A theoretical model for the evaluation of protective capability of a sandwich bulkhead structure in the close range of warhead explosion
-
摘要: 为改善当前战斗部近距爆炸下基于单纯抗爆或抗穿甲载荷开展防护结构设计的不足,本文中建立了战斗部近距爆炸下夹芯复合舱壁结构防护能力的理论评估模型,提出了联合作用下夹芯复合舱壁结构的防护能力需同时满足抗弹性能和整体变形破坏两方面要求。具体步骤为:首先计算战斗部爆炸后的联合毁伤载荷,然后基于抗弹理论模型评估夹芯复合舱壁结构的抗弹性能。若满足要求,则进一步根据联合作用理论模型校核夹芯复合舱壁结构在冲击波和破片群联合作用下是否满足整体变形破坏要求,判据为后面板是否产生撕裂、破口破坏。与有关实验结果进行了计算比较,结果吻合良好,证明了此理论评估模型的合理性。Abstract: In order to make up for the shortcomings in protective structure design based on simple anti-blast or anti-armor load, a theoretical model was proposed for evaluating the protective capability of sandwich bulkhead in the close range of a warhead explosion, and its protection capability should meet the requirements of both the ballistic performance and the overall deformation and destruction. The first step is to calculate the combined damage load under warhead explosion. Then, based on the ballistic theory model, it can be used to evaluate whether the composite structure meets the requirements of the ballistic resistance. If it is satisfied, the requirements of composite sandwich bulkhead on overall deformation and failure under the combined load of shock wave and fragment group are further checked according to the combined damage theory model, and the criterion is whether the rear panel is broken or being torn. The experimental results are in good agreement with those of the domestic experimental results, which shows that the theoretical evaluation model is reasonable.
-
表 1 后面板变形挠度理论值与实验值[7]的比较
Table 1. Comparsion of the deflection of back plate between calculated results by the theoretical model and the experimental ones[7]
序号 夹芯复合舱壁结构 爆距/mm 后面板变形挠度/cm 理论 实验[7] 1 1 mm前面板+20 mm气凝胶毡+10 mm UMWPE+
10 mm陶瓷棉+2 mm后面板334 6.9 6.7 2 1 mm前面板+10 mm陶瓷棉+3 mmAl2O3+
10 mm UMWPE+10 mm陶瓷棉+2 mm后面板334 6.6 6.4 -
[1] 孔祥韶, 吴卫国, 杜志鹏, 等.圆柱形战斗部爆炸破片特性研究[J].工程力学, 2014, 31(1):243-249. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2012.09.0672.KONG Xiangshao, WU Weiguo, DU Zhipeng, et al. Research on fragments characteristic of cylindrical warhead[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(1):243-249. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2012.09.0672. [2] 史作飞.模拟弹与水面舰船防护甲板的对抗研究[D].南京: 南京理工大学, 2014. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10288-1014176692.htm [3] LONGÈRE P, GEFFROY-GRÈZE A G, LEBLÉ B, et al. Ship structure steel plate failure under near-field air-blast loading:numerical simulations vs experiment[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 62:88-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.06.009. [4] 陈长海, 朱锡, 侯海量, 等.舰船舷侧复合装甲结构抗动能穿甲模拟实验[J].爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(1):11-18. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0011-08.CHEN Changhai, ZHU Xi, HOU Hailiang, et al. Experimental study on composite armour structure of warship topside against kinetic armor piercing[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1):11-18. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0011-08. [5] 陈长海, 朱锡, 侯海量, 等.结构形式对舰船舷侧复合装甲结构抗穿甲性能的影响研究[J].振动与冲击, 2013, 32(14):58-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.14.010CHEN Changhai, ZHU Xi, HOU Hailiang, et al. Influence of structure configuration on perforation-resistance of a warship topside composite armour system[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(14):58-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.14.010 [6] 张成亮, 朱锡, 侯海量, 等.爆炸冲击波与高速破片对夹层结构的联合毁伤效应试验研究[J].振动与冲击, 2014, 33(11):33-37. