水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸的抑制作用

胡立双; 刘洋; 杨亚军; 祝贺; 梁凯丽; 胡双启

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0346

水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸的抑制作用

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0346

1.
中北大学环境与安全工程学院，山西太原 030051
2.
山西江阳兴安民爆器材有限公司，山西太原 030041

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（52276138）；山西省基础研究计划（202203021212160, 20210302123030）

详细信息

作者简介:
胡立双（1985－　），男，博士，副教授，hlsly1314@163.com

通讯作者:
胡双启（1962－　），男，博士，教授，hsq@nuc.edu.cn

中图分类号: O389; TJ55; X944
计量
- 文章访问数: 172
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 58
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-09-27
- 修回日期: 2023-12-01
- 网络出版日期: 2024-01-22
- 刊出日期: 2024-05-08

Inhibition effect of water mist on RDX dust explosion

1.
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China
2.
Shanxi Jiangyang Xing’an Industrial Explosive Materials Co., Ltd, Taiyuan 030041, Shanxi, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸的抑制作用，自主设计了可视化方管粉尘爆炸水雾抑制系统，选择了不同喷嘴类型、喷孔直径以及雾化压力等实验条件，以RDX粉尘爆炸火焰传播动态、爆炸压力以及爆炸温度等变化，判断不同条件下水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸特性的影响。结果表明：在同一雾化压力下，不同类型喷嘴喷出水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸抑制效果不同，离心喷嘴喷出水雾抑爆效果最好；随着雾化压力增大，水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸抑制作用增强；在实验选用的0.8、1.2、1.5、2.0、2.4 mm五种孔径离心喷嘴中，1.5 mm孔径离心喷嘴喷出水雾抑爆效果最佳，在雾化压力4 MPa下，RDX粉尘爆炸压力仅为0.1184 MPa，相比于无水雾时RDX粉尘爆炸压力0.4561 MPa，压力峰值降低了74.0%，爆炸温度为234 ℃，相比于无水雾时RDX粉尘爆炸温度774 ℃，温度峰值降低了69.8%。
- RDX /
- 粉尘爆炸 /
- 水雾 /
- 抑爆 /
- 压力
Abstract: A visual square tube water mist suppression system was independently designed in order to study the inhibition effect of water mist on RDX dust explosion. The system is composed of closed explosion chamber, powder spraying system, ignition system, high-speed photography system, water mist generation system, data acquisition system and time control system. The automatic control of powder injection and ignition is carried out by the time control system. Various experimental conditions such as different nozzle types, nozzle diameters, and atomization pressures were selected. The effect of water mist on RDX dust explosion characteristics was evaluated by comparing the changes in flame propagation dynamics, explosion pressure, and explosion temperature of RDX dust explosion. The results show that the explosion pressure, and temperature of RDX dust clouds increase with the increase of explosive mass. The inhibition effect of water mist on RDX dust explosions varies with different types of nozzles at the same atomization pressure. The water mist sprayed by centrifugal nozzle has the best explosion inhibition effect, and the spiral nozzle has the worst explosion inhibition effect. As the atomization pressure increases, the explosion inhibition effect of water mist enhances. The water mist sprayed by centrifugal nozzle with diameter of 1.5 mm shows the optimal explosion inhibition effect among the five centrifugal nozzles with diameters of 0.8, 1.2, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.4 mm used in the experiment. The explosion pressure and temperature attenuation of water mist on RDX dust explosion increased with the increase of spray pressure. The explosion pressure of RDX dust is only 0.1184 MPa at an atomization pressure of 4 MPa. the peak pressure is reduced by 74.0% compared to the situation without water mist where the explosion pressure of RDX dust is 0.4561 MPa. The explosion temperature is 234 ℃, which is 69.8% lower than the explosion temperature of RDX dust without water mist (774 ℃).
- RDX /
- dust explosion /
- water mist /
- explosion inhibition /
- pressure

HTML全文

图 1 RDX粒径分布图

Figure 1. Particle size distribution of RDX

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 实验系统示意图

Figure 2. Diagram of experimental system

1. Compressor; 2. Gas tank; 3. Pressure gauge; 4. Solenoid valve; 5. Electric spark generator; 6. Temperature acquisition instrument; 7. Pressure acquisition instrument; 8. Water tank; 9. Nitrogen cylinder; 10. Electrode; 11, 12, 13. Spare interface; 14. Thermocouple; 15. Pressure sensor; 16. Explosion chamber; 17. Water mist generation device; 18. Spray nozzle; 19. Bursting disc; 20, 22. Valve; 21. Vacuum gauge; 23. Vacuum connection; 24. Time controller; 25. High speed camera; 26. Computer; 27. Controller; 28. Flame detector; 29. Trigger; 30. Dust nozzle; 31. Connecting flange.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 4.5 g RDX粉尘爆炸火焰传播图像（单位：ms）

Figure 3. Flame propagation of RDX dust explosion (unit: ms)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同质量RDX粉尘爆炸压力变化

Figure 4. Pressure diagrams of RDX dust explosion with different masses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同质量RDX粉尘爆炸温度变化

Figure 5. Temperature diagrams of RDX dust explosion with different masses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同类型喷嘴

Figure 6. Different types of nozzles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 爆炸压力、温度随雾化压力的变化

Figure 7. Pressure and temperature by RDX explosion varied with pressure of the mist

