Impact analysis of shock environment from floating shock platform on equipment response

Wang Jun; Yao Xiong-liang; Yang Di

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0236-07

Volume 35 Issue 2

Mar. 2015

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2015 > 35(2): 236-242

Wang Jun, Yao Xiong-liang, Yang Di. Impact analysis of shock environment from floating shock platform on equipment response[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 236-242. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0236-07

Citation:

Wang Jun, Yao Xiong-liang, Yang Di. Impact analysis of shock environment from floating shock platform on equipment response[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 236-242. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0236-07

Citation:

PDF( 4050 KB)

Impact analysis of shock environment from floating shock platform on equipment response

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0236-07

College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China

Received Date: 2013-07-05
Rev Recd Date: 2013-09-18
Publish Date: 2015-03-25

Abstract

Abstract

The shock environment of floating shock platform for the equipment and the response of ship board equipment under different shock environment were studied by numerical simulation and theoretical analysis. Based on the calculation model of American intermediate floating shock platform, the shock environment of equipment base was compared with German BV specification. In order to analyze the difference of spectrum acceleration between the two systems in impact requirements of the equipment, numerical simulations for different ship board equipment were carried out. Through the modal method of virtual constraint boundary, a model for the multi-degree freedom system with basic excitation under different shock environment was proposed. Numerical analysis and theoretical results show that the spectrum acceleration of shock spectrum has little effect on the response of ship board equipment, but spectrum displacement and velocity have significant effect on equipment response. The response of multi-degree freedom system analyzed by theoretical calculations is consistent with the numerical simulation results. Meanwhile, during the design of floating shock platform, the influence of spectrum acceleration on equipment response does not need to be considered.
- mechanics of explosion,
- equipment response,
- finite element,
- floating shock platform,
- shock environment

FullText(HTML)

References(13)

References

[1]	汪玉, 华宏星.舰船现代冲击理论及应用[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 185-195.
[2]	李国华, 李玉节, 张效慈.浮动冲击平台水下爆炸冲击谱测量与分析[J].船舶力学, 2000, 4(2): 51-60. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=4326902 Li Guo-hua, Li Yu-jie, Zhang Xiao-ci. Shock spectrum measurement and analysis of underwater explosion on a floating shock platform[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2000, 4(2): 51-60. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=4326902
[3]	刘建湖, 潘建强, 何斌.各主要海军国家设备抗冲击标准之比较[J].应用科技, 2010, 37(9): 17-25. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yykj201009005 Liu Jian-hu, Pan Jian-qiang, He Bin. Comparison of anti-shock criteria for equipment in some primary navy countries[J]. Applied Science and Technology, 2010, 37(9): 17-25. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yykj201009005
[4]	张玮.利用浮动冲击平台考核舰用设备抗冲击能力的数值仿真研究[J].振动与冲击, 2010, 29(12): 60-63. http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1015.shtml Zhang Wei. Numerical simulation for shock resistivity of shipboard equipment on floating shock platform[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2010, 29(12): 60-63. http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1015.shtml
[5]	梁卓中, 陈立贤.应用美规MIL-STD-901D标准水中爆震平台进行船舰重装备之抗震能力分析[J].科学与工程技术期刊, 2009, 5(2): 35-50. http://www.airitilibrary.cn/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=18166563-200906-200908050043-200908050043-35-50 Liang Zhuo-zhong, Chen Li-xian. Heavyweight shock resistant shipboard equipment: A numerical study using an MIL-STD-901D floating shock platform[J]. Journal of Science and Engineering Technology, 2009, 5(2): 35-50. http://www.airitilibrary.cn/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=18166563-200906-200908050043-200908050043-35-50
[6]	Kwon J I, Lee S G, Chung J H. Numerical simulation of MIL-S-901D heavy weight shock test of a double resiliently mounted main engine module[J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 2005, 42(5): 499-505. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE01819242
[7]	郑长允, 赵鹏远, 赵红光, 等.设备缓冲平台在水下爆炸载荷作用下冲击响应分析[J].科技导报, 2012, 30(18): 37-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KJDB201218023.htm Zheng Chang-yun, Zhao Peng-yuan, Zhao Hong-guang, et al. Shock response of buffer platform for equipment in under-water explosion[J]. Science and Technology Review, 2012, 30(18): 37-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KJDB201218023.htm
[8]	姚熊亮, 戴绍仕, 周其新, 等.船体与设备一体化抗冲击分析[J].爆炸与冲击, 2009, 29(4): 367-374. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)04-0367-08 Yao Xiong-liang, Dai Shao-shi, Zhou Qi-xin, et al. Numerical experiment methods for ship hull and equipment integrated analysis on shock resistance of shipboard equipments[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2009, 29(4): 367-374. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)04-0367-08
[9]	Zhang A M, Zhou W X, Wang S P, et al. Dynamic response of the non-contact underwater explosions on naval equipment[J]. Marine Structures, 2011, 24(4): 396-411. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833911000487
[10]	MIL-S-901D Shock tests high impact shipboard machinery, equipment, and systems, requirement[S]. US NAVY, 1989.
[11]	温建明, 冯奇.弹性限位浮筏隔振系统的动力学建模与算法[J].船舶力学, 2010, 14(5): 549-555. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/91784A/20105/34042881.html Wen Jian-ming, Feng Qi. Model and algorithm for floating raft with elastic limiters[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2010, 14(5): 549-555. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/91784A/20105/34042881.html
[12]	邱吉宝, 向树红, 张正平.计算结构动力学[M].合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2009: 279-283.
[13]	朱石坚, 何琳.船舶机械振动控制[M].北京: 国防工业出版社, 2006: 17-32.

