Application of pulse shaping technique in Hopkinson bar experiments

Guo Chun-huan; Zhou Pei-jun; Lu Zi-chun; Chang Yun-peng; Zou Guang-ping; Jiang Feng-chun

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0881-07

Volume 35 Issue 6

Nov. 2015

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2015 > 35(6): 881-887

Guo Chun-huan, Zhou Pei-jun, Lu Zi-chun, Chang Yun-peng, Zou Guang-ping, Jiang Feng-chun. Application of pulse shaping technique in Hopkinson bar experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 881-887. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0881-07

Citation:

Guo Chun-huan, Zhou Pei-jun, Lu Zi-chun, Chang Yun-peng, Zou Guang-ping, Jiang Feng-chun. Application of pulse shaping technique in Hopkinson bar experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 881-887. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0881-07

Citation:

PDF( 605 KB)

Application of pulse shaping technique in Hopkinson bar experiments

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0881-07

1.
Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials and Surface Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilonhjiang, China
2.
College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China

Received Date: 2014-05-16
Rev Recd Date: 2014-11-18
Publish Date: 2015-12-10

Abstract

Abstract

New findings in the research of pulse shaping technique are widely used in dynamic compressive test. Dynamic tension, Brazilian disc test and dynamic bending fracture test are introduced in detail. Furthermore, the problems found in the application of the pulse shaping technique are summarized, and the directions for further research in this area are put forward.
- solid mechanics,
- Hopkinson bar,
- constant strain rate,
- pulse shaping technique,
- dynamic stress equilibrium,
- dynamic fracture toughness

FullText(HTML)

References(58)

