Particle velocity models on small yields underground explosions
-
摘要: 在第四纪砂砾层中进行了系列公斤至百公斤级的地下封闭爆炸,研究了小当量化学爆炸地震波传播规律。在近场,地震波持时很短,水平振幅强于垂向振幅。质点速度随当量呈现指数增加,水平向指数为1.09,垂直向指数为0.77,质点速度随距离呈现指数衰减,水平向和垂直向指数分别为2.07与1.57。Sadauskas模型、显函模型和双极模型都能定量描述小当量地下爆炸地震波质点速度变化,但他们之间的反演精度存在差异,双极模型的残差最小。换言之,采用双极模型反演的数据更接近实际。Abstract: A series of underground explosions whose yield is confined at a limited level ranging from a few kilograms to a hundred were carried out in the Quaternary Period hardpan. The law of seismic wave propagation on small yield chemical explosion was investigated in the experiments. The results show that the duration of the seismic waves were shorter in the near field, the horizontal vibration amplitudes was stronger than the perpendicular ones, and the particle velocity increases exponentially with the increase of the yield. An index in the horizontal direction was approximately 1.09, while that in the perpendicular direction was approximately 0.77. The particle velocity exponentially decreases with the increases of the distance. The attenuating index in the horizontal direction is 2.07 and that in the vertical direction is 1.57. It is shown that the Sadauskas model, the obvious model, and the double extreme model can all quantitatively describe the seismic particle velocity on small yield underground explosions but they differ in the inverse precision of the parameters. Here, the difference in the residual of the double extreme model is the least. In other words, the parameters inversed by using the double extreme model are closest to the data actually observed.
-
表 1 300 kg实验部分观测点质点速度
Table 1. Partial observation data of 300 kg explosion
台站 R/km ve/(μm·s-1) vn/(μm·s-1) vv/(μm·s-1) ven/(μm·s-1) W2 1.038 0 288.00 619.29 179.55 453.65 W3 1.599 3 126.17 119.70 99.95 122.94 W4 2.144 7 170.35 92.06 51.20 131.20 W5 2.980 6 49.70 33.14 31.43 41.42 W6 4.967 7 13.10 8.73 4.77 10.92 E1 0.521 6 1 172.70 1 227.42 361.80 1 200.10 E3 1.151 8 221.67 122.48 96.97 172.08 E4 1.844 2 61.54 141.97 48.56 101.75 表 2 双极模型部分计算数据
Table 2. Partial calculating data from double extreme model
α βh bh γh σh βv bv γv σv 1.70 1.891 4 0.141 0 0.976 4 0.188 7 1.760 8 -0.289 8 0.930 0 0.314 2 1.80 1.957 6 0.078 7 0.978 7 0.179 6 1.827 1 -0.235 7 0.934 5 0.304 1 1.90 2.017 4 -0.016 3 0.980 0 0.174 1 1.887 5 -0.181 2 0.938 1 0.296 1 2.00 2.071 2 0.045 6 0.980 5 0.172 0 1.942 4 -0.126 6 0.940 7 0.289 9 2.10 2.119 4 0.106 5 0.980 2 0.173 0 1.992 1 -0.072 6 0.942 6 0.285 4 2.20 2.162 6 0.166 2 0.979 4 0.176 5 2.036 9 -0.019 3 0.943 8 0.282 5 2.30 2.201 1 0.224 3 0.978 1 0.182 1 2.077 3 0.033 0 0.944 3 0.281 1 2.40 2.235 3 0.280 8 0.976 3 0.189 2 2.113 5 0.084 0 0.944 4 0.280 9 2.50 2.265 6 0.335 6 0.974 2 0.197 4 2.146 1 0.133 6 0.944 1 0.281 8 2.60 2.292 4 0.388 4 0.971 7 0.206 4 2.175 2 0.181 8 0.943 3 0.283 6 -
[1] 刘爱文, 俞言祥, 付长华, 等.50 t科学爆破振动的衰减特征及地形效应[J].爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(1):21-26. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0021-06Liu Aiwei, Yu Yanxiang, Fu Changhua, et al. Attenuation characteristics and topographic effect of a scientif ic explosion with 50 t explosive[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1):21-26. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0021-06 [2] 赵爱华, 郭永霞, 孙为国, 等.华北地区矿山爆破活动的时空特征[J].地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(3):917-923. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqwlxjz201203012Zhao Aihua, Guo Yongxia, Sun Weiguo, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of mine blast activity in North China[J]. Progress in Geophys, 2012, 27(3):917-923. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqwlxjz201203012 [3] 崔汝国, 王尚旭, 宁鹏鹏, 等.炸药震源在济阳坳陷粘土介质中的激发理论初探[J].石油物探, 2009, 48(6):601-610. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2009.06.011Cui Ruguo, Wang Shangxu, Ning Pengpeng, et al. Preliminary discussion on shooting theory for dynamite in clay medium of Jiyang[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2009, 48(6):601-610. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2009.06.011 [4] 陈亚娟, 王利.土介质中TNT炸药爆炸波传播特性的数值模拟[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 29(1):88-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9787.2010.01.018Chen Yajuan, Wang Li. Numerical study on the propagation and damage behavior of the blasing wave with TNT in soil medium[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (National Science), 2010, 29(1):88-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9787.2010.01.018 [5] 张雪亮, 黄树棠.爆破地震效应[M].北京:地震出版社, 1981. [6] 李学政, 张诚鎏, 刘文学.封闭爆炸近场地震纵波及横波质点速度模型[J].爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(2):196-203. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0196-08Li Xuezheng, Zhang Chengliu, Liu Wenxue. Particle velocity models of longitudinal and transversal waves in the near field of sealed explosions[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(2):196-203. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0196-08 [7] 林大超, 张奇, 白春华.爆炸地震效应的时频分析[J].爆炸与冲击, 2003, 23(1):32-36. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2003.01.006Lin Dachao, Zhang Qi, Bai Chunhua. Time frequency analysis of explosion seismic effects[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2003, 23(1):31-36. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2003.01.006 [8] Bache C T. Estimating yield of underground nuclear explosion[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1982, 72(6):131-168. [9] Khalturin V I, Rautian T G, Richards P G. The Seismic signal strength of chemical explosions[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1998, 88(6):1511-1524. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=52b8b744b48f203b312d344a7fa28854 [10] 谢毓寿, 王耀文.工业爆破的地震效应[J].地球物理学报, 1962, 11(2):154-161. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=801500Xie Yushow, Wang Yaowen. Seismic effect of construction blasting[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1962, 11(2):154-163. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=801500