Distinguishing underground nuclear test by full moment tensor inversion
-
摘要: 将震源矩张量中的各分量作为权重因子，利用基本Green函数的线性组合可以对地震波场进行描述，本文利用水平分层模型下的广义反射-透射系数方法的地震波场正演公式，反演了苏联东哈萨克斯坦地下核试验场的7次地下核爆炸、3次震中位置相近的天然地震的震源矩张量，反演结果表明地下核爆炸震源明显含有爆炸源成分，同时包含双力偶成分（DC）和线性偶极补偿源成分（CLVD），且CLVD成分比重大，CLVD的存在可用层裂机制来解释；天然地震震源矩张量的反演结果表明，DC源为主要成分，符合剪切位错震源模式。Abstract: The full moment tensor inversion is an important tool to monitor underground nuclear tests, thus has been employed in this paper to analyze the recorded data of seven underground nuclear tests and three natural earthquakes in the region of Eastern Kazakhstan. The results show that, except the obvious explosion source in underground nuclear tests, the components of double couple (DC) and compensate linear vector dipole (CLVD) also exist, in which the later plays a more important role and could be explained by the explosion-induced spall. In the case of natural earthquakes, the DC component is the main contribution, in consistent with the model of shear dislocation seismic source.
-
Key words:
- underground nuclear test /
- surface wave /
- Green function /
- full moment tensor inversion /
- CLVD source
-
表 1 苏联7次地下核试验的震源矩张量解
Table 1. Moment tensor of seven underground nuclear tests
试验编号 EXP DC CLVD VR 88125 24.89% 10.22% 64.89% 87.77% 88094 22.71% 13.56% 63.73% 89.06% 88258 19.95% 13.83% 66.22% 83.72% 89189 28.16% 13.74% 58.10% 73.97% 88044 22.97% 12.98% 64.05% 85.26% 88352 35.09% 14.40% 50.51% 81.36% 88317 38.67% 7.98% 53.35% 78.91% 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 苏联地下核试验场中天然地震的相关信息
Table 2. Information about the three natural earthquakes
事件代号 事件日期 震中位置 震源深度 震级/Mb 08029 2008-01-29 49.74N，83.48E 24.8km 4.6 08111 2008-04-20 45.97N，82.73E 21.9km 4.9 98193 1998-07-12 47.79N，82.78E 35.4km 5.2
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 苏联地下核试验场附近天然地震震源矩张量解
Table 3. Moment tensor of underground nuclear tests
试验编号 EXP DC CLVD VR 08029 1.8% 75.72% 22.48% 86.69% 08111 6.1% 79.26% 14.64% 85.21% 98193 23.66% 66.47% 9.87% 83.33%
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] WANG C Y, HERRMANN R B. A numerical study of P, SV, Sh-wave generation in a plane layered medium[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1980, 70(4):1015-1036. [2] MINSON S E, DREGER D S. Stable inversions for complete moment tensors[J]. Geophysical Journal Internation, 2008, 174(2):585-592. doi: 10.1111/gji.2008.174.issue-2 [3] STUMP B W, JOHNSON L R. The determination of source properties by the linear inversion of seismograms[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1977, 67:1489-1502. [4] AKI K, RICHARDS P G. Quantitative seismology, theory and methods[M]. San Francisco:W H Freeman, 1980. [5] 何永锋, 李锴, 刘炳灿, 等.基于面波数据的地下核爆炸的全元素矩张量反演方法[J].爆炸与冲击.2017, 37(5):945-950. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9804.shtmlHE Yongfeng, LI Kai, LIU Bingcan, et al. Full moment tensor inversion method of underground nuclear explosions based on surface waves data[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5):945-950. http://www.bzycj.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9804.shtml [6] JOST M L, HERRMANN R B. A student's guide to and review of moment tensor[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 1989, 60(2):37-57. [7] DREGER D, HELMBERGER D. Determination of source parameters at regional distances with three-components sparse network data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 1993, 98:8107-8125. doi: 10.1029/93JB00023 [8] SAIKIA C K. Modified frequency-wavenumber algorithm for regional seismograms using Filon's quadrature:modeling of Lg waves in eastern North America[J]. Geophysical Journal Internation, 1994, 118(1):142-158. doi: 10.1111/gji.1994.118.issue-1 [9] CHEN X F. A systematic and efficient method of computing normal modes for multilayered half-space[J]. Geophysical Journal