Explosion energy distribution by side initiation and its effects on rock fragmentation
-
摘要: 为了提高不同岩石中爆破破岩的能量利用率，分析了导爆索侧向起爆和一端起爆条件下的爆炸冲击能和爆生气体能的分布规律，并结合响水沟过渡料爆破开采实验，对比了这两种起爆方式下的爆破块度级配曲线。结果表明，侧向起爆和一端起爆条件下的爆炸冲击能和爆生气体能的分布有着很大差异。可以通过改变起爆方式来调整用于爆破破岩的冲击能和气体能的比例，以提高爆破破岩的能量利用率。此在基础上，提出了不同强度岩体中起爆方式选择的原则，导爆索侧向起爆适用于软岩和裂隙岩体的爆破破碎以及轮廓爆破，而在硬岩中的级配料爆破开采则不宜采用侧向起爆。Abstract: To improve the energy utilization and fragmentation effect in rock blasting, the explosion energy partitions of end initiation and continuous side initiation were analyzed. In addition, field blasting tests were conducted in Xiangshuigou Quarry, and the results show significant differences in the partition of shock and gas energy between the two initiation methods. The effective energy utilization of these two initiation methods in different rocks varies considerably. On this basis, a selection principle of initiation methods for rocks with different intensities was put forward. The continuous side initiation with a detonating cord is advantageous in soft and fissured rocks and contour blasting, while blasting for graded material in hard rock, the end initiation is recommended instead of the side initiation.
-
Key words:
- rock blasting /
- fragmentation effect /
- initiation method /
- energy partition /
- shock energy /
- gas energy
-
图 5 冲击能和气体能的分布随导爆索爆速的变化
Figure 5. Partition of shock and gas energies varying with detoantion velocity of detonating cord
图 6 冲击能和气体能的分布随dru/db的变化
Figure 6. Partition of shock and gas energies varying with dru/db
图 8 侧向起爆和一端起爆在不同岩石中的能量利用
Figure 8. Energy utilization for hard and soft rocks with side and end initiations, respectively
表 1 长河坝过渡料开采爆破实验参数
Table 1. Blasting parameters for transition material excavation field tests
爆破参数 编号A、B 编号C、D 侧向起爆 一端起爆 侧向起爆 一端起爆 炮孔直径/mm 120 120 90 90 台阶高度H/m 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 超深Δh/m 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 钻孔深度L/m 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 钻孔倾角θ/(°) 90 90 90 90 孔距×排距/(m×m) 2.3×2.0 2.3×2.0 1.85×1.85 1.85×1.85 堵塞长度Ls/m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 单耗q/(kg·m-3) 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.8 装药结构 连续耦合 连续耦合 连续不耦合 连续不耦合 起爆网络 V形起爆 V形起爆 V形起爆 V形起爆 炸药品种 散装乳化炸药 散装乳化炸药 2#岩石乳化炸药 2#岩石乳化炸药 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 4组爆破破碎结果统计
Table 2. Summary of fragmentation results of four groups field tests
实验区域 起爆方式 d50/mm Cu Cc 产出率/% dmax/mm d < 5 mm d>110 mm A 侧向起爆 111 11.21 2.55 5.20 29.03 520 一端起爆 75 24.72 2.90 11.50 11.37 320 B 侧向起爆 100 12.45 1.62 5.56 27.76 500 一端起爆 86 30.29 2.74 11.90 11.55 310 C 侧向起爆 114 10.00 2.66 4.68 27.12 470 一端起爆 105 12.64 2.83 8.26 11.10 < 300 D 侧向起爆 73 15.40 2.62 8.63 16.56 < 300 一端起爆 64 21.67 2.79 12.25 7.72 < 300
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Liang K, Zhang J, Liu C. Detonation propagation characteristics of superposition explosive materials[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Materials Science Edition), 2003, 18(1):80-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02835096 [2] Lownds C M, Du Plessis M P. Behaviour of explosives in intermediate-diameter boreholes[J]. Quarry Management, 1984, 11:799-804. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160916300752 [3] Duvall W I, Pugliese J M. Comparison between end and axial methods of detonating an explosive in granite[M]. Pittsburgh: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1965. [4] 卢文波, 陶振宇.预裂爆破中炮孔压力变化历程的理论分析[J].爆炸与冲击, 1994, 14(2):140-147. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/10619Lu Wenbo, Tao Zhenyu. Theoretical analysis of the pressure-variation in borehole for pre-splitting explosion[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1994, 14(2):140-146. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/10619 [5] 冷振东, 卢文波, 陈明, 等.岩石钻孔爆破粉碎区计算模型的改进[J].爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(1):101-107. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0101-07Leng Zhendong, Lu Wenbo, Chen Ming, et al. Improved calculation model for the size of crushed zone around blasthole[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1):101-107. