基于PVDF复合压电效应的低强度冲击波柔性测量

范志强; 常瀚林; 何天明; 郑航; 胡敬坤; 谭晓丽

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0152

基于PVDF复合压电效应的低强度冲击波柔性测量

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0152

1.
中北大学理学院，山西太原 030051
2.
西北工业大学航空学院，陕西西安 710072
3.
中国科学院材料力学行为和设计重点实验室，安徽合肥 230027

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(12072326)；中国博士后科学基金(2021T140562)；中北大学青年学术带头人支持计划(QX202003)

详细信息

作者简介:
范志强（1989－　），男，博士，副教授，fanzhq@nuc.edu.cn

中图分类号: O383
计量
- 文章访问数: 459
- HTML全文浏览量: 114
- PDF下载量: 83
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-04-11
- 修回日期: 2022-07-01
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-09
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-05

Flexible measurement of low-intensity shock wave based on coupling piezoelectric effect of PVDF

1.
School of Science, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China
2.
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Poly technical University, Xi’an 710072, Shaanxi, China
3.
CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China

摘要

摘要: 为探索低强度冲击波的柔性测量技术，对PVDF（polyvinylidene fluoride）压力传感器开展冲击波加载和灵敏度标定实验，评估其低强度冲击波压力测量的可靠性。基于微结构设计改进薄膜传感器，获得适用于低强度冲击波压力测量的高灵敏柔性传感器，结果表明：单一压电工作模式的薄膜传感器测量低强度冲击波时有效输出电荷量和信噪比较低，测量结果容易受压电膜力电响应非线性、结构表面变形振动以及封装因素的影响，灵敏度系数不稳定、个体差异性大。采用周向固支的微结构设计能够将作用于薄膜传感器表面幅值较低的冲击波转换为幅值较高的面内拉应力，产生的复合压电效应可大幅提高传感器名义灵敏度系数、降低个体差异性。研制的柔性传感器在0.2～0.7 MPa压力范围内名义灵敏度约900～1350 pC/N，相对测量误差不大于±13%。
- 冲击波 /
- 柔性测量 /
- 聚偏氟乙烯 /
- 复合压电效应 /
- 灵敏度系数
Abstract: To explore the flexible measurement technology of low-intensity shock wave, the sensitivity calibration experiment was performed on PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) filmed pressure gauges by using a shock tube. The measurement reliability of flexible PVDF pressure gauge for low intensity shock wave was evaluated. To improve the measurement stability and sensitivity, the filmed pressure gauge was modified based on the microstructure design and obtained a flexible gauge with high force-electric sensitivity, which was more suitable for low-intensity shock wave measurement. It was found that the effective output charge caused by the out-of-plane shock wave and the signal-noise ratio were too low when the pressure gauge was in an individual piezoelectric mode that was mostly used in high intensity pressure measurement. The measurement results were significantly influenced by the nonlinear force-electric response of the piezoelectric membrane, the deformation and vibration of the structural surface, and the packaging factors inside the gauge. The effects of these factors led to unstable piezoelectric sensitivity and large discrepancy among different gauges when the gauges were used under low intensity pressure. By using the micro-structure design with circumferential fixed constraint on the filmed gauge, the low-intensity out-of-plane shock can be transformed into a high-amplitude in-plane tensile stress field in the PVDF filmed gauge, causing a coupling piezoelectric working mode. The coupling piezoelectric effect produced by the micro-structure can greatly improve the nominal sensitivity coefficient of the gauge and reduce the individual difference. The nominal sensitivity of the developed flexible gauge is about 900−1350 pC/N within the 0.2−0.7 MPa pressure range, which is about 40 times higher than that in the individual piezoelectric working mode. In addition, the relative measurement error can be controlled within ±13% under the coupling piezoelectric mode. The proposed flexible measurement method of low-intensity shock wave can provide effective design technique for the development of high-sensitive flexible devices which are suitable for shock wave monitoring of personnel equipment.
- shock wave /
- flexible measurement /
- polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) /
- coupling piezoelectric effect /
- sensitivity coefficient

HTML全文

图 1 PVDF薄膜压力传感器

Figure 1. PVDF filmed pressure gauges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 冲击波测量实验装置

Figure 2. Experimental setup of shock wave measurement

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 JYC15传感器冲击波测量结果与力电响应

Figure 3. Shock wave measurement results and pressure-electric response of JYC15 gauges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 PVF 2-11传感器冲击波测量结果

