加载角度对层理页岩裂纹扩展影响的实验研究

杨国梁; 毕京九; 郭伟民; 张志飞; 韩子默; 程帅杰

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0097

加载角度对层理页岩裂纹扩展影响的实验研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0097

杨国梁^1,,
毕京九^1, ,,
郭伟民¹,
张志飞¹,
韩子默¹,
程帅杰^{1, 2}

1.
中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院，北京 100083
2.
中信建设有限责任公司，北京 100027

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目（51934001）

详细信息

作者简介:
杨国梁（1979－　），男，博士，副教授，yanggl531@163.com

通讯作者:
毕京九（1995－　），男，博士研究生，bijingjiu@126.com

中图分类号: O346; TU452
计量
- 文章访问数: 734
- HTML全文浏览量: 318
- PDF下载量: 92
- 被引次数: 19
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-03-22
- 修回日期: 2021-05-06
- 网络出版日期: 2021-08-16
- 刊出日期: 2021-09-14

Experimental study on the effect of loading angle on crack propagation in bedding shale

1.
School of Mechanics and Architectural Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
2.
CITIC Construction Co., Ltd., Beijing 100027, China

摘要

摘要: 采用分离式霍普金森压杆（SHPB）系统对页岩进行冲击实验，研究层理角度对页岩动态断裂过程的影响，在裂尖设置裂纹扩展计，借助高速摄影和数字图像相关（DIC）技术对页岩中心切槽半圆盘弯曲（NSCB）试件断裂的全过程进行研究，得到了不同加载角度下页岩的动态起裂韧度、裂纹扩展速度、断裂过程中应变场和水平位移场的变化规律。实验发现：不同加载角度下，页岩的动态起裂韧度具有显著的各向异性，加载角度与动态起裂韧度呈正相关；加载角度对试样的裂纹扩展速度具有显著影响，与裂纹扩展速度呈负相关；当冲击速度较低时，切槽方向是裂纹扩展的优势方向，而当冲击速度较高时，试样会产生沿层理弱面的次生裂纹，次生裂纹对试样的断裂具有显著影响。
- 页岩 /
- 层理 /
- 中心切槽半圆盘弯曲试件 /
- 动态断裂韧度 /
- 数字图像相关技术 /
- 分离式霍普金森压杆
Abstract: The dynamic fracture of rock materials is a basic problem in the field of rock mechanics, while the dynamic fracture mechanism of shale is more complex due to its anisotropic characteristics. In order to study the effect of bedding angle on dynamic fracture process of shale, a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system was used to carry out impact tests on notched semi-circular bend (NSCB) specimens of shale. Additionally, a crack propagation gauge (CPG) was set at the crack tip, and the whole fracture process of the shale NSCB specimen was studied with the help of a high-speed photography system and the digital image correlation (DIC) method. The loading rate and Mode-I dynamic fracture toughness of the shale NSCB samples were obtained by the method recommended by the International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM). And the crack initiation time and crack propagation speed of the shale NSCB samples can be accurately obtained by CPG. It is found from the experimental results that the Mode-I dynamic fracture toughness of the shale NSCB samples has significant anisotropy, and the loading angle has a positive correlation with the Mode-I dynamic fracture toughness. Although the crack propagation of the C-0sample is not affected by the bedding, its crack propagation needs to cut through the shale matrix, hence the C-0 and 90° shale specimens have a high Mode-I dynamic fracture toughness. When the impact velocity is low, the bending stress on the dangerous section affects the fracture direction of the shale specimen, but with less effect on the bedding. The crack propagation path finally closes to the notch direction. With the increase of impact velocity, stress concentration and micro cracks may exist along the weak plane of bedding due to its relatively low strength. With the increase of impact velocity, the cracks between the weak planes of bedding begin to extend, and the failure planes along the direction of bedding and notch occurred simultaneously.
- shale /
- bedding /
- notched semi-circular bend (NSCB) specimen /
- dynamic fracture toughness /
- digital image correlation method /
- split Hopkinson pressure bar

HTML全文

图 1 NSCB试件构型

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of NSCB

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 页岩NSCB试件加载角示意图

Figure 2. Loading angle of the shale NSCB specimens

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 实验所用页岩NSCB试件

Figure 3. Shale NSCB specimens

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 SHPB实验布置

Figure 4. Layout of the SHPB experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 力平衡的验证