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0101-07 [6] 颜事龙, 陈叶青.岩石中集中装药爆炸能量分布的计算[J].爆破器材, 1993, 77(6):1-5. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BPQC199306000.htmYan Shilong, Chen Yeqing. Distribution of the explosive energy of concentrated charge in rock blasting[J]. Explosive Materials, 1993, 77(6):1-5. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BPQC199306000.htm [7] 宗琦, 杨吕俊.岩石中爆炸冲击波能量分布规律初探[J].爆破, 1999, 16(2):1-6. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BOPO902.000.htmZong Qi, Yang Lüjun. Shock energy distribution of column charge in rock[J]. Blasting, 1999, 16(2):1-6. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BOPO902.000.htm [8] Kurokawa K, Hashimoto K, Tabuchi M. The experimental study on the effect of performances of explosives on rock fracture[C]//Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 1993: 379-386. [9] Brinkman J R. Separating shock wave and gas expansion breakage mechanisms[C]//Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 1989: 6-15. [10] Hustrulid W A. Blasting principles for open pit mining: Theoretical foundations[M]. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1999:205-207. [11] Cook M A. The science of industrial explosives[M]. Salt Lake City: IRECO Chemicals, 1974:120-123. [12] Long Y, Zhong M S, Xie Q M, et al. Influence of initiation point position on fragmentation by blasting in iron ore[C]//Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, 2012: 111-116. [13] 郑炳旭.经山寺铁矿优化开采综合爆破技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(8):1530-1536. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201208004.htmZheng Bingxu. Multiple blasting techniques for exploitation optimizion of jinshan temple iron mine[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(8):1530-1536. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201208004.htm [14] 邢光武, 郑炳旭.采石场爆破块度分区及块度预测研究[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(6):1258-1261. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxkj200906036Xing Guangwu, Zheng Bingxu. Study on prediction of block zoning and block size in quarry blasting[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2009, 5(6):1258-1261. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxkj200906036 [15] Junk N M. Overburden blasting takes on new dimensions[J]. Coal Age, 1972, 77(1):92-96. [16] Singh S P. Mechanism of tracer blasting[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1996, 14(1):41-50. [17] Lin Shaochi. Cylindrical shock waves produced by instantaneous energy release[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1954, 25(1):54-57. doi: 10.1063/1.1721520 [18] Lownds C M. The strength of explosives[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Planning and Operation of Open-Pit and Strip Mines, 1986: 151159. [19] 许金余, 刘石.大理岩冲击加载试验碎块的分形特征分析[J].岩土力学, 2012, 33(11):3225-3229. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ytlx201211005Xu Jinyu, Liu Shi. Research on fractal characteristics of marble fragments subjected to impact loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(11):3225-3229. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ytlx201211005 [20] 周传波.基于回归分析理论的爆破块度预测模型研究[J].爆破, 2003, 20(4):1-4. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bp200304001Zhou Chuanbo. Model of predicting the blasting fragmentation based on regressional analysis[J]. Blasting, 2003, 20(4):1-4. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bp200304001 期刊类型引用(7)
1. 游鹏，周克栋，何伟，赫雷，张迪，缪桓举. 不同消声碗结构的消声器膛口射流噪声数值模拟. 兵工自动化. 2024(12): 90-96 . 
百度学术2. 张京辉，余永刚. 弹道枪水下全淹没式发射膛口流场演化特性的数值模拟研究. 兵工学报. 2020(03): 471-480 . 百度学术3. 刘康，管小荣，徐诚，朱一辉，李芳芮. 斜切角膛口流场的数值模拟. 兵器装备工程学报. 2020(04): 1-5 . 百度学术4. 张京辉，余永刚. 弹道枪不同水深下全淹没式发射膛口流场的数值分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2020(10): 97-109 . 
本站查看5. 张欣尉，余永刚. 水深对机枪密封式膛口流场影响的数值分析. 船舶力学. 2019(05): 558-565 . 百度学术6. 张欣尉，余永刚，莽珊珊. 装药参数对水下机枪密封式膛口流场影响的数值分析. 兵工学报. 2018(01): 18-27 . 百度学术7. 张欣尉，余永刚. 水下发射对机枪膛口温度场影响的数值分析. 含能材料. 2017(11): 932-938 . 百度学术其他类型引用(1)
-
百度学术
图(10) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 4619
- HTML全文浏览量: 1418
- PDF下载量: 362
- 被引次数: 8