水下接触爆炸下高聚物层对钢筋混凝土板的防护效果

赵小华; 刘树参; 方宏远; 孙金山; 石明生

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0033

水下接触爆炸下高聚物层对钢筋混凝土板的防护效果

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0033

赵小华^{1, 2, 3,},
刘树参^{1, 4, ,},
方宏远¹,
孙金山^{2, 3},
石明生¹

1.
郑州大学黄河实验室，河南郑州 450001
2.
江汉大学精细爆破国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430056
3.
江汉大学爆破工程湖北省重点实验室，湖北武汉 430056
4.
雅砻江流域水电开发有限公司，四川成都 610066

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（52009126）；爆破工程湖北省重点实验室开放基金（BL2021-04）

详细信息

作者简介:
赵小华（1991－　），男，博士，副教授，zhaoxh2014@126.com

通讯作者:
刘树参（1999－　），男，硕士研究生，lsc63124@163.com

中图分类号: O383; TQ317
计量
- 文章访问数: 177
- HTML全文浏览量: 80
- PDF下载量: 126
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-02-08
- 修回日期: 2023-11-05
- 网络出版日期: 2023-11-06
- 刊出日期: 2023-12-12

Protective effect of polymer layer on reinforced concrete slabs under an underwater contact explosion

ZHAO Xiaohua^{1, 2, 3
,},
LIU Shucan^{1, 4
, ,},
FANG Hongyuan¹,
SUN Jinshan^{2, 3},
SHI Mingsheng¹

1.
Yellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, Hubei, China
3.
Hubei Key Laboratory of Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, Hubei, China
4.
Yalong River Hydropower Development Company Ltd., Chengdu 610066, Sichuan , China

摘要

摘要: 为研究多孔材料高聚物对水下混凝土结构的抗爆防护性能，对含高聚物防护层的钢筋混凝土板开展了水下爆炸实验，并设置了对照组。利用AUTODYN有限元程序建立了含高聚物防护层的钢筋混凝土板水下爆炸全耦合模型，并通过数值模拟结果与实验的对比，验证了所建模型的可靠性。在此基础上，通过数值模拟，进一步分析了前置钢板对高聚物层防护性能的提升效果。以钢筋混凝土板跨中残余位移为指标，参数化分析了起爆药量和复合结构层厚比对高聚物层水下防护效果的影响规律。结果表明：水下爆炸下，高聚物防护层能够有效降低混凝土结构的毁伤程度；在高聚物层外侧布置钢质薄板，可以更好地发挥高聚物层的吸能效果，对钢筋混凝土板起到更好的防护效果，且当高聚物层与前置钢板层厚度比为20时，防护效果最佳。
- 水下爆炸 /
- 高聚物 /
- 复合结构 /
- 钢筋混凝土板 /
- 防护性能
Abstract: In order to study the anti-explosion protection performance of porous polymers on underwater concrete structures, underwater explosion experiments were carried out on reinforced concrete slabs with a polymer protective layer, and an ordinary reinforced concrete slab was set as a comparing subject. A fully coupled model of underwater explosion of reinforced concrete slab with polymer protective layer was established by the AUTODYN finite element program, while the reliability of the proposed model was verified by the comparison of the calculatied results with experimental ones. Thus, the propagation characteristics of explosion load in water and the damage results of the structure can be better simulated by this model. In addition, the effect of the front steel plate on the enhancement of the protection performance of the polymer layer was further analyzed by numerical simulation. The front steel plate can evenly exert the pressure generated by the explosion load on the inner core layer, so that the polymer layer can display a better energy-absorbing effect. Taking the mid-span residual displacement of the reinforced concrete slab as an index, the influences of the amount of detonating charge and the layer thickness ratio of the composite structure on the underwater protection effect of the polymer layer are analyzed parametrically. The results show that the damage degree of the concrete structure under underwater explosion can be reduced by the polymer protective layer; arranging the steel thin plate on the outside of the polymer layer can improve the energy-absorbing effect of the polymer layer and provide better protection to the reinforced concrete slab; and the protection effect is the best when the ratio of the polymer layer to the front steel plate layer thickness is 20. The research results can provide a reference for the subsequent studies and application of polymer materials in the protection of underwater engineering structures.
- underwater explosion /
- polymer /
- composite structure /
- reinforced concrete slab /
- protective performance

