Materials & Mechenical Testing 2005. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2005. [33] 姚德源, 王其政.统计能量分析原理及其应用[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社, 1995. [34] Manning J E, Lee K. Predicting mechanical shock transmission[J]. Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 1968, 37(4):65-70. [35] Sun H B, Sun J C, Richards E J. Prediction of total loss factors of structures. Part Ⅲ: Effective loss factors in quasi-transient conditions[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1986, 106(3):465-479. doi: 10.1016/0022-460X(86)90192-6 [36] Fahy J F, Yao D Y. Power flow between non-conservatively coupled oscillators[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1987, 114(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016-S0022-460X(87)80227-4/ [37] Borello G. SEA航天应用[M]. Belgium: Inter AC, 2010. [38] Borello G, Courjal A. Modelling payloads using SEA for vibroacoustic and shock prediction[R]. France: Inter AC-L'Union, 2005. [39] SEA: Shock module of SEA+ user's guide[M]. Inter AC, Inc, 2013. [40] Dalton E C, Chambers B S. Analysis and validation testing of impulsive load response in complex, multi-compartmented structures[C]//Proceedings of the 36th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 1995. [41] Dalton E C, Frydman A, Li A, et al. High frequency shock predictions in armored vehicles: Ags case study[C]//Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Ballistics. San Francisco, CA, 1996. [42] Dalton E C, Loper R B, Frydman A, et al. Simulation of ballistic shock in composite armored vehicles[C]//Proceedings of the 68th Shock and Vibration Symposium. 1997. [43] Dalton E C. High frequency shock prediction, short course notes[M]. Military Technology, Inc, 1999. [44] Ullio R, Marucchi-Chierro P C. Auto SEA shock application on shock event simulation: Study case and problematics encountered[R]. Toulouse: Euro PAM, 2006. [45] Lee D O, Han J H, Jang H W, et al. Shock respones prediction of a low altitude earth observation satellite during launch vechicle separation[J]. International Journal of Aeronautical & Space Sciences, 2010, 11(1):49-57. [46] 王军评, 毛勇建, 黄含军, 等.统计能量分析法在爆炸分离冲击响应预示中的应用[J].航天器环境工程, 2011, 28(5):414-420. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2011.05.002Wang Junping, Mao Yongjian, Huang Hanjun, et al. Application of statistical energy analysis method in prediction of pyroshock responses[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2011, 28(5):414-420. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2011.05.002 [47] 柯受全, 金恂叔.卫星环境工程和模拟试验(下)[M].北京:宇航出版社, 1996. [48] 焦亮, 邓明.爆炸分离冲击试验分析[J].电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2013, 31(1):31-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5468.2013.01.007Jiao Liang, Deng Ming. The pyroshock test[J]. Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing, 2013, 31(1):31-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5468.2013.01.007 [49] 马斌捷, 张建华, 吴江.火工品爆炸加载方法在火箭分离冲击环境模拟试验中的应用与效果[J].强度与环境, 2007, 34(5):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3919.2007.05.001Ma Binjie, Zhang Jianhua, Wu Jiang. Applications and effects of pyrotechnic explode loading in shock environment simulation experiment of rocket separation[J]. Structure & Enviroment Engineering, 2007, 34(5):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3919.2007.05.001 [50] 毕文辉, 严楠, 何春全, 等.航天火工品爆炸冲击多参量的测试[J].计测技术, 2009, 29(3):14-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5795.2009.03.005Bi Wenhui, Yan Nan, He Chunquan, et al. Measurement of pyroshock for explosive initiating device used in spacecraft[J]. Metrology & Measurement Technology, 2009, 29(3):14-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5795.2009.03.005 [51] 张欢, 刘天雄, 李长江, 等.航天器火工冲击环境防护技术现状与应用[J].航天器工程, 2014, 23(2):104-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8748.2014.02.018Zhang Huan, Liu Tianxiong, Li Changjiang, et al. Status and application analysis of spacecraft pyroshock protection techniques[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2014, 23(2):104-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8748.2014.02.018 [52] 毛勇建, 李玉龙, 陈颖, 等.炸药条加载圆柱壳的数值模拟(Ⅱ):解耦分析与实验验证[J].高压物理学报, 2013, 27(1):76-82. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201301012.htmMao Yongjian, Li Yulong, Chen Ying, et al. Numerical simulation of cylindrical shell loaded by explosive rods (Ⅱ): Decoupling analysis and experimental validation[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2013, 27(1):76-82. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201301012.htm [53] 毛勇建, 李玉龙, 陈颖, 等.炸药条加载圆柱壳的数值模拟(Ⅰ):流固耦合模拟[J].高压物理学报, 2012, 26(2):155-162. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201202007.htmMao Yongjian, Li Yulong, Chen Ying, et al. Numerical simulation of cylindrical shell loaded by explosive rods (Ⅰ): Fluid-structure interaction simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2012, 26(2):155-162. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201202007.htm [54] 王军评, 毛勇建, 黄含军.点式火工分离装置冲击载荷作用机制的数值模拟研究[J].振动与冲击, 2013, 32(2):9-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.02.003Wang Junping, Mao Yongjian, Huang Hanjun. Numerical simulation for impulsively loading mechanism of a point pyrotechnic separation device[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(2):9-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.02.003