Experimental study on impact resistance of steel reinforced concrete members
-
摘要: 利用超重型落锤试验机对钢骨混凝土构件进行了侧向冲击试验,研究了落锤冲击钢骨混凝土构件的冲击全过程和最终的破坏形态;分析了钢骨混凝土构件冲击力、位移和轴力时程曲线的特性;对比了不同冲击速度、冲击能量、轴压和边界条件等因素对钢骨混凝土构件的动力响应的影响。结果表明:钢骨混凝土构件在落锤冲击作用下外侧混凝土破坏严重,且冲击能量越大,外侧混凝土越易出现剪切破坏,但内部钢筋和钢骨只发生了一定的弯曲变形,表明钢骨混凝土构件抗冲击性能整体良好。本次试验参数范围内,钢骨混凝土构件的冲击力和跨中位移随冲击速度增加而增大;轴压力增大使钢骨混凝土构件的冲力峰值增大,冲击持时和跨中位移减小;相对于固简支和两端简支的边界条件,两端固支的边界对于钢骨混凝土构件的抗冲击性能提升最好。Abstract: In this work we carried out a lateral impact test of steel reinforced concrete (SRC) members using a super heavy drop weight impact tester, studied the whole process of impact and the ultimate failure mode of drop weight impacted SRC members, and analyzed the time history curves of the impact force, the displacement and the axial force, with the effects of different impact velocities, impact energies, axial pressures and boundary conditions on the dynamic response of SRC members compared. The following results were achieved: the outer concrete of the SRC members is seriously damaged under drop weight impact; the larger the impact energy of the drop weight, the more likely the shear failure of the outer concrete; the internal rebar and H-shaped steel only have a limited bending deformation; and the impact resistance of SRC is generally good. Within the parameters of this test, the impact force and the mid-span displacement of SRC increase with the increase of the impact velocity; the increase of the axial pressure increases the peak value of the impact of SRC, and the impact time and mid-span displacement decrease. Compared with the boundary conditions of one fixed end, one simply supported end and the two simple supported ends, the boundary of the two fixed ends is the best for the impact resistance of SRC.
-
表 1 钢骨混凝土试件信息及试验结果
Table 1. SRC specimen information and test results
试件编号 边界条件 m/kg N/kN v/(m·s−1) Fmax/kN Fstab/kN Td/ms $\varDelta _{\rm{cmax}} /{\rm{mm}}$ $\varDelta _{\rm{cstab}} /{\rm{mm}}$ $\varDelta _{\rm{rstab}} /{\rm{mm}}$ SRC4 两端固支 1 158.7 340.4 5.42 10 932.02 2 524.77 10.40 13.67 5.00 5.36 SRC5 两端固支 1 158.7 340.4 7.67 12 489.50 3 780.58 21.97 27.43 15.43 13.02 SRC6 两端固支 1 158.7 340.4 9.39 14 936.49 3 977.93 31.93 34.18 20.65 20.10 SRC7 两端固支 1 158.7 680.8 5.42 − − − 14.23 3.94 5.00 SRC8 两端固支 1 158.7 680.8 7.67 12 600.27 3 429.33 19.93 25.35 13.00 12.76 SRC9 两端固支 1 158.7 680.8 9.39 15 426.77 4 259.52 25.93 32.55 19.50 21.00 SRC10 固简支 1 158.7 0 9.39 12 880.98 1 703.57 43.93 46.13 30.00 22.28 SRC11 两端简支 1 158.7 0 9.39 12 281.95 1 648.84 47.93 59.00 42.50 40.96 注:m为冲击质量;N为所施加的轴力;v为冲击速度;Fmax为冲击力峰值;Fstab为冲击力平台值;Td为冲击力持续时间;$\varDelta _{\rm{cmax}} $为高速摄影测得试件跨中位移最大值;$\varDelta _{\rm{cstab}} $为高速摄影测得试件跨中残余位移值;$\varDelta _{\rm{rstab}} $为高度尺测得试件跨中残余位移值。 表 2 钢材的力学性能
Table 2. Mechanical properties of the steel
钢材类型 屈服强度/MPa 极限强度/MPa 弹性模量/GPa 伸长率/% 6 mm 钢板 427.0 625.3 210 22.2 9 mm 钢板 358.2 529.4 203 23.0 12 mm 纵筋 362.3 543.5 212 23.2 8 mm 箍筋 370.2 525.7 216 20.8 表 3 落锤具体尺寸
Table 3. Specific size of drop weight
名称 形状 底面直径/mm 底面尺寸/mm 高度/mm 质量/kg 配重 圆柱体 490 − 486 719.43 锤头顶部 圆柱体 500 − 150 231.20 过渡部位 长方体 − 300×300 50 35.33 传感器 长方体 − 200×200 100 31.40 锤头底部 长方体 − 300×300 200 141.30 总质量 1 158.70 -
[1] 叶列平, 方鄂华. 钢骨混凝土构件的受力性能研究综述 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2000, 33(5): 1–12. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2000.05.001.YE Lieping, FANG Ehua. State of the art of study behaviors of steel reinforced concrete structure [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2000, 33(5): 1–12. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2000.05.001. [2] 叶列平, 方鄂华, 周正海, 等. 钢骨混凝土柱的轴压力限值 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 1997, 18(5): 43–50. DOI: 10.14006/j.jz.jgxb.1997.05.005.YE Lieping, FANG Ehua, ZHOU Zhenghai, et al. Axial load limit for steel reinforced concrete columns [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 1997, 18(5): 43–50. DOI: 10.14006/j.jz.jgxb.1997.05.005. [3] 周颖, 缪驰, 闫峰, 等. 钢骨混凝土连梁联肢剪力墙抗震性能试验研究及有限元分析 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(3): 36–45. DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2015.03.005.ZHOU Ying, MIAO Chi, YAN Feng, et al. Experimental study and FEA of seismic performance of coupled shear walls with steel reinforced concrete coupling beams [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(3): 36–45. DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2015.03.005. [4] 蒋晶. 异形钢骨混凝土柱侧向抗冲击性能研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳建筑大学, 2014.JIANG Jing. Research on resistance to lateral impact properties of the special-shaped steel reinforced concrete columns [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Jianzhu University, 2014. [5] 张玲. 