Similarity relations of underwater explosion in centrifuge and pressurizing vessels
-
摘要: 水下爆炸冲击波和气泡脉动的共同作用不能仅依据几何相似条件进行模型试验，相关的尺寸缩比模型试验可以借助密闭加压罐或离心机进行。通过量纲分析和π定理对模型试验的相似理论进行了推导，分别探讨了密闭加压容器和离心机中水下爆炸的相似关系及其适用范围，并对原型工况和尺寸缩比为1/20和1/30的模型工况基于LS-DYNA进行了数值模拟。结果表明：加压模型试验中水下爆炸冲击波、气泡脉动半径和周期可以满足相似关系，但是气泡迁移和射流不符合相似关系；离心模型试验中水下爆炸冲击波和气泡脉动基本完全相似。Abstract: The collective effect of underwater explosion shock wave and bubble pulsation does not meet the traditional geometric similarity relation, and the scaled model test must be carried out in a closed pressurized tank or centrifuge apparatus. Through the dimensional analysis and π theorem, the similarity theory of the model tests was deduced. The prototype condition and model conditions with the scaled ratio of 1/20 and 1/30 were simulated based on LS-DYNA, which shows the similarity relations and application scope of the pressurized model and centrifugal model. The shock wave, bubble radius and bubble period can meet the similarity relations but the bubble motion and jet can not meet the similarity relations in the pressurized model; and the shock wave and bubble pulsation almost meet the similarity relations in the centrifugal model.
-
Key words:
- underwater explosion /
- model test /
- centrifugal model /
- pressurized model /
- LS-DYNA
-
图 4 离心模型工况2和工况3的气泡半径数值结果
Figure 4. Numerical bubble radius histories under working conditions 2 and 3 of the centrifugal model
图 5 离心模型换算到原型的气泡半径数值结果
Figure 5. Numerical bubble radius histories for converting the centrifugal model into the prototype
图 6 离心模型工况2和工况3的冲击波数值结果
Figure 6. Numerical shock wave pressure-time curves under working conditions 2 and 3 of the centrifugal model
图 7 离心模型换算到原型的冲击波数值结果
Figure 7. Numerical shock wave pressure-time curves for converting the centrifugal model into the prototype
图 8 150 mg药量在0.170 8 MPa气压、37.5 cm水深下爆炸气泡脉动过程数值模拟结果(工况5)
Figure 8. The numerical simulated process of bubble pulsation of 150 mg charge in the water depth of 37.5 cm under the atmospheric pressure of 0.170 8 MPa (condition 5)
图 9 加压模型工况4和工况5的气泡半径数值结果
Figure 9. Numerical bubble radius histories under working conditions 4 and 5 of the pressurized model
图 10 加压模型换算到原型的气泡半径数值结果
Figure 10. Numerical bubble radius histories for converting the pressurized model into the prototype
图 11 加压模型工况4和工况5的冲击波数值结果
Figure 11. Numerical shock wave pressure-time curves under working conditions 4 and 5 of the pressurized model
图 12 加压模型换算到原型的冲击波数值结果
Figure 12. Numerical shock wave pressure-time curves for converting the pressurized model into the prototype
图 13 加压模型气泡垂直方向迁移运动的数值结果
Figure 13. Numerical vertical motion of the bubble for the pressurized model
图 14 加压模型换算到原型气泡垂直方向迁移运动的数值结果
Figure 14. Numerical vertical motion of the bubble for converting the pressurized model into the prototype
表 1 相似关系
Table 1. The similarity relations
参量分类 参数名称 原型参量 离心模型 加压模型 模型参量 参量缩比 模型参量 参量缩比 长度参数 装药半径 r λr λ λr λ 爆距 d λd λ λd λ 装药沉深 h λh λ λh λ 特征长度 l λl λ λl λ 速度参数 流速 v v 1 v 1 重力参数 加速度 ag ag/λ 1/λ ag 1 压力参数 大气压强 p0 p0 1 p0+ρ0agh(1-λ) 装药参数 装药质量 m λ3m λ3 λ3m λ3 冲击波参数 峰值压力 ps ps 1 ps 1 时间常数 τ λτ λ λτ λ 冲量 I λI λ λI λ 气泡参数 气泡半径 R λR λ λR λ 脉动周期 T λT λ λT λ 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 工况设置
Table 2. The working conditions
模型 工况 m h/cm ag/g p0/MPa 长度缩比 mp/g hp/cm 原型 1 1 200 g 750.0 1 0.101 0 1 1 200 750.0 离心模型 2 50 mg 25.0 30 0.101 0 1/30 1 350 750.0 3 150 mg 37.5 20 0.101 0 1/20 1 200 750.0 加压模型 4 50 mg 25.0 1 0.172 1 1/30 1 350 750.0 5 150 mg 37.5 1 0.170 8 1/20 1 200 750.0
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 模型和原型数值计算结果对比
Table 3. Comparison of the numerical calculation results between the models and prototype
工况 工况参数 d/cm 模型 原型 m ag/g h/cm p/kPa ps/MPa Rmax/cm T/ms ps/MPa Rmax/cm T/ms 1 1 200 g 1 750.0 0.101 0 150.0 28.84 144.2 221.3 2 50 mg 30 25.0 0.101 0 5.0 25.80 4.95 6.82 25.80 148.5 204.6 3 150 mg 20 37.5 0.101 0 7.5 27.03 7.02 10.84 27.03 140.4 216.8 4 50 mg 1 25.0 0.172 1 5.0 25.80 4.69 6.85 25.80 140.7 205.5 5 150 mg 1 37.5 0.170 8 7.5 27.03 7.02 10.82 27.03 140.4 216.4
