不同撞击速度下穿燃弹侵彻陶瓷/铝合金复合靶板时弹芯破碎失效特性研究

王晓东; 余毅磊; 蒋招绣; 马铭辉; 高光发

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0181

不同撞击速度下穿燃弹侵彻陶瓷/铝合金复合靶板时弹芯破碎失效特性研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0181

王晓东^1,,
余毅磊¹,
蒋招绣²,
马铭辉¹,
高光发^{1, 2, ,}

1.
南京理工大学机械工程学院，江苏南京 210094
2.
宁波大学冲击与安全工程教育部重点实验室，浙江宁波 315211

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(11772160，11472008，11802001)；江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划(KYCX20_0319)；爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室开放课题(KFJJ18-01M)

详细信息

作者简介:
王晓东（1993－　），男，博士研究生，18752006367@163.com

通讯作者:
高光发（1980－　），男，博士，教授，gfgao@ustc.edu.cn

中图分类号: O385；TJ012.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 538
- HTML全文浏览量: 301
- PDF下载量: 120
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-05-12
- 修回日期: 2021-09-30
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-24
- 刊出日期: 2022-02-28

Dynamic fragmentation and failure of the hard core of a 12.7 mm API projectile against SiC/6061T6Al composite armor with various impact velocities

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China
2.
MOE Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究12.7 mm穿燃弹以不同速度撞击陶瓷/铝合金复合靶板时弹芯的破碎及失效特性，开展了12.7 mm穿燃弹以434.5～844.6 m/s速度撞击SiC陶瓷/6061T6铝合金复合靶板的弹道试验，分析了弹靶的失效模式。弹芯在侵彻靶板后会产生不同尺寸的碎片，使用回收箱收集弹芯碎片并用不同孔径筛网对其进行筛分、称重，得到了不同撞击速度下弹芯碎片的质量分布，并对不同部位的弹芯碎片断口形貌进行了宏观和微观观测分析。研究结果表明：背板失效模式为碟形变形-剪切穿孔-花瓣形失效，试验后的弹芯碎片累积质量分布符合Rosin-Rammler幂率分布规律，且随着着靶速度的增大，小质量碎片质量增加；弹芯在冲击过程中等效直径较大碎片（大于8 mm）失效模式为拉伸脆性断裂，而等效直径小于2 mm的碎片上存在局部塑性剪切断裂。
- 侵彻 /
- 12.7 mm穿燃弹 /
- 破碎 /
- 质量分布 /
- 断裂模式
Abstract: The high hardness combined with its lower density makes silicon carbide (SiC) an attractive candidate for armor material. The main purpose of employing ceramics plate is to erode and fragment the impacting projectile, such as a 12.7 mm armor piercing incendiary (API) projectile with a very hard steel core. To explore the failure mechanism of the hard steel core, the ballistic impact experiments were carried out to study the dynamic responses of 12.7 mm API projectiles impacting ceramic/aluminium alloy composite armors. The SiC ceramics/6061T6 aluminium alloy composite targets with the composite cover on the front of the SiC were tested at speeds of 434.5, 503.1, 662.7, 704.6 and 844.6 m/s. The targets were entirely perforated by 12.7 mm API projectiles with the hard steel cores. The damages of projectiles, ceramic and back plates were analyzed phenomenologically. The damage modes of ceramic and steel backplates were identified. The resulting core fragments were collected and separated through a series of sized sieving screens, which allowing the core fragmentation to be quantified. The cumulative mass distribution curves of core after impact under various velocities were obtained. Microstructural and mechanical responses to the ballistic impacts were studied by using scanning electron microscope (SEM), showing that the core was broken into different particle sizes under the action of stress wave and impact. The cumulative mass of the steel core conforms to the Rosin–Rammler power function distribution. With the increase of impact velocity, both the power index k and the average characteristic size λ decreased. Average characteristic size λ can be used to characterize the fragmentation degree of the whole core to a certain extent. The failure mode of the larger equivalent diameter fragment (greater than 8 mm) in the process of impact was a tensile brittle fracture, while the local plastic shear fracture existed on the fragments with an equivalent diameter less than 2 mm.
- penetration /
- 12.7 mm armor piercing incendiary projectile /
- fragment /
- mass distribution /
- fracture mode