Figure 5. Verification of the force balance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 加载率的确定

Figure 6. Determination of the loading rate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 典型加载波形时程曲线

Figure 7. Time history curve of a typical loading waveform

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 典型裂纹扩展计电压时程曲线

Figure 8. Voltage time history curve of a typical crack growth meter

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 加载率与动态起裂韧度关系曲线

Figure 9. Relationship between the loading rate and the dynamic fracture toughness

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 裂纹扩展位置示意图

Figure 10. Schematic diagram of the crack propagation position

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同加载率下C-0试件裂纹扩展速度变化

Figure 11. Crack propagation speed of the C-0 specimens under different loading rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 等冲击速度下不同加载角试件的裂纹扩展速度

Figure 12. Crack propagation speed of specimens with different loading angles under constant impact velocity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 典型页岩NSCB试件动态断裂过程

Figure 13. Dynamic fracture process of a typical shale NSCB specimen

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 DIC数据处理过程中的裂尖坐标轴及目标子区域

Figure 14. Crack tip coordinate axises and target subregion during DIC data processing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 C-0试件典型位移场和应变场变化规律

Figure 15. Typical displacement field and strain field of the C-0 specimens

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 60°试件典型位移场和应变场变化规律

Figure 16. Typical displacement field and strain field of the specimens with loading angle of 60°

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 不同冲击速度下页岩试样的典型破坏形态

Figure 17. Typical failure modes of shale NSCB specimens under different impact speeds

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 试件沿层理面断裂

Figure 18. Specimen fractures along the bedding plane

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 断裂过程

Figure 19. Fracture process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 页岩基本力学性质

Table 1. Mechanical properties of shale

层理方向	单轴抗压强度/MPa	密度/（g·cm⁻³）	弹性模量/GPa	泊松比	纵波波速/（m·s⁻¹）
平行层理	97.34	2.43	17.62	0.29	4 217
垂直层理	108.21	2.46	26.34	0.32	4 592

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 页岩动态起裂韧度

Table 2. Dynamic initiation toughness of shale

加载角度	冲击速度/（m·s⁻¹）	起裂时刻/μs	加载力峰值对应时刻/μs	加载率/（GPa·m^1/2·s⁻¹）	动态起裂韧度/（MPa·m^1/2）	裂纹扩展速度/（m·s⁻¹）
C-0	3	551.3	493.8	89.335	3.83	278.49
	4	538.1	527.9	179.391	5.85	296.43
	5	551.5	525.3	348.482	8.28	382.26
0°	3	554.7	524.6	108.322	2.45	335.30
	4	571.8	538.3	309.285	7.14	383.71
	5	524.9	518.4	474.167	9.23	445.16
30°	3	570.3	547.2	119.442	4.23	312.21
	4	519.2	489.6	235.974	6.28	392.52
	5	563.4	523.4	392.154	8.04	415.17
60°	3	554.9	535.2	122.36	4.02	264.50
	4	577.4	521.7	269.242	7.03	350.02
	5	576.1	549.3	430.563	9.07	382.35
90°	3	578.8	554.3	160.947	5.13	225.66
	4	533.2	507.6	323.626	8.62	331.74
	5	569.4	513.8	463.592	10.44	367.53