Relative Articles

[1]	CHEN Yang, TANG Jie, YI Guo, WU Liang, JIANG Gang. Simulation analysis on impact resistance of aluminum foam sandwich structures using peridynamics[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 034202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0110
[2]	SU Xingya, ZHOU Lun, JING Lin, DENG Guide, ZHAO Longmao. Dynamic compressive mechanical properties and constitutive models of flexible polyurethane foam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(9): 091410. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0201
[3]	XU Linfeng, CHEN Li, LI Zhan, YUE Chengjun. Experimental and analytical study on blast resistance performance of brick infill walls strengthened with polyuria[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 075102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0332
[4]	XIE Fupei, XU Fei, ZENG Zhuo, ZHOU Zhongyu, GU Zhuowei. Numerical simulation on stability of composite cylindrical shell under impact compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(11): 112201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0431
[5]	GONG Xiangfei, LIU Wentao, ZHANG Shudao, YANG Jiming. Numerical simulation of peak pressure in near-field underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041409. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0262
[6]	QIANG Hongfu, SUN Xinya, WANG Guang, HUANG Quanzhang. Numerical simulation on steel box damage under internal explosion by smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0439
[7]	ZHANG Chunbo, SONG Zhenfei, GU Zhuowei, LU Ji, ZHAO Shicao. Numerical simulation of the multilayer coiled solenoid under implosive compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 999-1005. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0052
[8]	ZHOU Xiaosong, MEI Zhiyuan, ZHANG Yanbing. Research progress of composite sandwich structure in ship collision protection[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 696-706. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0303
[9]	Zhang Yong, Chen Li, Chen Rong-jun, Xie Wei-hong. Dynamic mechanical property experiment and constitutive model establishment of polyurethane foam aluminum[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(3): 373-378. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0373-06
[10]	XIAO Yi-hua, HU De-an, HAN Xu, YANG Gang. AnadaptiveaxisymmetricFEM-SPHcouplingalgorithmand itsapplicationtohighvelocityimpactsimulation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 384-392. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0384-09
[11]	SONG Yan-Ze, WANG Zhi-Hua, ZHAO Long-Mao, ZHAO Yong-Gang. Dynamic response of foam sandwich plates subjected to impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(3): 301-307. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)03-0301-07
[12]	JIANG Da-zhi, GUO Yang, LI Chang-liang, XIAO Jia-yu. Experimental investigation on response of two-core sandwich composite structures under transverse impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(6): 590-595. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)06-0590-06
[13]	WANG Dai-hua, LIU Dian-shu, DU Yu-lan, LIU Hui-peng. Numerical simulation of anti-blasting mechanism and energy distribution of composite protective structure with foam concrete[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(6): 562-567. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)06-0562-06
[14]	XU Zhi-hong, TANG Wen-hui, LUO Yong. Applications of the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method to hypervelocity impact simulations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 53-58. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0053-06
[15]	FU Yu, JIANG Ping, XIE Ruo-ze, TIAN Chang-jin, TAO Jun-lin, ZHANG Fang-ju, NIU Wei. Experimental investigation on static compressive behavior and energy-absorption performance of closed cellular Al-Cu alloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(5): 416-422. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)05-0416-07

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	赵崇林，赖富文，孔凡胜，唐宇琦，王文廉. 爆炸环境气体测试防护结构的数值模拟. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2024(01): 160-165+171 .
2.	吕永琪，游晓红，王录才. 泡沫铝夹芯板弯曲行为的仿真模拟. 金属功能材料. 2024(03): 74-79 .
3.	刘进，张芸，马衍轩，李梦瑶，王鹏，张建，王公斌，张鹏，高嵩. 钢筋混凝土的负泊松比设计与抗高速冲击性能. 硅酸盐通报. 2024(08): 2858-2870 .
4.	胡钰彬，游晓红，王录才，米渊聪. 泡沫铝夹芯结构抗冲击性能数值模拟. 金属功能材料. 2024(04): 24-30 .
5.	刘志东，赵小华，方宏远，王高辉，石明生. 高聚物牺牲包层对钢筋混凝土板的爆炸毁伤缓解效应. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(02): 89-105 . 本站查看
6.	赵浩楠，方宏远，赵小华，王高辉. 接触爆炸作用下高聚物复合板毁伤特性分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(05): 3-19 . 本站查看
7.	周颖，黄广炎，王涛，解亚宸，张旭东. 多孔聚氨酯基复合削爆屏障的防护性能. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(10): 138-151 . 本站查看
8.	周宏元，杜文钊，王小娟，张雪健，余尚江，张宏. 地冲击下新型脆断构件防护性能实验研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(07): 115-125 . 本站查看
9.	周辉，任辉启，吴祥云，易治，黄魁，穆朝民，王海露. 成层式防护结构中分散层研究综述. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(11): 3-28 . 本站查看