Numerical and theoretical investigations on crashworthiness of star-shaped hybrid multi-cell tubes
-
摘要: 为研发轻质高效的能量吸收装置，提出了基于多边形截面与星形截面混合设计的星形混合多胞管。采用数值模拟方法研究了星形混合多胞管在轴向加载条件下的吸能特性和变形模式，并结合简化超折单元理论推导了该管的平均碰撞力理论公式。研究结果表明，星形混合多胞管的多边形截面与星形截面之间产生了协同效应，额外吸收了更多的冲击动能：当多边形边数N=6时，混合截面的协同性最好；当N=8时，该管的能量吸收效率最高。在此基础上，进一步开展了几何参数分析，发现壁厚对于星形混合多胞管的耐撞性有显著的影响，碰撞力水平随着壁厚的增加而线性增长。此外，星形角度的变化对耐撞性的影响相对较小，碰撞荷载效率和比吸能随着星形角度的增加表现出先增大后减小；当星形角度α=120°时，该管拥有最佳的耐撞性。Abstract: In order to develop a lightweight and efficient energy absorption device, a novel type of the star-shaped hybrid multi-cell (SHM) tubes based on the hybrid design of polygonal cross-section and star-shaped cross-section was proposed. The finite element (FE) models of the polygonal thin-walled (PT) tubes, the star-shaped thin-walled (ST) tubes and the SHM tubes were established by ABAQUS, and the reliability of the FE model was verified by simulating quasi-static axial crush tests. Then, the energy absorption characteristics and deformation modes of three kinds of thin-walled tubes under axial loading conditions were studied by numerical simulation. Based on the simplified super folding element (SSFE) theory, the theoretical formula of the mean crushing force of the SHM tubes under the progressive folding deformation mode is established. The numerical results show that there is a synergistic effect between the polygonal cross-section and the star-shaped cross-section of the SHM tubes. Compared with the PT tubes and the ST tubes, the energy absorption of the SHM tubes is significantly improved. When the number of polygon edges N=6, the cross-section synergistic effect of the SHM tubes is the best, and the energy absorption efficiency is the highest when N=8. Subsequently, the investigations on geometric parameters of the SHM tubes are carried out, and the effects of wall thickness and star angle on crashworthiness are discussed respectively. It is found that the wall thickness has obvious influence on the crashworthiness of the SHM tubes, and the crushing force level increases linearly with the increase of the wall thickness. In addition, the change of the star angle has little influence on crashworthiness. The crushing load efficiency and the specific energy absorption increase first and then decrease with the increase of the star angles. When the star angle α=120°, the SHM tubes has the most excellent crashworthiness. The research results can provide design methods and theoretical guidance for the cross-section design of multi-cell structures.
-
图 5 实验与有限元模拟的结果对比
Figure 5. Comparison of experimental and finite element simulation results
图 9 三种薄壁管压溃后的变形视图
Figure 9. Deformation views of three thin-walled tubes after collapse
图 10 不同壁厚条件下星形混合多胞管的初始峰值碰撞力
Fp 和平均碰撞力ˉF Figure 10. Initial peak impact force (
Fp ) and average impact force (ˉF ) of the SHM tubes with different wall thicknesses
图 11 不同壁厚条件下星形混合多胞管的碰撞载荷效率
η 和比吸能a Figure 11. Efficiency of impact load (η) and specific absorbed energy (a) of the SHM tubes with different wall thicknesses
图 12 不同星形角度条件下星形混合多胞管的初始峰值碰撞力
Fp 和平均碰撞力ˉF Figure 12. Initial peak crushing force (
Fp ) and average impact force (ˉF ) of the SHM tubes with different star angles
图 13 不同星形角度条件下星形混合多胞管的碰撞载荷效率
η 和比吸能a Figure 13. Efficiency of impact load (η) and specific absorbed energy (a) of the SHM tubes with different star angles
图 14 不同几何参数的星形混合多胞管变形视图
Figure 14. Deformation views of the SHM tubes with different geometric parameters
图 17 理论预测值与有限元模拟值的对比
Figure 17. Comparison between theoretical predictions and finite element simulations
表 1 有限元模型的材料参数
Table 1. Material parameters of finite element model
材料 密度/(kg·m−3) 弹性模量/GPa 泊松比 初始屈服应力/MPa 极限应力/MPa 不锈钢 7800 210 0.3 − − AA6061-O[26] 2700 68.2 0.3 96.8 195.0 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 三种薄壁管的耐撞性指标值
Table 2. Crashworthiness indicators of three thin-walled tubes
试件 Fp/kN ˉF/kN η/% A/kJ a/(kJ·kg−1) PT4 14.16 6.55 46.25 0.51 8.68 PT6 15.98 9.38 58.69 0.72 11.74 PT8 17.48 12.49 71.47 0.97 15.32 ST4 17.94 10.41 58.03 0.80 11.96 ST6 21.77 16.52 75.87 1.27 17.88 ST8 24.22 20.63 85.20 1.59 21.90 SHM4 43.58 22.15 50.83 1.71 13.64 SHM6 50.99 34.53 67.73 2.67 20.05 SHM8 55.65 43.24 77.70 3.34 24.60
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 角单元的角度
Table 3. Angle of corner elements
试件 α/(°) β/(°) γ/(°) SHM4 120 30 90 SHM6 120 60 120 SHM8 120 75 135