HTML全文

图 1 混凝土板尺寸及钢筋布置

Figure 1. Sizes of an RC slab and reinforcement layout in it

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 防护层的制作流程

Figure 2. Manufacturing procedure of protection layer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 实验布置

Figure 3. Experimental arrangement

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 RC板的实验结果

Figure 4. Test results of an RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 P-RC板的实验结果

Figure 5. Test results of a P-RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 数值模型

Figure 6. Numerical model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 混凝土RHT模型的三个极限面

Figure 7. Three limit surfaces of the RHT model for concrete

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 一维楔形体计算模型

Figure 8. A one-dimensional calculation model of a wedge-shaped body

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 数值结果与经验公式峰值压力对比

Figure 9. Comparison of peak pressures between numerical and experiential results

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 P-RC板实验和数值模拟破坏模式对比

Figure 10. Comparison of experimental and simulated failure modes of a P-RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 冲击波在RC板中的传播过程

Figure 11. Propagation process of blast wave in an RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 冲击波在P-RC板中的传播过程

Figure 12. Propagation process of blast wave in a P-RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 气泡对RC板的毁伤过程

Figure 13. Damage process of bubbles on an RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 气泡对P-RC板的毁伤过程

Figure 14. Damage process of bubbles on P-RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 SP-RC板示意图

Figure 15. Schematics of SP-RC slab

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 不同防护层RC板的破坏模式对比

Figure 16. Comparison of failure modes of RC slabs with different protective layers

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 试件迎爆面压力峰值分布

Figure 17. Distributions of peak pressure at the blast surfaces of P-RC and SP-RC slabs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 P-RC板和SP-RC板的能量时程曲线

Figure 18. Energy-time history curves of P-RC and SP-RC slabs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 防护层作用原理

Figure 19. Protective layer working principle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 不同药量下RC板的毁伤模式

Figure 20. Damage modes of RC slabs with different explosive quantities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 不同药量下RC板的残余位移

Figure 21. Residual displacement of RC slabs under different explosive quantities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 22 不同钢板厚度下RC板的毁伤模式

Figure 22. Damage modes of RC slabs with different thicknesses of the steel plates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 23 不同内芯厚度下RC板的毁伤模式

Figure 23. Damage modes of RC slabs with different core thicknesses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 24 不同工况下RC板的残余位移

Figure 24. Residual displacement of RC slabs under different working conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 试件损伤程度

Table 1. Degree of damage to specimens

试件	迎爆面破坏区域	是否发生冲切破坏	整体性	承载能力
RC板	140 mm×130 mm	是	一般	较差
P-RC板		否	较好	较好

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 混凝土材料参数^[19]

Table 2. Material parameters of concrete^[19]

密度$ {\rho }_{0} $/(g·cm⁻³)	体积模量A₁/GPa	剪切模量G/GPa	抗压强度f_c/MPa	抗拉强度f_t/f_c	抗剪强度f_s/f_c
2.75	35.27	22.06	35	0.1	0.18

失效面常数A	残余失效面常数B	残余失效面指数M	损伤常数D₁	损伤常数D₂	侵蚀应变
1.60	1.60	0.61	0.04	1.00	2.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 高聚物RHT模型材料参数^{[15, 21-22]}

Table 3. Material parameters of RHT model for polymer^{[15, 21-22]}

密度$ {\rho }_{0} $/(g·cm⁻³)	体积模量A₁/GPa	剪切模量G/MPa	抗压强度f_c/MPa	抗拉强度f_t/f_c	抗剪强度f_s/f_c
0.2	2.2	20.78	4.5	0.598	0.694

失效面常数A	残余失效面常数B	残余失效面指数M	损伤常数D₁	损伤常数D₂	侵蚀应变
0.61	1.60	0.61	0.04	1.00	0.60

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 炸药材料参数^[23]

Table 4. Material parameters of explosive^[23]

ρ/(g·cm⁻³)	D/(m·s⁻¹)	A/GPa	B/GPa	${p_{{\mathrm{CJ}}}}$/GPa	R₁	R₂	ω	E/GPa
1.05	3850	209.70	3.50	3.70	5.76	1.29	0.39	4.20

