爆破地震波作用下法兰接口燃气管道动力失效机制

赵珂; 蒋楠; 贾永胜; 姚颖康; 朱斌; 周传波

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0320

爆破地震波作用下法兰接口燃气管道动力失效机制

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0320

赵珂^1,,
蒋楠^{1, 2, ,},
贾永胜^{2, 3},
姚颖康^{2, 3},
朱斌¹,
周传波¹

1.
中国地质大学（武汉）工程学院，湖北武汉 430074
2.
江汉大学工程爆破湖北省重点实验室，湖北武汉 430024
3.
武汉爆破有限公司，湖北武汉 430024

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（41807265，41972286）；爆破工程湖北省重点实验室开放基金重点项目（HKLBEF202001）

详细信息

作者简介:
赵　珂（1996－　），男，硕士研究生，zk942283319@163.com

通讯作者:
蒋　楠（1986－　），男，博士，副教授，happyjohn@foxmail.com

中图分类号: O389
计量
- 文章访问数: 450
- HTML全文浏览量: 303
- PDF下载量: 87
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-09-10
- 修回日期: 2020-12-23
- 网络出版日期: 2021-08-13
- 刊出日期: 2021-09-14

Dynamic failure mechanism of gas pipeline with flange joint under blasting seismic wave

ZHAO Ke^1
,,
JIANG Nan^{1, 2
, ,},
JIA Yongsheng^{2, 3},
YAO Yingkang^{2, 3},
ZHU Bin¹,
ZHOU Chuanbo¹

1.
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
2.
Hubei Key Laboratory of Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430024, Hubei, China
3.
Wuhan Explosion & Blasting Co., Ltd, Wuhan 430024, Hubei, China

摘要

摘要: 基于典型城市燃气管道直埋地层特点，通过全尺寸直埋燃气管道爆破地震实验，并结合LS-DYNA动力有限元数值计算软件建立不同爆源距离的无接口和法兰接口的燃气管道模型，分析研究了爆破地震波作用下法兰接口燃气管道动力响应特征及其失效机制。研究结果表明：管道截面应变以轴向拉伸应变为主，环向应变为辅；不同爆破工况下，无接口管道和法兰接口管道及地表峰值振动速度随爆源距离减小而增大；沿管道轴线方向，无接口管道、地表峰值振动速度以管道中心截面为对称面沿两端不断减小，法兰接口管道峰值振速由两侧向中间逐渐增大，在法兰接口处突然减小；法兰接口处出现明显的应力集中现象；管道法兰接口处是爆破地震作用下研究的关键点，螺栓的峰值有效应力、垫片轴向压力、法兰峰值有效应力、法兰偏转角随爆源距离增大而减小；法兰管道偏转角与地表峰值振动速度具有对应关系，法兰接口燃气管道中心正上方地表的控制振速（13.82 cm/s）可作为邻近燃气管道爆破工程地表的安全控制值。
- 爆破振动 /
- 动力响应 /
- 振动速度 /
- 法兰接口 /
- 控制振速
Abstract: In the process of blasting and excavation of urban subways, controlling the impact of blasting vibration on adjacent pipelines is critical. Based on the characteristics of directly buried gas pipelines in Wuhan and the full-scale direct-buried gas pipeline blasting seismicexperiment, the dynamic finite element numerical calculation software LS-DYNA was used to establish gas pipeline without joints and flange gas pipeline models under different blasting source distances. The effects of blasting seismic wave’s dynamic response characteristics of flanged gas pipeline were analyzed. The research results show that the strain of pipeline section is mainly axial tensile strain, supplemented by circumferential strain. The peak particle velocity of pipeline without joints and flange pipes and the ground surface increase with the decrease of the distance from the blasting source under different blasting conditions. Along the pipeline axis, the peak vibration velocity of the pipeline without joints and the ground surface decreases along the two ends with the central section of the pipe as the symmetry plane. The peak particle velocity of the flange pipeline gradually increases from two sides to the middle but suddenly decreases at the flange joint. There is an obvious stress concentration at the flange interface. The flange joint is the key point of pipeline under blasting earthquake. The peak effective stress of the bolt, the axial pressure of the gasket, the peak effective stress of the flange, and the flange deflection angle decrease with the increase of the explosion source distance. The deflection angle of the flanged pipeline has a corresponding relationship with the peak vibration velocity of the ground surface. The control vibration speed of 13.82 cm/s on the surface directly above the center of the flanged gas pipeline is used as the safety control value of the adjacent gas pipeline under blasting engineering.
- blasting vibration /
- dynamic response /
- vibration speed /
- flange interface /
- control vibration speed

