基于聚能射流的岩石定向劈裂机制

刘迪; 顾云; 孙飞; 李飞; 陈顺禄; 刘勤杰

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0496

基于聚能射流的岩石定向劈裂机制

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0496

刘迪^1,,
顾云¹,
孙飞^1, ,,
李飞¹,
陈顺禄²,
刘勤杰¹

1.
核工业南京建设集团有限公司，江苏南京 211102
2.
南京君缘科爆工程技术有限公司，江苏南京 211135

基金项目: 江苏省地质矿产勘查局科技创新项目（2020KY07）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘　迪（1988－　），男，硕士研究生，工程师，laudi0321@outlook.com

通讯作者:
孙　飞（1989－　），男，硕士研究生，工程师，1326662880@qq.com

中图分类号: O389; TJ51
计量
- 文章访问数: 402
- HTML全文浏览量: 103
- PDF下载量: 152
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-11-07
- 修回日期: 2023-03-11
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-13
- 刊出日期: 2023-08-31

Directional splitting mechanism of rock based on shaped charge jet

LIU Di^1
,,
GU Yun¹,
SUN Fei^{1
, ,},
LI Fei¹,
CHEN Shunlu²,
LIU Qinjie¹

1.
Nuclear Industry Nanjing Construction Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211102, Jiangsu, China
2.
Junyuan Kebao Nanjing Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211135, Jiangsu, China

摘要

摘要: 基于岩石材料脆性断裂模型分析，从提高炸药能量向岩石断裂表面能转换效率的角度，提出采用预切槽和多点聚能射流冲击岩石进行裂纹引导与扩展，实现岩石定向劈裂。设计了一种可用于岩石劈裂的聚能装药，利用数值计算方法研究了岩石类脆性材料在聚能射流冲击作用下的定向劈裂机制，并计算比较了不同形状金属杆射流对岩体的冲击劈裂效果。分析计算该聚能装药射流形成与岩石的侵彻断裂过程，得出用于岩石劈裂的最佳聚能装药结构与炸高。实验成功用2枚聚能装药将岩石试块按预制方向劈裂，测试获得的岩石表面应力峰值约0.5~0.8 MPa。结果表明，采用该聚能装药在25 mm炸高下能够形成长径比约1∶3的楔形金属杆射流，沿着控界面预先设计的切槽方向，多点设置聚能装药，同时起爆后形成楔形金属杆射流冲击岩石，产生了较好的定向劈裂效果。该方法将爆炸能量精准导入控界面并有效地转换成岩石断裂表面能，从而提升了岩石定向劈裂的效果及炸药的能量利用率，研究结果可为大范围岩体开挖精确控界爆破切割装置设计及降低工程爆破危害提供参考。
- 聚能装药 /
- 岩石断裂表面能 /
- 定向劈裂 /
- 控界爆破
Abstract: Based on the brittle fracture model of rock materials, from the perspective of improving the conversion efficiency of explosive energy to the fracture surface energy of rock materials, it is proposed to use pre-cutting and multi-point shaped charge jet impact on rocks for crack fracturing and propagation, achieving directional rock splitting. A shaped charge that can be used for rock splitting was designed, while the directional splitting mechanism of rock-like brittle materials under the impact of shaped charge jet is studied using numerical method, by which the impact splitting effects of different shapes of high-speed metal rods on rocks are calculated and compared. The formation of the shaped charge jet and the impact fracture process on the rock are analyzed by using numerical simulation, and the optimal shaped charge structure and explosion height for splitting are obtained. In the experiment, 2 shaped charges were used to successfully split the rock samples followed the design direction, and the peak stress on the rock surface obtained from the test were about 0.5−0.8 MPa. The results show that using this shaped charge can form a wedge-shaped metal rod with a length-to-diameter ratio of about 1∶3 at an explosion offset of 25 mm. The shaped charges are set at multiple points along the pre-cutting direction of the designed rock control interface, and at the same time, the wedge-shaped metal rod jets are formed after explosion, which impact the rock and produce a good directional splitting effect. This technology accurately introduces explosive energy into the control interface and converts it into rock fracture surface energy effectively, thereby improving the effective utilization rate of explosives, providing reference for the design of precise control blasting cutting devices for large-scale rock excavation and reducing blasting hazards.
- shaped charge /
- rock fracture surface energy /
- directional splitting /
- boundary control blasting

