水下爆炸冲击波和气泡行为自由面效应的实验研究

方厚林; 卢强; 郭权势; 李国亮; 刘存旭; 陶思昊; 张德志

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2024-0003

水下爆炸冲击波和气泡行为自由面效应的实验研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0003

西北核技术研究所，陕西西安 710024

详细信息

作者简介:
方厚林（1987－　），男，硕士，副研究员，fanghoulin@nint.ac.cn

通讯作者:
张德志（1973－　），男，博士，研究员，zhangdezhi@nint.ac.cn

中图分类号: O382.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 226
- HTML全文浏览量: 81
- PDF下载量: 99
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-01-02
- 修回日期: 2024-06-30
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-01
- 刊出日期: 2024-08-05

Experimental research on the free surface effect of shock wave and bubble behavior of small yield underwater explosion

Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, Shaanxi, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究自由面对水下爆炸冲击波、气泡行为和由气泡与自由面强耦合作用形成水幕的影响，设计了小当量PETN球形装药近水面水下爆炸实验系统，开展了5种典型工况水下爆炸实验，采用高速相机和压力传感器分别获取了气泡和水幕形态演变过程、水中测点压力时间历程。根据冲击波、气泡时序特征分别分析了其自由面效应，冲击波主要变现为截断效应，气泡与自由面相互作用表现为复杂的气泡形态演化和水幕生成及演化，通过高速图像结合压力时间历程分析，进一步从气泡水平半径、中心偏移位移和水幕最大高度定量分析气泡自由面效应。结果表明：随着爆深的减小，水面反射波程差减小，自由面对冲击波的截断效应增强，即冲击波正压作用时间减小，实测截断时间差与计算时间差的最大偏差为6.81%；随着比例爆深减小，自由面效应加剧，气泡和水幕形态趋于复杂化；气泡由球形演变为卵形以及更加复杂的形态，水幕由单一的水冢，逐渐转变为水冢-顶端飞溅水柱、水冢-垂直喷射水柱-水射流等复杂形态；气泡水平半径从第2个脉动周期不再保持脉动特征过渡到第1个脉动周期，甚至到第1次气泡膨胀阶段；气泡水平半径中心偏移位移呈现出两段式变化规律，在前期偏移位移快速增加阶段（偏移位移范围0~20 mm），4种比例爆深偏移位移呈现出近似线性变化规律，线性系数相近。
- 水下爆炸 /
- 冲击波 /
- 气泡行为 /
- 自由面效应
Abstract: In order to study the effects of free surface on underwater explosion shock wave, bubble behavior and water plumes formed by strong coupling between bubble and free surface, a small yield pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) spherical charge near water surface underwater explosion experimental system was designed, five typical conditions of underwater explosion experiments were carried out, and the evolution process of bubble and water plumes, as well as time history of pressure at the gauge were obtained by high-speed camera and pressure sensor respectively. Based on the characteristics of shock waves and bubble time series, their free surface effects were analyzed separately. The shock wave mainly manifests as truncation effects. The interaction between bubble and free surface is manifested as complex bubble evolution and water plume generation and evolution, which were mainly analyzed through high-speed images, appropriately combined with pressure values. The free surface effects of the bubble were further quantitatively analyzed by the horizontal radius of the bubble, the offset displacement of the bubble, and the maximum height of water plume. The results show that with the decrease of the detonation depth , the difference of the surface reflection wave path decreases, and the truncation effect of the free surface on shock wave increases, that is, the time of the positive pressure of shock wave decreases, and the maximum deviation between the measured truncation time difference and the calculated time difference is 6.81%. With the decrease of the scaled detonation depth, the free surface effects increase, and the shapes of bubble and water plumes become more complicated. The bubble evolves from a sphere to an oval shape, even more complex shapes. The water plume gradually changes from a single water spike to a complex form such as a water spike-top splash column, a water spike-vertical jet column-water jet, etc. The change of the horizontal radius of the bubble no longer retain pulsation characteristics from the second pulsation period to the first pulsation period and even to the first bubble expansion stage. The offset displacement of the center of the bubble’s horizontal radius shows a two-stage variation law, and in the early rapidly-increasing stage (0–20 mm), the offset displacements at 4 scaled detonation depths show a linear variation law, and the linear coefficients are close.
- underwater explosion /
- shock wave /
- bubble behavior /
- free surface effect

HTML全文

图 1 实验系统示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental system composition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 典型压力时程曲线

Figure 2. History curve of typical pressure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同爆深时的实验压力时程曲线

Figure 3. Pressure history curves with different detonation depths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 γ=2.450时水幕和气泡演变过程的高速图像

Figure 4. High-speed images of water plumes and bubble evolution when γ=2.450

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 γ=1.379时水幕和气泡演变过程的高速图像：(a)～(g)为水幕演变图像，(h)～(p)为气泡演变图像

