Theoretical prediction of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure considering self-accelerating flame propagation
-
摘要: 通过揭示当量比对氢气云爆炸火焰形态、火焰半径和爆炸超压峰值的影响规律，本文拟建立耦合火焰自加速传播的氢气云爆炸超压预测模型。结果表明：氢气云爆炸火焰传播速度由大至小对应的当量比依次是Φ=2.0、Φ=1.0和Φ=0.8。Le＜1.0和Le＞1.0的氢气云爆炸火焰表面均出现胞格结构，胞格结构的出现必然会增加火焰燃烧表面积，进而出现“火焰自加速”现象。对于特定的当量比，随着压力监测点和点火位置间距的增加，爆炸超压峰值的正值和负值绝对值均单调减小；对于特定的压力监测点，爆炸超压峰值的正值和负值绝对值随当量比的关系存在些许差异；不同当量比和监测点位置的爆炸超压峰值的负值绝对值大都高于正值。耦合火焰自加速传播的氢气云爆炸超压预测模型可成功预测不同压力监测点薄膜破裂前氢气云爆炸超压的发展过程。Abstract: On the basis of revealing the effects of equivalence ratio on flame morphology, radius and maximum explosion overpressure, this work was aimed at establishing a theoretical model to predict hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure by considering self-accelerating flame propagation. The results indicated that the decreasing order of flame propagation velocity is Φ=2.0, Φ=1.0 and Φ=0.8. For Le＜1.0 and Le＞1.0, the cellular structures could be formed on the flame surface, which would increase flame surface area and result in self-accelerating flame propagation. When the equivalence ratio was fixed, the positive maximum explosion overpressure and absolute value of negative maximum explosion overpressure continue to decrease as the distance between pressure senor and ignition source increases. As the equivalence ratio changes, there are some differences for positive maximum explosion overpressure and absolute value of negative maximum explosion overpressure at the fixed distance. The absolute value of negative maximum explosion overpressure was relatively higher than positive maximum explosion overpressure. Before rupture of thin film, the explosion overpressure evolution at various monitoring points could be reproduced using the theoretical model considering self-accelerating flame propagation.
-
图 2 氢气云爆炸典型超压曲线（Φ=2.0）
Figure 2. Typical curves of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure (Φ=2.0)
图 3 当量比对氢气云爆炸火焰形态的影响规律
Figure 3. Effects of equivalence ratio on flame morphology of hydrogen cloud explosion
图 4 Le＜1.0和Le＞1.0的氢气云爆炸火焰自加速传播特征
Figure 4. Self-accelerating flame propagation of hydrogen cloud explosion of Le＜1.0 and Le＞1.0
图 5 当量比对热膨胀比和火焰厚度的影响
Figure 5. Effects of equivalence ratio on thermal expansion ratio and flame thickness
图 6 当量比对氢气云爆炸超压峰值（正值和负值）的影响规律
Figure 6. Effects of equivalence ratio on maximum explosion overpressure (positive and negative value)
-
[1] KIM W K, MOGI T, DOBASHI R. Flame acceleration in unconfined hydrogen/air deflagrations using infrared photography [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(6): 1501–1505. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.09.009. [2] KIM W K, MOGI T, KUWANA K, et al. Prediction model for self-similar propagation and blast wave generation of premixed flames [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(34): 11087–11092. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.123. [3] WU F J, JOMAAS G, LAW C K. An experimental investigation on self-acceleration of cellular spherical flames [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(1): 937–945. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.05.068. [4] CAI X, WANG J, BIAN Z, et al. On transition to self-similar acceleration of spherically expanding flames with cellular instabilities [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2020, 215(5): 364–375. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.02.001. [5] DESHAIES B, LEYER J C. Flow field induced by unconfined spherical accelerating flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 1981, 40: 141–153. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(81)90119-X. [6] PU L, SHAO X, LI Q, et al. A simple and effective approach for evaluating unconfined hydrogen/air cloud explosions [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(21): 10193–10204. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.041. [7] MOLKOV V V, MAKAROV D V, SCHNEIDER H. Hydrogen-air deflagration in open atmosphere: Large eddy simulation analysis of experimental data [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2198–2205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.021. [8] TOLIAS I C, VENETSANOS A G, MARKATOS N, et al. CFD evaluation against a large scale unconfined hydrogen deflagration [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11): 7731–7739. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.052. [9] THOMAS A, WILLIAMS G T. Flame noise: sound emission from spark-ignited bubbles of combustible gas [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1966, 294: 449–466. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1966.0218. [10] LEYER J C, DESBORDES D, CLOUD J P S, et al. Unconfined deflagrative explosion without turbulence: experiment and model [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1993, 34(2): 123–150. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3894(93)85002-V. [11] LAPALME D, LEMAIRE R, SEERS P. Assessment of the method for calculating the Lewis number of H2/CO/CH4 mixtures and comparison with experimental results [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(12): 8314–8328. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.099. [12] SUN Z, LIU F, BAO X, et al. Research on cellular instabilities in outwardly propagating spherical hydrogen-air flames [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(9): 7889–7899. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.011. [13] LI Y, BI M, ZHANG S, et al. Dynamic couplings of hydrogen/air flame morphology and explosion pressure evolution in the spherical chamber [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(4): 2503–2513. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.044. [14] MUKAIYAMA K, SHIBAYAMA S, KUWANA K. Fractal structures of hydrodynamically unstable and diffusive-thermally unstable flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(11): 2471–2475. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.05.017. [15] GOSTINTSEV Y A, ISTRATOV A G, SHULENIN Y V. Self-similar propagation of a free turbulent flame in mixed gas mixture [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 1988, 24(5): 563–569. DOI: 10.1007/BF00755496. 期刊类型引用(17)
1. 白洁琪，白纪成，梁运涛，王琳，宋双林，田富超. CF_3H和CO_2抑制CH_4爆炸实验研究. 煤矿安全. 2024(05): 122-130 . 
