水平管道煤尘爆炸残留物时空变化特征

刘贞堂; 林松; 赵恩来; 张松山; 郭汝林

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0237-06

水平管道煤尘爆炸残留物时空变化特征

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0237-06

刘贞堂^{1, 2},
林松^{1, 2, ,},
赵恩来^{1, 2},
张松山^{1, 2},
郭汝林^{1, 2}

1.
中国矿业大学煤矿瓦斯与火灾防治教育部重点实验室，江苏徐州 221116
2.
中国矿业大学安全工程学院，江苏徐州 221116

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 51174200

中国矿业大学优秀创新团队建设项目 2014ZY001

详细信息

作者简介:
刘贞堂(1963-)，男，博士，教授

通讯作者:
林松，linsong1991@126.com

中图分类号: O381
计量
- 文章访问数: 4367
- HTML全文浏览量: 1285
- PDF下载量: 436
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-07-20
- 修回日期: 2015-11-06
- 刊出日期: 2017-03-25

Characteristics of space-time variations of coal dust residues from explosion in a horizontal pipe

Liu Zhentang^{1, 2},
Lin Song^{1, 2
, ,},
Zhao Enlai^{1, 2},
Zhang Songshan^{1, 2},
Guo Rulin^{1, 2}

1.
Key Laboratory of Coal Methane and Fire Control, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
2.
School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究煤尘爆炸气固态残留物成分差异性及其时空分布规律，利用水平管道煤尘爆炸装置进行了煤尘爆炸实验，收集并分析了气固态残留物类别及特征。研究表明：爆炸后煤尘中灰分显著增加，挥发分和固定碳减少；爆炸前后煤尘的微观形貌特征差别明显，爆炸后煤尘颗粒表面光滑，且产生了颗粒破裂现象，部分颗粒中出现孔洞，少数颗粒呈现薄壳状，颗粒之间出现了粘结现象；煤尘爆炸气体残留物成分主要有氧气、氮气、一氧化碳、二氧化碳、甲烷、乙烯、乙烷、乙炔、丙烷等，爆源点处最低氧气浓度仅为2.52%，一氧化碳浓度达到0.38%~0.68%，距离爆源点越远，氧气浓度越高，碳氧化物气体与烃类气体浓度越低。
- 时空变化特征 /
- 残留物分析 /
- 煤尘 /
- 水平管道
Abstract: In the present work, to find out the differences in composition and the regularities in space-time distribution for coal dust residues, we carried out a coal dust explosion experiment using a horizontal pipe and analyzed the gas and solid residues of the coal dust. The results show that the content of ashes in the residues increased significantly while that of the volatile and fixed carbon decreased, with a smooth surface of the coal particle residue, accompanied by the particle cracking and bonding occurred. The study also reveals that the major components of the coal dust gas residue from explosion consist of O₂, N₂, CO, CO₂, CH₄, C₂H₄, C₂H₆, C₂H₂, C₃H₈, etc. At the source point of the explosion, the minimum concentration of oxygen was only 2.52% and that of carbon monoxide concentration was 0.38%~0.68%. The greater the distance from the explosive source point, the higher the concentration oxygen but the lower that of carbon oxide gas and hydrocarbon gas.
- space-time characteristics /
- residues analysis /
- coal dust /
- horizontal pipe

HTML全文

图 1 煤尘爆炸实验系统示意图

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of experimental setup for coal dust explosion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 爆炸反应煤尘变化过程

Figure 2. Change process of coal dust during explosive reaction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 煤尘爆炸前SEM图像

Figure 3. SEM images of coal dust before explosion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 煤尘爆炸后SEM图像

Figure 4. SEM images of coal dust after explosion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 管道不同位置处气体成分及浓度分布情况

Figure 5. Gas composition and concentration at different locations in the pipe

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同煤样煤尘爆炸前后工业分析结果

Table 1. Component analysis of different coal dusts before and after explosion

煤样	状态	质量分数/%
煤样	状态	水分	灰分	挥发分	固定碳
1#	爆前	0.83	15.76	13.89	69.52
1#	爆后	0.99	36.88	10.87	51.26
2#	爆前	1.04	40.70	20.45	37.81
2#	爆后	1.24	55.00	15.85	27.91
3#	爆前	1.56	6.71	39.60	52.14
3#	爆后	2.10	26.75	27.41	43.74
4#	爆前	2.64	1.22	43.82	52.32
4#	爆后	2.18	22.66	31.52	43.64