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] COLE R H. Underwater explosion[M]. New Jersey:Princeton University Press, 1948. [2] MURPHY G. Similitude in engineering[M]. New York:Ronald Press Co., 1950. [3] GEL'FAND B E, TAKAYAMA K. Similarity criteria for underwater explosions[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2004, 40(2):214-218. DOI: 10.1023/B:CESW.0000020144.55275.df. [4] 张效慈.水下爆炸试验相似准则[J].船舶力学, 2007, 11(1):108-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2007.01.014.ZHANG Xiaoci. Similarity criteria for experiment of underwater explosion[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2007, 11(1):108-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2007.01.014. [5] 张效慈.水下爆炸试验模型律的若干问题[J].船舶力学, 2009, 13(5):783-787. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2009.05.016.ZHANG Xiaoci. Some problems for model law of underwater explosion tests[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2009, 13(5):783-787. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2009.05.016. [6] 刘文韬, 姚熊亮, 李帅, 等.离心机水下爆炸缩比实验原理及数值研究[J].爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(6):789-796. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0789-08.LIU Wentao, YAO Xiongliang, LI Shuai, et al. Experimental principle and numerical study of scaled-down underwater explosion model on a centrifuge apparatus[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6):789-796. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0789-08. [7] SCHMIDT R M, HOUSEN K R. Some recent advances in the scaling of impact and explosion cratering[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1987, 5(1/4):543-560.DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(87)90069-8. [8] HOUSEN K R, SCHMIDT R M, HOLSAPPLE K A. Crater eject a scaling laws:fundamental forms based upon dimensional analysis[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1983, 88:2485-2499. DOI: 10.1029/JB088iB03p02485. [9] KUTTER B L, O'LEARY L M, THOMPSON P Y. Centrifugal modeling of the effect of blast loading on tunnels[C]//Addendum to Proceedings of the Second Symposium on the Interaction of Non-nuclear Munitions with Structures. Panama City Beach Florida, April 15-18, 1985. [10] 范一锴, 陈祖煜, 梁向前, 等.砂中爆炸成坑的离心模型试验分析方法比较[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30:4123-4128. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201104561938FAN Yikai, CHEN Zuyu, LIANG Xiangqian, et al. Comparison of three methods for geotechnical centrifuge model tests of explosion cratering in sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30:4123-4128. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201104561938 [11] 马立秋, 张建民, 胡耘, 等.地面爆炸条件下浅埋地下结构物响应的离心模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29:3672-3678. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb2010z2032MA Liqiu, ZHANG Jianmin, HU Yun, et al. Centrifugal model tests for responses of shallow-buried underground structures under surface blasting[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29:3672-3678. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb2010z2032 [12] SONG Ge, CHEN Zuyu, LONG Yuan, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the centrifugal model for underwater explosion shock wave and bubble pulsation[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 142:523-531.DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.035. [13] HU Jing, CHEN Zuyu, ZHANG Xuedong, et al. Underwater explosion in centrifuge:Part Ⅰ:validation and calibration of scaling laws[J]. Science China:Technological Sciences, 2017, 60(11):1638-1657. DOI: 10.1007/s11431-017-9083-0. [14] 马坤, 初哲, 王可慧, 等.小当量炸药深水爆炸气泡脉动模拟实验[J].爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(3):320-325. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)03-0320-06.MA Kun, CHU Zhe, WANG Kehui, et al. Experimental research on bubble pulse of small scale charge exploded under simulated deep water[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3):320-325. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)03-0320-06. [15] Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA[Z]. Livermore, CA, USA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2012. [16] 李晓杰, 张程娇, 王小红, 等.水的状态方程对水下爆炸影响的研究[J].工程力学, 2014, 31(8):46-52. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.03.0180.LI Xiaojie, ZHANG Chengjiao, WANG Xiaohong, et al. Numerical study on the effect of equations of state of water on underwater explosions[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(8):46-52. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.03.0180. [17] LEE E, FINGER M, COLLINS W. JWL equation of state coefficients for high explosives: Rept-UCID-16189[R]. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1973. 期刊类型引用(18)
1. 高飞，邓树新，张国凯，纪玉国，刘晨康，王明洋. 缩比模型弹侵彻岩石靶尺寸效应试验研究与理论分析. 兵工学报. 2023(12): 3601-3612 . 
