基于重球触地实验的空区塌落振动分析及治理

仪海豹; 张西良; 杨海涛; 李明; 高琪琪; 金科

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0160

基于重球触地实验的空区塌落振动分析及治理

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0160

仪海豹^{1, 3,},
张西良^{1, 2},
杨海涛^{1, 3},
李明^{1, 3},
高琪琪³,
金科³

1.
中钢集团马鞍山矿山研究院有限公司，安徽马鞍山 243000
2.
中国科学技术大学中国科学院材料力学行为和设计重点实验室，安徽合肥 230026
3.
金属矿山安全与健康国家重点实验室，安徽马鞍山 243000

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0602902)

详细信息

作者简介:
仪海豹(1987－　)，男，硕士，工程师，hang_tianfeiji@126.com

中图分类号: O382; TD73
计量
- 文章访问数: 5508
- HTML全文浏览量: 1924
- PDF下载量: 52
- 被引次数: 25
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-04-20
- 修回日期: 2018-05-18
- 网络出版日期: 2019-06-25
- 刊出日期: 2019-07-01

Goaf collapse vibration analysis and disposal based on a experiment of heavy ball touchdown

YI Haibao^{1, 3
,},
ZHANG Xiliang^{1, 2},
YANG Haitao^{1, 3},
LI Ming^{1, 3},
GAO Qiqi³,
JIN Ke³

1.
Sinosteel Maanshan Institute of Mining Research Co. Ltd., Manshan 243000, Anhui, China
2.
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Safety and Health for Metal Mines, Manshan 243000, Anhui, China

摘要

摘要: 根据相似理论，以重球落地实验模拟采空区坍塌进而指导采空区治理为出发点，在振动波动特性分析的基础上，分别开展了质量为4 kg和10 kg的重球从1.0、1.5和2.0 m的高度落地的峰值振动速度测试实验；首次提出了累计振动速度衰减率和相对能量比概念；以普氏拱理论为基础，分析了采空区坍塌振动速度。研究表明：振动速度与重球质量和落地高度成正相关，且前者对累计衰减率的影响大于后者；随着测点距离的增大，振动速度整体表现为衰减趋势；重球质量为4 kg和10 kg时，在水平距离重球落地点3.0 m处的累计衰减率分别为79.79%～81.61%和79.95%～83.52%。不同介质交界面的反射和折射可引起振动速度的小幅度“跃增”。重球质量对振动能量衰减影响明显；质量越大，近区能量衰减越慢。采空区冒落体582.5～5 926.5 t，引起的振动速度远大于边坡安全允许值。采用“采空区顶板崩落+边坡削坡”方案进行治理后，边坡安全系数可达到1.26，消除采空区安全隐患。
- 重球触地实验 /
- 振动速度 /
- 采空区治理 /
- 数值分析
Abstract: Based on the similarity theory, the heavy ball landing experiments were conducted to simulate the collapse of the goaf in order to provide guidance for the goaf disposal. The particle peak vibration velocities corresponding to the balls with the mass 4 kg and 10 kg dropping from 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 m respectively were measured experimentally on the basis of characteristics analysis of vibration wave. For the first time, the concepts of cumulative attenuation rate of vibration velocity and relative energy ratio were proposed. The collapse vibration velocity of the goaf was analyzed with the help of the Protodyakonov’s arch theory. The study shows that the mass and dropping height of the heavy ball are positively related to the vibration velocity, and the former has greater influence on the cumulative attenuation rate than that of the latter. With the increase of measuring distance, the overall vibration velocity shows an attenuation trend. The accumulative decay rates for 4 kg and 10 kg heavy balls at 3.0 m are 79.79%−81.61% and 79.95%−83.52%, respectively. Reflections and refractions at the interface of different media can cause a small " jump increase” in vibration velocity. The mass has a significant effect on vibration energy attenuation: the greater the mass, the slower the energy attenuation in the near area. The goaf collapsed mass is 582.5 t to 5 926.5 t and it causes the particle vibration velocity to be much larger than that of the safety allowable value. With the comprehensive treatment plan of " roof caving+slope slope cutting”, the slope safety factor can reach 1.26, completely eliminating the hidden dangers in the goaf area.
- heavy ball touchdown experiment /
- vibration velocity /
- goaf disposal /
- numerical analysis