钢骨混凝土桥墩静动响应研究[D]. 南京: 南京工业大学, 2015.ZHANG Ling. Research on static and dynamic response of steel reinforced concrete bridge piers [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Tech University, 2015. [6] 朱翔, 曹瑞东, 康婷婷, 等. 侧向冲击荷载作用下钢骨混凝土柱抗冲击性能研究 [J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2017(04): 161–170. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2017.04.023.ZHU Xiang, CAO Ruidong, KANG Tingting, et al. Study on the impact resistance of steel reinforced concrete columns under lateral impact loads [J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2017(04): 161–170. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2017.04.023. [7] PAN J, FANG H, XU M C, et al. Study on the performance of energy absorption structure of bridge piers against vehicle collision [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 130: 85–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.05.008. [8] 朱翔, 陆新征, 杜永峰, 等. 列车脱轨后运行姿态模拟 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(23): 126–130. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.23.026.ZHU Xiang, LU Xinzheng, DU Yongfeng, et al. Simulation for running attitude of a train after derailment [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(23): 126–130. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.23.026. [9] GHOLIPOUR G, ZHANG C, LI M. Effects of soil–pile interaction on the response of bridge pier to barge collision using energy distribution method [J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2018, 14(11): 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2018.1450427. [10] YOUSUF M, UY B, TAO Z, et al. Transverse impact resistance of hollow and concrete filled stainless steel columns [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 82: 177–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.005. [11] HAN L H, HOU C C, ZHAO X L, et al. Behaviour of high-strength concrete filled steel tubes under transverse impact loading [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 92: 25–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.09.003. [12] 朱翔, 陆新征, 杜永峰, 等. 外包钢管加固RC柱抗冲击试验研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(6): 23–33. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.11.0991.ZHU Xiang, LU Xinzheng, DU Yongfeng, et al. Experimental study on impact resistance of RC columns strengthened with steel jacket [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(6): 23–33. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.11.0991. [13] 朱翔, 陆新征, 杜永峰, 等. 新型复合柱抗冲击试验研究及有限元分析 [J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(8): 158–166. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.03.0153.ZHU Xiang, LU Xinzheng, DU Yongfeng, et al. Experimental study and finite element analysis of impact resistance of novel composite columns [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(8): 158–166. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.03.0153. [14] 张南, 王慧, 陈旭, 等. 钢骨混凝土桥墩抗撞击性能试验研究 [J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(11): 99–107. DOI: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2017.11.010.ZHANG Nan, WANG Hui, CHEN Xu, et al. Experimental research on impact performance of steel reinforced concrete bridge piers [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(11): 99–107. DOI: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2017.11.010. [15] 陈佳佳, 张南, 巫业双, 等. 内置钢骨形式对混凝土桥墩撞击性能影响研究 [J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2018, 38(1): 72–80. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2018.01.010.CHEN Jiajia, ZHANG Nan, WU Yeshuang, et al. Research on influence of embedded steel skeleton form on impact performance of concrete piers [J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2018, 38(1): 72–80. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2018.01.010. [16] 朱翔. 脱轨列车撞击站房结构的非线性响应及连续倒塌研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2015.ZHU Xiang. Nonlinear response and progressive collapse research of railway station due to the impact of derailed trains [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2015. [17] 胡昌明, 韩林海. 圆形钢管混凝土叠合构件抗冲击性能试验研究 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2016(10): 11–17. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2016.10.004.HU Changming, HAN Linhai. Experimental behavior of circular concrete-encased concrete-filled steel tubes under lateral impact [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016(10): 11–17. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2016.10.004.