On quenching characteristics of combustible premixed gas through a crimped-ribbon flame arrester at different initial pressures
-
摘要: 阻火器是一种应用广泛的爆炸阻隔装置。为了深入理解影响阻火器性能的因素，通过实验方法探究了不同初始压力下可爆预混气体通过波纹板阻火器的淬熄特性。结果表明，可燃气的活性、体积分数和初始压力均会影响火焰速度稳定性、传播模式以及淬熄难度。实验发现火焰传播具有3种模式：直接淬熄、穿过阻火单元后逐渐淬熄、淬熄失败。可淬熄的最大初始压力plim用以表征火焰淬熄难度，虽然其最小值位于化学计量比，但仍在一定体积分数范围内保持恒定。此外，基于传热作用得到密闭管道中丙烷-空气预混气爆燃阻火速度公式，并进行了实验验证。Abstract: The crimped flame arrester is a common disaster prevention and control device. Most of the research focuses on the higher-pressure working conditions instead of the pressure lower than 0.1 MPa when it applies in special areas or environments. This paper explores the quenching characteristics of different combustible gas-air mixtures passing through crimped ribbon flame arresters at different initial pressures to replenish the low-pressure protection test and understand the factors affecting the performance of the flame arrester deeply. The experiments were carried out in the DN80 circular pipe. And the crimped ribbon plate slit channel with a cross-section of an approximately equilateral triangle is 38 mm long and 0.8 mm high. The experimental gases are premixed propane-air with a volume fraction of 4.2% and premixed ethylene-air with different concentrations obtained according to the partial pressure method. The ignition voltage is 10 kV. It is found that the activity, concentration, and initial pressure of combustible gas will affect the stability of flame velocity, propagation mode, and quenching difficulty. The results show that there are three modes of flame propagation: direct quenching, quenching after passing through the flame retardant unit, and quenching failure. They can be explained as the flame not passing through the slits, the flame passing through the slits but being extinguished before reaching the pipe end, and the flame keeps spreading until the pipe end. Also, the velocity oscillation occurs on the unprotected side of the pipeline, and the velocity rises incredibly when the quenching failed flame passes through the protected side. The formula of deflagration flame quenching velocity of premixed propane-air in a closed pipe was established based on the heat transfer effect and verified by the quenching experiment of premixed gas with a volume fraction of 4.2%. The maximum initial pressure is defined as the limit pressure that quenching would fail at initial pressure higher than it. It is proposed to use the limit pressure to characterize the degree of quenching difficulty. It is worth remarking that quenching is the most difficult at stoichiometric concentration, where the limit pressure is the smallest, and the limit pressure will remain constant within a certain concentration range.
-
Key words:
- crimped-ribbon flame arrester /
- premixed flame /
- quenching /
- initial pressure /
- flame speed
-
图 2 不同初始压力下的乙烯-空气预混气体火焰传播速度曲线（贫燃料）
Figure 2. Flame propagation velocity of premixed C2H4-air under different initial pressures (lean fuel)
图 3 不同初始压力下的乙烯-空气预混气体火焰传播速度曲线（富燃料）
Figure 3. Flame propagation velocity of premixed C2H4-air under different initial pressures (rich fuel)
图 4 未受保护侧体积分数5.0%的乙烯-空气预混气体火焰速度振荡分析
Figure 4. Flame velocity oscillation analysis of 5.0% C2H4-air premixed gas on the unprotected side
图 5 未受保护侧不同体积分数乙烯-空气预混气体火焰速度振荡分析
Figure 5. Flame velocity oscillation analysis of C2H4-air premixed gas with different volume fractions on the unprotected side
图 6
φ = 4.2%时不同初始压力下丙烷-空气预混气体的火焰传播速度曲线Figure 6. Flame velocity of C3H8-air premixed gas under different initial pressures (
φ = 4.2%)
图 7 不同初始压力下可燃气-空气预混气体的阻火结果
Figure 7. Quenching results of premixed combustible gas-air under different initial pressures
图 8 不同体积分数（当量比）乙烯-空气预混气体的极限压力
Figure 8. Limit pressure of premixed C2H4-air with different volume fractions (equivalence ratios)
图 9 临界压力下未受保护侧可燃气-空气预混气体火焰速度分析
Figure 9. Flame velocity analysis of premixed combustible gas-air under critical pressure on the unprotected side
表 1 可燃气-空气预混气体
Table 1. Combustible gas-air premixed gas