HTML全文

图 1 现场实验设计示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of field experiment design

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 实验监测点布置图

Figure 2. Layout drawing of experimental monitoring points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 轴向与环向动态峰值应变

Figure 3. Peak strain of axial and horizontal

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 现场实验数值模型示意图

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of numerical model of field experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 实验和数值模拟的波形和频谱图

Figure 5. Waveform and spectrogram of experiment and numerical simulation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 法兰接口系统

Figure 6. Flange interface system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 法兰接口管道数值模型示意图

Figure 7. Schematic diagram of numerical model of flange interface pipe

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 合振动速度对比图

Figure 8. Comparison chart of combined vibration speed

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 监测点示意图

Figure 9. Schematic diagram of monitoring points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 管道轴线方向振速分布图

Figure 10. Vibration velocity in the axial direction of the pipeline

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 管道有效应力分布图

Figure 11. Pipeline stress cloud chart

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 螺栓的有效应力分布图

Figure 12. Effective stress distribution diagram of bolt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 各个工况的螺栓的有效应力分布图

Figure 13. Effective stress distribution diagram of bolts in various working conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 轴向压应力分布图

Figure 14. Distribution diagram of axial compressive stress of gaskets

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 垫片单元轴向压应力分布图

Figure 15. Axial compressive stress diagram of gasket unit

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 法兰测点示意图

Figure 16. Schematic diagram of flange measuring point

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 法兰有效应力

Figure 17. Effective stress of flange

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 法兰偏转角示意图

Figure 18. Schematic diagram of flange deflection angle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 法兰偏转角与地表振速关系

Figure 19. Relationship between flange deflection angle and ground surface vibration velocity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 模型材料参数

Table 1. Model material parameters

材料	密度/(g·cm⁻³)	弹性模量/GPa	剪切模量/GPa	泊松比	黏聚力/MPa	内摩擦角/（°）	抗拉强度/MPa
管道、法兰	7.85	205.000	1.2	0.33			420.000
螺栓	7.82	210.000	1.0	0.30			660.000
粉质黏土	1.98	0.012	4.3	0.28	0.035	15	0.028
砂岩	2.40	3.000	11.2	0.28	5.500	43	2.580

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 爆轰产物状态方程参数

Table 2. Detonation product state equation parameters

ρ/（g·cm⁻³）	A/GPa	B/GPa	R₁	R₂	ω	E₀/GPa	V/cm³
1.25	214	18.2	4.2	0.9	0.1	4.19	1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 数值模拟结果与实测数据对比分析