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201415033ZHANG Chengliang, ZHU Xi, HOU Hailiang, et al. Tests for combined damage effect of blast waves and high fragments on composite sandwich plates[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(15):184-188. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201415033 [7] 侯海量, 张成亮, 李茂, 等.冲击波和高速破片联合作用下夹芯复合舱壁结构的毁伤特性[J].爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(1):116-123. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0116-08.HOU Hailiang, ZHANG Chengliang, LI Mao, et al. Damage characteristics of sandwich bulkhead under the impact of shock and high-velocity fragments[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1):116-123. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0116-08. [8] 李典, 朱锡, 侯海量, 等.近距爆炸破片作用下芳纶纤维夹芯复合舱壁结构毁伤特性实验研究[J].兵工学报, 2016, 37(8):1436-1442. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.014.LI Dian, ZHU Xi, HOU Hailiang, et al. Experimental investigation on damage of aramid fiber sandwich bulkhead under near explosion and fragment loadings[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(8):1436-1442. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.014. [9] CHUNG KIM YUEN S, NURICK G N, LANGDON G S, et al. Deformation of thin plates subjected to impulsive load:Part Ⅲ:an update 25 years on[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 107:108-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.010. [10] RAHIMZADEH T, ARRUDA E M, THOULESS M D. Design of armor for protection against blast and impact[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2015, 85:98-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.009. [11] MAMIVAND M, LIAGHAT G H. A model for ballistic impact on multi-layer fabric targets[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010, 37:806-812. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.01.003. [12] CWIK T K, LANNUCCI L, CURTIS P, et al. Investigation of the ballistic performance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene composite panels[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 149:197-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.009. [13] NYSTRÖM U, GYLLTOFT K. Numerical studies of the combined effects of blast and fragment loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(8):995-1005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.008. [14] MARCHAND K A, VARGAS M M, NIXON J D. The synergistic effects of combined blast and fragment loadings: ESL-TR-91-18[R]. 1992. [15] KONG Xiangshao, WU Weiguo, LI Jun, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation on a multi-layer protective structure under the synergistic effect of blast and fragment loadings[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 65(3):146-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.009. [16] 孙业斌.爆炸作用与装药设计[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 1987. [17] XUE Zhenyu, HUTCHINSON J W. A comparative study of impulse resistant metal sandwich plates[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(10):1283-1305. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007. [18] 王儒策.赵国志.弹丸终点效应[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社, 1993. [19] 隋树元, 王树山.终点效应学[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2000. [20] 赵国志.穿甲工程力学[M].北京:兵器工业出版社, 1989. [21] WEN H M. Predicting the penetration and perforation of FRP laminates struck normally by projectiles with different nose shapes[J]. Composite Structure, 2000, 49(3):321-329. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00064-7. [22] WEN H M. Penetration and perforation of thick FRP laminates[J]. Composite Science and Technology, 2001, 61(8):1163-1172. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00020-3. [23] 李永池, 陈居伟, 胡秀章.等.