预混气体 φ/% ϕ 丙烷-空气（C3H8-air） 4.2 1.03 乙烯-空气（C2H4-air） 5.0 0.76 5.5 0.83 6.5 1.00 7.5 1.16 8.5 1.33 9.5 1.50 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] PAYMAN W, WHEELER R V. Propagation of flames through tubes of small diameter [J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, Transactions, 1918, 113(2): 36–45. DOI: 10.1039/CT9181300656. [2] CUBBAGE P A. Flame traps for use with town gas/air mixtures [M]. London, UK: Gas Gouncil, 1959: 30–47. [3] PALMER K N, TONKIN P S. The quenching of flames by crimped ribbon flame arresters: fire research notes 438 [R]. International Association for Fire Safety Science, 1960. [4] LANGFORD B, PALMER K N, TONKIN P S. The performance of flame arresters against flames propagating in various fuel/air mixtures: fire research notes 486 [R]. International Association for Fire Safety Science, 1961. [5] BERLAD A L. Flame quenching by a variable-width rectangular-channel burner as a function of pressure for various propane-oxygen-nitrogen mixtures [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1954, 58(11): 1023–1026. DOI: 10.1021/j150521a021. [6] KERSTEN C, FÖRSTER H. Investigation of deflagrations and detonations in pipes and flame arresters by high-speed framing [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2004, 17(1): 43–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2003.09.004. [7] HENKEL S, ZAKEL S, STOLPE F. Determination of the performance limits of flame arresters at increased oxygen concentrations [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2019, 58: 17–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.01.003. [8] 周凯元, 李宗芬, 周自金. 波纹板阻火器对爆燃火焰淬熄作用的实验研究 [J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 1997, 27(4): 449–454.ZHOU K Y, LI Z F, ZHOU Z J. The quenching of deflagration by crimped ribbon flame arresters [J]. Journal of China University of Science and Technology, 1997, 27(4): 449–454. [9] 周凯元. 气体爆燃火焰在狭缝中的淬熄 [J]. 火灾科学, 1999, 8(1): 22–33.ZHOU K Y. The quenching of gaseous deflagration in narrow channels [J]. Fire Safety Science, 1999, 8(1): 22–33. [10] 陈鹏. 管内气体爆炸数值模拟与惰性气体的淬熄研究 [D]. 辽宁大连: 大连理工大学, 2007. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1093162.CHEN P. Numerical simulation of premixed combustiable gas explosion in duct and study on quenching effects of inert gas [D]. Dalian, Liaoning, China: Dalian University of Technology, 2007. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1093162. [11] 张省漪. 多孔结构对管道内火焰速度和压力的影响 [D]. 辽宁大连: 大连理工大学, 2011.ZHANG S Y. The effect of porous structure on flame velocity and pressure in pipes [D]. Dalian, Liaoning, China: Dalian University of Technology, 2011. [12] 孙少辰, 毕明树, 刘刚, 等. 爆轰火焰在管道阻火器内的传播与淬熄特性 [J]. 化工学报, 2016, 5(5): 2176–2184. DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151383.SUN S C, BI M S, LIU G, et al. Detonation flame propagation and quenching characteristics in crimped-ribbon flame arrester [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2016, 5(5): 2176–2184. DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151383. [13] 孙少辰. 波纹管道阻火器系统的阻爆特性研究 [D]. 辽宁大连: 大连理工大学, 2018.SUN S C. Research of explosion resistant characteristic in in-line crimped-ribbon flame arrester [D]. Dalian, Liaoning, China: Dalian University of Technology, 2018. [14] 王鲁庆, 马宏昊, 沈兆武, 等. 波纹板阻爆燃型阻火器对丙烷-空气预混火焰的淬熄研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(4): 766–772. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0766-07.WANG L Q, MA H H, SHEN Z W, et al. Quenching of crimped ribbon deflagration arrestor by propane-air premixed flame [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 766–772. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0766-07. [15] BERLAD A L, POTTER A E JR. Prediction of the quenching effect of various surface geometries [J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1955, 5(1): 728–735. DOI: 10.1016/S0082-0784(55)80100-2. [16] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 石油气体管道阻火器: GB/T 13347—2010 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Flame arresters for petroleum gas pipeline systems: GB/T 13347—2010 [S]. Beijing, China: Standards Press of China, 2011. 期刊类型引用(28)
1. 朱剑雷，韩磊，方展翔，徐豫新. 活性材料与炸药环状复合内爆的准静态压力计算方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2025(04): 60-69 . 
本站查看2. 万文超，张兆龙，吕宁，蔡斯渊，洪旸. 冲击波和破片联合作用下舱段毁伤效应分析. 舰船科学技术. 2024(03): 19-27 . 
