Characteristics of flame propagation during coal dust cloud explosion

Cao Wei-guo; Xu Sen; Liang Ji-yuan; Gao Wei; Pan Feng; Rao Guo-ning

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08

Volume 34 Issue 5

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2014 > 34(5): 586-593

Cao Wei-guo, Xu Sen, Liang Ji-yuan, Gao Wei, Pan Feng, Rao Guo-ning. Characteristics of flame propagation during coal dust cloud explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5): 586-593. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08

Citation:

Cao Wei-guo, Xu Sen, Liang Ji-yuan, Gao Wei, Pan Feng, Rao Guo-ning. Characteristics of flame propagation during coal dust cloud explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5): 586-593. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08

Citation:

PDF( 3646 KB)

Characteristics of flame propagation during coal dust cloud explosion

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08

1.
School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China
2.
National Quality Supervision and Inspection Center for Industrial Explosive Materials, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China
3.
School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Received Date: 2013-04-01
Rev Recd Date: 2013-06-29
Publish Date: 2014-09-25

Abstract

Abstract

Two kinds of different volatile pulverized coal were tested in a semi-enclosed vertical combustion tube.And a high-speed video camera and an infrared imager were used to record the flame propagation process and the spatial flame temperature distribution, respectively.The changes of the flame propagation velocity and temperature with time were analyzed for the two different coal dust clouds during combustion.Experimental results show that the flame propagation velocity and flame temperature of the high-volatile coal dust cloud are higher than those of the low-volatile coal dust cloud under the same experimental conditions.And the volumic mass of coal dust cloud as well as ignition energy can affect the flame propagation.With increasing the volumic mass of coal dust cloud, the flame propagation velocity and the flame temperature increase at first and then decrease, oscillating phenomena appear in the next process.With increasing the ignition energy, the flame propagation velocity and flame temperature increase.Based on the experimental data, an empirical formula was proposed for calculating the flame propagation velocity and flame temperature under certain conditions.
- mechanics of explosion,
- ignition energy,
- flame temperature,
- coal dust cloud mass fraction,
- dust explosion,
- flame propagation

FullText(HTML)

References(14)

