Numerical simulation on shock waves generated by explosive mixture gas from large nuclear blast load generator based on equivalent-energy principles

Zhang Xiu-hua; Zhang Chun-wei; Duan Zhong-dong

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0080-07

Volume 34 Issue 1

Mar. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2014 > 34(1): 80-86

Zhang Xiu-hua, Zhang Chun-wei, Duan Zhong-dong. Numerical simulation on shock waves generated by explosive mixture gas from large nuclear blast load generator based on equivalent-energy principles[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 80-86. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0080-07

Citation:

Zhang Xiu-hua, Zhang Chun-wei, Duan Zhong-dong. Numerical simulation on shock waves generated by explosive mixture gas from large nuclear blast load generator based on equivalent-energy principles[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 80-86. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0080-07

Citation:

Zhang Xiu-hua, Zhang Chun-wei, Duan Zhong-dong. Numerical simulation on shock waves generated by explosive mixture gas from large nuclear blast load generator based on equivalent-energy principles[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 80-86. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0080-07

PDF( 2327 KB)

Numerical simulation on shock waves generated by explosive mixture gas from large nuclear blast load generator based on equivalent-energy principles

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0080-07

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China
2.
School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China

Funds: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51078116)

Received Date: 2012-06-11
Rev Recd Date: 2013-02-07
Publish Date: 2014-01-25

Abstract

Abstract

Based on the nonlinear explicit dynamic finite element program LS-DYNA and the multi-material Euler algorithm, the shock wave propagations were numerically simulated for the two explosion resources of the TNT dynamite and the acetylene-air gaseous mixture in free air field, respectively.The overpressures of the shock waves and the propagation principles were compared between the two blast-loading methods.Based on the equivalent-explosion energy, a formula for calculating the nominal scale distance of gas explosion was obtained in terms of overpressure.The results show that the Euler method can be used to calculate the propagation process of two kinds of explosion sources and the numerical results agree well with the ones based on the empirical equations.With the increasing of the propagation distances, the overpressures decrease sharply and the overpressure relative error between the two load methods decreases gradually.When the shock wave overpressure was lower than 0.5MPa, the acetylene-air gaseous mixture can replace the chemical dynamite for generating blast shock waves by the large nuclear blast load generator.
- mechanics of explosion,
- air shock wave,
- equivalent energy principle,
- explosive gas,
- Euler algorithm,
- large nuclear blast load generator

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

[1]	欧进萍, 张春巍, 张晓漪, 等.大型模爆器综合试验系统研制、改造与应用[C]//中国土木工程学会防护工程分会第十次学术年会.乌鲁木齐, 2006.
[2]	张春巍.结构抗爆抗冲击与振动控制的若干问题研究[R].哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2007.
[3]	李生娟, 毕明树, 章正军, 等.气体爆炸研究现状及发展趋势[J].化工装备技术, 2002, 23(6): 15-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7251.2002.06.004 Li Sheng-juan, Bi Ming-shu, Zhang Zheng-jun, et al. Gas explosion present research situation and development trend[J]. Chemical Equipment Technology, 2002, 23(6): 15-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7251.2002.06.004
[4]	Benson D J. Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1992, 99: 235-394. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(92)90042-I
[5]	LS-DYNA keyword user's manual: Version 971[M]. Livermore California: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006.
[6]	张秀华.气爆炸冲击作用下钢框架抗爆性能试验研究与数值模拟[D].哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2011.
[7]	Smith P D, Hetherington J G. Blast and ballistic loading structures[M]. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, 1994: 30-166.
[8]	Mays G C, Smith P D. Blast effects on buildings[M]. London: Thomas Telford Publications, 1995: 24-50.
[9]	Baker W E. Explosions in air[M]. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1973: 7-15.
[10]	王飞, 朱立新, 顾文彬, 等.基于ALE算法的空气冲击波绕流数值模拟研究[J].工程爆破, 2002, 8(2): 13-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2002.02.004 Wang Fei, Zhu Li-xin, Gu Wen-bin, et al. Numerical simlation shock wave around-flow on basis of ALE algorithm[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2002, 8(2): 13-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2002.02.004

