Dynamic response of underground arch structure under lateral point blast loads
-
摘要: 首先，利用几何关系与介质中超压、位移衰减公式得出结构表面自由场荷载和位移的分布形式，并对衰减因数、爆距等参数进行讨论；其次，利用MSSI（modified soil-structure interaction）相互作用模型对拱的振动方程进行正交求解，得到任意角度荷载作用下的结构弹性动力响应解析解。基于动力响应解析解，得到了土体的声阻抗对结构位移、速度、加速度时程响应曲线的影响。研究结果表明：侧向爆炸荷载作用下，岩土介质声阻抗越大，埋设其中的地下结构的位移、速度和加速度变化越大。为此，建议地下防护结构应修建在声阻抗小的岩土介质中。Abstract: Firstly, the distribution of load and displacement of the free surface of the arch were obtained by using the geometrical relation and the empirical formula, and the related parameters were discussed. Secondly, the modified soil-structure interaction model was used to solve the vibration equation of the arch orthogonally, and get the analytic solution of the elastic dynamic response of the structure under arbitrary angle loading. Then the time histories curve of displacement, velocity and acceleration were predicted. The analysis results indicate that the responses of the arch are greatly influenced by the acoustic impedance. The larger the acoustic impedance, the greater the displacement, velocity and acceleration of the structure. So the protective structures are better to be constructed in a site with low acoustic impedance.
-
图 1 侧向爆炸时拱形结构受力情况
Figure 1. Force geometry of the lateral point blast-loaded arch structure
图 2 不同衰减系数的情况下作用在结构表面自由场荷载和位移的分布
Figure 2. Peak load and displacement distribution along the arch surface with different decay coefficients
图 3 不同ξ下作用在结构表面自由场位移分布
Figure 3. The displacement distribution on structure surface with the different distance ratios
图 4 θ0=0°~60°对应的荷载与位移分布曲线
Figure 4. Stress and displacement distribution when the angle is 0°-60
图 5 爆炸点与拱心连线处拱上点的动力响应时程曲线
Figure 5. Dynamic response-time curves of a certain point at the the arch
图 6 爆炸点与拱心连线处拱上点的时程响应与比例爆距的关系曲线
Figure 6. Dynamic response of a certain point at the the arch varying with scale distance
表 1 3种土壤的相关参数
Table 1. Properties of three soils
土壤类型 ρs/(kg·m-3) ρscs/(kg·m-2·s-1) n Bukit Timah soil 1 800 2.97×106 2.25 Kallang soil 1 420 1.917×106 2.50 Dry sand 1 630 4.98×106 2.75 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] WANG Zhongqi, LU Yong, HAO Hong, et al. A full coupled numerical analysis approach for buried structures subjected to subsurface blast[J]. Computers and Structures, 2005, 83(4/5):339-356. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045794904003839 [2] MA Guowei, ZHOU Hongyuan, LU Yong, et al. In-structure shock of underground structures:A theoretical approach[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(12):3836-3844. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.026 [3] KIGER S A, DALLRIVA F D, HALL R L. Dynamic skin-friction effects on buried arches[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1989, 115(7):1768-1781. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:7(1768) [4] 陈海龙, 范华林, 金丰年.爆炸荷载作用下地下拱结构动力分析[J].工程力学, 2012, 30(4):169-174. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201304024.htmCHEN Hailong, FAN Hualin, JIN Fengnian. Forced vibration of underground clamped arch under arch under blast load[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 30(4):169-174. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201304024.htm [5] 杨昇田, 曹志远.地下结构与岩体动力相互作用的一种解析解[J].应用数学和力学, 1983, 6:861-868. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSX198306013.htmYANG Shengtian, CAO Zhiyuan. An analytical solution for underground structure-country rock dynamic interaction[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1983, 6:861-868. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSX198306013.htm [6] MILLER C A, COSTANTINO C J. Structure-foundation interaction of a nuclear power plant with a seismic disturbance[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1970, 14(2):332-342. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(70)90110-X [7] WEIDLINGER P, HINMAN E. Analysis of underground protective structures[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(7):1658-1673. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:7(1658) [8] 陈海龙, 金丰年, 夏志成, 等.侧向爆炸作用下地下拱结构动力响应[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(增刊2):3478-3481. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2012S2005.htmCHEN Hailong, JIN Fengnian, XIA Zhicheng, et al. Dynamic response of underground arch structure under side blast load[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(suppl 2):3478-3481. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2012S2005.htm [9] 孙惠香, 许金余.爆炸荷载作用下地下结构与围岩动力相互作用研究[J].土木工程学报, 2011, 44(增刊):148-151. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/600a5b496c175f0e7cd137e5.htmlSUN Huixiang, XU Jinyu. Dynamic action study between structure and rock of underground structure subjected to blast load[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 4(suppl):148-151. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/600a5b496c175f0e7cd137e5.html [10] HENRYCH J. The dynamics of arches and frames[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1981. [11] Department of the Army. Technical Manual TM 5-855-1:Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons[M]. Washington, DC, USA:Department of the Army, 1986. 期刊类型引用(1)
1. 杨广栋，田许杰，范勇，田斌，卢晓春. 钢筋混凝土拱的水下抗爆性能. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(02): 39-54 . 
本站查看其他类型引用(1)
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 5033
- HTML全文浏览量: 1214
- PDF下载量: 176
- 被引次数: 2