Figure 5. High-speed images of water plumes and bubble evolution when γ=1.379: (a)–(g) are evolution images of water plumes, (h)–(p) are evolution images of bubble

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 γ=0.960时水幕和气泡演变过程的高速图像：(a)～(g)为水幕演变图像，(h)～(q)为气泡演变图像

Figure 6. High-speed images of water plumes and bubble evolution when γ=0.960: (a)–(g) are evolution images of water plumes, (h)–(q) are evolution images of bubble

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 γ=0.300时水幕和气泡演变过程的高速图像：(a)～(j)为水幕演变图像，(k)～(s)为气泡演变图像

Figure 7. High-speed images of water plumes and bubble evolution when γ=0.300: (a)–(j) are evolution images of water plumes, (k)–(s) are evolution images of bubble

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 γ=0.172时水幕和气泡演变过程高速图像：(a)～(h)为水幕演变图像，(i)～(r)为气泡演变图像

Figure 8. High-speed images of water plumes and bubble evolution when γ=0.172: (a)–(h) are evolution images of water plumes, (i)–(r) are evolution images of bubble.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同比例爆深下气泡水平半径、中心偏移位移随时间变化曲线

Figure 9. Bubble-horizontal-radius and center-offset-displacement curves of different detonation depth experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同比例爆深下水幕高度随时间变化曲线

Figure 10. Plume height curves of different scaled detonation depths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 实验工况

Table 1. Experimental working conditions

实验	当量W/g	水深/mm	d/mm	R_m/mm	γ
1	1	900	380	155.1	2.450
2	1	735	215	155.9	1.379
3	1	670	150	156.2	0.960
4	1	567	47	156.8	0.300
5	1	547	27	156.9	0.172

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 截断时间差分析

Table 2. Analysis of truncated time difference

实验	d/mm	峰值时刻/ms	截断压力时刻/ms	截断时间差/ms	水面反射波程差/mm	由波程差计算截断时间差/ms	截断时间测量与计算的误差/%
2	215	0.1512	0.3207	0.1695	238.1	0.1587	6.81
3	150	0.1504	0.2392	0.0888	132.7	0.0884	0.40
4	47	0.1525	0.1638	0.0113	16.8	0.0112	1.05

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(25)

