基于EMD改进算法的爆破振动信号去噪

易文华 刘连生 闫雷 董斌斌

易文华, 刘连生, 闫雷, 董斌斌. 基于EMD改进算法的爆破振动信号去噪[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(9): 095201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0471
引用本文: 易文华, 刘连生, 闫雷, 董斌斌. 基于EMD改进算法的爆破振动信号去噪[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(9): 095201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0471
YI Wenhua, LIU Liansheng, YAN Lei, DONG Binbin. Vibration signal de-noising based on improved EMD algorithm[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 095201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0471
Citation: YI Wenhua, LIU Liansheng, YAN Lei, DONG Binbin. Vibration signal de-noising based on improved EMD algorithm[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 095201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0471

基于EMD改进算法的爆破振动信号去噪

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0471
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51404111);江西省自然科学基金(20192BAB206017);江西理工大学清江优秀人才支持计划(JXUSTQJYX2016007)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    易文华(1996- ),男,硕士研究生,yiwenhua0918@163.com

    通讯作者:

    刘连生(1979- ),男,博士,教授,lianshengliu@jxust.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: O389

Vibration signal de-noising based on improved EMD algorithm

  • 摘要: 为了解决振动信号经验模态分解(empirical mode decomposition, EMD)滤波去噪效果不佳的问题,提出一种自适应性正交经验模态分解(principal empirical mode decomposition, PEMD)的信号去噪方法。该算法融合了EMD分解的自适应性和主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA)的完全正交性特点,对信号EMD分解过程中产生的模态混叠现象进行消除,得到了最佳的去噪效果。分析表明:PEMD在仿真模拟试验中相比于传统EMD算法和集总经验模态分解(ensemble empirical mode decomposition, EEMD) 算法,信噪比分别提高了1.15 dB和0.38 dB,且均方根误差最小;频域上PEMD对仿真信号频率(30 Hz)识别的灵敏度最高,30 Hz之外的噪声滤除效果最好。在爆破振动试验中,PEMD和EEMD去除噪声毛刺的效果较为理想,且PEMD在0~300 Hz的中低频振动信号保存效果最好,300 Hz以上的高频噪声滤除效果最好。
  • 图  1  PEMD算法流程图

    Figure  1.  PEMD algorithm flow chart

    图  2  仿真信号IMF分量与频谱

    Figure  2.  IMF component and spectrum of simulation signal

    图  3  正交信号与仿真信号频谱对比

    Figure  3.  Spectrum comparison between orthogonal signal and simulated signal

    图  4  IMF分量自相关函数特性曲线

    Figure  4.  Characteristic curves of IMF component autocorrelation function

    图  5  EMD、EEMD和PEMD去噪信号时域对比

    Figure  5.  Comparison of EMD, EEMD and PEMD de-noising signal time domain

    图  6  EMD、EEMD和PEMD去噪信号频谱对比

    Figure  6.  Comparison of EMD, EEMD and PEMD de-noising signal spectrum

    图  7  地质地形及监测点布置图

    Figure  7.  Geological topography and layout of the monitoring site

    图  8  EMD、EEMD和PEMD去噪信号时域对比

    Figure  8.  Comparison of EMD, EEMD and PEMD de-noising signal time domain

    图  9  EEMD与PEMD去噪信号频谱对比

    Figure  9.  Comparison of EEMD and PEMD de-noising signal spectrum

    表  1  主成分变量信息贡献率

    Table  1.   Principal component variable information contribution rate

    主成分变量${y_1}$${y_2}$${y_3}$${y_4}$${y_5}$${y_6}$${y_7}$${y_8}$${y_9}$
    信息贡献率/%14.8813.6311.9711.4410.4910.439.809.168.21
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  去噪效果评价指标

    Table  2.   Evaluation index of de-noising effect

    去噪算法 γ$\sigma $
    EMD 2.832.04
    EEMD 3.601.87
    PEMD 3.981.79
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同测点的爆破参数

    Table  3.   Blasting parameters of different measuring points

    测点最大段药量/kg水平距离/m高程差/m
    13 17219020
    23 17228640
    33 17231150
    43 17233060
    53 17235080
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ZHAI M Y. Seismic data de-noising based on the fractional Fourier transformation [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2014, 109: 62–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.07.012.
    [2] 李夕兵, 凌同华, 张义平. 爆破震动信号理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 60−63.
    [3] 中国生, 徐国元, 赵建平. 基于小波变换的爆破地震信号阈值去噪的应用研究 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(9): 1055–1059. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.09.016.

    ZHONG G S, XU G Y, ZHAO J P. Study and application of threshold de-noising in seismic signals of blasting based on wavelet transform [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(9): 1055–1059. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.09.016.
    [4] 王志超, 夏虹, 朱少民, 等. 基于改进小波包的堆内构件振动信号去噪方法研究 [J]. 应用科技, 2018, 46(6): 74–79. DOI: 10.11991/yykj.201804005.

