Dynamic response of cold-formed thin-wall steel lipped channel under axial impact
-
摘要: 针对轴向冲击载荷下C型冷弯薄壁钢构件的动力响应,采用商业有限元软件Abaqus建立了能够反映冲击过程的有限元模型。通过对比有限元模拟和落锤实验中利用数字散斑技术采集的数据以及试样残余变形,验证了数值模型的可靠性。采用该模型分析了在不同冲击速度下翼缘、腹板和卷边质点的轴向位移-时间曲线以及腹板横向挠度的变化,结果表明:在较低冲击能量的作用下,翼缘对卷边的约束作用明显;而在较高冲击能量的加载过程中,冲击端卷边的轴向位移和速度明显大于翼缘和腹板,卷边破坏严重;随着冲击速度的提升,C型冷弯薄壁钢构件的动态屈曲临界载荷相应提升。Abstract: In our study, we established a finite element model using Abaqus, a commercially available software, to simulate the dynamic response of a cold-formed thin-wall steel lipped channel under axial compact, and verified its reliability by the highly consistent data and residual deformation obtained both from the finite element simulation and a drop hammer test. Based on the finite element model, we analyzed the axial displacement histories of the web, the flange and the lip, and the changing process of the web's lateral deflection under different impact energies. The results indicate that the axial displacement and the speed of the lip are significantly greater than those of the web and the flange during the loading process of higher impact energy, while the flange exerts an obvious constraint on the lip under lower impact energy. The dynamic critical load of the cold-formed steel channel under axial impact increases as the impact velocity goes up.
-
Key words:
- steel structure /
- dynamic response /
- drop hammer test /
- axial impact
-
表 1 非线性分析中引入的屈曲模态及比例系数
Table 1. Buckling modes and their proportional coefficients in nonlinear analysis
有限元模态 临界载荷/kN 模态分数/% 模态比重 缺陷幅值 Ⅰ 415.24 22.76 1.00 0.137 Ⅱ 440.53 21.46 0.94 0.129 Ⅲ 461.18 20.50 0.90 0.127 Ⅳ 504.07 18.76 0.84 0.115 Ⅴ 572.11 16.52 0.80 0.169 -
[1] 冷弯薄壁型钢结构技术规范: GB50018-2002[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2002. [2] AISI. Specification for the design of cold-formed steel structural members, cold-formed steel design manual-Part Ⅴ[M]. Washington D C: American Iron and Steel Institute, 2005. [3] ZEINODDINI V M, SCHAFER B W. Simulation of geometric imperfections in cold-formed steel members using spectral representation approach[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2012, 60:105-117. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2012.07.001 [4] RUSINEK A, ZAERA R, KLEPACZKO J R. Constitutive relations in 3-D for a wide range of strain rates and temperatures-application to mild steels[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2007, 44(17):5611-5634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.01.015 [5] KENNY S, PEGG N, TAHERI F. Dynamic elastic buckling of a slender beam with geometric imperfections subject to an axial impulse[J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2000, 35(3):227-246. doi: 10.1016/S0168-874X(99)00067-0 [6] BONADA J, CASAFONT M, ROURE F, et al. Selection of the initial geometrical imperfection in nonlinear FE analysis of cold-formed steel rack columns[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2012, 51:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.10.003 [7] KARAGIOZOVA D, JONES N. Dynamic elastic-plastic buckling phenomena in a rod due to axial impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1996, 18(7/8):919-947. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X96000358 [8] 肖刚. 结构在约束下和动力作用下屈曲的数值模拟[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2008. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=D060764 [9] VOLMIR S A. Nonlinear dynamics of plates and shells[M]. Moscow: Science, 1972. 期刊类型引用(2)
1. 段文峰,何宝蔚,徐宇航. 燃气爆炸荷载作用下钢筋混凝土板抗爆性能数值模拟. 北方建筑. 2024(03): 76-80 . 百度学术
2. 孙松,王明洋,邱艳宇,高康华. 气爆荷载下弯曲构件动力响应数值计算. 北京理工大学学报. 2019(08): 800-807 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)
-
推荐阅读
爆炸作用下建筑结构高效毁伤评估方法
吕晋贤 等, 爆炸与冲击, 2025
混凝土中多点聚集爆炸效应起爆参数优化设计
时本军 等, 爆炸与冲击, 2025
接触爆炸下聚脲/钢筋混凝土厚板复合结构的抗爆性能
徐赵威 等, 爆炸与冲击, 2025
近场近地爆炸下建筑柱爆炸荷载分布规律及简化模型
喻君 等, 爆炸与冲击, 2024
近场爆炸下波纹双钢板混凝土组合墙板的损伤破坏及抗爆性能
赵春风 等, 高压物理学报, 2024
近场多发爆炸荷载作用下方钢管构件的动态响应及其损伤
王万月 等, 高压物理学报, 2022
爆炸载荷下仿贝壳voronoi砖泥结构的动态响应
陈鑫康 等, 高压物理学报, 2024
Biological evaluation, dft, mep, homo-lumo analysis and ensemble docking studies of zn(ii) complexes of bidentate and tetradentate schiff base ligands as antileukemia agents
Akbari, Zahra et al., JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 2024
A couple voronoi-rbsm modeling strategy for rc structures
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2024
Equivalent method of stiffened plates for dynamic response and damage assessment under internal blast
STRUCTURES, 2025