References

[1]	Proust Ch. A few fundamental aspects about ignition and flame propagation in dust clouds[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(2/3): 104-120. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423005001026
[2]	Han O, Masaaki Y, Matsuda T, et al. A study of flame propagation mechanisms in lycopodium dust clouds based on dust particles'behavior[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2001, 14(3): 153-160. doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(00)00049-8
[3]	Han O, Masaaki Y, Matsuda T, et al. Behavior of flames propagating through lycopodium dust clouds in a vertical duct[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2000, 13(6): 449-457. doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(99)00072-8
[4]	Gao W, Dobashi R, Toshio M, et al. Effects of particle characteristics on flame propagation behavior during organic dust explosions in a half-closed chamber[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2012, 25(6): 993-999. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.05.015
[5]	丁以斌, 孙金华, 何学超, 等.锆粉尘云的火焰传播特性[J].燃烧科学与技术, 2010, 16(4): 353-358. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=35258845 Ding Yi-bin, Sun Jin-hua, He Xue-chao, et al. Flame propagation characteristic of zirconium particle cloud[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2010, 16(4): 353-358. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=35258845
[6]	蒯念生, 黄卫星, 袁旌杰, 等.点火能量对粉尘爆炸行为的影响[J].爆炸与冲击, 2012, 32(4): 432-438. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BZCJ201204016.htm Kuai Nian-sheng, Huang Wei-xing, Yuan Jing-jie, et al. Influence of ignition energy on dust explosion behavior[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 432-438. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BZCJ201204016.htm
[7]	来诚锋, 段滋华, 张永发, 等.煤粉末的爆炸机理[J].爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(3): 325-328. Lai Cheng-feng, Duan Zi-hua, Zhang Yong-fa, et al. Explosion mechanism of carbon powder[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(3): 325-328.
[8]	高聪, 李化, 苏丹, 等.密闭空间煤粉的爆炸特性[J].爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(2): 164-168. Gao Cong, Li Hua, Su Dan, et al. Explosion characteristics of coal dust in a sealed vessel[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(2): 164-168.
[9]	徐旭常, 周力行.燃烧技术手册[M].北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007.
[10]	Ewald K H, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Munir Z A. Combustion of zirconium powders in oxygen[J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2000, 291(1/2): 118-130. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921509300009679
[11]	Hanai H, Kobayashi H, Niioka T. A numerical study of pulsating flame propagation in mixtures of gas and particles[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(1): 815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80285-4
[12]	潘峰, 马超, 曹卫国, 等.玉米淀粉粉尘爆炸危险性研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2011: 21(7): 46-51. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgaqkxxb201107008 Pan Feng, Ma Chao, Cao Wei-guo, et al. Research on explosion risk of corn starch dust[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(7): 46-51. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgaqkxxb201107008
[13]	Dreizin L, Hoffman K. Constant pressure combustion of aerosol of coarse magnesium panicles in microgravity[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 118(1): 262-280. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010218098001448
[14]	仲倩, 王伯良, 黄菊, 等.火球动态模型在温压炸药热毁伤效应评估中的应用[J].爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(5): 528-532. Zhong Qian, Wang Bo-liang, Huang Ju, et al. Application of a dynamic model to thermal damage estimation of thermobaric explosives[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 528-532.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHAO Jiangping, ZHANG Shuqi, ZHONG Xingrun, YU Kainan. Explosion characteristics of additive manufacturing aluminum and aluminum-silicon alloy powders[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0093
[2]	HU Lishuang, LIU Yang, YANG Yajun, ZHU He, LIANG Kaili, HU Shuangqi. Inhibition effect of water mist on RDX dust explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 055401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0346
[3]	MAO Wenzhe, ZHANG Guotao, YANG Shuaishuai, XU Zihui, WANG Yan, JI Wentao. Characteristics of hydrogenated magnesium dust explosion flame propagating in a semi-enclosed space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(6): 065401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0363
[4]	LIU Jiajia, ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Xiang, NIE Zishuo. Simulation study on propagation characteristics of gas explosion in Y-shaped ventilated coal face[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(8): 085401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0018
[5]	GUO Rui, LI Nan, ZHANG Xinyan, ZHANG Yansong, XU Chang, ZHANG Gongyan, ZHAO Xing, XIE Yuxuan, HAN Zhelin. Correlation between pressure characteristics and thermochemical kinetics during suppression of micro/nano PMMA dust explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 125401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0058
[6]	KANG Penglin, LI Xiaodong, LIU Wenjie, SUN Yantao, GUAN Yunfei, MA Zhigang, ZHAO Ziwen. Influence of the ignition energy on combustion and explosion characteristics of single-base propellant[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(7): 072302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0452
[7]	ZHANG Qiwei, CHENG Yangfan, XIA Yu, WANG Zhonghua, WANG Quan, SHEN Zhaowu. Application of colorimetric pyrometer in the measurement of transient explosion temperature[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 114101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0477
[8]	WU Linyuan, YU Lifu, WANG Tianshu, SUN Wei, XU Jianhang, LI Hang. Explosion characteristics of oil shale dust in a confined space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 015401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0139
[9]	ZHOU Yonghao, GAN Bo, JIANG Haipeng, HUANG Lei, GAO Wei. Investigations on the flame propagation characteristics in methane and coal dust hybrid explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 015402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0064
[10]	ZHANG Yansong, LI Nan, GUO Rui, ZHANG Xinyan, ZHANG Gongyan, HUANG Xingwang. Relationship between pyrolysis kinetics and flame propagation characteristics of lauric acid and stearic acid dust explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 075402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0470
[11]	LIU Xueling, ZHANG Qi. Influence of pre-ignition turbulence intensity on n-pentane mists explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 032101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0458
[12]	YU Jianliang, JI Wentao, YAN Xingqing, YU Xiaozhe, HOU Yujie. Flame propagation characteristics of lycopodium dust explosion under explosion pressure accumulation conditions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 025401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0436
[13]	GAN Bo, GAO Wei, ZHANG Xinyan, JIANG Haipeng, BI Mingshu. Flame temperatures of PMMA dust clouds with different particle size distributions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 015401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0244
[14]	ZHOU Ning, ZHANG Guowen, WANG Wenxiu, ZHAO Huijun, YUAN Xiongjun, HUANG Weiqiu. Effect of ignition energy on the explosion process and the dynamic response of propane-air premixed gas[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1031-1038. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0049
[15]	Chen Xi, Chen Xianfeng, Zhang Hongming, Liu Xuanya, Zhang Ying, Niu Yi, Hu Dongtao. Effects of inerting agent with different particle sizes onthe flame propagation of aluminum dust[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 759-765. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0759-07
[16]	Yu Jianliang, Ji Wentao, Sun Huili, Yan Xingqing, Zhang Xinyan. Experimental investigation of the lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures of methane and lycopodium dust[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 924-930. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-0924-07
[17]	Gao Wei, Abe Shuntaro, Rong Jian-zhong, Dobashi Ritsu. Effect of airflow characteristics on flame structure for following lycopodium dust-air mixtures in a long horizontal tube[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 372-379. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)03-0372-08
[18]	KUAI Nian-sheng, HUANG Wei-xing, YUAN Jing-jie, . Influenceofignitionenergyondustexplosionbehavior[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 432-438. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0432-07
[19]	GAO Cong, LI Hua, SU Dan, HUANG Wei-Xing. Explosion characteristics of coal dust in a sealed vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(2): 164-168. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)02-0164-05
[20]	CHEN Zhi-hua, YE Jing-fang, FAN Bao-chun, JIANG Xiao-hai, GUI Ming-yue. Effects of a wedge obstacle on flame propagation and its structure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 208-213. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0208-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(26)