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 页岩NSCB试样的典型破坏路径

Table 3. Typical failure pathes of shale NSCB samples

冲击速度/（m·s⁻¹）	加载角度
冲击速度/（m·s⁻¹）	C-0	0°	30°	60°	90°
3
4
5

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

[1]	张金川, 徐波, 聂海宽, 等. 中国页岩气资源勘探潜力 [J]. 天然气工业, 2008(6): 136–140. DOI: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.06.040. ZHANG J C, XU B, NIE H K, et al. Exploration potential of shale gas resources in China [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008(6): 136–140. DOI: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.06.040.
[2]	陈军斌. 页岩气储层液体火药高能气体压裂增产关键技术研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社地质分社, 2017.
[3]	YANG G L, BI J J, MA L N. Dynamic compression damage energy consumption and fractal characteristics of shale [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2019(3): 1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5792841.
[4]	李德建, 祁浩, 李春晓, 等. 含层理面煤试样的巴西圆盘劈裂实验及数值模拟研究 [J]. 矿业科学学报, 2020, 5(2): 150–159. DOI: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2020.02.003. LI D J, QI H, LI C X, et al. Brazilian disc splitting tests and numerical simulations on coal samples containing bedding planes [J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020, 5(2): 150–159. DOI: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2020.02.003.
[5]	邓华锋, 王伟, 李建林, 等. 层状砂岩各向异性力学特性试验研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 37(1): 112–120. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1205. DENG H F, WANG W, LI J L, et al. Experimental study on anisotropic characteristics of bedded sandstone [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 37(1): 112–120. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1205.
[6]	王聪聪, 李江腾, 林杭, 等. 板岩单轴压缩各向异性力学特征 [J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(11): 3759–3764. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2016.11.020. WANG C C, LI J T, LI K, et al. Anisotropic mechanical characteristics of slat in uniaxial compression [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2019, 47(11): 3759–3764. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2016.11.020.
[7]	衡帅, 杨春和, 张保平, 等. 页岩各向异性特征的试验研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(3): 609–616. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.03.001. HENG S, YANG C H, ZHANG B P, et al. Experimental research on anisotropic properties of shale [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(3): 609–616. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.03.001.
[8]	HUANG D, LI B, MA W Z, et al. Effects of bedding planes on fracture behavior of sandstone under semi-circular bending test [J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 108: 102625. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102625.
[9]	何柏, 谢凌志, 李凤霞, 等. 龙马溪页岩各向异性变形破坏特征及其机理研究 [J]. 中国科学: 物理学力学天文学, 2017, 47(11): 114611. DOI: 10.1360/sspma2016-00534. HE B, XIE L Z, LI F X, et al. Anisotropic mechanism and characteristics of deformation and failure of Longmaxi shale [J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2017, 47(11): 114611. DOI: 10.1360/sspma2016-00534.
[10]	衡帅, 杨春和, 郭印同, 等. 层理对页岩水力裂缝扩展的影响研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(2): 228–237. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.02.002. HENG S, YANG C H, GUO Y T, et al. Influence of bedding planes on hydraulic fracture propagation in shale formations [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(2): 228–237. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.02.002.
[11]	李玉琳. 龙马溪组层状页岩宏细观破坏行为及模型研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2019: 49–73. LI Y L. Investigation on macroscopic and microscopic failure behavior and model study of layered Longmaxi shale [D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Tachnology (Beijing), 2019: 49–73.
[12]	ZHOU Y X, XIA K, LI X B, et al. Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture toughness of rock materials [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 49: 105–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.10.004.
[13]	赵文峰, 张盛, 王猛, 等. 用两种ISRM推荐圆盘试样测试岩石断裂韧度的试验研究 [J]. 实验力学, 2020, 35(4): 702–711. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-18-216. ZHAO W F, ZHANG S, WANG M, et al. Experimental study on testing rock fracture toughness with two types of disc specimens recommended by ISRM [J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2020, 35(4): 702–711. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-18-216.
[14]	宋耀. 不同加载率条件下花岗岩动态断裂及损伤机理试验研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2019: 87–95. SONG Y. Experimental study on dynamic fracture and damage mechanism of granite under different loading rates [D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Tachnology (Beijing), 2019: 87–95.
[15]	YANG G L, LI X G, BI J J, et al. Dynamic crack initiation toughness of shale under impact loading [J]. Energies, 2019, 12(9): 1636. DOI: 10.3390/en12091636.
[16]	SHI X S, YAO W, LIU D A, et al. Experimental study of the dynamic fracture toughness of anisotropic black shale using notched semi-circular bend specimens [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 205: 136–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.027.
[17]	赵子江, 刘大安, 崔振东, 等. 半圆盘三点弯曲法测定页岩断裂韧度(K _Ⅰ _C)的实验研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S1): 258–266. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0571. ZHAO Z J, LIU D A, CUI Z D, et al. Experimental study of determining fracture toughness K _Ⅰ _C of shale by semi-disc three-point bending [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S1): 258–266. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0571.
[18]	曹富, 杨丽萍, 李炼, 等. 压缩单裂纹圆孔板(SCDC)岩石动态断裂全过程研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(6): 1573–1582; 1588. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.005. CAO F, YANG L P, LI L, et al. Research on whole dynamic fracture process of rock using single cleavage drilled compression (SCDC) specimen [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(6): 1573–1582; 1588. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.005.
[19]	GAO G, HUANG S, XIA K, et al. Application of digital image correlation (DIC) in dynamic notched semi-circular bend (NSCB) tests [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2015, 55(1): 95–104. DOI: 10.1007/s11340-014-9863-5.
[20]	潘兵, 吴大方, 夏勇. 数字图像相关方法中散斑图的质量评价研究 [J]. 实验力学, 2010, 25(2): 120–129. PAN B, WU D F, XIA Y. Study of speckle pattern quality assessment used in digital image correlation [J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2010, 25(2): 120–129.
[21]	ZHANG Q B, ZHAO J. Quasi-static and dynamic fracture behaviour of rock materials: phenomena and mechanisms [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2014, 189: 1–32. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-014-9959-z.
[22]	周妍, 张财贵, 王启智. 用圆孔内单边裂纹平台巴西圆盘和实验-数值-解析法确定砂岩的动态起裂和扩展韧度 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(5): 37–47. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.05.007. ZHOU Y, ZHANG C G, WANG Q Z. Determination of dynamic initiation toughness and dynamic propagation toughness of sandstone [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(5): 37–47. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.05.007.
[23]	岳中文, 胡庆文, 陈彪. 爆生裂纹与层理缺陷相互作用的实验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(12): 99–104. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.12.017. YUE Z W, HU Q W, CHEN B. An experimental study of the interaction between the blast-indused crack and the bedding defect [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(12): 99–104. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.12.017.
[24]	王雁冰, 吴后为, 孔骥, 等. 含预制双层理的半圆盘模型冲击试验 [J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(11): 198–205. WANG Y B, WU H W, KONG J, et al. Impact test of half-disc model with prefabricated double bedding [J]. China Mining Magazine, 2020, 29(11): 198–205.
[25]	岳中文, 宋耀, 陈彪, 等. 冲击载荷下层状岩体动态断裂行为的模拟试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(12): 223–229. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.12.036. YUE Z W, SONG Y, CHEN B, et al. A study on the behaviors of dynamic fracture in layered rock under impact loading [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(12): 223–229. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.12.036.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(13)