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同煤尘爆炸气体残留物体积分数

Table 2. Volume fraction of different coal dusts' gas residue from explosion

煤样	无机成分体积分数/%				烃类成分体积分数/(10^-6)
煤样	O₂	N₂	CO	CO₂	CH₄	C₂H₄	C₂H₆	C₂H₂	C₃H₈
1#	8.15	48.96	0.38	0.99	333.06	62.28	15.84	38.41	11.08
2#	6.68	49.37	0.52	1.53	866.47	62.50	20.89	31.67	10.21
3#	3.34	49.12	0.66	1.91	3805.99	1014.35	118.70	750.24	120.60
4#	2.52	78.06	0.68	2.67	5171.64	1368.42	182.21	722.06	125.16

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(14)

[1]	郭红光, 王飞, 王凯.煤矿井下粉尘治理的PM2.5标准初探[J].煤矿安全, 2015, 46(4):174-177. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mkaq201504051 Guo Hongguang, Wang Fei, Wang Kai. Preliminary study on PM2.5 standard for dust control in underground coal mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(4):174-177. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mkaq201504051
[2]	张松山, 刘贞堂, 高勤琼, 等.煤尘爆炸性与挥发分关系研究[J].煤炭技术, 2015, 34(2):131-133. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtjs201502051 Zhang Songshan, Liu Zhentang, Gao Qinqiong, et al. Study on relationship between coal dust explosion and volatile[J]. Coal Technology, 2015, 34(2):131-133. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtjs201502051
[3]	宫广东, 刘庆明, 胡永利, 等.管道中煤尘爆炸特性实验[J].煤炭学报, 2010, 35(4):609-612. http://www.mtxb.com.cn/CN/Y2010/V35/I4/609 Gong Guangdong, Liu Qingming, Hu Yongli, et al. Experimental research on methane and coal dust explosion characteristics in tube[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(4):609-612. http://www.mtxb.com.cn/CN/Y2010/V35/I4/609
[4]	曹卫国, 徐森, 梁济元, 等.煤粉尘爆炸过程中火焰的传播特性[J].爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(5):586-593. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9293.shtml Cao Weiguo, Xu Sen, Liang Jiyuan, et al. Characteristics of flame propagation during coal dust cloud explosion[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5):586-593. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9293.shtml
[5]	Cao Weiguo, Gao Wei, Peng Yuhuai, et al. Experimental and numerical study on flame propagation behaviors in coal dust explosions[J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 266: 456-462. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.063
[6]	Salamonowicz Z, Kotowski M, Polka M, et al. Numerical simulation of dust explosion in the spherical 20 L vessel[J]. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences-Technical Sciences, 2015, 63(1):289-293. doi: 10.1515/bpasts-2015-0033
[7]	Houim R W, Oran E S. Numerical simulation of dilute and dense layered coal-dust explosions[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(2):2083-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.032
[8]	来诚锋, 段滋华, 张永发, 等.煤粉末的爆炸机理[J].爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(3):325-328. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract8365.shtml Lai Chengfeng, Duan Zihua, Zhang Yongfa, et al. Explore the mechanism of carbon powder explosion[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(3):325-328. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract8365.shtml
[9]	蒯念生, 黄卫星, 袁旌杰, 等.点火能量对粉尘爆炸行为的影响[J].爆炸与冲击, 2012, 32(4):432-438. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1455.2012.04.014 Kuai Niansheng, Huang Weixing, Yuan Jingjie, et al. Influence of ignition energy on dust explosion behavior[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4):432-438. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1455.2012.04.014
[10]	景国勋, 程磊, 杨书召.受限空间煤尘爆炸毒害气体传播伤害研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(4):55-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2010.04.009 Jing Guoxun, Cheng Lei, Yang Shuzhao. Study on dissemination injury of poisons gas from coal dust explosion in confined space[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(4):55-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2010.04.009
[11]	贾迎梅, 刘贞堂, 王从银, 等.瓦斯爆炸气体成分实验研究[J].煤炭技术, 2009, 28(12):78-81. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtjs200912036 Jia Yingmei, Liu Zhentang, Wang Congyin, et al. Experimental study on gas composition after gas explosion[J]. Coal Technology, 2009, 28(12):78-81. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtjs200912036
[12]	Seames W S. An initial study of the fine fragmentation fly ash particle mode generated during pulverized coal combustion[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 81(2):109-125. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00006-7
[13]	冷杰宣, 卢甲斌, 于鸽, 等.矿井煤尘爆炸机理及预防技术[J].采矿技术, 2009, 9(4):55-57. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caikjs200904025 Leng Jiexuan, Lu Jiabin, Yu Ge, et al. The mechanism and prevention technology of mine coal dust explosion[J]. Mining Technology, 2009, 9(4):55-57. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caikjs200904025
[14]	崔银萍, 秦玲丽, 杜娟, 等.煤热解产物的组成及其影响因素分析[J].煤化工, 2007, 35(2):10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9598.2007.02.003 Cui Yinping, Qin Lingli, Du Juan, et al. Products distribution and its influencing factors for coal pyrolysis[J]. Coal Chemical Industry, 2007, 35(2):10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9598.2007.02.003