1.	赵懿明，刘毅飞，杨振欣，张传彪，许张归，张欣，周庄红，李雯娟，曹卫国. 点火能量对煤尘爆炸火焰传播规律的影响. 中北大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 70-75 .
2.	孙睿成，刘天奇，孙溢阳. 微米级煤尘云最低着火温度特性试验研究. 科技与创新. 2022(17): 7-9 .
3.	梁运涛，王泠峰，苑春苗，田富超，王敬燕. 热板上煤尘着火及引燃煤粉尘云特性试验研究. 中国矿业大学学报. 2022(05): 894-900 .
4.	刘静平，焦枫媛，刘毅飞，吴星亮，徐司雨，徐森. 点火延时对褐煤煤粉爆炸火焰传播过程的影响. 中北大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 536-540 .
5.	刘天奇，田伟业，贾瑞衡，孙睿成. 微米级褐煤粉尘爆炸压力试验研究. 消防科学与技术. 2022(12): 1629-1632 .
6.	汤其建，秦汝祥，戴广龙. 索特平均直径对煤粉及其在瓦斯气氛下爆炸特性的影响. 煤炭学报. 2021(02): 489-497 .
7.	李海涛，陈晓坤，邓军，胡湘渝，王秋红，翟小伟. 开放管道内煤粉云形成机制及爆炸过程火焰动态行为数值模拟. 煤炭学报. 2021(08): 2600-2613 .
8.	郭家鑫，谭迎新，刘毅飞，方帆，杨振欣，张硕，曹卫国. 燃烧管长度对煤粉火焰传播规律的影响. 测试技术学报. 2021(05): 381-385 .
9.	葛少成，王卓龑，陈曦，范超男. 煤矿除尘技术的研究与展望. 能源与环保. 2021(12): 1-8 .
10.	马瑞，魏芸，刘晅亚，陈晔. 大型储煤筒仓进料过程煤尘浓度分布及煤尘爆炸数值模拟. 消防科学与技术. 2021(12): 1728-1732 .
11.	王燕，齐英全，温小萍，王蔚，甘向阳，裴蓓，纪文涛. 煤尘组分对瓦斯/煤尘复合爆炸下限的影响研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2020(02): 125-130 .
12.	刘天奇. 微米级玉米粉尘爆炸能量传播数学模型研究. 数学的实践与认识. 2020(10): 144-149 .
13.	宫婕，聂百胜，樊堉，张乐同，葛泽. 水平管道内褐煤煤尘爆炸传播特性. 兵工学报. 2020(S2): 156-161 .
14.	甘波，高伟，张新燕，姜海鹏，毕明树. 不同粒径PMMA粉尘云火焰温度特性研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(01): 140-147 . 本站查看
15.	宋佰超，李雨成，罗红波. 挥发分对煤尘爆炸特性影响研究. 数学的实践与认识. 2019(01): 118-123 .
16.	刘天奇. 水平管道空间煤尘爆炸火焰传播特性数值模拟. 工矿自动化. 2019(07): 59-65 .
17.	刘天奇. 不同尺度管道内煤尘爆炸火焰传播数值模拟. 消防科学与技术. 2019(07): 917-921 .
18.	刘天奇，李雨成，罗红波. 不同变质程度煤尘爆炸压力特性变化规律实验研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(09): 158-165 . 本站查看
19.	刘天奇. 褐煤爆炸冲击气流传播特性与CO生成特性数值模拟. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(10): 152-160 . 本站查看
20.	刘天奇. 不同煤质煤尘爆炸火焰热量释放模型研究. 消防科学与技术. 2019(12): 1676-1680 .
21.	刘天奇，郑秋雨，苏长青. 水平管内不同煤质煤尘爆炸火焰传播特性实验研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2018(10): 127-132 .
22.	李雨成，刘天奇，周西华，褚洋，孟昱. 小尺度水平玻璃管中煤尘爆炸火焰传播特性影响因素研究. 安全与环境学报. 2017(06): 2176-2179 .
23.	刘贞堂，林松，赵恩来，张松山，郭汝林. 水平管道煤尘爆炸残留物时空变化特征. 爆炸与冲击. 2017(02): 237-242 . 本站查看
24.	陈曦，陈先锋，张洪铭，刘晅亚，张英，牛奕，胡东涛. 惰化剂粒径对铝粉火焰传播特性影响的实验研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2017(04): 759-765 . 本站查看
25.	李雨成，毕秋苹，刘天奇. 混合煤质协同作用下煤尘爆炸火焰特性研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2017(04): 68-71+88 .
26.	刘静平，赵金刚，潘峰，秋珊珊. 硬脂酸粉尘爆炸过程中火焰传播试验及数值模拟. 爆破器材. 2016(05): 11-16 .