1.	王梓宇，李胜林，李黎，凌天龙，梁书锋，孙旭. 隧道爆破地震作用下燃气管道动力响应规律研究. 爆破. 2024(03): 212-221+247 . 百度学术
2.	郭映聪. 基于小波分析基坑钻爆开挖地震效应预测研究. 市政技术. 2023(02): 126-132 . 百度学术
3.	李辉，王董东，杜文康，弓煜. 安家岭煤矿爆破振速预测与安全允许距离研究. 煤炭工程. 2023(10): 156-161 . 百度学术
4.	代树红，安志奎，王晓晨，韩荣军. 露天煤矿爆破振动速度计算公式研究. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 41-46 . 百度学术
5.	宋宏坤. 基于爆破振速衰减规律的爆破振动控制技术. 中外公路. 2022(02): 188-193 . 百度学术
6.	贾海鹏，刘殿书，方真刚，田帅康. 地铁隧道钻爆法施工中敏感区间及安全药量确定. 北京理工大学学报. 2021(01): 23-29 . 百度学术
7.	万嗣鹏，陶铁军，陈二平，刘永明，杨志强. 考虑岩体抗拉强度的爆破振动速度衰减多元非线性模型. 爆破器材. 2020(03): 53-58 . 百度学术
8.	王林峰，邓冰杰，莫诎，赵精富，肖弘光. 基于概率论的爆破振动安全评估与控制. 振动与冲击. 2020(14): 122-129 . 百度学术
9.	周文海，梁瑞，余建平，杜超飞，王敦繁，楼晓明. 边坡抛掷爆破峰值质点振动速度的无量纲分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(05): 76-83 . 本站查看
10.	袁旺小. 隧道掘进爆破地表振速的预测研究. 公路交通科技(应用技术版). 2019(05): 257-259 . 百度学术
11.	周文海，余建平，梁瑞，吕亚茹，王敦繁，陈宗杰. 基于逐步回归算法的边坡爆破振动控制研究. 长江科学院院报. 2019(07): 89-95 . 百度学术
12.	王奋，范勇，周宜红，赵春菊，严鹏. 隧洞爆破地震波作用下临近水电站的安全性评估. 爆破. 2017(02): 132-137 . 百度学术
13.	王玉乐，罗周全，谢承煜，随晓丹，曹祖华. 深孔爆破对隐患资源开采两帮的动力响应特性研究. 爆破. 2017(04): 33-39 . 百度学术