References

[1]	Gerlach R, Sivasubramaniam K, Sathianathan C S, et al. A novel method for pulse shaping of split Hopkinson tensile bar signals[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(12): 976-980. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.007
[2]	Nemat-Nasser S, Isaacs J B, Starrett J E. Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1991, 435(11): 371-391. http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/435/1894/371.abstract
[3]	Gerlach R, Kettenbeil C, Petrinic N. A new split Hopkinson tensile bar design[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 50(12): 63-67. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X1200156X
[4]	Chen W, Lu F, Cheng M. Tension and compression tests of two polymers under quasi-static and dynamic loading[J]. Polymer Testing, 2002, 21(2): 113-121. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00055-1
[5]	Duffy J, Campbell J D, Hawley R H. On the use of a torsional split Hopkinson bar to study rate effects in 1100-O aluminum[J]. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1971, 38(1): 83-91. doi: 10.1115/1.3408771
[6]	Jiang F, Vecchio K S. Hopkinson bar loaded fracture experimental technique: A critical review of dynamic fracture toughness tests[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2009, 62(060902): 1-39. http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=AMREAD000062000006060802000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes
[7]	Chuban V D, Ivanteyev V I, Chudayev B J, et al. Numerical simulation of flutter validated by flight-test data for TU-204 aircraft[J]. Computer Structure, 2002, 80(32): 2551-2563. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00221-3
[8]	Saeedi M A, Barkhordari M A. Dynamic behaviour of space structures using models of different pattern density[J]. Computing Developments in Civil and Structural Engineering, 1999: 59-63. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/269077713_Dynamic_Behaviour_of_Space_Structures_using_Models_of_Different_Pattern_Density
[9]	Sinha G, Mukhopadhyay M. Transient dynamic response of arbitrary stiffened shells by the finite element method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics-Transactions of the ASME, 1995, 117(1): 11-16. doi: 10.1115/1.2873855
[10]	Ghoshal A, Harrison J, Sundaresan M J, et al. Damage detection testing on a helicopter flexbeam[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2001, 12(5): 315-330. doi: 10.1106/9V39-ETJU-DNMG-TJUF
[11]	宋博, 姜锡权, 陈为农.霍普金森压杆实验中的脉冲整形技术[C]//第三届全国爆炸力学实验技术交流会论文集.合肥, 2004: 1-70.
[12]	Christensen R J, Swanson S R, Brown W S. Split-Hopkinson-bar tests on rocks under confining pressure[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1972, 12(11): 508-513. doi: 10.1007/BF02320747
[13]	Ellwood S, Griffiths L J, Parry D J. Materials testing at high constant strain rates[J]. Journal of Physics E: Science Instrument, 1982, 15(3): 280-282. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/15/3/009
[14]	Parry D J, Walker A G, Dixon P R. Hopkinson bar pulse smoothing[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 1995, 6(5): 443-446.
[15]	Cloete T J, Westhuizen A V, Kok S, et al. A tapered striker pulse shaping technique for uniform strain rate dynamic compression of bovine bone[J]. DYMAT International Conferences, 2009, 1: 901-907. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/46251659_A_tapered_striker_pulse_shaping_technique_for_uniform_strain_rate_dynamic_compression_of_bovine_bone
[16]	Li X B, Lok T S, Zhao J, et al. Oscillation elimination in the Hopkinson bar apparatus and resultant complete dynamic stress-strain curves for rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2000, 37(7): 1055-1060. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136516090000037X
[17]	Li X B, Lok T S, Zhao J. Dynamic characteristics of granite subjected to intermediate loading rate[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2005, 38(1): 21-39.
[18]	Lok T S, Asce M, Zhao P J. Impact response of steel fiber-reinforced concrete using a split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2004, 16(1): 54-59. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/245307944_Impact_Response_of_Steel_Fiber-Reinforced_Concrete_Using_a_Split_Hopkinson_Pressure_Bar
[19]	Baranowski P, Malachowski J, Gieleta R, et al. Numberical study for determination of pulse shaping design variables in SHPB apparutus[J]. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences, 2013, 61(2): 459-466. doi: 10.2478/bpasts-2013-0045
[20]	Naghdabadi R, Ashrafi M J, Arghavani J. Experimental and numerical investigation of pulse-shaped split Hopkinson pressure bar test[J]. Material Science and Engineering: A, 2012, 539(3): 285-293. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921509312001311
[21]	Frew D J, Forrestal M, Chen W. Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2002, 42(1): 93-106. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/reference/XREF?id=10.1007/BF02411056
[22]	Frew D J, Forrestal M, Chen W. Pulse shaping techniques for testing elastic-plastic materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2005, 45(2): 186-195. doi: 10.1007/BF02428192
[23]	Ramirez H, Gonzalez R C. Finite-element simulation of wave propagation and dispersion in Hopkinson bar test[J]. Materials and Design, 2006, 27(1): 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.021
[24]	李夕兵, 周子龙, 王卫华.运用有限元和神经网络为SHPB装置构造理想冲头[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(23): 4215-4218. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb200523003 Li Xi-bing, Zhou Zi-long, Wang Wei-hua. Construction of ideal striker for SHPB device based on FEM and neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(23): 4215-4218. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yslxygcxb200523003
[25]	Franz C E, Follansbee P S, Wright J. New experimental techniques with the split Hopkinson pressure bar[C]//Berman I, Schroeder J W. 8th Internatinal Conference on High Energy Rate Fabrication, Pressure Vessel and Piping Division, ASME. San Antonio, TX, 1984.
[26]	Follansbee P S. Mechanical testing and evaluations[M]. ASM Handbook, ASM, Materials Park, OH, 1985.
[27]	Woo S C, Kim J T, Cho C H, et al. The dynamic compressive behavior of armor structural materials in split Hopkinson pressure bar test[J]. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 2013, 48(7): 420-4369. doi: 10.1177/0309324713496084
[28]	陶俊林, 田常津, 陈裕泽, 等. SHPB系统试件恒应变率加载实验方法研究[J].爆炸与冲击, 2004, 24(5): 413-418. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/9978 Tao Jun-lin, Tian Chang-jin, Chen Yu-ze, et al. Investigation of experimental method to obtain constant strain rate of specimen in SHPB[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2004, 24(5): 413-418. http://www.bzycj.cn/article/id/9978
[29]	Vecchio K S, Jiang F. Improved pulse shaping to achieve constant strain rate and stress equilibrium in split Hopkinson pressure bar testing[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions: A, 2007, 38(11): 2655-2665. doi: 10.1007/s11661-007-9204-8
[30]	Lee O S, Jin S P. Dynamic deformation behavior of bovine femur using SHPB[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2011, 25(9): 2211-2215. doi: 10.1007/s12206-011-0602-x