百度学术2. 吴君安，朱杭钦，梁志星，冯泓，张苏. CO_2驱动下NaHCO_3对甲烷爆炸特性的影响. 安全与环境工程. 2024(04): 37-44 . 百度学术3. 裴蓓，胡紫维，韩谕良，徐梦娇，陈立伟，邵翔宇. 含改性氯化合物对N_2/细水雾抑制LPG爆炸影响研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(11): 171-182 . 
本站查看4. 段玉龙，龙凤英，黄俊，俞树威，卜云兵. 水雾喷洒时间对滑移装置下甲烷爆炸特性影响. 安全与环境学报. 2023(01): 64-71 . 百度学术5. 裴蓓，李世梁，韦双明，康亚祥，潘荣锟，路长，景国勋. N_2/超细水雾抑制甲烷爆炸点火和火焰传播特性. 中国矿业大学学报. 2023(02): 329-341 . 百度学术6. 胡双启，朱文博，胡立双，刘耿麟，李连强. 惰性气体-水雾协同抑爆甲烷研究. 安全与环境学报. 2023(07): 2321-2326 . 百度学术7. 王健，余靖宇，凡子尧，郑立刚，刘贵龙，赵永贤. 组合多孔介质与氮气幕协同抑制瓦斯爆炸实验研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(10): 185-194 . 本站查看8. 李昂，彭瑞，司俊鸿，周西华. 可封闭火区的泄爆门结构设计及性能研究. 煤矿安全. 2022(05): 116-121 . 百度学术9. 郑露露，龙凤英，温子阳，李泽欢，段玉龙. 多孔材料-CO_2对CH_4/H_2抑爆失效研究. 安全. 2022(09): 24-30+36 . 百度学术10. 何昆，石英杰，李孝斌，田国兵. 惰性气体抑制丙酮蒸气爆炸实验对比研究. 消防科学与技术. 2021(01): 16-19 . 百度学术11. 程方明，南凡，罗振敏，康晓锋. 瓦斯抑爆材料及机理研究进展与发展趋势. 煤炭科学技术. 2021(08): 114-124 . 百度学术12. 张龚. 工业气体爆炸事故原因分析及应急救援. 化工设计通讯. 2021(09): 147-148 . 百度学术13. 陈硕，路长，苏振国，孟琪，刘金刚. 煤矿瓦斯爆炸发展规律及防治的综述及展望. 火灾科学. 2021(02): 63-79 . 百度学术14. 余明高，阳旭峰，郑凯，栾鹏鹏. 我国煤矿瓦斯爆炸抑爆减灾技术的研究进展及发展趋势. 煤炭学报. 2020(01): 168-188 . 百度学术15. 温小萍，郭志东，王发辉，刘梦茹，裴蓓，刘志超. 一维多孔介质和超细水雾协同抑制瓦斯爆炸试验. 安全与环境学报. 2020(02): 539-547 . 百度学术16. 段玉龙，王硕，王文和，邓智迅，赖帆，张晏华. 多孔陶瓷结构抑制甲烷爆炸实验研究. 消防科学与技术. 2020(06): 746-749 . 百度学术17. 贾海林，翟汝鹏，李第辉，项海军，杨永钦. 三种盐类超细水雾抑制管道内甲烷-空气预混气爆炸的差异性. 爆炸与冲击. 2020(08): 42-53 . 本站查看其他类型引用(24)
-
下载:
百度学术
图(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 619
- HTML全文浏览量: 345
- PDF下载量: 88
- 被引次数: 41