HTML全文

图 1 测点布置图

Figure 1. Measuring points layout

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 现场实验照片

Figure 2. Field test photo

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同测点的爆破峰值振动速度

Figure 3. Peak particle velocity of blasting vibration at different measuring points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 水平距离重球落地点0.5 m处测试得到的不同质量的重球从不同高度落地引起的地振动速度波形

Figure 4. Vibration velocity-time curves measured at the measuring point with the horizontal distance of 0.5 m away from the landing place of different-mass heavy balls free-falling from different heights

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 对于不同的质量重球从不同高度落地累计振动速度衰减率与传播距离关系

Figure 5. Relations of cumulative attenuation rate and propagation distance for ground vibration induced by different-mass heavy balls free-falling from different heights and touching the ground

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 应力波反射示意图

Figure 6. Schematic of stress wave reflection

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 相对能量比随距离的变化

Figure 7. Variation of relative energy ratio with distance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 采空区位置剖面图

Figure 8. Section of goaf location

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 平衡拱分析示意图

Figure 9. Schematic of balanced arch analysis

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 设计治理后边坡剖面

Figure 10. Slope profile after goaf disposal

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 采空区空间位置图

Figure 11. Goaf space location

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 边坡安全系数计算模型

Figure 12. Calculation model of slope safety factor

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 竖直应力等值线图

Figure 13. Vertical stress contour

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 剪切应变率

Figure 14. Contour of shear strain rate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 振动测量数据

Table 1. Vibration measurement data

重球质量/kg	测点距离/m	峰值振动速度/(cm·s⁻¹)
		第1次	第2次	平均值	第1次	第2次	平均值	第1次	第2次	平均值
		高度 1.0 m			高度 1.5 m			高度 2.0 m
4	0.5	7.029	7.262	7.146	9.006	8.403	8.705	10.089	10.33	10.210
	1.0	6.215	6.670	6.443	6.737	8.022	7.380	9.120	8.686	8.903
	2.0	2.362	2.371	2.367	2.374	2.769	2.572	3.688	3.315	3.502
	3.0	1.326	1.386	1.356	1.591	1.506	1.549	2.002	2.009	2.006
	4.0	1.340	1.547	1.444	1.603	1.598	1.601	1.776	2.199	1.988
10	0.5	11.514	12.939	12.227	14.447	13.721	14.084	15.708	15.612	15.660
	1.0	11.747	11.886	11.817	13.492	13.865	13.679	14.714	15.075	14.895
	2.0	6.782	6.215	6.499	7.255	7.134	7.195	8.442	8.257	8.350
	3.0	1.881	2.270	2.076	2.095	2.546	2.321	3.143	3.136	3.140
	4.0	2.532	2.879	2.706	3.001	3.101	3.051	3.073	3.621	3.347

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 对于不同的落球条件在不同测点得到的累计振动速度衰减率

Table 2. Cumulative vibration attenuation rates at different measuring points for different falling ball conditions

重球质量/kg	测点距离/m	振动速度/(cm·s⁻¹)	累计衰减率/%	振动速度/(cm·s⁻¹)	累计衰减率/%	振动速度/(cm·s⁻¹)	累计衰减率/%
重球质量/kg	测点距离/m	高度 1.0 m		高度 1.5 m		高度 2.0 m
4	0.5	7.146	0	8.705	0	10.210	0
	1.0	6.443	9.84	7.380	15.22	8.903	12.80
	2.0	2.367	66.88	2.572	70.45	3.502	65.70
	3.0	1.356	81.02	1.549	82.21	2.006	80.35
	4.0	1.444	79.79	1.601	81.61	1.988	80.53
10	0.5	12.227	0	14.084	0	15.660	0
	1.0	11.817	3.35	13.679	2.88	14.895	4.89
	2.0	6.499	46.85	7.195	48.91	8.350	46.68
	3.0	2.076	83.02	2.321	83.52	3.140	79.95
	4.0	2.706	77.87	3.051	78.34	3.347	78.63