百度学术2. 朱少平，王志亮，熊峰. 卵形弹丸对混凝土侵彻动力响应数值研究. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 243-250 . 百度学术3. 邵伟，范锦彪，耿宇飞，王玮. 基于微元法的侵彻体弹头摩擦升温计算方法. 探测与控制学报. 2022(02): 34-40 . 百度学术4. 章毅，胡枫，吴昊，王安宝. 高强混凝土介质侵彻系数计算方法. 防护工程. 2021(02): 31-38 . 百度学术5. 张丁山，谷鸿平，徐笑，张博，吕永柱. 截卵形头部平台直径对初始侵彻弹道偏转的影响. 高压物理学报. 2021(05): 138-144 . 百度学术6. 吴飚，任辉启，陈力，杨建超，黄家蓉，高伟亮，金栋梁. 弹体侵彻混凝土尺度效应试验研究与理论分析. 防护工程. 2020(02): 1-10 . 百度学术7. 彭永，卢芳云，方秦，吴昊，李翔宇. 弹体侵彻混凝土靶体的尺寸效应分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(11): 58-68 . 
本站查看8. 张学伦，汪衡，谭正军，王昭明. 混凝土靶边界效应与弹丸长径比关联性的研究. 兵器装备工程学报. 2018(04): 11-13+18 . 百度学术9. 刘宗伟，武海军，张学伦，刘俞平，熊国松，谭正军，曾令清. 高超弹体侵蚀机理及抗侵蚀设计研究. 兵器装备工程学报. 2017(04): 46-49 . 百度学术10. 李艳，范文，赵均海，翟越. 中低速长杆弹侵彻半无限岩石靶的动态响应研究. 工程力学. 2017(09): 139-149 . 百度学术11. 薛建锋，沈培辉，王晓鸣. 基于层裂机理的弹体侵彻混凝土的工程模型. 国防科技大学学报. 2017(03): 194-200 . 百度学术12. 曹扬悦也，蒋志刚，谭清华，蒙朝美. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的混凝土-岩石类靶侵彻模型. 振动与冲击. 2017(05): 48-53+60 . 百度学术13. 薛建锋，沈培辉，王晓鸣. 不同头部形状弹体侵彻混凝土的试验研究. 兵工自动化. 2016(02): 75-78 . 百度学术14. 邓佳杰，张先锋，乔治军，郭磊，何勇，陈东东. 卵形弹体侵彻预开孔靶理论分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2016(05): 625-632 . 本站查看15. 张学伦，刘宗伟. 弹丸CRH值对侵彻混凝土深度影响研究. 兵器装备工程学报. 2016(10): 31-34 . 百度学术16. 薛建锋，沈培辉，王晓鸣. 钻地弹斜侵彻混凝土靶的工程计算模型. 航空学报. 2016(06): 1899-1911 . 百度学术17. 张丁山，吕永柱，周涛，谷鸿平，张立建. 侵彻战斗部引信前后置过载的影响因素. 探测与控制学报. 2016(06): 41-45+50 . 百度学术18. 彭永，方秦，吴昊，孔祥振，肖云凯. 不同头部形状弹体侵彻混凝土靶体的终点弹道参数分析. 兵工学报. 2014(S2): 128-134 . 百度学术其他类型引用(11)
-
百度学术
计量
- 文章访问数: 6731
- HTML全文浏览量: 2058
- PDF下载量: 52
- 被引次数: 29