Numerical simulation of a muzzle flow field involving chemical reactions based on gridless method

Wu Wei; Xu Hou-qian; Wang Liang; Xue Rui

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0625-08

Volume 35 Issue 5

Nov. 2015

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2015 > 35(5): 625-632

ZHENG Jian, LU Fangyun. On impact response of a prestressed metal beam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(3): 031401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0328

Citation:

Wu Wei, Xu Hou-qian, Wang Liang, Xue Rui. Numerical simulation of a muzzle flow field involving chemical reactions based on gridless method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(5): 625-632. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0625-08

ZHENG Jian, LU Fangyun. On impact response of a prestressed metal beam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(3): 031401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0328

Citation:

PDF( 3119 KB)

Numerical simulation of a muzzle flow field involving chemical reactions based on gridless method

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0625-08

School of Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2014-02-19
Rev Recd Date: 2014-06-27
Publish Date: 2015-10-10

Abstract

Abstract

A gridless method for simulation of reactive flows involving moving boundaries was investigated based on the linear basis least-squares gridless method. The Euler equations of arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian form were employed as governing equations. The numerical flux and chemical sources were calculated by the multi-component HLLC ((Harten-Lax-van Leer-Contact) scheme and finite rate reaction model, respectively. An elevated restructuring technique of local cloud was adopted to deal with the moving boundaries. The front advance method of fictitious boundaries was used during the restructuring. The flow around the cylinder and the shock-induced combustion flow field were simulated to validate the accuracy firstly. The muzzle flow of a 12.7 mm machine gun was simulated. The computational shadowgraphs agree well with the experimental photographs, the density and pressure contours are in agreement with the results by the unstructured mesh method. The numerical results show the coupling and interaction progress in the initial muzzle flow field, the under-expanding jet of explosive gas and high-speed projectile clearly, and the temporal, spatial distribution characteristics of the muzzle flash are reappeared plainly.
- mechanics of explosion,
- dynamic cloud,
- gridless method,
- muzzle flow field,
- chemical non-equilibrium flow

FullText(HTML)

References(11)