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 相对能量比

Table 3. Relative energy ratio

重球质量/kg	测点距离/m	v²/(cm·s⁻¹)²	k/%	v²/(cm·s⁻¹)²	k/%	v²/(cm·s⁻¹)²	k/%
重球质量/kg	测点距离/m	高度 1.0 m		高度 1.5 m		高度 2.0 m
4	0.5	51.07	100	75.78	100	104.24	100
	1.0	41.51	81.29	54.46	71.87	79.26	76.04
	2.0	5.60	10.97	6.62	8.73	12.26	11.76
	3.0	1.84	3.60	2.40	3.17	4.02	3.86
	4.0	2.09	4.08	2.56	3.38	3.95	3.79
10	0.5	149.50	100	198.36	100	245.24	100
	1.0	139.64	93.41	187.12	94.33	221.86	90.47
	2.0	42.24	28.25	51.77	26.10	69.72	28.43
	3.0	4.31	2.88	5.39	2.72	9.86	4.02
	4.0	7.32	4.90	9.31	4.69	11.20	4.57

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	杜坤, 李夕兵, 刘科伟, 等. 采空区危险性评价的综合方法及工程应用 [J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 42(9): 2802–2811. DU Kun, LI Xibing, LIU Kewei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of underground goaf risk and engineering application [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2011, 42(9): 2802–2811.
[2]	徐恒, 王贻明, 吴爱祥, 等. 基于尖点突变理论的充填体下采空区安全顶板厚度计算模型 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(3): 579–586. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.0199. XU Heng, WANG Yiming, WU Aixiang, et al. A computational model of safe thickness of roof under filling body based on cusp catastrophe theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(3): 579–586. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.0199.
[3]	吴爱祥, 王贻明, 胡国斌. 采空区顶板大面积冒落的空气冲击波 [J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2007, 36(4): 473–477. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1964.2007.04.011. WU Aixiang, WANG Yiming, HU Guobin. Air shock wave induced by roof falling in a large scale in ultra-huge mined-area [J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2007, 36(4): 473–477. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1964.2007.04.011.
[4]	刘晓明, 罗周全, 杨承祥, 等. 基于实测的采空区稳定性数值模拟分析 [J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(S1): 521–526. LIU Xiaoming, LUO Zhouquan, YANG Chengxiang, et al. Analysis of stability of cavity based on cavity monitoring [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(S1): 521–526.
[5]	付建新, 杜建华, 谭玉叶. 缓倾斜厚大矿体崩落法开采隐伏空区顶板冒落过程及机理研究 [J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2017, 34(5): 891–898. DOI: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2017.05.010. FU Jianxin, DU Jianhua, TAN Yuye. The falling process and mechanism of concealed gob roof during the caving mining of the gently inclined heavy ore [J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2017, 34(5): 891–898. DOI: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2017.05.010.
[6]	吴启红, 万世明, 彭文祥. 一种多层采空区群稳定性的综合评价法 [J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 43(6): 2324–2330. WU Qihong, WAN Shiming, PENG Wenxiang. A comprehensive evaluation method about stability of polylaminate goafs [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2012, 43(6): 2324–2330.
[7]	王凯兴, 潘一山, 窦林名. 摆型波传播过程块系岩体能量传递规律研究 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(12): 2309–2314. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201612021. WANG Kaixing, PANYishan, DOU Linming. Energy transfer in block-rock mass during propagation of pendulum-type waves [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(12): 2309–2314. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201612021.
[8]	楼晓明, 周文海, 简文彬, 等. 微差爆破振动波速度峰值-位移分布特征的延时控制 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(6): 839–846. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0839-08. LOU Xiaoming, ZHOU Wenhai, JIAN Wenbin, et al. Control of delay time characterized by distribution of peak velocity-displacement vibration of millisecond blasting [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6): 839–846. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0839-08.
[9]	李俊如, 高建光, 邵蔚, 等. 砂土中的强夯振动对周边环境的影响研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2002, 23: 198–200. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.z1.057. LI Junru, GAO Jianguang, SHAO Wei, et al. Research on influence of dynamic compaction vibration of sand-soil on surroundings [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23: 198–200. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.z1.057.
[10]	杨年华, 张乐. 爆破振动波叠加数值预测方法 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2012, 32(1): 84–90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1455.2012.01.015. YANG Nianhua, ZHANG Le. Blasting vibration waveform prediction method based on superposition principle [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2012, 32(1): 84–90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1455.2012.01.015.
[11]	KOLSKY H. Stress waves in solids [M]. New York: Dover Publications, 1963.
[12]	RAYLEIGH L. On waves propagated along the plane surface of an elastic solid [J]. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 1885, 17: 4–11. DOI: 10.1112/plms/s1-17.1.4.
[13]	ZHANG Z X, NAARTTIJÄRVI T. Reducing ground vibrations caused by underground blasts in LKAB Malmberget mine [J]. International Journal for Blasting and Fragmentation, 2005, 9(2): 61–78. DOI: 10.1080/13855140500140275.
[14]	RICKETTS T E, GOLDSMITH W. Dynamic properties of rocks and composite structural materials [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1970, 7(3): 315–335. DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(70)90045-8.
[15]	王礼立. 应力波基础 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2005.
[16]	杨风威, 李海波, 齐三红, 等. 平面应力波在岩质边坡中的传播规律研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(S1): 2623–2631. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2013.1374. YANG Fengwei, LI Haibo, QI Sanhong, et al. Study of regularity of plane stress wave transmitting in rock slope [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(S1): 2623–2631. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2013.1374.
[17]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010-2010 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015: 18−19.
[18]	黄庆享, 郑超. 巷道支护的自稳平衡圈理论 [J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(5): 1231–1236. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.003. HUANG Qingxiang, ZHENG Chao. Theory of self-stable ring in roadway support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(5): 1231–1236. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.003.
[19]	赵国彦, 周礼, 李金跃, 等. 房柱法矿柱合理尺寸设计及矿块结构参数优选 [J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(11): 3943–3948. ZHAO Guoyan, ZHOU Li, LI Jinyue, et al. Reasonable pillar size design and nugget structural parameters optimization in room-and-pillar mining [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2014, 45(11): 3943–3948.
[20]	杨仙, 张可能, 黎永索, 等. 深埋顶管顶力理论计算与实测分析 [J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(3): 757–761. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2013.03.027. YANG Xian, ZHANG Keneng, LI Yongsuo, et al. Theoretical and experimental analyses of jacking force during deep-buried pipe jacking [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(3): 757–761. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2013.03.027.
[21]	YI Haibao, LIU Weizhou, ZHANG Xiliang, et al. Study on deformation mechanism of high stress and broken roadway and its controlling measures [J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 501−504: 1798–1803. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.501-504.
[22]	王洪江, 李公成, 吴爱祥, 等. 龙首矿围岩流变特性理论分析及现场监测 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(S2): 3676–3681. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.s2.035. WANG Hongjiang, LI Gongcheng, WU Aixiang, et al. Theoretical analysis for rheological characteristics of surrounding rock and on-site monitoring in Longshou mine [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(S2): 3676–3681. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.s2.035.
[23]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 非煤露天矿边坡工程技术规范: GB 51016-2014 [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2014: 6−7.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(10)

