An experimental study on ignition and explosion of high-pressure hydrogen jet in open space
-
摘要: 采用高速相机和压力传感器，对开放空间中稳态射流氢气点火爆炸初期的火焰行为和超压变化规律进行了实验研究。结果表明：在点火爆炸初期，火焰在点火电极处以球形向外扩散；爆炸后4~6 ms，火焰前锋达到最大位移，之后逐渐熄灭，最后形成射流火焰。火焰前锋位移主要受喷嘴直径影响，并随喷嘴直径的增大而增大。火焰宽度的变化规律与火焰前锋位移基本相似。整个爆炸过程仅出现1个超压峰值，正压维持时间约为1 ms。在同一点火距离处，峰值超压随氢气流量的增加而增大。在相同氢气流量下，峰值超压随点火距离的增大而减小。最大峰值超压与氢气流量成正比，与点火距离成反比。Abstract: Experiments were carried out on the flame behaviors and overpressure evolutions at the initial stage of ignition and explosion of steady-state hydrogen jet in open space, while a high-speed camera and pressure transducers were employed to record the flame shape and overpressure. The results show that at the early stage of ignition and explosion, the flame propagated outward from the ignition electrode with a spherical shape. After 4-6 ms, the flame front reached its maximum displacement, gradually extinguished, and finally formed a jet flame. The displacement of the flame front was mainly affected by the nozzle diameter and increased with the nozzle diameter. The variations of flame width were basically similar to those of the flame front displacement. The entire explosion process only experienced one overpressure peak, with a positive pressure maintained for approximately 1 ms. At the same ignition distance, the peak overpressure increased with hydrogen flow rate. At the same hydrogen flow rate, the peak overpressure decreased with increasing ignition distance. The maximum peak overpressure was directly proportional to the hydrogen flow rate and inversely proportional to the ignition distance.
-
Key words:
- hydrogen explosion /
- flame front displacement /
- flame width /
- maximum peak overpressure
-
图 2 氢气火焰图像处理过程（工况18，p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm）
Figure 2. Image processing of hydrogen flame (case 18, p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm)
图 3 初始阶段火焰演变过程（工况18，p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm）
Figure 3. Evolutions of the flame at the initial stage (case 18, p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm)
图 4 平均体积分数随距离的变化（工况18，p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm）
Figure 4. Variation of mean concentration with distance (case 18, p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm)
图 5 3 ms时氢气火焰前锋的位移和宽度
Figure 5. Displacement and width of hydrogen flame front at 3 ms
图 6 火焰前锋位移和宽度随点火距离的变化
Figure 6. Variations of flame front displacement and width with ignition distance
图 7 超压随时间变化趋势（工况17, p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm）
Figure 7. Evolution of overpressure with time (case 17, p0=0.5 MPa, d=4 mm)
图 8 不同流量下峰值超压随点火距离的变化
Figure 8. Evolution of peak overpressure with ignition distance at different flow rates
图 9 不同点火距离下最大峰值超压随流量的变化
Figure 9. Relation between the flow rate and maximum peak overpressure at different ignition distances
图 10 最大峰值超压与点火距离的关系
Figure 10. Relationship between the maximum peak overpressure and ignition distance
表 1 氢气点火实验参数
Table 1. Experimental parameters of hydrogen ignition
工况 d/mm 点火距离/cm p0/MPa m/（g·s−1） 最大火焰前锋位移/mm ˉφ 1 2 16 0.3 0.78 229.6 0.314 2 2 20 0.3 0.78 199.5 0.254 3 2 30 0.3 0.78 73.5 0.171 4 2 37 0.3 0.78 5 2 16 0.5 1.17 339.5 0.325 6 2 20 0.5 1.17 267.4 0.269 7 2 30 0.5 1.17 147.0 0.188 8 2 37 0.5 1.17 145.6 0.156 9 2 16 0.7 1.56 387.8 0.322 10 2 20 0.7 1.56 338.8 0.282 11 2 30 0.7 1.56 229.6 0.196 12 2 37 0.7 1.56 88.2 0.164 13 3 16 0.5 2.64 350.0 0.449 14 3 20 0.5 2.64 338.1 0.377 15 3 30 0.5 2.64 348.6 0.269 16 3 37 0.5 2.64 264.6 0.224 17 4 16 0.5 4.69 576.5 0.574 18 4 20 0.5 4.69 592.2 0.471 19 4 30 0.5 4.69 321.3 0.342 20 4 37 0.5 4.69 342.3 0.287 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] LI H W, TANG Z S, LI J L, et al. Investigation of vented hydrogen-air deflagrations in a congested vessel [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 129: 196–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.07.009. [2] 郝腾腾, 王昌建, 颜王吉, 等. 氢气泄爆作用下结构动力响应特性研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(6): 065401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0412.HAO T T, WANG C J, YAN W J, et al. Structural dynamical characteristics induced by vented hydrogen explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(6): 065401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0412. [3] RUI S C, WANG C J, GUO S S, et al. Hydrogen-air explosion with concentration gradients in a cubic enclosure [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 151: 141–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.05.003. [4] WANG L Q, LI T, MA H H. Explosion behaviors of hydrogen-nitrous oxide mixtures at reduced initial pressures [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 153: 11–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.010. [5] 曹勇, 郭进, 胡坤伦, 等. 点火位置对氢气-空气预混气体泄爆过程的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(6): 847–852. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0847-06.CAO Y, GUO J, HU K L, et al. Effect of ignition locations on vented explosion of premixed hydrogen-air mixtures [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6): 847–852. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0847-06. [6] 余明高, 阳旭峰, 郑凯, 等. 障碍物对甲烷/氢气爆炸特性的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(1): 19–27. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0172.YU M G, YANG X F, ZHENG K, et al. Effect of obstacles on explosion characteristics of methane/hydrogen [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 19–27. