递进式凸轮加载的中等应变率实验技术

苗春贺 徐松林 马昊 袁良柱 陆建华 王鹏飞

苗春贺, 徐松林, 马昊, 袁良柱, 陆建华, 王鹏飞. 递进式凸轮加载的中等应变率实验技术[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(3): 034101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0344
引用本文: 苗春贺, 徐松林, 马昊, 袁良柱, 陆建华, 王鹏飞. 递进式凸轮加载的中等应变率实验技术[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(3): 034101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0344
MIAO Chunhe, XU Songlin, MA Hao, YUAN Liangzhu, LU Jianhua, WANG Pengfei. An experimental technique for medium strain-rate loading by a progressive cam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 034101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0344
Citation: MIAO Chunhe, XU Songlin, MA Hao, YUAN Liangzhu, LU Jianhua, WANG Pengfei. An experimental technique for medium strain-rate loading by a progressive cam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 034101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0344

递进式凸轮加载的中等应变率实验技术

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0344
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(11672286, 11872361);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(WK2480000008);中石油与中科院重大战略合作项目(2015A-4812);高压物理与地震科技联合实验室开放基金(2019HPPES01)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    苗春贺(1994- ),男,博士研究生,mch@mail.ustc.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    徐松林(1971- ),男,博士,研究员,博士生导师,slxu99@ustc.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: O341

An experimental technique for medium strain-rate loading by a progressive cam

  • 摘要: 研制了一种可以实现多次加载的凸轮递进式中应变率压缩实验系统。该实验装置采用伺服电机驱动蓄能飞轮转动,后蓄能飞轮带动加载凸轮压缩加载杆的方法,实现对试样中应变率的压缩;同时在一级压缩即将结束时步进电机迅速推动蓄能飞轮贴近加载凸轮,实现多级压缩。试样的动态压缩载荷通过两侧杆上粘贴的应变片所记录的应变信号得到;试样变形过程通过激光干涉测速系统测得的试样两侧杆端的运动速度信号得到。以纸蜂窝试样为例,基于研制的中应变率实验系统,并结合高速摄影图片,研究了厚度10 mm、直径14.5 mm的纸蜂窝试样在应变率3.5 s−1下的动态压缩力学性能,得到了单级压缩和两级压缩过程中纸蜂窝试样的应力-应变曲线和变形过程,并讨论了该实验系统的可靠性。此实验系统可以实现多级递进式中应变率加载;纸蜂窝试样在中等应变率下的峰值强度和平台应力对高应变率下的动态压缩实验数据和低应变率下的准静态实验数据进行了较好地衔接;试样的失效模式主要为准弹性变形后的外壁屈曲和面内剪切。
  • 图  1  递进式凸轮中等应变率实验系统

    Figure  1.  A medium strain rate experimental system based on a progressive cam

    图  2  实验系统

    Figure  2.  The experimental system

    图  3  纸蜂窝试样及其典型压缩过程

    Figure  3.  Paper honeycomb sample and its typical compression process

    图  4  实验原始波形

    Figure  4.  Typical experimental original waveforms

    图  5  实验结果处理

    Figure  5.  Experimental data processing

    图  6  试样的应力应变曲线及对应CCD图片

    Figure  6.  The stress-strain curve of the sample and the corresponding CCD images

    图  7  不同应变率下的应力-应变曲线

    Figure  7.  Stress-strain curves under different strain rates

    图  8  峰值应力和平台应力与应变率的关系

    Figure  8.  Relationships of the peak stress and plateau stress with strain rate

  • [1] HUANG J, XU S, YI H, et al. Size effect on the compression breakage strengths of glass particles [J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 268: 86–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.08.037.
    [2] 薛晓, 乔禹, 王鹏飞, 等. 碳纳米管纤维的动态拉伸力学性能研究 [J]. 实验力学, 2020, 35(5): 811–819. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-19-213.

    XUE X, QIAO Y, WANG P F, et al. Dynamic tensile mechanical properties of carbon nanotube fiber [J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2020, 35(5): 811–819. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-19-213.
    [3] MIAO C H, XU S L, SONG Y P, et al. Influence of stress state on dynamic breakage of quartz glass spheres subjected to lower velocity impacting [J]. Powder Technology, 2022, 397: 117081. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.117081.
    [4] 袁良柱, 苗春贺, 单俊芳, 等. 冲击下混凝土试样应变率效应和惯性效应探讨 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(1): 013101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0114.

    YUAN L Z, MIAO C H, SHAN J F, et al. On strain-rate and inertia effects of concrete samples under impact [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 013101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0114.
    [5] 郑监, 卢芳云. 金属梁在预应力下的冲击响应 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(3): 031401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0328.

