Protective performance of explosive reactive armor with composite rubber armor as front or back plate
-
摘要: 采用实验和数值模拟方法研究了橡胶复合板作为爆炸反应装甲面、背板时的防护性能,分析了两种反应装甲结构的防护机理,并与面密度相同的钢反应装甲进行了对比。实验结果表明:爆炸反应装甲面板或背板为橡胶复合板时的防护性能优于钢反应装甲,其中橡胶复合板作为背板时效果最优。数值模拟结果表明:橡胶复合板在爆炸驱动下外层钢板速度相比于钢反应装甲飞板提高16%,橡胶复合板的界面效应及其飞板间隙可以有效减小逃逸射流的长度。Abstract: The protection performance and mechanism of explosive reactive armors (ERA) with composite rubber armor as its front or back plate were investigated using experiments and numerical simulation, and the results were examined in comparison with ERA using conventional steel plates of the same area density. The experimental results show that the protection performance of ERA with composite rubber armor as the front or back plates are superior to that of the ERA with steel plates, and the optimal performance is achieved when the rubber composite armor is used as the back plate. The numerical simulation results show that the back plate velocity of the composite rubber armor is 16% higher than that of the ERA with steel plates, the space between the two moving plates of the composite rubber armor and the boundary effect contribute significantly to reducing the length of the escaping shaped charge jet.
-
Key words:
- explosive reactive armors (ERA) /
- shaped charge /
- protection performance
-
表 1 实验结果
Table 1. Experimental results of penetration
装甲结构 开坑尺寸/(mm×mm) 开坑深度/mm 结构(a) 7×11 9 结构(b) 6×11 11 结构(c) 6×7 6 表 2 炸药计算参数
Table 2. Computational parameters for JH-2 and Comp.B
炸药 ρ/(g·cm-3) D/(m·s-1) A/GPa B/GPa R1 R2 ω JH-2 1.685 8 130 625.3 23.29 5.25 1.6 0.28 Comp. B 1.715 7 980 524.2 7.77 4.2 1.1 0.50 表 3 Lee-Tarver反应模型参数
Table 3. Computational parameters for Lee-Tarver model
I/s-1 b a x G1/GPa c d y G2/GPa e g z 4.4×1017 0.667 0 20 310 0.667 0.111 1.0 400 0.333 1.0 2.0 表 4 紫铜和Q235钢材料的本构方程计算参数
Table 4. Computational parameters for copper and Q235 steel
材料 ρ/(g·cm-3) A1/GPa B1/GPa n C1 m c0/(km·s-1) s Γ0 Q235 7.85 0.792 0.51 0.26 0.014 1.03 4.57 1.33 1.67 Cu 8.96 0.090 0.29 0.31 0.025 1.09 3.94 1.49 1.99 表 5 橡胶夹层和聚能壳体材料参数
Table 5. Computational parameters for rubber interlayer and polymer shell
材料 ρ/(g·cm-3) c0/(m·s-1) s Γ0 σb/MPa ε/% 橡胶 1.01 852 1.865 1.5 20 400 Teflon 2.15 1 680 1.82 0.59 30 450 -
[1] 黄正祥.聚能装药理论与实践[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社, 2014.Huang Zhengxiang. Theory and practice of shaped charge[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2014. [2] Thoma K, Vinckier D, Kiermeir J, et al. Shaped charge jet interaction with highly effective passive sandwich systems-experiments and analysis[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 1993, 18(5):275-281. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4087 [3] Mayseless M, Marmor E, Gov N S, et al. Interaction of a shaped charge jet with reactive or passive cassettes[C]//14th International Symposium on Ballistics. Quebec, Canada, 1993: 439-448. [4] 赵慧英, 沈兆武, 刘天生.反应装甲与陶瓷复合装甲集成技术研究探讨[J].爆炸与冲击, 2006, 26(1):21-26. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2006.01.004Zhao Huiying, Shen Zhaowu, Liu Tiansheng. On the integrated technology of reactive armors with composite ceramic armors[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1):21-26. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2006.01.004 [5] Lee H J, Choi J H, Lee C H, et al. The effective analysis of backup plates of explosive reactive armor[C]//28th International Symposium on Ballistics. Atlanta, GA, 2014: 988-995. [6] Friling S, Benyami M, Yaziv D. The interaction O shaped charge jets with combined reactive-inert cassettes[C]//14th International Symposium on Ballistics. Quebec, Canada, 1993: 227-235. [7] Jia X, Huang Z X, Zu X D, et al. Theoretical analysis of the disturbance of shaped charge jet penetrating a woven fabric rubber composite armor[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 65(2):69-78. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=0968760788eb642191a0beed33c7c985 [8] Jia X, Huang Z X, Zu X D, et al. Experimental study on the performance of woven fabric rubber composite armor subjected to shaped charge jet impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 57(7):134-144. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=31af7c6a6a07030ba6e67601044666a4 [9] Zu X, Huang Z, Jia X. Study on rubber composite armor anti-shaped charge jet penetration[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2013, 38(5):695-702. doi: 10.1002/prep.v38.5 [10] Lee E L, Tarver C M. Phenomenological model of shock initiation in heterogeneous explosives[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1980, 23(12):2362-2372. doi: 10.1063/1.862940 [11] Li X D, Yang Y S, Lü S T. A numerical study on the disturbance of explosive reactive armors to jet penetration[J]. Defence Technology, 2014, 10(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2014.01.006 [12] Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual[DB]. California: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2001.