Relative Articles

[1]	YANG Shigang, CAI Jiongwei, YANG Ya, SUN Wensheng, MEN Jingmin. Disaster effects of combustible gas explosion in an urban shallow-buried pipe trench (Ⅱ): influencing factor analysis and consequence evaluation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(1): 015401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0503
[2]	YANG Shigang, CAI Jiongwei, YANG Ya, SUN Wensheng, MEN Jingmin. Disaster effects of combustible gas explosion in an urban shallow-buried pipe trench (Ⅰ): shock wave propagation on the ground[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(10): 105101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0502
[3]	QIN Yi, CHEN Xiaowei, HUANG Wei. Overpressure prediction of combustible gas explosion in confined space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(3): 032202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0175
[4]	WANG Xinying, WANG Shushan, LU Xi, WANG Jianmin. Overpressure-impulse damage criterion of air shock waves on biological targets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 106-111. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0031
[5]	Cao Yong, Guo Jin, Hu Kunlun, Shao Ke, Yang Fan. Effect of ignition locations on vented explosion of premixed hydrogen-air mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6): 847-852. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0847-06
[6]	Zhou Ning, Zhang Bingbing, Feng Lei, Geng Ying, Jiang Shuai, Zhang Lu. Effects of reflected wave on premixed-gas explosion and dynamic response of tube shells[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(4): 541-547. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)04-0541-07
[7]	Yu Jian-liang, Gao Yuan, Yan Xing-qing, Gao Wei. Correlation between the critical tube diameter and annular interval for detonation wave in high-concentration argon diluted mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 603-608. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0603-06
[8]	Ning Hui-jun, Wang Hao, Wu Tan-hui, Zhang Meng-hua, Zhang Cheng, Ruan Wen-jun. Dynamics simulation of a profiled rod after detonation flying against air resistance[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 541-546. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0541-06
[9]	Yao Cheng-bao, Li Ruo, Tian Zhou, Guo Yong-hui. Two dimensional simulation for shock wave produced by strong explosion in free air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 585-590. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0585-06
[10]	Cheng Guan-bing, Li Jun-xian, Li Shu-ming, Qu Hong-chun. An experimental study on detonation characteristics of binary fuels hydrogen/propane-air mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0249-06
[11]	Guo Ya-li, Han Yan, Wang Li-ming. Overpressure reconstruction of shock wave based on generalized inverse theory[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 764-768. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0764-05
[12]	Liu Xian-jun, Wang Xiao-long, Li Si-zhong, Zhong Wei-zhou, Zhou Ben-quan. Device for ejecting water column by inertia effect based on load technology of gas gun[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(3): 272-277. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0272-06
[13]	Zhou Xi-Hua, Meng Le, Shi Mei-jing, Guo Liang-hui, Zhao Jian-yuan, Feng Cun-cun. Influences of sealing fire zone in high gas mine on impact factors of gas explosion limits[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(4): 351-356. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0351-06
[14]	ZHANG Bo, Lee J H S, BAI Chun-hua. CriticalenergyfordirectinitiationofC2H4-O2 mixture[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(2): 113-120. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)02-0113-08
[15]	LU Sheng-zhuo, WANG Wei, ZHANG Bo-yi. Experimentalresearchondestructionmechanismof large-scalefloating-roofoiltankunderblastloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(2): 158-164. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0158-07
[16]	SHI Xi-lin, WANG Zhi-rong, JIANG Jun-cheng. Explosion-vented processes for methane-air premixed gas in spherical vessels with venting pipes[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(4): 390-394. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)04-0390-05
[17]	TENG Hong-hui, Lv Jun-ming, JIANG Zong-lin. Downstream detonation initiation induced by interaction between shock wave and obstacle in combustible gas mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(3): 251-258. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)03-0251-08
[18]	WANG Chun, ZHANG De-liang, JIANG Zong-lin. Numerical investigation of detonation sweeping an interface of inert gas and its decoupling[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(6): 556-561. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)06-0556-06
[19]	SHI Peng, DENG Guo-qiang, YANG Xiu-min, CHEN Zhao-yuan. Study on ground shock energy distribution of explosion in soil[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 240-244. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0240-05
[20]	WANG Bao-guo, ZHANG Jing-lin, WANG Zuo-shan, LIU Yu-cun, WANG Jian-hua. Influencing factors of the yield of diamond powder synthesised by detonation and explosion shock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(5): 429-433. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)05-0429-05

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	李腾飞，钟冬望，何理，司剑峰，黄秋月. 基于落锤-弹簧碰撞系统的燃气爆炸载荷模拟加载方法研究. 力学与实践. 2024(04): 796-802 .
2.	Chaozhi Yang，Zhengxiang Huang，Xin Jia，Wei Shang，Jian Zhang. Analysis model for damage of reinforced bars in RC beams under contact explosion. Defence Technology. 2024(11): 104-118 .
3.	钟冬望，李腾飞，何理，杨志龙，陈江伟. 管廊燃气爆炸载荷特征及作用效应研究. 金属矿山. 2022(07): 19-26 .
4.	丁宇奇，叶碧涛，芦烨，成佳浩，卢宏，谢清，王学勇. 基于不同等效方法的储罐内爆载荷计算与结构破坏分析. 化工机械. 2021(01): 35-43 .
5.	陈德勇，贺小轩，杨慧，相光友，左祖雄. 瓦斯爆炸冲击波对通风设施破坏情况数值模拟影响因素分析. 安全. 2021(12): 36-42 .
6.	陈志峰，何子建，沙芳菲，董新慧，张悦. 爆炸冲击波作用下圆形通风设施的动态破坏特性. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2020(04): 88-93 .
7.	李志鹏，吴顺川，严琼，蒋一波. 隧道瓦斯爆炸数值分析与爆源类型确定研究. 振动与冲击. 2018(14): 94-101+140 .
8.	张秀华，段忠东，李玉顺. 燃气爆炸冲击加载试验研究与数值模拟. 振动与冲击. 2015(10): 142-146 .