References

[1]	Cai Xiao-wei, Tan Jun-jie, Ma Xin-jian, et al. Application of hybrid Cartesian grid and gridless approach to moving boundary flow problems[J]. International Journal for Numerical Method in Fluid, 2013, 72(9): 994-1013. doi: 10.1002/fld.3775
[2]	盛鸣剑, 叶正寅, 蒋超奇.附面层修正应用于无网格算法的研究[J].计算力学学报, 2011, 28(6): 920-925. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JSJG201106018.htm Sheng Ming-jian, Ye Zheng-yin, Jiang Chao-qi. Study of boundary layer solution coupled with gridless method[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2011, 28(6): 920-925. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JSJG201106018.htm
[3]	Hashemi M Y, Jahangirian A. An efficient implicit mesh-less method for compressible flow calculations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2011, 67(6): 754-770. doi: 10.1002/fld.2387
[4]	周星.含动边界复杂非定常流动的无网格算法研究[D].南京: 南京理工大学, 2012.
[5]	马新建.最下二乘无网格及其重叠点云法在CFD中的应用研究[D].南京: 南京理工大学, 2012.
[6]	Kirshman D J, Liu F. A gridless boundary condition method for the solution of the Euler equations on embedded Cartesian meshes with multigrid[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2004, 201(1): 119-147. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1046830
[7]	Luo H, Baum J D, Löhner R. A hybrid Cartesian grid and gridless method for compressible flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 214(2): 618-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.10.002
[8]	吴伟, 许厚谦.激波诱导燃烧流场模拟的无网格算法[J].力学与实践, 2013, 35(6): 19-23. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_lxysj201306003.aspx Wu Wei, Xu Hou-qian. Meshless method for numerical simulation of shock-induced combustion[J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2013, 35(6): 19-23. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_lxysj201306003.aspx
[9]	Katz A, Jameson A. A comparison of various meshless schemes within a unified algorithm[R]. AIAA Paper, 2009-596, 2009.
[10]	代淑兰.复杂化学反应流并行数值模拟[D].南京: 南京理工大学, 2008.
[11]	Soetrisno M, Imlay S T. Simulation of the flow field of a ram accelerator[R]. AIAA Paper, 1991-1915, 1991.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Haipeng, PAN Zuanfeng, SI Doudou. Numerical simulation on dynamic response of reinforced concrete beams to secondary explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(10): 101404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0021
[2]	QIAN Haimin, PAN Yahao, ZONG Zhouhong, GAN Lu, WU Xi, SUN Miaomiao. Experimental study on dynamic response of underground utility tunnel under ground explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(7): 075102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0400
[3]	ZHAO Haonan, FANG Hongyuan, ZHAO Xiaohua, WANG Gaohui. Analysis on the blast resistance of polymer composite slabs under contact explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0161
[4]	XU Weizheng, ZHAO Hongtao, LI Yexun, HUANG Yu, FU Hua. An experimental study on dynamic response of cylindrical shell under near-field/contact underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(9): 091413. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0072
[5]	HAO Tengteng, WANG Changjian, YAN Wangji, REN Weixin. Structural dynamical characteristics induced by vented hydrogen explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(6): 065401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0412
[6]	SHI Bo, ZHANG Xiaoying, LI Kuo, LI Zhiqiang. Influencing factors of dynamic response of hollow laminated glass subject to blast loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 119-123. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0018
[7]	ZHOU Zhongxin, JIN Fengnian, YUAN Xiaojun, CHEN Hailong, ZHOU Jiannan, XU Ying, KONG Xinli. Dynamic response of underground arch structure under lateral point blast loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 639-646. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0295
[8]	Xu Qiang, Cao Yang, Chen Jianyun. Antiknock performance of an overflow dam subjected to contact explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 677-684. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0677-08
[9]	Li Shiqiang, Li Xin, Wu Guiying, Wang Zhihua, Zhao Longmao. Dynamic response of functionally graded honeycomb sandwich plates under blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 333-339. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0333-07
[10]	Li Xianglong, Wang Jianguo, Zhang Zhiyu, Huang Yonghui. Experimental study for effects of strain rates and joint angles on dynamic responses of simulated rock materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(4): 483-490. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)04-0483-08
[11]	Ji Chong, Xu Quan-jun, Wan Wen-qian, Gao Fu-yin, Song Ke-jian. Dynamic responses of steel cylindrical shells under lateral explosion loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(2): 137-144. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)02-0137-08
[12]	Feng Hui-ping, Liu Hong-bing, Zuo Xing, Hui Lang-lang. Dynamic response of underground tunnel to explosive loading from penetration weapons in the critical collapse distance[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5): 539-546. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0539-08
[13]	CUI Wei, SONG Hui-fang, ZHANG She-rong. CoupledSPH-FEanalysisfordynamicresponseof boxculvertsubjectedtosubsurfaceblas[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 551-556. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0551-06
[14]	ZHAI Xi-mei, WANG Yong-hui. Dynamicresponseandexplosionreliefof reticulatedshellunderblastloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 404-410. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0404-07
[15]	TIAN Yu-bin, LI Zhao, ZHANG Chun-wei. Dynamicresponseofreinforcedmasonrystructureunderblastload[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(6): 658-662. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)06-0658-05
[16]	MA Yuan-yuan, ZHENG Jin-yang, CHEN Yong-jun, DENG Gui-de. Numerical simulation on dynamic response of the cylindrical explosion containment vessel with an elliptical cover[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0249-06
[17]	ZHANG Xu-hong, WANG Zhi-hua, ZHAO Long-mao. Dynamic responses of sandwich plates with aluminum honeycomb cores subjected to blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(4): 356-360. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)04-0356-05
[18]	SONG Yan-ze, TIAN Jing-bang, ZHAO Long-mao, ZHENG Jin-yang. Dynamic responses of discrete multilayered wound ribbon vessels subjected to blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(4): 324-330. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)04-0324-07
[19]	DU Xiu-li, LIAO Wei-zhang, TIAN Zhi-min, LI Liang. Dynamic response analysis of underground structures under explosion-induced loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(5): 474-480. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)05-0474-07
[20]	CHEN Yong, TANG Ping, WANG Yu, YANG Shi-quan. Dynamic response analysis of rigid-plastic circular plate under underwater blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 90-96. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0090-07