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 不同类型喷嘴下水雾分散情况

Figure 8. Water mist dispersion under different nozzles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同孔径、不同雾化压力下水雾对RDX粉尘爆炸压力、温度抑制对比

Figure 9. Pressure and temperature suppression of RDX at different apertures and spray pressures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同雾化压力时RDX粉尘爆炸火焰传播

Figure 10. Flame propagation of RDX dust explosion under different spray pressures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同雾化压力下RDX爆炸压力曲线

Figure 11. Pressure curves of RDX explosion under different spray pressures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 不同雾化压力下RDX爆炸温度曲线

Figure 12. Temperature curves of RDX explosion under different spray pressures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(20)

[1]	王浩. 火炸药真空干燥工序风险评估及程序研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2019: 1–4. DOI: 10.27241/d.cnki.gnjgu.2019.000609. WANG H. Risk evaluation and software study for vacuum drying process of explosives [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2019: 1–4. DOI: 10.27241/d.cnki.gnjgu.2019.000609.
[2]	彭琪琪. GRS固体推进剂生产过程燃爆事故分析与风险控制研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2016: 1–2. PENG Q Q. Study on blasting accident analysis and risk control on GRS solid propellant production process [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2016: 1–2.
[3]	陈耀坤, 李亮. 黑索今生产线两次爆炸事故的教训 [J]. 兵工安全技术, 1996(5): 40–42.
[4]	李晋, 杨斌, 赵树森. 固体推进剂在压延中燃烧的预防和灭火研究 [J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(8): 58–62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-193X.2012.08.010. LI J, YANG B, ZHAO S S. Study on fire prevention and extinguishing of solid propellants in manufacture of rolling [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(8): 58–62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-193X.2012.08.010.
[5]	胡双启, 赵海霞, 何中其. 含能材料安全技术 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2020: 168-169.
[6]	KEENAN W A, WAGER P C. Mitigation of confined explosion effects by placing water in proximity of explosions [C]// Proceedings of the 25th DoD Explosives Safety Seminar. Anaheim, CL, USA: Naval Civil Engineering Lab Port Hueneme, 1992: 18–20.
[7]	MARCHAND K A, OSWALD C J. POLCYN M A. Testing and analysis done in support of the development of a container for on-site weapon demilitarization [C]// 27th DOESB Seminar. Las Vegas, 1996: 20–22.
[8]	SHIN Y S, LEE M, LAM K Y, et al. Modeling mitigation effects of watershield on shock waves [J]. Shock and Vibration, 1998, 5(4): 225–234. DOI: 10.1155/1998/782032.
[9]	BUZUKOV A A. Decreasing the parameters of an air shock wave using an air-water curtain [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2000, 36(3): 395–404. DOI: 10.1007/BF02699393.
[10]	TOMOTAKA H, YUTA S, KEI S, et al. Blast mitigation by water in a bag on a tunnel floor [J]. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, 192: 02039. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819202039.
[11]	PONTALIER Q, LOISEAU J, GOROSHIN S, et al. Experimental investigation of blast mitigation and particle-blast interaction during the explosive dispersal of particles and liquids [J]. Shock Waves, 2018, 28(3): 489–511. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-018-0821-5.
[12]	TAMBA T, SUGIYAMA Y, OHTANI K, et al. Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets [J]. Shock Waves, 2021, 31(1): 89–94. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3.
[13]	赵汉中. 在开阔空间中水对爆炸冲击波的削波作用 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2001, 21(1): 26–28. ZHAO H Z. Water effects on shock wave delay in free fields [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2001, 21(1): 26–28.
[14]	赵汉中. 在封闭结构中水对爆炸冲击波的削波、减压作用 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2002, 22(3): 252–256. ZHAO H Z. Water mitigation effects on explosions in confined chambers [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2002, 22(3): 252–256.
[15]	CHEN L, ZHANG L, FANG Q, et al. Performance based investigation on the construction of anti-blast water wall [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 81: 17–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.03.003.
[16]	ZHANG L, CHEN L, FANG Q, et al. Mitigation of blast loadings on structures by an anti-blast plastic water wall [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(2): 461–469. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-016-3091-3.
[17]	徐海斌, 王昭, 胡华权, 等. 封闭空间内水层对爆炸载荷特性影响的实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(8): 1443–1448. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.015. XU H B, WANG Z, HU H Q, et al. Experimental study of air-gap effect on water mitigation of confined explosion [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(8): 1443–1448. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.015.
[18]	徐海斌, 钟方平, 杨军, 等. 水及盛水容器对近距离爆炸载荷影响的实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(4): 525–531. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)04-0525-07. XU H B, ZHONG F P, YANG J, et al. Experimental study for effects of water and its container on explosion loading near explosive [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(4): 525–531. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)04-0525-07.
[19]	徐海斌. 水对封闭空间爆炸载荷的消减效果及影响机理 [D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2020: 37–58. DOI: 10.27517/d.cnki.gzkju.2020.000184. XU H B. Mechanism and effect of water mitigation on confined explosion loading [D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2020: 37–58. DOI: 10.27517/d.cnki.gzkju.2020.000184.
[20]	XU H B, CHEN L K, ZHANG D Z, et al. Mitigation effects on the reflected overpressure of blast shock with water surrounding an explosive in a confined space [J]. Defence Technology, 2021, 17(3): 1071–1080. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.06.026.