HTML全文

图 1 岩石聚能控界切割示意图

Figure 1. Directional split blasting

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 杆状聚能装药

Figure 2. Rod shaped charge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 集中力断裂模型

Figure 3. Concentrated force fracture model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 侵彻初始计算模型

Figure 4. Initial calculation model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 岩石中爆炸应力云图

Figure 5. Explosion stress contours in rocks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 岩石中爆炸损伤云图

Figure 6. Explosion damage contours in rocks

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 岩石损伤云图

Figure 7. Rock damage contours

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 聚能装药初始模型

Figure 8. Model of initial shaped charge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同炸高下形成的射流形态

Figure 9. Jet patterns under different burst heights

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 25 mm炸高下形成的楔形射流

Figure 10. The wedge jet formation at 25 mm height

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 楔形射流速度分布

Figure 11. Velocity distribution of wedge jet

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 射流整体速度时程曲线

Figure 12. Time-history curve of jet overall velocity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 不同炸高下射流侵彻损伤云图

Figure 13. Jet penetration damage contourunder different conditions of burst height

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 试验设置

Figure 14. Experimental set up

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 岩石断裂效果

Figure 15. Effects of rock fracturing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 岩石侧面应力曲线

Figure 16. Curves of rock side stress

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 金属楔形杆的尺寸

Table 1. Dimensions of metal wedges

楔形杆长度/mm 头部直径/mm 尾部直径/mm

A 29.0 2 8.0
B 20.8 2 9.8
C 16.4 2 11.2

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 高压冲击状态方程参数

Table 2. Shock EOS parameters

材料 c₀/$({\text{m} } \cdot { {\text{s} }^{ {{ - 1} } } })$ S Γ

岩石 3340 1.500 2.0
紫铜 3958 1.497 2.0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	王飞. CAP1400核岛负挖保护层爆破施工技术探讨 [J]. 煤炭技术, 2015, 34(11): 323–325. DOI: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2015.11.125. WANG F. Discussion on blasting construction technology of protection layer excavation in cap1400 nuclear island [J]. Coal Technology, 2015, 34(11): 323–325. DOI: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2015.11.125.
[2]	蒋跃飞, 张正忠, 王璞, 等. 国内石材开采方法综述 [J]. 露天采矿技术, 2014(1): 10–14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9816.2014.01.004. JIANG Y F, ZHANG Z Z, WANG P, et al. Summary of domestic stone mining method [J]. Opencast Mining Technology, 2014(1): 10–14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9816.2014.01.004.
[3]	姜楠, 徐全军, 龙源, 等. 大孔径静态破碎膨胀压力特性及布孔参数分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(4): 467–472. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0467-06. JIANG N, XU Q J, LONG Y, et al. Expansive pressure characteristic and borehole parameter analysis on large scale borehole soundless cracking [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 467–472. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0467-06.
[4]	陈礼干, 廖原时. 圆盘锯与串珠锯组合开采石材方法 [J]. 石材, 2009(8): 18–24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3352.2009.08.007. CHEN L G, LIAO Y S. Mining stones by circle saw combined with wire saw [J]. Stone, 2009(8): 18–24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3352.2009.08.007.
[5]	戴俊. 岩石动力学特性与爆破理论[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2002: 304–319. DAI J. Dynamic behaviors and blasting theory of rock [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2002: 304–319.
[6]	张志呈. 定向断裂控制爆破[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 2000: 109–138. ZHANG Z C. Directional fracture control of blasting [M]. Chongqing: Chongqing Press, 2000: 109–138.
