One-dimensional theory for pressurization process in explosive crack burning
-
摘要: 为了深入理解炸药裂缝燃烧演化过程中的压力增长行为，提升对事故点火下武器装药向高烈度反应转变机制的认识水平，基于炸药预置裂缝燃烧演化压力历程分析，对某HMX基PBX炸药裂缝燃烧的增压过程开展了理论计算。采用气体动力学相关理论建立了简化的炸药燃烧产物流动模型，基于一维等熵流动假设预测了不考虑黏性和摩擦阻力情况下炸药预置裂缝的燃烧压力增长过程，计算结果显示压力增长阶段与实验结果定性符合，为理解炸药裂缝燃烧的增压行为提供了一种理论解释。Abstract: The aim of this paper is to deep understand the pressurization behavior in evolution of crack burning, and promote the acknowledge level for transition mechanism of high intensity reaction in projectile fillings under accidental ignition. Based on qualitative analysis for pressure evolution in explosive crack burning, theoretical calculation is carried out for the pressurization process in crack burning of a HMX-based PBX (with a content of 95% for HMX). Simplified flow model for explosive burning products has been set up based on gas dynamic theory. With the hypothesis of one-dimensional isentropic flow, crack pressurization process has been predicted without regard to viscosity and friction resistance. The calculation result is qualitatively accord with experimental result in pressurization stage, providing a theoretical explanation for understanding the pressurization behavior in crack burning.
-
Key words:
- explosive crack /
- convective burning /
- pressurization /
- isentropic flow
-
图 1 炸药预置裂缝燃烧实验装置图
Figure 1. Experiment device for burning in preformed explosive cracks
图 2 200 μm宽裂缝燃烧压力阶段划分
Figure 2. Different stages of pressure from the 200 μm width crack burning experiment
-
[1] BERGHOUT H L, SON S F, ASAY B W. Convective burning in gaps of PBX9501 [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(1): 911–917. DOI: 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80297-0. [2] ASAY B W. Shock wave science and technology reference library, Vol. 5:non-shock initiation of explosives [M]. Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany: Springer, 2010: 245−292. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87953-4. [3] ASAY B W, SON S F, BDZIL J B. The role of gas permeation in convective burning [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1996, 22: 923–952. DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(96)00041-9. [4] 胡海波, 郭应文, 傅华, 等. 炸药事故反应烈度转化的主控机制 [J]. 含能材料, 2016, 24(7): 622–624. DOI: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2016.07.00X.HU H B, GUO Y W, FU H, et al. The dominant mechanism of reaction violence transition for explosive accident [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2016, 24(7): 622–624. DOI: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2016.07.00X. [5] DICKSON P M, ASAY B W, HENSON B F, et al. Observation of the behaviour of confined PBX 9501 following a simulated cookoff ignition [C] // Proceedings of the 11th International Detonation Symposium. Snowmass, Colorado, US: Office of Naval Research, 1998: 606−611. [6] DICKSON P M, ASAY B W, HENSON B F, et al. Thermal cook-off response of confined PBX 9501 [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2004, 460(2052): 3447–3455. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2004.1348. [7] SMILOWITZ L, HENSON B F, ROMERO J J, et al. Proton radiography of a thermal explosion in PBX9501 [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2007, 955: 1139–1142. DOI: 10.1063/1.2832919. [8] SMILOWITZ L, HENSON B F, ROMERO J J, et al. The evolution of solid density within a thermal explosion Ⅱ. Dynamic proton radiography of cracking and solid consumption by burning [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111: 103516. DOI: 10.1063/1.4711072. [9] SMILOWITZ L, HENSON B F, OSCHWALD D, et al. Internal sub-sonic burning during an explosion viewed via dynamic X-ray radiography [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2017, 111: 184103. DOI: 10.1063/1.5004424. [10] JACKSON S I, HILL L G, BERGHOUT H L, et al. Runaway reaction in a solid explosive containing a single crack [C] // Proceedings of the 13th International Detonation Symposium. Norfolk, VA, US: Office of Naval Research, 2006: 646−655. [11] BERGHOUT H L, SON S F, HILL L G, et al. Flame spread through cracks of PBX9501(a composite octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine-based explosive) [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2006, 99(11): 114901. DOI: 10.1063/1.2196219. [12] 尚海林, 杨洁, 胡秋实, 等. 炸药裂缝中的对流燃烧现象实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 99–106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.01.012.SHANG H L, YANG J, HU Q S, et al. Experimental research on convective burning in explosive cracks [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(1): 99–106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.01.012. [13] 尚海林, 杨洁, 李涛, 等. 约束HMX基PBX炸药裂缝中燃烧演化实验 [J]. 含能材料, 2019, 27(12): 1056–1062. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2019082.SHANG H L, YANG J, LI T, et al. Experimental study on burning evolution in confined explosive cracks [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2019, 27(12): 1056–1062. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2019082. [14] JACKSON S I, HILL L G. Runaway reaction due to gas-dynamic choking in solid explosive containing a single crack [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(2): 2307–2313. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.089. [15] 童秉纲, 孔祥言, 邓国华. 气体动力学[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012: 67−125. [16] MAIENSCHEIN J L, CHANDLER J B. Burn rates of pristine and degraded explosives at elevated temperatures and pressures [C] // Proceedings of the 11th International Detonation Symposium. Snowmass, Colorado, US: Office of Naval Research, 1998: 872−879. 期刊类型引用(8)
1. 张柱柱，毛海涛，周圣林，焦鹏，胡文林，吴省均，刘军，张旸，沈沛，刘宇麟. 分离式霍普金森压杆试验中金属材料端面摩擦效应误差分析. 机械工程材料. 2024(02): 89-96 . 
百度学术2. 高波，冯家臣，彭刚，王绪财，王伟，陈春晓，张彬，卢振宇. 霍普金森装置校准高应变率标准样品研制. 力学与实践. 2024(03): 617-624 . 百度学术3. 杜金飞，杜宇翔，贾永胜，孙金山，姚颖康，谢全民，范焜晖. 水-动力耦合作用下红砂岩变形破坏与能耗分析. 岩土力学. 2024(S1): 248-258 . 百度学术4. 张蓉蓉，经来旺，马冬冬. 冻融和热冲击循环作用后红砂岩SHPB试验和本构模型研究. 振动与冲击. 2022(09): 267-275 . 百度学术5. 陆杉，巫绪涛. 冲击载荷下砂岩SHPB实验的有限元模拟. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(11): 1517-1521 . 百度学术6. 崔衡. 不同冲击荷载作用下粉砂岩动力学特性试验研究. 安徽建筑. 2021(11): 170-171 . 百度学术7. 唐志强，李皋，石祥超，李泽，彭尧，包恒. 岩石单轴冲击加载破碎特征分析. 应用力学学报. 2019(05): 1076-1081+1258 . 百度学术8. 袁璞，马芹永，马冬冬. 端面不平行对岩石SHPB测试结果的影响分析. 爆破. 2018(02): 26-31+106 . 百度学术其他类型引用(10)
-
下载:
百度学术
图(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 5962
- HTML全文浏览量: 1334
- PDF下载量: 70
- 被引次数: 18