[31]	Li W M, Xu J Y. Impact characterization of basalt fiber reinforced geopolymeric concrete using a 100-mm-diameter split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2009, 513-514(7): 145-153. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921509309001890
[32]	汪洋, 李玉龙, 刘传雄.利用SHPB测定高应变率下冰的动态力学行为[J].爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(2): 215-219. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0215-05 Wang Yang, Li Yu-long, Liu Chuan-xiong. Dynamic mechanical behaviors of ice at high strain rates[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(2): 215-219. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0215-05
[33]	Chen W, Luo H. Dynamic Compressive responses of intact and damaged ceramics from a single split Hopkinson pressure bar experiment[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2004, 44(3): 295-299. doi: 10.1007/BF02427896
[34]	Yokoyama T, Nakai K, Yatim N H M. High strain-rate compressive behavior of bulk structural adhesives: Epoxy and methacrylate adhesives[J]. Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering, 2012, 6(2): 131-143. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012jsmme...6..131y
[35]	Chen W, Lu F, Zhou B. A quartz-crystal-embeded split Hopkinson pressure bar for soft materials[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2000, 40(1): 1-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02327540
[36]	Song B, Syn C J, Grupido C L, et al. A long split Hopkinson pressure bar(LSHPB)for intermediate-rate characterization of soft materials[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2008, 48(6): 809-815. doi: 10.1007/s11340-007-9095-z
[37]	赵习金, 卢芳云, 王悟, 等.入射波整形技术的实验和理论研究[J].高压物理学报, 2004, 18(3): 231-236. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gywlxb200403007 Zhao Xi-jin, Lu Fang-yun, Wang Wu, et al. The experimental and theoretical study on the incident pulse shaping technique[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2004, 18(3): 231-236. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gywlxb200403007
[38]	卢芳云, 陈荣, 林玉亮, 等.霍普金森杆实验技术[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[39]	Erzar B, Forquin P. An experimental method to determine the tensile strength of concrete at high rates of strain[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2010, 50(7): 941-955. doi: 10.1007/s11340-009-9284-z
[40]	Shazly M, Prakash V, Draper S. Mechanical behavior of Gamma-met PX under uniaxial loading at elevated temperatures and high strain rates[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2004, 41(22/23): 6485-6503. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020768304002410
[41]	Saksala T, Hokka M, Kuokkala V, et al. Numerical modeling and experimentation of dynamic Brazilian disc test on Kuru granite[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2013, 59(4): 128-138. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160912002468
[42]	Chen R, Dai F, Qin J, Lu F. Flattened Brazilian disc method for determining the dynamic tensile stress-strain curve of low strength brittle solids[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2013, 53(7): 1153-1159. doi: 10.1007/s11340-013-9733-6
[43]	Dong S, Wang Y, Xia Y. A finite element analysis for using Brazilian disk in split Hopkinson pressure bar to investigate dynamic frac-ture behavior of brittle polymer materials[J]. Polymer Testing, 2006, 25(7): 943-952. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.06.003
[44]	Dai F, Chen R, Xia K. A semi-circular bend technique for determining dynamic fracture toughness[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2010, 50(6): 783-791. doi: 10.1007/s11340-009-9273-2
[45]	Dai F, Chen R, Iqbal M J, et al. Dynamic cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc method for measuring rock fracture parameters[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(4): 606-613. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160910000535
[46]	vora V M F, Jain N, Shukla A. Fabrication, characterization, and dynamic behavior of polyester/TiO₂ nanocomposites[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2003, 361(1/2): 358-366. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921509303005367
[47]	Jiang F, Vecchio K S, Rohatgi A. Analysis of modified split Hopkinson pressure bar dynamic fracture test using an inertia model[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2004, 126(2): 143-164. doi: 10.1023/B:FRAC.0000026363.05467.2b
[48]	Ogawa K, Higashida F. Impact three-point bending tests by applying ramped incident wave[J]. Reinforced Plastics, 1990, 36: 123-129.
[49]	Kusaka T, Yamauchi Y, Kurokawa T. Effects of strain rate on mode Ⅱ interlaminar fracture toughness in carbon-fibre/epoxy laminated composites[J]. Journal de Physique Ⅳ: C, 1994, 4(8): 671-676. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/25/33/43/PDF/ajp-jp4199404C8102.pdf
[50]	Kusaka T, Kurokawa T, Hojo M, et al. Evaluation of mode Ⅱ interlaminar fracture toughness of composite laminates under dynamic loading[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 1998, 141/142/143: 477-500. https://www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.477
[51]	Todo M, Takahashi K. Measurement of dynamic fracture toughness of polymeric materials using impact bend test[J]. Engineering Science Reports, Kyushu University, 1998, 20: 267-273. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142941809001056
[52]	Todo M, Tanaka A, Arakawa K. Examination of SHPB type impact fracture toughens testing method by dynamic finite element analysis[J]. Society of Materials Science of Japan, 2006, 55(9): 813-818. doi: 10.2472/jsms.55.813
[53]	Jiang F, Vecchio K S. Dynamic effects in Hopkinson bar four-point bend fracture[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions: A, 2007, 38(12): 2896-2906. doi: 10.1007/s11661-007-9301-8
[54]	Nakamura T, Shih C F, Freund L B. Elastic-plastic analysis of a dynamically loaded circumferentially notched round bar[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 22(3): 437-452. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90144-4
[55]	Wang Q Z, Jia X M. The flattened Brazilian disc specimen used for testing elastic, modulus, tensile strength and fracture toughness of brittle rocks: Analysis and numerical results[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Minner Science, 2004, 41(2): 245-253. doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00093-5
[56]	Wang Q Z, Li W, Song X L. A method for testing dynamic tensile strength and elastic modulus of rock materials using SHPB[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2006, 163(5): 1091-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00024-006-0056-8
[57]	张盛, 王启智.采用中心圆孔裂缝平台圆盘确定岩石的动态断裂韧度[J].岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(6): 723-728. Zhang Sheng, Wang Qi-zhi. Method for determination of dynamic fracture toughness of rock using holed-crack flattened disc specimen[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechical Engineering, 2006, 28(6): 723-728.
[58]	Bacon C, Färm J, Lataillade J L. Dynamic fracture toughness determined from load-point displacement[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1994, 20(1): 217-223. doi: 10.1007/BF02319758