[1]	汪玉, 张磊, 史少华, 等. 舰船水下非接触爆炸抗冲击技术综述 [J]. 科技导报, 2009, 27(14): 19–22. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7857.2009.14.004. WANG Y, ZHANG L, SHI S H, et al. Review of shock-resistance technology of naval ship for underwater non-contact explosion [J]. Science & Technology Review, 2009, 27(14): 19–22. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7857.2009.14.004.
[2]	HIGDON C E. Water barrier ship self-defense concept: ADA 294929 [R]. USA: Naval Surface Warfare Center, 1994.
[3]	王高辉, 张社荣, 卢文波. 近边界面的水下爆炸冲击波传播特性及气穴效应 [J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(8): 999–1007. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20150035. WANG G H, ZHANG S R, LU W B. The influence of boundaries on the shock wave propagation characteristics and cavitation effects of underwater explosion [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46(8): 999–1007. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.20150035.
[4]	崔杰, 杨文山, 李世铭, 等. 近自由面水下爆炸冲击波切断效应研究 [J]. 船舶力学, 2012, 16(5): 465–471. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2012.05.001. CUI J, YANG W S, LI S M, et al. Research on the cutoff effect of shock wave induced by underwater explosion near free surface [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2012, 16(5): 465–471. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2012.05.001.
[5]	张鹏翔, 顾文彬, 叶序双. 浅层水中爆炸冲击波切断现象浅探 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2002, 22(3): 221–228. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2002.03.006. ZHANG P X, GU W B, YE X S. Discussions of blasting shock waves cutoff in shallow-layer water [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2002, 22(3): 221–228. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2002.03.006.
[6]	高建华, 陆林, 何洋扬. 浅水中爆炸及其破坏效应[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2010: 21–24.
[7]	郅斌伟, 张志江, 李健, 等. 近水面水下爆炸水柱效应研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2009, 29(1): 5–8. ZHI B W, ZHANG Z J, LI J, et al. A study on water columns produced by near water surface explosion [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2009, 29(1): 5–8.
[8]	文彦博, 胡亮亮, 秦健, 等. 近场水下爆炸气泡脉动及水射流的实验与数值模拟研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(5): 053203. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0206. WEN Y B, HU L L, QIN J, et al. Experimental study and numerical simulation on bubble pulsation and water jet in near-field underwater explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(5): 053203. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0206.
[9]	那立民, 古滨, 孙波, 等. 近水面爆炸气泡——自由面动态耦合演化特征研究 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2021, 42(1): 185–193. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2021.01.034. NA L M, GU B, SUN B, et al. Research on dynamic evolving characteristic of underwater explosion bubble coupling with free surface under shallow water [J]. Journal of Ordance Equipment Engineering, 2021, 42(1): 185–193. DOI: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2021.01.034.
[10]	董琪, 韦灼彬, 唐廷, 等. 爆炸深度对浅水爆炸气泡脉动的影响 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2018, 32(2): 024102. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20170580. DONG Q, WEI Z B, TANG T, et al. Influence of explosion depth on bubble pulsation in shallow water explosion [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2018, 32(2): 024102. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20170580.
[11]	陈莹玉, 姚熊亮. 近水面水下爆炸气泡强耦合运动特性研究 [J]. 中国造船, 2016, 57(3): 65–71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2016.03.008. CHEN Y Y, YAO X L. Dynamics of underwater explosion bubble near free surface [J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2016, 57(3): 65–71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2016.03.008.
[12]	李健, 荣吉利, 项大林. 近自由面水下爆炸气泡运动的数值计算研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(6): 200–205. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.15.035. LI J, RONG J L, XIANG D L. Numerical study of bubble motion by underwater explosion near free surface [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(6): 200–205. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.15.035.
[13]	张阿漫, 王超, 王诗平, 等. 气泡与自由液面相互作用的实验研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61(8): 084701. DOI: 10.7498/aps.61.084701. ZHANG A M, WANG C, WANG S P, et al. Experimental study of interaction between bubble and free surface [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(8): 084701. DOI: 10.7498/aps.61.084701.
[14]	倪宝玉, 李帅, 张阿漫. 气泡在自由液面破碎后的射流断裂现象研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2013, 62(12): 124704. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.124704. NI B Y, LI S, ZHANG A M. Jet splitting after bubble breakup at the free surface [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(12): 124704. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.124704.
[15]	李帅, 张阿漫, 王诗平. 气泡引起的皇冠型水冢实验与数值研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2013, 62(19): 194703. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.194703. LI S, ZHAN A M, WANG S P. Experimental and numerical studies on “crown” spike generated by a bubble near free-surface [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(19): 194703. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.194703.
[16]	李梅, 王树山, 马峰. 爆炸水幕高度变化规律实验研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2012, 32(8): 776–780. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2012.08.003. LI M, WANG S S, MA F. Experimental research on height variation of explosion plumes [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2012, 32(8): 776–780. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2012.08.003.
[17]	李梅, 魏继锋, 王树山, 等. 深水域近水面水下爆炸水柱形态及演变实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2013, 27(1): 63–68. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.01.009. LI M, WEI J F, WANG S S, et al. Experimental study on shape and evolution of water column caused by near surface explosion in deep water area [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2013, 27(1): 63–68. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.01.009.
[18]	李梅, 王树山, 魏继锋, 等. 近水面水下爆炸水柱形成实验研究 [J]. 船舶力学, 2013, 17(11): 1229–1235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2013.11.002. LI M, WANG S S, WEI J F, et al. Experimental study on water columns produced by near surface underwater explosion [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2013, 17(11): 1229–1235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2013.11.002.
[19]	王树山, 李梅, 马峰. 爆炸气泡与自由水面相互作用动力学研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2014, 63(19): 194703. DOI: 10.7498/aps.63.194703. WANG S S, LI M, MA F. Dynamics of the interaction between explosion bubble and free surface [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(19): 194703. DOI: 10.7498/aps.63.194703.
[20]	王占江. 岩土中填实与空腔解耦爆炸的化爆模拟实验研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2003: 4–13.
[21]	卢强, 王占江, 朱玉荣, 等. 花岗岩中实测球面波粒子速度的时域和频域分析 [J]. 现代应用物理, 2018, 9(4): 040104. DOI: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2018.040104. LU Q, WANG Z J, ZHU Y R, et al. Analytical methods in time and frequency domains for the measured particle velocity of spherical stress wave in granite [J]. Modern Applied Physics, 2018, 9(4): 040104. DOI: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2018.040104.
[22]	郭权势, 卢强, 方厚林, 等. 基于光学法水下爆炸流场压强测量与分析 [J]. 现代应用物理, 2024, 15(2): 021002. GUO Q S, LU Q, FANG H L, et al. Pressure measurement and analysis of underwater explosion flow field based on optical method [J]. Modern Applied Physics, 2024, 15(2): 021002.
[23]	张颖, 周刚. 小当量水下爆炸实验研究[C]//第七届全国爆轰学术会议文集. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2006: 222–227.
[24]	汪斌, 王彦平, 张远平. 有限水域气泡脉动实验方法研究 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2008, 31(3): 32–35. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2008.03.022. WANG B, WANG Y P, ZHANG Y P. A method of studying bubble pulses in a conf ined water area [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2008, 31(3): 32–35. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2008.03.022.
[25]	COLE R H. 水下爆炸[M]. 罗耀杰, 韩润泽, 官信, 等译. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1960: 162–165.