    ZHENG J, LU F Y. On impact response of a prestressed metal beam [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(3): 031401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0328.
    [6] HUH H, LIM J H, PARK S H. High speed tensile test of steel sheets for the stress-strain curve at the intermediate strain rate [J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2009, 10(2): 195–204. DOI: 10.1007/s12239-009-0023-3.
    [7] FROUSTEY C, LAMBERT M, CHARLES J L, et al. Design of an impact loading machine based on a flywheel device: application to the fatigue resistance of the high rate pre-straining sensitivity of aluminium alloys [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2007, 47(6): 709–721. DOI: 10.1007/s11340-007-9082-4.
    [8] COLE B N, STURGES J L. The flying wedge: a method for high strain rate tensile testing. Part 2: characteristics of the device [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 28(8): 891–908. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(03)00003-4.
    [9] PETITEAU J C, OTHMAN R, GUÉGAN P, et al. A drop-bar setup for the compressive testing of rubber-like materials in the intermediate strain rate range [J]. Strain, 2014, 50(6): 555–562. DOI: 10.1111/str.12113.
    [10] PEROGAMVROS N, MITROPOULOS T, LAMPEAS G. Drop tower adaptation for medium strain rate tensile testing [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2016, 56(3): 419–436. DOI: 10.1007/s11340-015-0112-3.
    [11] WHITTINGTON W R, OPPEDAL A L, FRANCIS D K, et al. A novel intermediate strain rate testing device: the serpentine transmitted bar [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 81: 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.02.009.
    [12] ZHU D, RAJAN S D, MOBASHER B, et al. Modal analysis of a servo-hydraulic high speed machine and its application to dynamic tensile testing at an intermediate strain rate [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2011, 51(8): 1347–1363. DOI: 10.1007/s11340-010-9443-2.
    [13] OTHMAN R, GUÉGAN P, CHALLITA G, et al. A modified servo-hydraulic machine for testing at intermediate strain rates [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(3): 460–467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.06.003.
    [14] LI Z, WANG T, JIANG Y, et al. Design-oriented crushing analysis of hexagonal honeycomb core under in-plane compression [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 187: 429–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.066.
    [15] ZHOU H, XU P, XIE S C, et al. Mechanical performance and energy absorption properties of structures combining two Nomex honeycombs [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 185: 524–536. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.059.
    [16] WANG Z G, LI Z D, XIONG W. Experimental investigation on bending behavior of honeycomb sandwich panel with ceramic tile face-sheet [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 164: 280–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.077.
    [17] WANG Z G, TIAN H Q, LU Z J, et al. High-speed axial impact of aluminum honeycomb: experiments and simulations [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2014, 56: 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.013.
    [18] SIBEAUD J M, THAMIÉ L, PUILLET C. Hypervelocity impact on honeycomb target structures: experiments and modeling [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(12): 1799–1807. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.037.
    [19] ZHOU X L, ZHOU H F, LI X Y, et al. Size effects on tensile and compressive strengths in metallic glass nanowires [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2015, 84: 130–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.07.018.
    [20] ZHOU Q, MAYER R R. Characterization of aluminum honeycomb material failure in large deformation compression, shear, and tearing [J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 2002, 124(4): 412–420. DOI: 10.1115/1.1491575.
    [21] HOU B, ZHAO H, PATTOFATTO S, et al. Inertia effects on the progressive crushing of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(19/20): 2754–2762. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.005.
    [22] WANG Z G, LI Z D, XIONG W. Numerical study on three-point bending behavior of honeycomb sandwich with ceramic tile [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 167: 63–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.108.
    [23] WANG D M. Impact behavior and energy absorption of paper honeycomb sandwich panels [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(1): 110–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.002.
    [24] HEIMBS S, SCHMEER S, MIDDENDORF P, et al. Strain rate effects in phenolic composites and phenolic-impregnated honeycomb structures [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2007, 67(13): 2827–2837. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.027.
    [25] SHAN J F, XU S L, ZHOU L J, et al. Dynamic fracture of aramid paper honeycomb subjected to impact loading [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 223: 110962. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110962.
    [26] 范成年, 张磊, 单俊芳, 等. 复合纸蜂窝结构的力学性能与吸能特性研究 [J]. 实验力学, 2021, 36(5): 627–637. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-21-001.

    FAN C N, ZHANG L, SHAN J F, et al. The mechanical performance and energy absorption properties of composite paper honeycomb structures [J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2021, 36(5): 627–637. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-21-001.
    [27] 徐松林, 单俊芳, 周李姜, 等. 对试样进行中等应变速率压缩的实验装置: CN109781555A [P]. 2019-05-21. 北京: 北京集佳知识产权代理有限公司, 2019.
    [28] RUAN D, LU G, CHEN F L, et al. Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates [J]. Composite Structures, 2002, 57(1): 331–336. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00100-9.
    [29] XU S Q, RUAN D, BEYNON J H, et al. Experimental investigation of the dynamic behavior of aluminum foams [J]. Materials Science Forum, 2010, 654/655/656: 950–953. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.950.
  • 加载中
图(8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  352
  • HTML全文浏览量:  95
  • PDF下载量:  70
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-08-09
  • 修回日期:  2022-10-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-10-12
  • 刊出日期:  2023-03-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回