Dynamic interaction between surrounding rock and initial supporting structure subjected to explosion shock wave
-
摘要: 爆炸作用下围岩与被覆结构的动力相互作用对于合理确定防护结构荷载、科学设计被覆结构具有重要意义。运用ANSYS/LS-DYNA非线性显式动力有限元程序和流-固耦合算法,对垂直爆炸作用下不同爆距、不同跨度的地下结构与围岩的动力相互作用进行了数值模拟,应用波动理论进行了动力相互作用力分析,讨论了相互作用动载计算公式在岩石结构中的适用性,得到了围岩与被覆结构的最大相互作用力变化规律。研究结果表明:在距拱顶1~25 m垂直爆炸作用下,14~25 m跨地下结构都发生了拱顶局部破坏,整个拱的混凝土均会产生震动裂缝;当爆距为4 m时,围岩与结构的动力耦合作用最大,可以作为确定最大荷载的依据。Abstract: The dynamic interaction between the surrounding rock and the initial supporting structure is essential for determining the load of the underground structure and designing the supporting structure. Using the nonlinear dynamic finite element procedure of ANSYS/LS-DYNA and the fluid-solid coupling algorithm, we simulated the underground arch structures with different spans subjected to the shock wave produced by an explosion perpendicular to the vault. Based on the wave theory we also analyzed the dynamic interaction force between the surrounding rock and the supporting structure and the applicability of the dynamic load equation, and obtained the variation of the maximum interaction. The results show that, at a perpendicular explosion that occurs 1~25 m away from the vault, the structures with 14~25 m spans experience partial failure on the vault while the concrete structure of the whole structure forms overall cracks. The maximum dynamic interaction force is observed when the explosion occurs at a distance 4 m. Our study can serve as a basis in determining the maximum load for the design of the surrounding rock and the underground structure.
-
Key words:
- explosion shock wave /
- underground structure /
- numerical simulation /
- dynamic interaction
-
表 1 材料参数
Table 1. Material parameters
材料 ρ/(kg·m-3) E/GPa ν fc/MPa εu ft/MPa 白云岩 2 500 34.0 0.31 83.0 0.003 0 2.45 混凝土 2 400 32.5 0.20 26.8 0.003 2 2.39 钢筋 7 850 200.0 0.27 400.0 6.750 0 400.00 表 2 炸药材料参数
Table 2. Material parameter of explosive
ρ/(kg·m-3) D/(m·s-1) A/GPa B/GPa R1 R2 ω E0/GPa pCJ/GPa 930 3 200 371 7.43 4.15 0.95 0.3 7.0 18.5 表 3 动力相互作用荷载计算结果与模拟结果的对比
Table 3. Comparison of experimental and simulation of dynamic interaction load
l/m d/m p/MPa 相对误差/% 计算 模拟 14 1 142.9 121.2 17.9 14 2 156.5 197.1 -20.6 14 3 186.5 317.1 -41.2 14 4 201.4 320.5 -37.1 14 5 90.9 314.5 -71.1 14 6 63.1 266.5 -76.3 14 7 38.8 183.8 -78.9 15 1 138.9 118.6 17.2 24 1 140.8 105.7 33.3 40 1 135.5 100.1 35.4 -
[1] 方秦, 柳锦春.地下防护结构[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2010:122-137. [2] 唐雄俊.隧道收敛约束法的理论研究与应用[D].武汉: 华中科技大学, 2009: 2-10. [3] Давыдов С С.地下结构的计算与设计[M].军事工程学院科学研究部, 译.北京: 高等教育出版社, 1957: 86-103. [4] 孙钧, 张玉生.大断面地下结构粘弹塑性有限元解析[J].同济大学学报, 1983(2):10-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-TJDZ198302001.htmSun Jun, Zhang Yusheng. Visco-elastic plastic finite element analysis of underground structures with large cross-sections[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 1983(2):10-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-TJDZ198302001.htm [5] 曹志远, 张耀勤.计入结构-介质动力相互作用的地下结构抗爆计算[J].爆炸与冲击, 1985, 5(1):16-23. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/11112Cao Zhiyuan, Zhang Yaoqin. Response analysis on the underground structures including structure-soil dynamic interaction under blast loading[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1985, 5(1):16-23. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/11112 [6] 吕安军, 曹志远.地下结构和岩土介质弹塑性耦合分析的摄动半解析法[J].应用数学和力学, 1998, 19(4):57-61. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSX804.008.htmLü Anjun, Cao Zhiyuan. Elasto_plastic coupled analysis of buried structure and soil medium by perturbational semi-analytic method[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1998, 19(4):57-61. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSX804.008.htm [7] 曹志远, 曾三平.爆炸波作用下地下防护结构与围岩的非线性动力相互作用分析[J].爆炸与冲击, 2003, 23(5):385-390. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2003.05.001Cao Zhiyuan, Zeng Sanping. Nonlinear dynamic interaction between underground structure and surrounding medium under blast loading[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2003, 23(5):385-390. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2003.05.001 [8] 房营光, 孙钧.在冲击波下非线性岩土与圆柱结构的相互作用[J].地震工程与工程振动, 1992, 12(3):55-64. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD1992-DGGC199203006.htmFang Yingguang, Sun Jun. Interaction between nonlinear soil and cylindrical structure due to shock wave[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1992, 12(3):55-64. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD1992-DGGC199203006.htm [9] 房营光, 孙钧.瞬态波作用下非线性岩土与非圆结构的相互作用[J].爆炸与冲击, 1993, 13(1):55-64. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/10658Fang Yingguang, Sun Jun. Interaction between nonlinear geo-medium and non-circular structure due to transient wave[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1993, 13(1):55-64. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/10658 [10] 赵瑜, 彭海游, 卢义玉.深埋隧道围岩与支护结构相互作用的非线性动力学特性研究[J].公路交通科技, 2009, 26(11):98-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2009.11.019Zhao yu, Peng Haiyou, Lu Yiyu.Study on nonlinear dynamic character of interaction between surrounding rock and support structure of deep buried tunnel[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2009, 26(11):98-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2009.11.019 [11] 孙惠香, 许金余, 朱国富, 等.爆炸作用下跨度对地下结构破坏形态的影响[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 14(2):90-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3516.2013.02.020Sun Huixiang, Xu Jinyu, Zhu Guofu, et al. The influence of span for deep underground arch structure on failure modes under blast loading[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 14(2):90-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3516.2013.02.020 [12] 白金泽.LS-DYNA3D理论基础与实例分析[M].北京:科学出版社, 2005:75-103.