[7]	郭德勇, 赵杰超, 张超, 等. 煤层深孔聚能爆破控制孔作用机制研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(4): 919–930. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1038. GUO D Y, ZHAO J C, ZHANG C, et al. Mechanism of control hole on coal crack initiation and propagation under deep-hole cumulative blasting in coal seam [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(4): 919–930. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1038.
[8]	肖正学, 张志呈, 郭学彬. 断裂控制爆破裂纹发展规律的研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(4): 546–549. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2002.04.019. XIAO Z X, ZHANG Z C, GUO X B. Research on crack developing law of rock fracture controlled blasting [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(4): 546–549. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2002.04.019.
[9]	申涛, 罗宁, 向俊庠, 等. 切缝药包爆炸作用机理数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(5): 1172–1180. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0410. SHEN T, LUO N, XIANG J X, et al. Numerical simulation on explosion mechanism of split-tube charge holders [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1172–1180. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0410.
[10]	李清. 爆炸致裂的岩石动态力学行为与断裂控制试验研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2009: 114–124. LI Q. Experiment of fracture behaviors and control for crackpropagation under blasting load [D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2009: 114–124.
[11]	李清, 郭阳, 刘航, 等. 切槽定向断裂控制爆破的数值模拟研究 [J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2015, 35(12): 79–83. DOI: 10.13827/j.cnki.kyyk.2015.12.018. LI Q, GUO Y, LIU H, et al. Numerical simulation on pre-notched directional fracture blast [J]. Mining R& D, 2015, 35(12): 79–83. DOI: 10.13827/j.cnki.kyyk.2015.12.018.
[12]	刘敦文, 蔡才武, 唐宇, 等. 微风化花岗岩多向聚能爆破破岩试验研究 [J]. 工程爆破, 2020, 26(2): 9–16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2020.02.002. LIU D W, CAI C W, TANG Y, et al. Experimental study on rock breaking by multi-direction cumulative blasting of slightly weathered granite [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2020, 26(2): 9–16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2020.02.002.
[13]	LUO Y, ZHAO S W. Study on orientation fracture blasting with shaped charge in rock [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, Mineral, Metallurgy, Material, 2006, 13(3): 193–198. DOI: 10.1016/s1005-8850(06)60042-x.
[14]	YIN Y, SUN Q, ZOU B P, et al. Numerical study on an innovative shaped charge approach of rock blasting and the timing sequence effect in microsecond magnitude [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2021, 54(9): 4523–4542. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-021-02516-w.
[15]	SHU Y, SHAO P, LI Z H, et al. Linear hypercumulation formation mechanism for π-type shaped charge [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2022, 47(3): e202100162. DOI: 10.1002/prep.202100162.
[16]	陈伟. 环向聚能装药的数值模似与应用研究 [D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2015: 65–66. CHEN W. Numerical simulation and application of radial shaped charge [D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2015: 65–66.
[17]	杨仁树, 王雁冰, 岳中文, 等. 定向断裂双孔爆破裂纹扩展的动态行为 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2013, 33(6): 631–637. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0631-07. YANG R S, WANG Y B, YUE Z W, et al. Dynamic behaviors of crack propagation in directional fracture blasting with two holes [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6): 631–637. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0631-07.
[18]	张金浩. 高应力条件下坚硬脆性岩石断裂特性研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2020: 17–25. ZHANG J H. Study on fracture characteristics of hard and brittle rock under high stress[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2020: 17–25.
[19]	ANDERSON T L. Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications [M]. ThirdEdition. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Taylor & Francis Group, 2005: 64–65.
[20]	黄维扬. 含裂纹半无限大板受集中力作用的应力强度因子 [J]. 航空学报, 1992, 13(3): 170–176. HUANG W Y. Stress intensity factors for a semi-infinite plate with a crack under concentrated forces [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautic Sinica, 1992, 13(3): 170–176.