Dynamic calibration of pressure sensors by small-scale explosive experiments in an explosion containment vessel

Xue Bing; Ma Hong-hao; Shen Zhao-wu; Yu Yong

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0437-05

Volume 35 Issue 3

Jun. 2015

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2015 > 35(3): 437-441

Zhou Guang-yu, Hu Shi-sheng. Pulse-shaping techniques of high-g-value acceleration generators[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(5): 479-486. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)05-0479-08

Citation:

Xue Bing, Ma Hong-hao, Shen Zhao-wu, Yu Yong. Dynamic calibration of pressure sensors by small-scale explosive experiments in an explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 437-441. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0437-05

Zhou Guang-yu, Hu Shi-sheng. Pulse-shaping techniques of high-g-value acceleration generators[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(5): 479-486. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)05-0479-08

Citation:

PDF( 1483 KB)

Dynamic calibration of pressure sensors by small-scale explosive experiments in an explosion containment vessel

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0437-05

Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China

Received Date: 2014-03-28
Rev Recd Date: 2014-07-06
Publish Date: 2015-05-25

Abstract

Abstract

Air blast experiments of small-scale charges were conducted in an explosion containment vessel.The shock wave velocity was measured by sensor series.And the approximately theoretic peak pressure was determined from the shock wave velocity by using the Rankine-Hugoniot relationship. The sensor was then calibrated, and the relative error of the sensitivity was small.The shock wave parameters were measured and post processed by using the modified-Friedlander equation.The results show that the nonlinear regression by fixing the overpressure is close to the physical fact, and the fitting by fixing the duration has a high precision.Error analysis reveals that the sensor properties and the post-processing methods can produce errors.Experimental results display that the shock wave parameter measuring and post-processing method suggested has a high precision.By this suggested method, the sensor calibration and parameter measurement can be conducted simultaneously.
- mechanics of explosion,
- dynamic calibration,
- air explosion,
- pressure sensor,
- blast vessel,
- shock wave,
- sensor series

FullText(HTML)

References(7)

References

[1]	Ethridge N H. A procedure for reading and smoothing pressure-time data from HE and nuclear explosions[R]. Army Ballistic Research Laboratories, 1965.
[2]	Ismail M M, Murray S G. Study of the blast wave parameters from small scale explosions[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 1993, 18(1): 11-17.
[3]	Kinney G F, Graham K J. Explosive shocks in air[M]. 2nd Edition. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 100-104.
[4]	张远平.池家春.压力传感器灵敏度的动态标定及超压测量[J].高能量密度物理, 2007(2): 62-64.
[5]	张衍芳, 杜红棉, 祖静.冲击波信号后期处理方法研究[J].工程与试验, 2010, 50(4): 15-18. Zhang Yan-fang, Du Hong-mian, Zu Jing. Research on post treatment method for shockwave signals[J]. Engineering and Test, 2010, 50(4): 15-18.
[6]	Biss M M. Characterization of blasts from laboratory-scale composite explosive charges[D]. Pennsylvania State U-niversity, 2009: 124-139.
[7]	Rahman S, Timofeev E, Kleine H. Pressure measurements in laboratory-scale blast wave flow fields[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2007, 78(12): 125106.

Relative Articles

[1]	WANG Mingtao, CHENG Yuehua, WU Hao. Study on blast loadings of cylindrical charges air explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 043201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0197
[2]	ZHANG Pengzhou, DONG Qi, YANG Sha. Influence of blast loading parameters on elastic dynamic response of an infinite-length cylindrical shell[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 063101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0269
[3]	CHENG Shuai, ZHANG Dezhi, LIU Wenxiang, YIN Wenjun, SHI Yingju, CHEN Bo, TANG Shiying. Strain growth of flange bolts of the spherical explosive vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 034102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0058
[4]	LI Lingfeng, WEI Zhuobin, TANG Ting, DONG Qi, LIU Jinghan, QIU Yanyu. Damage effects of the caisson gravity wharf model subjected to explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 012202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0406
[5]	LIU Wenxiang, ZHANG Dezhi, ZHONG Fangping, CHENG Shuai, ZHANG Qingming. Quasi-static gas pressure generated by explosive charge blasting in a spherical explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1045-1050. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0056
[6]	Lin Moujin, Cui Xiaorong, Ma Honghao, Zheng Bingxu, Jia Hu. Air blast performance of RDX-based aluminum fiber explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(2): 230-235. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0230-06
[7]	Yao Cheng-bao, Li Ruo, Tian Zhou, Guo Yong-hui. Two dimensional simulation for shock wave produced by strong explosion in free air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 585-590. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0585-06
[8]	Gao Hui-hui, Zhang Bo, Qiao Jian-jiang, Yang Shao-peng, Chen Ting, Chen Xiao. Explosion characteristics of dimethyl ether/air/argon mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(5): 753-757. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0753-05
[9]	Lai Fu-wen, Zhang Zhi-jie, Zhang Jian-yu, Li Dong. Processing method of shock wave test data based on dynamic characteristic compensation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 871-875. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0871-05
[10]	HouJun-liang, JiangJian-wei, MenJian-bing, WangShu-you. Dynamicresponseofthinplatewithholesunderblastloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6): 662-666. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0662-05
[11]	ZHOU Jie, TAO Gang, WANG Jian. Numericalsimulationoflunginjuryinducedbyshockwave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 418-422. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0418-05
[12]	MA Li, HU Yang, XIN Jian, ZHENG Jin-yang, DENG Gui-de, CHEN Yong-jun. Transientfailureprocessofexplosioncontainmentvessels subjectedtoadiabaticshear[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(2): 136-142. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)02-0136-07
[13]	LI Xiao-jie, QIN Xiao-yong, YAN Hong-hao. Baseconstraintformsofhemisphericalshock-wavestrapstructures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 7-11. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0007-05
[14]	GUAN Yong-hong, HU Ba-yi, HUANG Chao. Vibrationanalysisofanexplosionvesselbasedonwaveletpackettransform[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 551-555. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-00551-05
[15]	ZHANG Xiao-peng, GE Fei, XING Huai-nian, JIN Li-qiang. Dynamicstressmeasurementofalargeexplosion-containmentvessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 101-104. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0101-04
[16]	SHI Hua-qiang, ZONG Zhi, JIA Jing-bei. Short-range characters of underwater blast waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 125-130. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0125-06
[17]	MA Yuan-yuan, ZHENG Jin-yang, CHEN Yong-jun, DENG Gui-de. Numerical simulation on dynamic response of the cylindrical explosion containment vessel with an elliptical cover[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0249-06
[18]	SONG Gui-fei, LI Cheng-guo, XIA Fu-jun, WEN Qi. A new explosion vessel used to recover warhead fragments and its application[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(4): 372-377. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)04-0372-06
[19]	SUN Yue, CI Jia-xiang, SUN Dong. A measurer for characters of shockwave velocity detectors[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(5): 473-476. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)05-0473-04
[20]	YU Shang-jiang, LI Ke-jie. Design and performance of PVDF pressure sensor for shock wave measurement in concrete structures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 350-354. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0350-05

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	胡葵，柴亚博，罗宁，张浩浩. 2kg TNT当量圆柱形爆炸容器结构设计与安全校核. 工程爆破. 2024(04): 102-110 .
2.	马泽，张志杰. 基于EMD算法的激波管系统误差识别与消除方法. 测试技术学报. 2018(03): 243-249 .
3.	宫婕，汪泉，李志敏，程扬帆，汤有富，李成孝. 柱形爆炸容器内爆炸冲击波的传播规律研究. 爆破. 2017(04): 17-21+51 .