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 复合防护层不同层厚比

Table 5. Different layer thickness ratios of composite protective layers

工况	高聚物层厚度h₁/mm	前置钢板厚度h₂/mm	层厚比(h₁/h₂)	工况	高聚物层厚度h₁/mm	前置钢板厚度h₂/mm	层厚比(h₁/h₂)
1	60	2.0	30.0	6	40	3.0	13.3
2	60	2.5	24.0	7	50	3.0	16.7
3	60	3.0	20.0	8	70	3.0	23.3
4	60	3.5	17.1	9	80	3.0	26.7
5	60	4.0	15.0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(28)

[1]	张社荣, 孔源, 王高辉. 水下和空中爆炸时混凝土重力坝动态响应对比分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(17): 47–54. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.17.009. ZHANG S R, KONG Y, WANG G H. Dynamic responses of a concrete gravity dam subjected to underwater and air explosions [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(17): 47–54. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.17.009.
[2]	李凌锋, 韦灼彬, 唐廷, 等. 爆炸荷载下沉箱重力式码头模型毁伤效应 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(1): 012202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0406. LI L F, WEI Z B, TANG T, et al. Damage effect of caisson gravity wharf model under explosive loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 012202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0406.
[3]	YANG G D, WANG G H, LU W B, et al. Cross-section shape effects on anti-knock performance of RC columns subjected to air and underwater explosions [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 181(6): 252–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.031.
[4]	ZHAO X H, WANG G H, LU W B, et al. Experimental investigation of RC slabs under air and underwater contact explosions [J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2021, 25(1): 190–204. DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2018.1528892.
[5]	孔祥清, 赵倩, 曲艳东, 等. 空中和水下爆炸时钢筋混凝土板动态响应对比分析 [J]. 科技导报, 2016, 34(18): 279–286. KONG X Q, ZHAO Q, QU Y D, et al. Dynamic responses of a concrete slab subjected to air and underwater explosions [J]. Science and Technology Review, 2016, 34(18): 279–286.
[6]	刘超, 孙启鑫, 李会驰. 近爆作用下钢筋混凝土π梁防护性能的数值模拟 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(4): 223–231. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.04.029. LIU C, SUN Q X, LI H C. Numerical simulation for protective of reinforced concrete π beams under close-in explosion [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(4): 223–231. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.04.029.
[7]	石少卿, 张湘冀, 刘颖芳, 等. 硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料抗爆炸冲击作用的研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2005, 24(5): 59–61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2005.05.017. SHI S Q, ZHANG X J, LIU Y F, et al. The study on explosion shock resistance of rigid polyurethane foam plastics [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2005, 24(5): 59–61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2005.05.017.
[8]	刘佳, 崔传安, 徐畅. 爆炸波在硬质聚氨酯泡沫中的衰减特性模拟 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2017, 38(9): 164–167. DOI: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.09.035. LIU J, CUI C A, XU C. Simulation of explosive wave attenuation characteristics in rigid polyurethane foam [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2017, 38(9): 164–167. DOI: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.09.035.
[9]	CODINA R, AMBROSINI D, BORBÓN B F. Alternatives to prevent the failure of RC members under close-in blast loadings [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 60(2): 96–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.038.
[10]	KOSTOPOULOS V, KALIMERIS G D, GIANNAROS E. Blast protection of steel reinforced concrete structures using composite foam-core sacrificial cladding [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2022: 109330. DOI: 10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2022.109330.
[11]	夏志成, 张建亮, 王曦浩, 等. 钢板夹芯防爆墙防护效应的影响因素 [J]. 工程爆破, 2016, 22(6): 1–7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2016.06.001. XIA Z C, ZHANG J L, WANG X H, et al. Influencing factors of protective effect of steel plate sandwich explosion proof wall [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2016, 22(6): 1–7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2016.06.001.
[12]	邹广平, 孙杭其, 唱忠良, 等. 聚氨酯/钢夹芯结构爆炸载荷下动力学响应的数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(6): 907–912. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0907-06. ZOU G P, SUN H Q, CHANG Z L, et al. Numerical simulation on dynamic response of polyurethane/steel sandwich structure under blast loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 907–912. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0907-06.
[13]	李姝妍, 王在成, 毛亮, 等. 活性破片战斗部用缓冲结构应力衰减特性研究 [J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2020, 43(5): 43–49. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20200701.001. LI S Y, WANG Z C, MAO L, et al. Study on stress attenuation characteristics of buffer structure of reactive fragment warhead [J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2020, 43(5): 43–49. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20200701.001.