HTML全文

图 1 试验布置

Figure 1. Schematic of the arrangement for test

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 12.7 mm穿燃弹弹头结构

Figure 2. Structure of a 12.7 mm API projectile

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 弹芯材料准静态条件下的真实应力-应变曲线

Figure 3. Quasi-static true stress-strain curve of core material

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 靶板结构

Figure 4. Target structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 试验后靶板形貌

Figure 5. Back face images of tested targets

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同试验中后效板的失效

Figure 6. The failure of aftereffect targets in different tests

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 残余弹体出现的裂纹

Figure 7. A large fragment with a crack on the side

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 弹芯碎片质量

Figure 8. Core fragment mass

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 回收的弹体碎片

Figure 9. Recovered projectile core fragments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 残余弹体断裂面

Figure 10. Fracture surface of the residual projectile

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 弹体碎片断口

Figure 11. Fracture surface of projectile fragment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 残余弹体纵向裂纹

Figure 12. The longitudinal cross-section of the residual projectile

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 弹芯碎片中出现局部剪切韧窝

Figure 13. Local shear dimples appear in the core fragments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 不同着靶速度下碎片质量分布

Figure 14. Mass distribution of fragmentsunder different impact velocities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 不同速度时的幂指数与平均特征尺寸

Figure 15. The values of power index and average characteristic size under different impact velocities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(18)

[1]	SAVIO S G, SENTHIL P, SINGH V, et al. An experimental study on the projectile defeat mechanism of hard steel projectile against boron carbide tiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 86: 157–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.07.011.
[2]	DI BENEDETTO G, MATTEIS P, SCAVINO G. Impact behavior and ballistic efficiency of armor-piercing projectiles with tool steel cores [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 115: 10–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.12.021.
[3]	RAHBEK D B, JOHNSEN B B. Fragmentation of an armour piercing projectile after impact on composite covered alumina tiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 133: 103332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103332.
[4]	ASAHI KAWASHIMA, H K H K. Fracture toughness of Zr55Al10Ni5Cu30 bulk metallic glass by 3-point bend testing [J]. Materials Transactions, 2005(7): 1725–1732.
[5]	GRADY D E, KIPP M E. Impact failure and fragmentation properties of metals [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 20(1): 293–308. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(97)87502-1.
[6]	PIEKUTOWSKI A J. Effects of scale on debris cloud properties [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 20(6): 639–650.
[7]	GRADY D E. Dissipation in adiabatic shear bands [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1994, 17(2): 289–293.
[8]	MA G, ZHANG Y, ZHOU W, et al. The effect of different fracture mechanisms on impact fragmentation of brittle heterogeneous solid [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 113: 132–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.11.016.
[9]	WANG C T, HE Y, JI C, et al. Dynamic fragmentation of a Zr-based metallic glass under various impact velocities [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56(4): 2900–2911. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-05495-5.
[10]	SHAN J, XU S, LIU Y, et al. Dynamic breakage of glass sphere subjected to impact loading [J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 330: 317–329. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.009.
[11]	SARVA S, NEMAT-NASSER S, MCGEE J, et al. The effect of thin membrane restraint on the ballistic performance of armor grade ceramic tiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(2): 277–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.07.006.
[12]	CHI R, SERJOUEI A, SRIDHAR I, et al. Pre-stress effect on confined ceramic armor ballistic performance [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 84: 159–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.011.
[13]	LYNCH N J, BLESS S J, CULLIS I G, et al. The influence of confinement on the penetration of ceramic targets by KE projectiles at 1.8 and 2.6 km/s [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 33(1): 390–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.029.
[14]	LUNDBERG P, RENSTRÖM R, LUNDBERG B. Impact of metallic projectiles on ceramic targets: transition between interface defeat and penetration [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2000, 24(3): 259–275. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00152-9.
[15]	SAVIO S G, RAMANJANEYULU K, MADHU V, et al. An experimental study on ballistic performance of boron carbide tiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(7): 535–541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.01.006.
[16]	GRADY D E. Fragmentation of rings and shells[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 2−9.
[17]	GRADY D E. Fragment size distributions from the dynamic fragmentation of brittle solids [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(12): 1557–1562. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.042.
[18]	张青艳. 脆性材料在准静态和冲击压缩载荷作用下的动态碎裂过程[D]. 宁波: 宁波大学, 2019: 26−46. ZHANG Q Y. Fragmentations of brittle materials under quasi-static and dynamic compression[D]. Ningbo: Ningbo University, 2019: 26−46.