百度学术3. 张学瑞，周涛. 密闭空间中复合装药的能量释放特性. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(06): 41-49 . 本站查看4. 陈青华，陶彦光，梁振刚，杨佳岐. 双舱室模型内爆炸临舱压力载荷特性分析. 舰船科学技术. 2024(11): 75-79 . 百度学术5. 李营，杜志鹏，陈赶超，王诗平，侯海量，李晓彬，张攀，张伦平，孔祥韶，李海涛，郭君，姚术健，王志凯，殷彩玉. 舰艇爆炸毁伤与防护若干关键问题研究进展. 中国舰船研究. 2024(03): 3-60 . 百度学术6. 习修义，李俊，张娅，王志平，陈威，李营，李晓彬. 水雾环境下密闭舱室内爆准静态压力特性试验研究. 中国舰船研究. 2024(03): 174-181 . 百度学术7. 蒋欣利，张国凯，何勇，姚箭，王振，吴玉欣，刘举，王明洋. 密闭建筑温压炸药内爆炸后燃效应. 兵工学报. 2024(08): 2520-2530 . 百度学术8. 岳学森，周沪，孔祥韶，郑成，吴卫国. 舱室内爆载荷燃烧增强效应试验及仿真研究. 中国舰船研究. 2023(04): 223-232 . 百度学术9. 解江，潘汉源，李漩，王立轩，蒋逸伦，冯振宇. 内爆载荷作用下泄压容器准静态压力特性. 应用数学和力学. 2023(10): 1236-1249 . 百度学术10. 袁增森，徐振洋，潘博，李广尚. 不同不耦合系数下花岗岩爆破损伤特性的离散元模拟. 高压物理学报. 2022(01): 202-212 . 百度学术11. 刘正，聂建新，徐星，朱英中，刘攀，郭学永，闫石，张韬. 密闭空间内六硝基六氮杂异伍兹烷基复合炸药能量释放特性. 兵工学报. 2022(03): 503-512 . 百度学术12. 李怿，李典，侯海量，李永清. 基于密闭空间内爆的核爆冲击波载荷模拟试验和数值计算方法. 振动与冲击. 2022(17): 138-144 . 百度学术13. 黄魁，梁仕发，王励自，王启睿. 泄爆口对防护舱内TNT爆炸荷载的影响. 防护工程. 2021(01): 16-21 . 百度学术14. 焦立启，张权，李茂，张磊，张春辉. 典型舱内爆炸载荷对加筋板的毁伤特性. 中国舰船研究. 2021(02): 108-115+124 . 百度学术15. 孔祥韶，王子棠，况正，周沪，郑成，吴卫国. 密闭空间内爆炸载荷抑制效应实验研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(06): 24-37 . 本站查看16. 张鹏宙，董奇，杨沙. 爆炸载荷特征参数对无限长圆柱壳弹性动态响应的影响. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(06): 48-57 . 本站查看17. 赵英博，张子寒，赵跃堂. 弹药库内爆炸冲击波荷载研究. 防护工程. 2021(03): 46-54 . 百度学术18. 郑昆，侯卫国，马军，林文表，傅钊. 基于环境试验设备的锂离子电池燃爆特性分析. 环境技术. 2021(03): 186-188+197 . 百度学术19. 张磊，杜志鹏，高鹏，李营. 水面舰艇舱内爆炸毁伤载荷研究进展. 中国科学:物理学 力学 天文学. 2021(12): 54-64 . 百度学术20. 孙琦，董奇，杨沙，张刘成. 内爆炸准静态压力对球形容器弹塑性动态响应的影响. 含能材料. 2020(01): 25-31 . 百度学术21. 孔祥韶，况正，郑成，吴卫国. 舱室密闭空间中爆炸载荷燃烧增强效应试验研究. 兵工学报. 2020(01): 75-85 . 百度学术22. 张龙，邹虹，张宝国，张继军，张东亮，孔德骞. 有限空间爆炸静态压力的温度补偿方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2020(03): 100-109 . 本站查看23. 蔡林刚，李晓彬，杜志鹏，张磊，李营. 密闭空间中内爆载荷冲量饱和现象研究. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版). 2020(01): 85-90 . 百度学术24. 张玉磊，陈华，韩璐，李尚青，袁建飞，苏健军. 泄压口面积对温压炸药内爆炸准静态压力的影响. 火炸药学报. 2020(05): 521-525 . 百度学术25. 李彦超，徐鹏，蔡宣明，李海涛，秦国华. 爆炸载荷作用下含预制损伤膜片力学响应特性. 兵器装备工程学报. 2020(12): 149-154+176 . 百度学术26. 张广华，屈可朋，沈飞，王辉. 组合装药的撞击安全性与内爆威力试验研究. 高压物理学报. 2019(04): 175-181 . 百度学术27. 孙琦，董奇，杨沙，张刘成. 内爆炸准静态压力对球形容器弹性动态响应的影响. 含能材料. 2019(08): 698-707 . 百度学术28. 徐维铮，吴卫国. 密闭空间内爆炸准静态压力理论计算研究. 中国舰船研究. 2019(05): 124-130 . 百度学术其他类型引用(18)
-
百度学术
计量
- 文章访问数: 426
- HTML全文浏览量: 122
- PDF下载量: 62
- 被引次数: 46