[14]	刘宏杰, 王伟力, 苗润, 等. 基于环形切割串联战斗部隔爆结构的优化设计 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2019, 39(4): 73–76. DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2019.04.018. LIU H J, WANG W L, MIAO R, et al. Optimization design of flameproof structure based on annular cutting tandem warhead [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2019, 39(4): 73–76. DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2019.04.018.
[15]	WANG Z Y, DU M R, FANG H Y, et al. Influence of different corrosion environments on mechanical properties of a roadbed rehabilitation polyurethane grouting material under uniaxial compression [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 301: 124092. DOI: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.124092.
[16]	林沛元, 郭潘峰, 郭成超, 等. 钢板、高聚物、土不同材料界面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023,45(1): 1–11. LIN P Y, GUO P F, GUO C C, et al. Experimental study on interfacial shear properties of steel plate, polymer and soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023,45(1): 1–11.
[17]	孙文彬. 钢筋混凝土板的爆炸荷载试验研究 [J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 28(2): 217–220. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0562.2009.02.016. SUN W B. Experimental studies on reinforced concrete (RC) slabs subjected to blast loads [J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science), 2009, 28(2): 217–220. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0562.2009.02.016.
[18]	WANG Z Q, LU Y, HAO H, et al. A full coupled numerical analysis approach for buried structures subjected to subsurface blast [J]. Computers & Structures, 2005, 83(4/5): 339–356. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.014.
[19]	WANG W, ZhANG D, LU F Y, et al. Experimental study and numerical simulation of the damage mode of a square reinforced concrete slab under close-in explosion [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2013, 27. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.07.010.
[20]	赵浩楠, 方宏远, 赵小华, 等. 接触爆炸作用下高聚物复合板毁伤特性分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(5): 052201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0161. HAO H N, FANG H Y, ZHAO X H, et al. Analysis on the blast resistance of polymer composite slabs under contact explosions [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 052201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0161.
[21]	LI M J, DU M R, WANG F M, et al. Study on the mechanical properties of polyurethane (PU) grouting material of different geometric sizes under uniaxial compression [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 259: 119797. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119797.
[22]	石明生. 高聚物注桨材料特性与堤坝定向劈裂注桨机理研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2011: 22–61.
[23]	LIU Z D, ZHAO X H, LIU D, et al. Comparative study on blast damage features of reinforced concrete slabs with polyurethane sacrificial cladding based on different numerical simulation methods [J]. Polymers, 2022, 14(18): 3857. DOI: 10.3390/polym14183857.
[24]	杨广栋, 王高辉, 李麒, 等. 爆炸冲击下水底隧道的动态响应及毁伤模式研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(4): 150–158. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.04.020. YANG G D, WANG G H, LI Q, et al. Dynamic response and damage patterns of underwater tunnel subjected to blast loads [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(4): 150–158. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.04.020.
[25]	郑欣颖, 李海涛, 张弛, 等. 乳化炸药水下爆炸载荷输出特性实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2022, 36(4): 045101. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20220502. ZHENG X Y, LI H T, ZHANG C, et al. Experimental study on load output characteristics of emulsified explosive in underwater explosion [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(4): 045101. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20220502.
[26]	孙远翔, 田俊宏, 张之凡, 等. 含铝炸药近场水下爆炸冲击波的实验及数值模拟 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(14): 171–178, 193. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.14.025. SUN Y X, TIAN J H, ZHANG Z F, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation study on the near-field underwater explosion of aluminized explosive [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(14): 171–178, 193. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.14.025.
[27]	赵春风, 何凯城, 卢欣, 等. 弧形双钢板混凝土组合板抗爆性能数值研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(2): 025101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0205. ZHAO C F, HE K C, LU X, et al. Numerical study of blast resistance of curved steel-concrete-steel composite slabs [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(2): 025101–. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0205.
[28]	ZHAO L, YU H T, YUAN Y, et al. Blast mitigation effect of the foamed cement-base sacrificial cladding for tunnel structures [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 94(9): 710–718. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.076.