    WANG Z C, XIA H, ZHU S M, et al. Research on vibration signal de-noising method of PWR internals based on improved wavelet packet [J]. Applied Science and Technology, 2018, 46(6): 74–79. DOI: 10.11991/yykj.201804005.
    [5] 马宏伟, 张大伟, 曹现刚, 等. 基于EMD的振动信号去噪方法研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(22): 38–40. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2016.22.006.

    MA H W, ZHANG D W, CAO X G, et al. Vibration signal de-noising method based on empirical mode decomposition [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(22): 38–40. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2016.22.006.
    [6] 曹莹, 段玉波, 刘继承, 等. 多尺度形态滤波模态混叠抑制方法 [J]. 电机与控制学报, 2016, 20(9): 110–116. DOI: 10.15938/j.emc.2016.09.016.

    CAO Y, DUAN Y B, LIU J C, et al. Multi-scale morphological filtering method for mode mixing suppression [J]. Electric Machines and Control, 2016, 20(9): 110–116. DOI: 10.15938/j.emc.2016.09.016.
    [7] WU Z H, HUANG N E. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method [J]. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2009, 1(1): 1–41. DOI: 10.1142/S1793536909000047.
    [8] 李晓斌. HHT中EMD方法正交性的研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2010: 27−45.
    [9] 司守奎, 孙兆亮, 数学建模算法与应用[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2017: 231−239.
    [10] LIU B, FU A Q, YAO Z G, et al. SO2, Concentration retrieval algorithm using EMD and PCA with application in CEMS based on UV-DOAS [J]. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2018, 158: 273–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.12.057.
    [11] JAVED E, FAYE I, MALIK A S, et al. Removal of BCG artefact from concurrent fMRI-EEG recordings based on EMD and PCA [J]. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2017, 291: 150–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.08.020.
    [12] MACKIEWICZ A, RATAJCZAK W. Principal components analysis (PCA) [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 1993, 19(3): 303–342. DOI: 10.1016/0098-3004(93)90090-R.
    [13] 王志亮, 陈贵豪, 黄佑鹏. EEMD修正爆破加速度零漂信号中的最优白噪声系数 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(8): 084201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0154.

    WANG Z L, CHEN G H, HUANG Y P. Optimal white noise coefficient in EEMD corrected zero drift signal of blasting acceleration [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(8): 084201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0154.
    [14] 胡厅. 机械系统多点耦合非线性振动信号降噪方法研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南科技大学, 2016: 8−10.
    [15] 韩亮, 刘殿书, 辛崇伟, 等. 深孔台阶爆破近区振动信号趋势项去除方法 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(5): 1006–1012. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0194.

    HAN L, LIU D S, XIN C W, et al. A method to remove the trend term of vibration signal near the deep hole step blasting [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1006–1012. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0194.
    [16] 钟建军, 宋健, 由长喜, 等. 基于信噪比评价的阈值优选小波去噪法 [J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 54(2): 259–263. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2014.02.022.

    ZHONG J J, SONG J, YOU C X, et al. Wavelet de-noising method with threshold selection rules based on SNR evaluations [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2014, 54(2): 259–263. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2014.02.022.
    [17] 司祯祯. 傅里叶变换与小波变换在信号去噪中的应用 [J]. 电子设计工程, 2011, 19(4): 155–157. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6236.2011.04.045.

    SI Z Z. Application of Fourier transform and wavelet transform in signal de-noising [J]. Electronic Design Engineering, 2011, 19(4): 155–157. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6236.2011.04.045.
    [18] 张声辉, 刘连生, 钟清亮, 等. 露天边坡爆破地震波能量分布特征研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(7): 224–232. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.07.032.

    ZHANG S H, LIU L S, ZHONG Q L, et al. Energy distribution characteristics of blast seismic wave on open pit slope [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(7): 224–232. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.07.032.
    [19] 岳相臣. 经验模态分解算法应用研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2013:17−19.
    [20] HUANG N E, SHEN Z, LONG S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis [J]. Proceedings A, 1998, 454(1971): 903–995. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.
    [21] KRISHNA E H, SIVANI K, REDDY K A. On the use of EMD based adaptive filtering for OFDM channel estimation [J]. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 2018, 83: 492–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2017.11.002.
    [22] CHEN B, YU S Y, YU Y, et al. Nonlinear active noise control system based on correlated EMD and Chebyshev filter [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 130: 74–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.059.
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4019
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1368
  • PDF下载量:  87
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-12-16
  • 修回日期:  2020-03-10
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-07-25
  • 刊出日期:  2020-09-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回