1.	胡洋，陶红，宋民航，吕硕，张海霞. 长直管道预混气体爆燃波系演化过程研究. 中国安全科学学报. 2024(03): 55-62 . 百度学术
2.	边振华，李小萌. 封闭巷道挡板对爆炸冲击波传播的影响研究. 煤矿安全. 2023(01): 70-76 . 百度学术
3.	刘佳佳，张扬，张翔，聂子硕. Y型通风采煤工作面瓦斯爆炸传播规律模拟研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(08): 182-194 . 本站查看
4.	赵永耀，张艳敏，胡文燕. 煤矿瓦斯爆炸波传播及致灾机理的数值模拟研究. 中北大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(01): 73-78+90 . 百度学术
5.	罗振敏，康晓锋，王涛，苏彬，贾月华. 掘进工作面不同瓦斯源爆炸过程的数值模拟. 煤矿安全. 2020(01): 166-170 . 百度学术
6.	黄强，穆朝民，王亚军，周辉，李重情. 瓦斯体积分数对90°弯管泄爆特性的影响. 中国安全科学学报. 2020(11): 101-107 . 百度学术
7.	程科，叶文华，冯阳，肖磊明，陈阳明，王一茹. 破碎机锤轴转动对爆炸过程影响的数值模拟. 工程爆破. 2019(04): 20-25 . 百度学术
8.	贾进章，王枫潇. 瓦斯爆炸对躲避硐室影响的数值模拟. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(06): 517-522 . 百度学术
9.	Huanjuan Zhao，Yiran Yan，Yinghua Zhang，Yukun Gao. Propagating Characteristic of Premixed Methane-Oxygen Deflagration in the Coal Mine Lane Including a Refuge Chamber. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology. 2018(01): 109-117 . 必应学术
10.	黄文祥，陈玉涛，秦江涛. 管道内瓦斯爆炸变点火能系统构建与爆炸初期火焰三维分析. 煤矿安全. 2016(11): 181-183 . 百度学术