Directional pre-splitting of roadway roof based on the theory of bilateral cumulative tensile explosion
-
摘要: 为在切顶卸压沿空留巷中获得巷道顶板预裂炮孔的最优间距,基于双向聚能拉张爆破技术,采用以LS-DYNA动力分析软件为基础的数值模拟和现场试验对巷道顶板定向预裂进行研究,优化炮孔间距。数值模拟结果表明,当炮孔间距为400 mm时,应力波叠加后产生有效的拉应力;当炮孔间距为500 mm时,应力波叠加后也能够产生有效的拉应力,该拉应力大于孔壁围岩的抗拉强度,能够使孔壁围岩沿聚能方向形成裂缝,且利于炮孔间裂纹的扩展;随着炮孔间距进一步的增大,当炮孔间距为600 mm爆破时,由于间距过大,应力波无法有效叠加,不能产生连续裂缝。现场试验表明,间距为400和500 mm的炮孔间隔爆破时,未爆破孔自炮孔孔底至孔口产生连续有效裂缝,裂缝长度达2.4 m,相邻炮孔间沿炮孔中心线均能够形成连续有效的切缝面,能够有效控制沿空巷道顶底板位移及沿空巷道顶板压力。综合分析,在3种不同炮孔间距的试验方案中,确定间隔爆破、500 mm的炮孔间距为同一地质条件下3种试验设计中的最优方案。Abstract: To obtain the optimal pre-splitting hole spacing in a retained gob-side entry formed by roof cutting and pressure releasing, we investigated the directional pre-splitting of the roadway roof under bilateral cumulative tensile explosion using the LS-DYNA software and field test. The numerical results showed that the effective tension stress was generated after the stress wave superposition when the hole spacing was 400 mm; that when the hole spacing was 500 mm, the effective tension stress was also higher than the tensile strength of the hole wall rock, thus forming the cracks in the hole wall rock along the direction of cumulative energy and expanding the cracks between the adjacent holes; and that when the hole spacing was 600 mm, the cracks between the adjacent holes failed to form because the hole spacing was too large to generate the effective tension stress. The field tests showed that continuous cracks were formed from the hole bottom to porthole in the blasting-free holes when the hole spacing was 400 or 500 mm and the crack length reached 2.4 m, forming a continuous cutting surface and effectively restraining the displacement of roof and floor and the roof pressure along the roadway in the gob-side entry. Out study concluded that the interval blasting with a 500 mm hole spacing was the optimal design in the three tests under different hole-spacing conditions.
-
表 1 炸药参数
Table 1. Explosive parameters
ρ/(g·cm-3) D/(m·s-1) p/GPa A/GPa B/GPa R1 R2 ω E0/GPa 1.2 3 800 27 326 5.81 5.81 1.56 0.57 2.67 表 2 模型中岩石基本力学参数
Table 2. Basic mechanical parameters of rock in the model
ρ/(g·cm-3) ν cP/(m·s-1) cS/(m·s-1) K/GPa G/GPa fc/MPa T/MPa 2.56 0.34 3 835 2 665 25.7 21.9 67.1 6.8 表 3 聚能管材力学参数
Table 3. Mechanical parameters of shaped pipe
ρ/(g·cm-3) E/GPa GPVC/GPa σY/MPa ν 1.43 43 3.2 61.7 0.32 表 4 方案设计
Table 4. Schematic design
No. L/mm D/mm 起爆方式 1 400 48 间隔爆破 2 400 48 连孔爆破 3 500 48 间隔爆破 4 500 48 连孔爆破 5 600 48 间隔爆破 6 600 48 连孔爆破 表 5 现场试验方案设计
Table 5. Design of field test scheme
编号 距切眼距离/m L/mm 孔深/m 倾角/(°) 不耦合系数 D/mm 装药 1 250-350 400 3.5 20 1.5 48 3卷、1.5 m聚能管、填塞2 m 2 350-450 500 3.5 20 1.5 48 3卷、1.5 m聚能管、填塞2 m 3 350-650 600 3.5 20 1.5 48 3卷、1.5 m聚能管、填塞2 m -
[1] 张国锋, 何满潮, 俞学平, 等.白皎矿保护层沿空切顶成巷无煤柱开采技术研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报, 2011, 28(4):511-516. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL201104004.htmZHANG Guofeng, HE Manchao, YU Xueping, et al. Research on the technique of no-pillar mining with gob-side entry formed by advanced roof caving in the protective seam in baijiao coal mine[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2011, 28(4):511-516. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL201104004.htm [2] 孙晓明, 刘鑫, 梁广峰, 等.薄煤层切顶卸压沿空留巷关键参数研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(7):1449-1456. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yslxygcxb201407017SUN Xiaoming, LIU Xin, LIANG Guangfeng, et al. Key parameters of gob-side entry retaining formed by roof cut and pressure releasing in thin coal seams[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(7):1449-1456. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yslxygcxb201407017 [3] 何满潮.深部软岩工程的研究进展与挑战[J].煤炭学报, 2014, 39(8):1409-1417. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkxjz200805009HE Manchao. Progress and challenges of soft rock engineering in depth[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2014, 39(8):1409-1417. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkxjz200805009 [4] 陈勇, 郝胜鹏, 陈延涛, 等.带有导向孔的浅孔爆破在留巷切顶卸压中的应用研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报, 2015, 32(2):253-259. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ksylydbgl201502013CHEN Yong, HAO Shengpeng, CHEN Yantao, et al. Study on the application of short-hole blasting with guide hole to roof cutting pressure relief of gob-side entry retaining[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2015, 32(2):253-259. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ksylydbgl201502013 [5] 高魁, 刘泽功, 刘建, 等.深孔爆破在深井坚硬复合顶板沿空留巷强制放顶中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(8):1588-1594. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/yj/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_yslxygcxb201308010GAO Kui, LIU Zegong, LIU Jian, et al. Application of deep borehole blasting to gob-side entry retaining forced roof caving in hard and compound roof deep well[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(8):1588-1594. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/yj/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_yslxygcxb201308010 [6] WHITTAKER B N, SINGH R N. Design and stability of pillar in long wall mining[J]. Mining Engineer, 1979, 13:68-72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282989711_DESIGN_AND_STABILITY_OF_PILLARS_IN_LONGWALL_MINING [7] WHITTAKER B N, WOODROW G J M. Design loads for gateside packs and support systems[J]. Mining Engineer, 1977, 136:263. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282406484_DESIGN_LOADS_FOR_GATESIDE_PACKS_AND_SUPPORT_SYSTEMS [8] 薛俊华, 韩昌良.大采高沿空留巷围岩分位控制对策与矿压特征分析[J].采矿与安全工程学报, 2012, 29(4):466-473. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97910B/201204/42561560.htmlXUE Junhua, HAN Changliang. Strata behavior and control countermeasures for the gob-side entry retaining in the condition of large mining herght[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2012, 29(4):466-473. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97910B/201204/42561560.html [9] 康红普, 牛多龙, 张镇, 等.深部沿空留巷围岩变形特征与支护技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(10):1977-1986. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZXLJ201403082.htmKANG Hongpu, NIU Duolong, ZHANG Zhen, et al. Deformation characteristics of surrounding rock and supporting technology of gob-side entry retaining in deep coal mine[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(10):1977-1986. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZXLJ201403082.htm [10] 付玉平, 宋选民, 邢平伟, 等.大采高采场顶板断裂关键块稳定性分析[J].煤炭学报, 2009, 34(8):1027-1031. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96550X/200908/31247514.htmlFU Yuping, SONG Xuanmin, XING Pingwei, et al. Stability analysis on main roof key block in large mining height workface[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(8):1027-1031. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96550X/200908/31247514.html [11] 华心祝, 赵少华, 朱昊, 等.沿空留巷综合支护技术研究[J].岩土力学, 2006, 27(12):2225-2228. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.12.026HUA Xinzhu, ZHAO Shaohua, ZHU Hao, et al. Research on combined support technique of gob-side entry retaining[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(12):2225-2228. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2006.12.026 [12] 曹树刚, 王勇, 邹德均, 等.倾斜煤层沿空留巷力学模型分析[J].重庆大学学报, 2013, 36(5):143-150. doi: 10.11835/j.issn.1000-582X.2013.05.024CAO Shugang, WANG Yong, ZHOU Dejun, et al. Analysis on the mechanical model in gob-side entry retaining of inclinde coal seam[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2013, 36(5):143-150. doi: 10.11835/j.issn.1000-582X.2013.05.024 [13] 何满潮, 曹伍富, 单仁亮, 等.双向聚能拉伸爆破新技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(12):2047-2051. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2003.12.018HE Manchao, CAO Wufu, SHAN Renliang, et al. New blasting technology-bilateral cumulative tensile explosion[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(12):2047-2051. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2003.12.018 [14] 郭德勇, 商登莹, 吕鹏飞, 等.深孔聚能爆破坚硬顶板弱化试验研究[J].煤炭学报, 2013, 38(7):1149-1153. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/yj/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_mtxb201307008GUO Deyong, SHANG Dengying, LÜ Pengfei, et al. Experimental research of deep-hole cumulative blasting in hard roof weakening[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2013, 38(7):1149-1153. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/yj/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_mtxb201307008