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] WANG Z G, ZHANG J, LI Z D, et al. On the crashworthiness of bio-inspired hexagonal prismatic tubes under axial compression [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020, 186: 105893. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105893. [2] 牛枞, 黄晗, 向枳昕, 等. 仿生多胞薄壁管耐撞性分析及优化 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(10): 105901. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0527.NIU C, HUANG H, XIANG Z X, et al. Crashworthiness analysis and optimization on bio-inspired multi-cell thin-walled tubes [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(10): 105901. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0527. [3] MING S Z, SONG Z B, ZHOU C H, et al. The energy absorption of long origami-ending tubes with geometrical imperfections [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 161: 107415. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107415. [4] 刘亚军, 何玉龙, 刘姗姗, 等. 正多边形基多胞薄壁管的吸能特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(7): 071404. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0423.LIU Y J, HE Y L, LIU S S, et al. Energy absorption capacity of regular polygon-based multi-cell tubes [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(7): 071404. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0423. [5] LIU H, CHNG Z X C, WANG G J, et al. Crashworthiness improvements of multi-cell thin-walled tubes through lattice structure enhancements [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021, 210: 106731. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106731. [6] 何强, 王勇辉, 史肖娜, 等. 引入Sierpinski层级特性的新型薄壁多胞管轴向冲击吸能特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(12): 123101. DOI: 10.11883.bzycj/2020-0055.HE Q, WANG Y H, SHI X N, et al. Energy absorption of new thin-walled, multi-cellular, tubular structures with Sierpinski hierarchical characteristics under axial impact [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(12): 123101. DOI: 10.11883.bzycj/2020-0055. [7] PALOMBINI F L, DE ARAUJO MARIATH J E, DE OLIVEIRA B F. Bionic design of thin-walled structure based on the geometry of the vascular bundles of bamboo [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 155: 106936. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106936. [8] TRAN T, HOU S J, HAN X, et al. Crushing analysis and numerical optimization of angle element structures under axial impact loading [J]. Composite Structures, 2015, 119: 422–435. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.019. [9] ZHAO X, ZHU G H, ZHOU C Y, et al. Crashworthiness analysis and design of composite tapered tubes under multiple load cases [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 222: 110920. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110920. [10] DENG X L, LIU W Y, LIN Z Q. Experimental and theoretical study on crashworthiness of star-shaped tubes under axial compression [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 130: 321–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.06.002. [11] TRAN T, BAROUTAJI A. Crashworthiness optimal design of multi-cell triangular tubes under axial and oblique impact loading [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 93: 241–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.07.003. [12] WANG Z G, LIU J F, YAO S. On folding mechanics of multi-cell thin-walled square tubes [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 132: 17–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.036. [13] MA W, LI Z X, XIE S C. Crashworthiness analysis of thin-walled bio-inspired multi-cell corrugated tubes under quasi-static axial loading [J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 204: 110069. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110069. [14] HA N S, LU G X. A review of recent research on bio-inspired structures and materials for energy absorption applications [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020, 181: 107496. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107496. [15] WU J C, ZHANG Y, ZHANG F, et al. A bionic tree-liked fractal structure as energy absorber under axial loading [J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 245: 112914. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112914. [16] FAN H L, LUO Y H, YANG F, et al. Approaching perfect energy absorption through structural hierarchy [J]. International Journal of Engineering Science, 2018, 130: 12–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2018.05.005. [17] ZHANG L W, BAI Z H, BAI F H. Crashworthiness design for bio-inspired multi-cell tubes with quadrilateral, hexagonal and octagonal sections [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 122: 42–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.10.010. [18] HA N S, PHAM T M, CHEN W S, et al. Crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired fractal tree-like multi-cell circular tubes under axial crushing [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 169: 108315. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108315. [19] FU J, LIU Q, LIUFU K, et al. Design of bionic-bamboo thin-walled structures for energy absorption [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 135: 400–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.10.003. [20] GONG C, BAI Z H, WANG Y L, et al. On the crashworthiness performance of novel hierarchical multi-cell tubes under axial loading [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021, 206: 106599. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106599. [21] XU X, ZHANG Y, WANG J, et al. Crashworthiness design of novel hierarchical hexagonal columns [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 194: 36–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.099. [22] VINAYAGAR K, KUMAR A S. Crashworthiness analysis of double section bi-tubular thin-walled structures [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 112: 184–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.12.008. [23] BIGDELI A, DAMGHANI NOURI M. Experimental and numerical analysis and multi-objective optimization of quasi-static compressive test on thin-walled cylindrical with internal networking [J]. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2019, 26(19): 1644–1660. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1444231. [24] XIONG J, ZHANG Y, SU L, et al. Experimental and numerical study on mechanical behavior of hybrid multi-cell structures under multi-crushing loads [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2022, 170: 108588. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108588. [25] WIERZBICKI T, ABRAMOWICZ W. On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1983, 50(4a): 727–734. DOI: 10.1115/1.3167137. [26] WANG J, ZHANG Y, HE N, et al. Crashworthiness behavior of Koch fractal structures [J]. Materials & Design, 2018, 144: 229–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.035. [27] LI Z X, MA W, YAO S G, et al. Crashworthiness performance of corrugation-reinforced multicell tubular structures [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021, 190: 106038. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106038. [28] ZHANG X, ZHANG H. Energy absorption of multi-cell stub columns under axial compression [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, 68: 156–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.03.014. [29] CHEN H C, ZHANG Y, LIN J M, et al. Crushing responses and optimization of novel sandwich columns [J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 263: 113682. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113682. 期刊类型引用(13)
1. 王梓宇，李胜林，李黎，凌天龙，梁书锋，孙旭. 隧道爆破地震作用下燃气管道动力响应规律研究. 爆破. 2024(03): 212-221+247 . 
百度学术2. 郭映聪. 基于小波分析基坑钻爆开挖地震效应预测研究. 市政技术. 2023(02): 126-132 . 百度学术3. 李辉，王董东，杜文康，弓煜. 安家岭煤矿爆破振速预测与安全允许距离研究. 煤炭工程. 2023(10): 156-161 . 百度学术4. 代树红，安志奎，王晓晨，韩荣军. 露天煤矿爆破振动速度计算公式研究. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 41-46 . 百度学术5. 宋宏坤. 基于爆破振速衰减规律的爆破振动控制技术. 中外公路. 2022(02): 188-193 . 百度学术6. 贾海鹏，刘殿书，方真刚，田帅康. 地铁隧道钻爆法施工中敏感区间及安全药量确定. 北京理工大学学报. 2021(01): 23-29 . 百度学术7. 万嗣鹏，陶铁军，陈二平，刘永明，杨志强. 考虑岩体抗拉强度的爆破振动速度衰减多元非线性模型. 爆破器材. 2020(03): 53-58 . 百度学术8. 王林峰，邓冰杰，莫诎，赵精富，肖弘光. 基于概率论的爆破振动安全评估与控制. 振动与冲击. 2020(14): 122-129 . 百度学术9. 周文海，梁瑞，余建平，杜超飞，王敦繁，楼晓明. 边坡抛掷爆破峰值质点振动速度的无量纲分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(05): 76-83 . 
本站查看10. 袁旺小. 隧道掘进爆破地表振速的预测研究. 公路交通科技(应用技术版). 2019(05): 257-259 . 百度学术11. 周文海，余建平，梁瑞，吕亚茹，王敦繁，陈宗杰. 基于逐步回归算法的边坡爆破振动控制研究. 长江科学院院报. 2019(07): 89-95 . 百度学术12. 王奋，范勇，周宜红，赵春菊，严鹏. 隧洞爆破地震波作用下临近水电站的安全性评估. 爆破. 2017(02): 132-137 . 百度学术13. 王玉乐，罗周全，谢承煜，随晓丹，曹祖华. 深孔爆破对隐患资源开采两帮的动力响应特性研究. 爆破. 2017(04): 33-39 . 百度学术其他类型引用(6)
-
百度学术
计量
- 文章访问数: 313
- HTML全文浏览量: 118
- PDF下载量: 89
- 被引次数: 19