纤维增强复合靶抗贯穿规律研究[J].弹道学报, 2000, 12(2):15-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-499X.2000.02.004.LI Yongchi, CHEN Juwei, HU Xiuzhang, et al. The research on the anti-penetration rules of fiber-reinforced composite laminates[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2000, 12(2):15-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-499X.2000.02.004. [24] 王礼立.应力波基础[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2005:1-60. [25] 吴有生, 彭兴宁, 赵本立.爆炸载荷作用下舰船板架的变形与破损[J].中国造船, 1995(4):55-61. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199500633715WU Yousheng, PENG Xingning, ZHAO Benli. Plastic deformation and damage of naval panels subjected to explosion loading[J]. Shipbuliding of China, 1995(4):55-61. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199500633715 [26] 朱锡, 张振华, 梅志远, 等.舰船结构毁伤力学[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2013. 期刊类型引用(36)
1. 何理,殷琳,钟冬望,张鑫玥,赵永明,熊海涛,陈莎莎,NJAMBA Bruno. 爆破振动强度、波形与频谱研究综述:预测及主动控制. 爆破. 2024(03): 189-204+262 . 百度学术
2. 王士明,周发明,刘聪. 浅孔控制爆破技术在环境和地质双复杂条件下基坑开挖工程中的应用. 煤矿爆破. 2024(04): 33-37 . 百度学术
3. 汤松,李立峰,郑雅风,赵渊,仲鹏,王淼. 基于改进的线性叠加法和岩石破碎效果的最优延期时间分析. 爆破. 2023(03): 12-19 . 百度学术
4. 杨璐瑶,莫宏毅,王雪松,全铭,徐振洋. 应力叠加下的爆破减振效应现场试验研究. 金属矿山. 2023(10): 24-30 . 百度学术
5. 白晓杰,耿新宇,蔺海洋,董法,春坚超,陈亚军. 非均质复杂岩体深凹露天煤矿爆破参数优选确定. 煤炭技术. 2023(12): 46-49 . 百度学术
6. 赵民强. 下穿山岭隧道爆破振动效应的数值模拟分析. 科技与创新. 2023(24): 95-97 . 百度学术
7. 项荣军,刘传鹏,李胜林,凌天龙. 隧道内部爆破振动传播规律与降振技术研究. 爆破. 2023(04): 82-88+200 . 百度学术
8. 龚敏,曹贞洋,石发才,吴昊骏,吴晓东,周世均. 双临空面条件下隧道爆破近区振动波形构造与应用. 振动与冲击. 2022(01): 52-59+97 . 百度学术
9. 谢先启,黄小武,姚颖康,何理,伍岳. 露天深孔台阶精细爆破技术研究进展. 金属矿山. 2022(07): 7-18 . 百度学术
10. 何理,杨仁树,钟冬望,解联库,张奎,杨磊. 非电起爆网路修正单响药量计算及PPV预测应用实例. 振动与冲击. 2022(15): 54-62 . 百度学术
11. 黄强. 隧道爆破振动场中断层对岩体远场振动特性影响研究. 铁道建筑技术. 2022(09): 55-59+80 . 百度学术
12. 赵岩,王小敬,王海龙,王东升. 交叉隧道爆破振速回归分析及对比研究. 工程爆破. 2022(05): 121-127 . 百度学术
13. 褚怀保,余梦飞,严少洋,王昌,孙博. 高压气体爆破与炸药爆破振动试验研究. 爆破. 2022(04): 177-185 . 百度学术
14. 林飞. 复杂环境下爆破降振的微差时间优选. 金属矿山. 2021(04): 59-63 . 百度学术
15. 孙鹏昌,卢文波,雷振,陈明,李瑞泽,李福千. 单薄山体岩质高边坡爆破振动响应分析及安全控制. 岩土工程学报. 2021(05): 877-885 . 百度学术
16. 关振长,朱凌枫,俞伯林. 隧道掘进排孔爆破的精细化数值模拟. 振动与冲击. 2021(11): 154-162 . 百度学术
17. 李永刚,马修胜,马修利. 露天煤矿剥离台阶降低大块率爆破方法研究. 科学技术创新. 2021(19): 102-103 . 百度学术
18. 李祥龙,张其虎,王建国,杨德源,李斌,朱兴彪. 地下爆破精确延时逐孔起爆减振试验研究. 黄金科学技术. 2021(03): 401-410 . 百度学术
19. 包松,郭连军,莫宏毅,徐振洋. 考虑高程与能量的爆破振动持时分析. 金属矿山. 2021(08): 67-70 . 百度学术
20. 王子明,闫建文,杨振军. 洞室爆破振动信号时频分析及能量分布研究. 西安理工大学学报. 2021(02): 261-268 . 百度学术
21. 何理,杨仁树,钟东望,李鹏,吴春平,陈江伟. 毫秒延时爆破等效单响药量计算及振速预测. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(09): 132-144 . 本站查看
22. 何理,谢先启,韩传伟,钟冬望,王洪刚,黄小武,黄炳林. 基于地震波频谱分析与线性叠加的电子雷管延时优选. 金属矿山. 2021(11): 41-48 . 百度学术
23. 余良松,周龙杰,胡英国,胡伟. 两河口水电站级配料开采爆破孔间延时优选的试验研究. 爆破. 2021(04): 81-88 . 百度学术
24. 杨茂森,陈永祥,郝润华. 露天煤矿超高台阶抛掷爆破振动效应评价. 爆破. 2021(04): 156-162 . 百度学术
25. 孙冰,罗志业,曾晟,何旺. 爆破振动影响因素及控制技术研究现状. 矿业安全与环保. 2021(06): 129-134 . 百度学术
26. 李猛,范延静,李彬,潘建荣,王湛. 爆破振动对高层框架-剪力墙结构的影响. 工程爆破. 2021(06): 26-31 . 百度学术
27. 何山,郭剑锋,韩全吉. 山岭隧道微差爆破技术在周边建筑物保护中的应用. 科技通报. 2019(01): 15-18 . 百度学术
28. 陈亚军,常治国,赵斐. 干旱区露天矿爆破作用线理论与实践研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2019(02): 357-363 . 百度学术
29. 叶海旺,袁尔君,雷涛,龙梅. 基于量纲分析的爆破振动质点峰值速度预测公式. 金属矿山. 2019(05): 56-61 . 百度学术
30. 相志斌,杨仕教,蒲成志,朱忠华,郑建礼. 基于爆破振动对孔间微差时间的确定. 中国矿业. 2019(11): 123-127 . 百度学术
31. 王伟,李兴华,陈作彬,范磊,孙飞. 基于小波包变换的爆破振动信号能量熵特征分析. 爆破器材. 2019(06): 19-23 . 百度学术
32. 李祥龙,骆浩浩,胡辉,张松涛,李克钢. 延期时间对高台阶抛掷爆破效果的影响. 北京理工大学学报. 2018(06): 579-584 . 百度学术
33. 张绍银,王瑞鹏,吴顺川,赵革. 露天矿边坡爆破振动高程效应分析. 化工矿物与加工. 2018(01): 35-39 . 百度学术
34. 张景华,刘钟阳. 露天采矿爆破对中缅油气管道振动的影响试验. 油气储运. 2018(07): 816-821 . 百度学术
35. 陈士海,吴建. 双孔微差及长柱药包爆破振动数值模拟研究. 爆破. 2017(03): 46-52 . 百度学术
36. 何理,钟冬望,陈晨,黄雄. 岩质高边坡开挖施工的爆破振动监测与分析. 金属矿山. 2017(01): 6-10 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(28)
-