Figure 4. Shock wave measurement results of PVF2-11 gauges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 CPT传感器冲击波测量结果与力电响应

Figure 5. Shock wave measurement results and pressure-electric response of CPT gauges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 复合压电效应及DSP传感器

Figure 6. Coupling piezoelectric effect and DSP pressure gauge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 DSP压力计有限元模型与von Mises应力云图

Figure 7. Finite element model and the von Mises stress map of DSP gauge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 DSP传感器在面外冲击波作用下的力学响应

Figure 8. Mechanical response of DSP pressure gauge subjected to out-of-plane shock

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 DSP面内冲击拉伸实验装置和典型测量结果

Figure 9. Experimental setting of in-plane dynamic stretching for DSP and the typical testing result

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 DSP传感器面内拉伸灵敏度系数标定

Figure 10. Calibration of sensitivity coefficients of DSP under in-plane stretching deformation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 DSP传感器冲击波测量结果

Figure 11. Shock wave measuring results of DSP gauges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 柔性靶体上的冲击波测量

Figure 12. Shock wave measurement of DSP on flexible target

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(14)

[1]	COURTNEY A C, COURTNEY M W. A thoracic mechanism of mild traumatic brain injury due to blast pressure waves [J]. Medical Hypotheses, 2009, 72(1): 76–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.08.015.
[2]	ROSENFELD J V, MCFARLANE A C, BRAGGE P, et al. Blast-related traumatic brain injury [J]. The Lancet Neurology, 2013, 12(9): 882–893. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70161-3.
[3]	TANIELIAN T, JAYCOX L H, SCHELL T L, et al. Invisible wounds of war [R]. Santa Monica: RAND, 2008.
[4]	LIU Y B, LU Y T, SHAO Y, et al. Mechanism of the traumatic brain injury induced by blast wave using the energy assessment method [J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2022, 101: 103767. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103767.
[5]	栗志杰, 由小川, 柳占立, 等. 爆炸冲击波作用下颅脑损伤机理的数值模拟研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 015901. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0348. LI Z J, YOU X C, LIU Z L, et al. Numerical simulation of the mechanism of traumatic brain injury induced by blast shock waves [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 015901. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0348.
[6]	ARAVIND A, KOSTY J, CHANDRA N, et al. Blast exposure predisposes the brain to increased neurological deficits in a model of blast plus blunt traumatic brain injury [J]. Experimental Neurology, 2020, 332: 113378. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113378.
[7]	YU X C, AZOR A, SHARP D J, et al. Mechanisms of tensile failure of cerebrospinal fluid in blast traumatic brain injury [J]. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 2020, 38: 100739. DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2020.100739.
[8]	MA Y J, ZHANGY C, CAI S S, et al. Flexible hybrid electronics for digital healthcare [J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(15): 1902062. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201902062.
[9]	GUO R, ZHANG H L, CAO S L, et al. A self-powered stretchable sensor fabricated by serpentine PVDF film for multiple dynamic monitoring [J]. Materials & Design, 2019, 182: 108025. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108025.
[10]	WANG G, LIU T, SUN X C, et al. Flexible pressure sensor based on PVDF nanofiber [J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2018, 280: 319–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.07.057.
[11]	柴栋梁, 王文廉. 柔性传感冲击波瞬态压力测试方法 [J]. 中国测试, 2018, 44(12): 91–95. DOI: 10.11857/j.issn.1674-5124.2018.12.016. CHAI D L, WANG W L. Test method of transient pressure of flexible sensing shock wave [J]. China Measurement & Testing, 2018, 44(12): 91–95. DOI: 10.11857/j.issn.1674-5124.2018.12.016.
[12]	WANG Y C, HUANG C H, LEE Y C, et al. Development of a PVDF sensor array for measurement of the impulsive pressure generated by cavitation bubble collapse [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 41(3): 365–373. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-006-0135-8.
[13]	范志强, 马宏昊, 沈兆武, 等. PVDF压力计在结构表面爆炸压力测量中的应用技术研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(S2): 27–32. FAN Z Q, MA H H, SHEN Z W, et al. Investigation on application of PVDF gauges in blast pressure measurement on structure surfaces [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(S2): 27–32.
[14]	吴建梁. 受预张力薄膜的轴对称大挠度问题 [D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2009. WU J L. Axial symmetrical large deflection of pre-stretched membranes [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2009.