Internation, 1993, 115(2):391-409. doi: 10.1111/gji.1993.115.issue-2 [10] YAO Z X, HARKRIDER D G. A generalized reflection-transmission coefficient matrix and discrete wavenumber method for synthetic seismograms[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1983, 73(6):1685-1699. [11] LANGSTON C A. Source inversion of seismic waveforms:the Koyna, India, earthquakes of 13 September 1967[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1981, 71(1):1-24. [12] MCLAUGHLIN K L, BARKER T G, DAY S M, et al. Effects of depth of burial on explosion and earthquake regional seismograms: regional discrimination and yield estimation: SSS_R_88_9844[R]. La Jolla, California, 1988. [13] DAY S M. Surface waves from underground explosions with spall:analysis of elastic and nolinear source models[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1983, 73(1):247-264. [14] 林向东, 葛洪魁, 徐平, 等.近场全波形反演:芦山7.0级地震及余震矩张量解[J].地球物理学报, 2013, 56(12):4037-4047. doi: 10.6038/cjg20131209LIN Xiangdong, GE Hongkui, XU Ping, et al. Near field full waveform inversion:Lushan magnitude 7.0 earthquake and its aftershock moment tensor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(12):4037-4047. doi: 10.6038/cjg20131209 [15] TEMPLETON D C, DREGER D S. Non-double couple earthquakes in the long valley volcanic region[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006, 96(1):69-79. doi: 10.1785/0120040206 [16] BOWERS D, HUDSON J A. Defining the scalar moment of a seismic source with a generak moment tensor[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1999, 89(5):1390-1394. [17] FORD S R, DREGER D S, WALTER W R. Identifying isotropic events using an improved regional moment tensor inversion technique[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008, 114(B1). DOI: 10.1029/2008jb005743. [18] DREGER D, WOODS B. Regional distance seismic moment tensors of nuclear explosions[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 365(1):139-156. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195102003815 [19] MASSE R P. Review of seismic source models for underground nuclear explosions[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1981, 71(4):1249-1268. [20] PATTON H J. Source models of the HARZER explosion from regional observations of fundamental-mode and higher mode surface waves[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988, 78(3), 1133-1157. [21] 何永锋, 陈晓非, 张海明.地下核爆炸Lg波的激发机制[J].地球物理学报, 2005, 48(2):367-372. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2005.02.019HE Yongfeng, CHEN Xiaofei, ZHANG Haiming. The excitation of Lg wave by underground nuclear explosions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2005, 48(2):367-372. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2005.02.019 [22] 何永锋, 赵克常, 张献兵.地下核爆炸地震波二次源特征[J].地球物理学报, 2012, 55(5):1742-1748. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqwlxb201205031HE Yongfeng, ZHAO Kechang, ZHANG Xianbing, et al. The characteristic of the waveform from the second source induced by underground explosion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(5):1742-1748. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqwlxb201205031 [23] 郑建常, 陈运泰.基于Langston分解和Hilbert变换约束的区域偏量矩张量反演方法及应用[J].地震学报, 2012, 34(2):171-190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2012.02.005ZHENG Jianchang, CHEN Yuntai. Regional deviatoric moment tensor inversion based on Langston's decomposition and Hilbert transform constraints and its application[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2012, 34(2):171-190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3782.2012.02.005 [24] 许力生, 陈运泰.震源深度误差对矩张量反演的影响[J].地震学报, 1997, 19(5):462-470. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199700067589 -
图(7) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 5413
- HTML全文浏览量: 2033
- PDF下载量: 88
- 被引次数: 0