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0172. [7] 陈昊, 郭进, 王金贵, 等. 破膜压力对氢气-甲烷-空气泄爆的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(11): 115401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0418.CHEN H, GUO J, WANG J G, et al. Effects of vent burst pressure on hydrogen-methane-air deflagration in a vented duct [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 115401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0418. [8] SWAIN M R, FILOSO P A, SWAIN M N. An experimental investigation into the ignition of leaking hydrogen [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 287–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.041. [9] PANDA P P, HECHT E S. Ignition and flame characteristics of cryogenic hydrogen releases [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(1): 775–785. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.051. [10] FRIEDRICH A, BREITUNG W, STERN G, et al. Ignition and heat radiation of cryogenic hydrogen jets [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(22): 17589–17598. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.070. [11] KOBAYASHI H, MUTO D, DAIMON Y, et al. Experimental study on cryo-compressed hydrogen ignition and flame [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(7): 5098–5109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.091. [12] MOGI T, HORIGUCHI S. Experimental study on the hazards of high-pressure hydrogen jet diffusion flames [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(1): 45–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.08.006. [13] GUO J, WANG C J, LI M H, et al. Experimental study on spark ignition of non-premixed hydrogen jets [J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2014, 23(4): 354–358. DOI: 10.1007/s11630-014-0717-3. [14] 闫伟阳, 潘旭海, 汪志雷, 等. 高压氢气泄漏自燃形成喷射火的实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(11): 115402. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0394.YAN W Y, PAN X H, WANG Z L, et al. Experimental investigation on spontaneous combustion of high-pressure hydrogen leakage to form jet fire [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 115401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0394. [15] AHMED S F, MASTORAKOS E. Spark ignition of lifted turbulent jet flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 146(1/2): 215–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.03.007. [16] AHMED S F, BALACHANDRAN R, MASTORAKOS E. Measurements of ignition probability in turbulent non-premixed counterflow flames [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(1): 1507–1513. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.089. [17] GRUNE J, SEMPERT K, KUZNETSOV M, et al. Experimental study of ignited unsteady hydrogen jets into air [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(3): 2497–2504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.152. [18] ROYLE M, WILLOUGHBY D B. Consequences of catastrophic releases of ignited and unignited hydrogen jet releases [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(3): 2688–2692. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.141. [19] GRUNE J, SEMPERT K, KUZNETSOV M, et al. Experimental study of ignited unsteady hydrogen releases from a high pressure reservoir [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(11): 6176–6183. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.076. [20] BIRCH A D, BROWN D R, DODSON M G, et al. The structure and concentration decay of high pressure jets of natural gas [J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1984, 36(5/6): 249–261. DOI: 10.1080/00102208408923739. [21] BIRCH A D, HUGHES D J, SWAFFIELD F. Velocity decay of high pressure jets [J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1987, 52(1): 161–171. DOI: 10.1080/00102208708952575. [22] SCHEFER R W, HOUF W G, WILLIAMS T C, et al. Characterization of high-pressure, underexpanded hydrogen-jet flames [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(12): 2081–2093. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.08.037. [23] DUAN Q L, XIAO H H, GAO W, et al. Experimental study on spontaneous ignition and flame propagation of high-pressure hydrogen release via a tube into air [J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 811–819. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.066. [24] TAKENO K, OKABAYASHI K, KOUCHI A, et al. Dispersion and explosion field tests for 40 MPa pressurized hydrogen [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2144–2153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.018. [25] KIKUKAWA S, YAMAGA F, MITSUHASHI H. Risk assessment of Hydrogen fueling stations for 70 MPa FCVs [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(23): 7129–7136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.063. 期刊类型引用(4)
1. 王明洋，何勇，陈丹鹤，徐天涵. 新型钻地武器毁伤与防护计算原理. 陆军工程大学学报. 2023(01): 1-10 . 
百度学术2. 李志浩，李杰，王明洋. 大当量爆炸地冲击毁伤效应的理论与试验研究Ⅲ：深埋洞室地冲击效应模拟试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2023(05): 1162-1174 . 百度学术3. 李志浩，李杰，王明洋，蒋海明，吴红晓，潘越峰，陈伟，王德荣. 大当量爆炸地冲击毁伤效应的理论与试验研究Ⅰ：深埋洞室地冲击破坏的现场实测分析. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2022(05): 865-876 . 百度学术4. 宫凤强，代金豪，王明洋，黄书岭，徐磊. 高地应力“强度&应力”耦合判据及其分级标准. 工程地质学报. 2022(06): 1893-1913 . 百度学术其他类型引用(3)
-
百度学术
计量
- 文章访问数: 142
- HTML全文浏览量: 64
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 7