The conservative and non-conservative algorithms applied to numerical studies of the interface instability in multi-component fluids

ZHANG Xue-ying; ZHAO Ning; ZHU Jun

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0065-06

Volume 26 Issue 1

Nov. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2006 > 26(1): 65-70

ZHANG Xue-ying, ZHAO Ning, ZHU Jun. The conservative and non-conservative algorithms applied to numerical studies of the interface instability in multi-component fluids[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 65-70. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0065-06

Citation:

ZHANG Xue-ying, ZHAO Ning, ZHU Jun. The conservative and non-conservative algorithms applied to numerical studies of the interface instability in multi-component fluids[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 65-70. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0065-06

Citation:

ZHANG Xue-ying, ZHAO Ning, ZHU Jun. The conservative and non-conservative algorithms applied to numerical studies of the interface instability in multi-component fluids[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 65-70. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0065-06

PDF( 523 KB)

The conservative and non-conservative algorithms applied to numerical studies of the interface instability in multi-component fluids

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0065-06

1.
School of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016 Jiangsu, China;
2.
School of Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016 Jiangsu, China

Publish Date: 2006-01-25

Abstract

Abstract

Under the conservative scheme, flux components are reconstructed with the component by component versions. Then the quasi-linear systems are solved by the multiple WENO reconstruction based on the 1st order up wind scheme. The level set equation is used to capture the interface movement. Finally the two algorithms are applied to simulate the muti-component fluid flow. Satisfied numerical results have been obtained.
- fluid mechanics,
- conservative and non-conservative (M)WENO scheme,
- Level-Set method,
- multi-component fluid interface,
- GFM

FullText(HTML)

References(0)

References

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Xuezhe, LIN Zhong, WANG Ruili, YU Yunlong. A constructed method of manufactured solutions and code verification for 2D Lagrangian radiation hydrodynamic equations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 014201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0199
[2]	Liu Na, Chen Yibing. High order spectral volume method for multi-component flows[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 114-119. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0114-06
[3]	Xu Chunguang, Dong Haibo, Liu Jun. An accurate conservative interpolation method for the mixed gridbased on the intersection of grid cells[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 305-312. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0305-08
[4]	Zhao Jibo, Sun Chengwei, Gu Zhuowei, Wang Guiji, Cai Jintao. Magnetic hydrodynamic calculation on planar and cylindrical configurations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 9-16. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0009-08
[5]	Xu Shuang, Zhao Ning, Wang Chun-wu, Wang Dong-hong. Interface treating methods for the gas-water multi-phase flows[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 326-334. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)03-0326-09
[6]	Chen Hong, Zhu Wei-bing, Zhang Xiao-bin, Sun Run-peng, Guo Jin-xin. Application of real ghost fluid method to simulation of compressible multi-fluid flows[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(1): 29-37. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)01-0029-09
[7]	ZHANG Zhi-hong, MENG Qing-chang, GU Jian-nong, JIN Yong-gang. Acalculationmethodforsupercavityprofile aboutaslendercone-shapedprojectiletraveling inwateratsupersonicspeed[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 49-54. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0049-06
[8]	YAO Yang. ApplicationofGELmethodtodouble-interfacesproblems[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(4): 413-417. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)04-0413-05
[9]	ZHANG Zhi-Hong, MENG Qing-Chang, GU Jian-Nong, WANG Chong. A calculation method for supercavity profile about a slender cone-shaped projectile traveling in water at subsonic speed[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(3): 254-261. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)03-0254-08
[10]	CHEN Er-yun, ZHAO Gai-ping, DAI Ren, MA Da-wei. Adiscontinuousfiniteelementmethod forcompressiblemulti-componentflow[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4): 419-423. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)04-0419-05
[11]	BAI Jin-Song, WANG Tao, ZOU Li-Yong, LI Ping. Large eddy simulation for the multi-viscosity-fluid and turbulence[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(3): 262-268. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)03-0262-07
[12]	CHEN Rong-san, SHENG Wan-cheng. A modified ghost fluid method for strong shock wave impacting on material interface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(2): 144-148. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)02-0144-05
[13]	ZHANG Jun, ZHAO Ning, REN Deng-feng, TAN Jun-jie. Application of the level set method on adaptive cartesian grids[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 438-442. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0438-05
[14]	SUN Zhen-sheng, ZHANG Shi-ying. Discontinuous Galerkin method and computation of fluid-rigid interaction[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(1): 80-85. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)01-0080-06
[15]	WANG Gang-hua, SUN Cheng-wei, ZHAO Jian-heng, HU Xi-jing, JIANG Ji-hao. One-dimensional, magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically driven flyer plates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(3): 261-264. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)03-0261-04
[16]	HOU Bao-lin. Influence of fluid behavior index on performance of a gun recoil magneto-rheological damper[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 245-249. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0245-05
[17]	LIAO Hua-lin, LI Gen-sheng. Influences of the pore-fluid coupling effect on impact stress in rocks impacted by water jets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 84-90. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0084-07
[18]	CAI Li, FENG Jian-hu, XIE Wen-xian, ZHOU Jun. Applications of the ghost fluid method based on the fourth-order semi-discrete central-upwind scheme[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(2): 137-144. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)02-0137-08