Table 3. Comparative analysis of numerical simulation results and measured data

工况	监测点	合振动速度、应变		误差率/%
工况	监测点	现场实验	数值模拟	误差率/%
Ⅰ	D3	1.65 cm/s	1.72 cm/s	4.2
	D4	1.17 cm/s	1.26 cm/s	7.6
	D6	0.76 cm/s	0.72 cm/s	5.3
	D7	1.45 cm/s	1.54 cm/s	6.2
	S₁	28.65×10⁻⁶	34.23×10⁻⁶	19.4
	S₂	13.54×10⁻⁶	8.56×10⁻⁶	3.7
Ⅱ	D3	2.84 cm/s	2.76 cm/s	8.0
	D4	1.99 cm/s	2.06 cm/s	3.5
	D6	2.64 cm/s	2.73 cm/s	9.0
	D7	1.32 cm/s	1.46 cm/s	10.6
	S₁	36.71×10⁻⁶	41.23×10⁻⁶	12.3
	S₂	16.12×10⁻⁶	13.15×10⁻⁶	18.4
Ⅲ	D3	6.57 cm/s	6.98 cm/s	6.2
	D4	4.18 cm/s	4.45 cm/s	6.4
	D6	5.47 cm/s	5.78 cm/s	5.6
	D7	3.98 cm/s	4.15 cm/s	4.3
	S₁	37.15×10⁻⁶	43.23×10⁻⁶	16.3
	S₂	15.96×10⁻⁶	18.56×10⁻⁶	16.2
Ⅳ	D3	15.19 cm/s	15.32 cm/s	0.8
	D4	11.21 cm/s	12.54 cm/s	1.3
	D6	13.18 cm/s	14.25 cm/s	8.1
	D7	7.34 cm/s	8.32 cm/s	13.4
	S₁	187.06×10⁻⁶	198.09×10⁻⁶	5.9
	S₂	19.23×10⁻⁶	22.63×10⁻⁶	17.7
Ⅴ	D3	30.45 cm/s	31.56 cm/s	3.6
	D4	21.19 cm/s	23.23 cm/s	9.6
	D6	28.45 cm/s	29.56 cm/s	3.9
	D7	12.15 cm/s	13.21 cm/s	8.7
	S₁	209.50×10⁻⁶	225.61×10⁻⁶	7.6
	S₂	35.62×10⁻⁶	42.66×10⁻⁶	19.8

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 垫片的各项参数

Table 4. The parameters of the gasket

密度/（g·cm⁻³）	E_x/MPa	E_y/MPa	E_z/MPa	μ_xy	μ_yz	μ_xz	G_xy/MPa	G_yz/MPa	G_xz/MPa
7.85	232.17	434.51	19089.64	0.44	0.008	0.005	115.88	32770.11	103.59

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	管晓明, 张良, 王利民, 等. 隧道近距下穿管线的爆破振动特征及安全标准 [J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 50(11): 2870–2885. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2019.11.026. GUAN X M, ZHANG L, WANG L M, et al. Blasting vibration characteristics and safety standard of pipeline passed down by tunnel in short distance [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2019, 50(11): 2870–2885. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2019.11.026.
[2]	夏宇磬, 蒋楠, 姚颖康, 等. 粉质黏土层预埋承插式混凝土管道对爆破振动的动力响应 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(4): 043302. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0207. XIA Y Q, JIANG N, YAO Y K, et al. Dynamic responses of a concrete pipeline with bell-and-spigot joints buried in a silty clay layer to blasting seismic waves [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 043302. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0207.
[3]	ASHFORD S A, JUIRNARONGRIT T. Response of single piles and pipelines in liquefaction–induced lateral spreads using controlled blasting [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2002, 1(2): 181–193. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-002-0064-3.
[4]	ABEDI A S, HATAF N, GHAHRAMANI A. Analytical solution of the dynamic response of buried pipelines under blast wave [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2016, 88: 301–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.014.
[5]	KOURETZIS G P, BOUCKOVALAS G D, GANTES C J. Analytical calculation of blast-induced strains to buried pipelines [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(10): 1683–1704. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.08.008.
[6]	LIU X B, ZHANG H, XIA M Y, et al. Mechanical response of buried polyethylene pipelines under excavation load during pavement construction [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 90: 355–370. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.027.
[7]	张震, 周传波, 路世伟, 等. 爆破振动作用下邻近埋地混凝土管道动力响应特性 [J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 46(9): 79–84. DOI: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201611089. ZHANG Z, ZHOU C B, LU S W, et al. Dynamic response characteristic of adjacent buried concrete pipeline subjected to blasting vibration [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 46(9): 79–84. DOI: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201611089.
[8]	JIANG N, GAO T, ZHOU C B, et al. Effect of excavation blasting vibration on adjacent buried gas pipeline in a metro tunnel [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 590–601. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.022.
[9]	高坛, 周传波, 蒋楠, 等. 基坑开挖爆破下邻近管道振动速度安全阈值研究 [J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(6): 2191–2195. DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2017.06.029. GAO T, ZHOU C B, JIANG N, et al. Study on the vibration velocity threshold of the adjacent pipeline under the blasting excavation of the foundation pit [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017, 17(6): 2191–2195. DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2017.06.029.
[10]	屈若枫, 徐光黎, 王金峰, 等. 武汉地区典型软土物理力学指标间的相关性研究 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(S2): 113–119. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2019. QU R F, XU G L, WANG J F, et al. Correlations of physical and mechanical properties of typical soft soils in Wuhan [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(S2): 113–119. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2019.
[11]	时党勇, 李裕春, 张胜民. 基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA 8.1进行显式动力分析[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2005: 156−158.
[12]	王先军, 陈明祥, 常晓林, 等. Drucker-Prager系列屈服准则在稳定分析中的应用研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(12): 3733–3738. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.12.030. WANG X J, CHEN M X, CHANG X L, et al. Studies of application of Drucker-Prager yield criteria to stability analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(12): 3733–3738. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.12.030.
[13]	MOKHTARI M, NIA A A. A parametric study on the mechanical performance of buried X65 steel pipelines under subsurface detonation [J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 15(3): 668–679. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2014.12.013.
[14]	郑爽英, 杨立中. 隧道爆破地震下输气管道动力响应数值试验 [J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2017, 52(2): 264–271. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.02.008. ZHENG S Y, YANG L Z. Numerical experiments of dynamic response of buried gas pipeline under the action of seismic waves induced by tunnel blasting [J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 52(2): 264–271. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.02.008.
[15]	朱斌, 蒋楠, 贾永胜, 等. 下穿燃气管道爆破振动效应现场试验研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(12): 2582–2592. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0183. ZHU B, JIANG N, JIA Y S, et al. Field experiment on blasting vibration effect of underpass gas pipeline [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(12): 2582–2592. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0183.
[16]	中国机械工业联合会. 整体铸铁法兰: GB/T 17241.6-2008 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[17]	王志文, 蔡仁良. 化工容器设计[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005: 42−45.
[18]	中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 水及燃气用球墨铸铁管、管件和附件: GB/T 13295−2019 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019.
[19]	MATHAN G, PRASAD N S. Evaluation of effective material properties of spiral wound gasket through homogenization [J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2010, 87(12): 704–713. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.10.003.
[20]	蒋国庆, 马斌, 陈万华. 螺栓法兰连接结构有限元模型参数确定方法 [J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2020, 42(4): 51–56. DOI: 10.11887/j.cn.202004009. JIANG G Q, MA B, CHEN W H. Parameter determination method for bolted flange’s finite element model [J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2020, 42(4): 51–56. DOI: 10.11887/j.cn.202004009.
[21]	蔡仁良, 顾伯勤, 宋鹏云. 过程装备密封技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006: 51−52.
[22]	ASME锅炉及压力容器委员会压力容器分委员会. ASME锅炉及压力容器规范: 2010版. 第8卷. 第1册, 压力容器建造规则[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2011: 415.
[23]	陆晓峰, 沈轶. 高温法兰密封接头的可靠性分析 [J]. 压力容器, 2007, 24(9): 20–24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2007.09.005. LU X F, SHEN Y. Reliability analysis on bolted flanged joints at elevated temperature [J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2007, 24(9): 20–24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2007.09.005.
[24]	王和慧, 卢均臣, 关凯书, 等. 带接管组合法兰的强度和密封有限元分析 [J]. 压力容器, 2012, 29(2): 22–29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2012.02.005. WANG H H, LU J C, GUAN K S, et al. Strength and seal FE analysis of combined flanges with a pipe [J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2012, 29(2): 22–29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2012.02.005.