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

1.	金志豪，李远，栾亚伟，王春晓，周明. 动静荷载下煤岩体应力波传播与衰减特征. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(09): 3469-3479 .
2.	郭瑞奇，许鑫，任辉启，尤奇，孙金磊，李江南，刘兵. 主动围压下纳米SiO_2增强珊瑚砂水泥砂浆动态力学性能. 硅酸盐学报. 2023(11): 2931-2941 .
3.	肖革胜，熊蘅，邱吉，司博文，树学峰 . 电子互连导电胶的率相关剪切力学行为表征. 固体力学学报. 2023(06): 831-842 .
4.	郑志豪，任辉启，龙志林，郭瑞奇，蔡洋，黎智健. PP/CF增强珊瑚砂水泥基复合材料冲击压缩力学性能研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(07): 61-73 . 本站查看
5.	白晓军，张晓辰，赵阳. 聚异氰氨酸酯唑烷酮的高应变动态响应研究. 弹性体. 2021(01): 26-31 .
6.	梁为民，刘恒，李敏敏，岳高伟. 结构异性煤体单轴/三轴冲击动力学性能研究. 过程工程学报. 2021(07): 817-826 .
7.	任文科，李汶峰，王江波，徐立志，高光发. 整形器对SHPB入射波形影响规律的定量研究. 北京理工大学学报. 2021(09): 901-910 .
8.	杜冰，郭亚洲，李玉龙. 一种基于电磁霍普金森杆的材料动态包辛格效应测试装置及方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2020(08): 4-12 . 本站查看
9.	郭瑞奇，任辉启，龙志林，吴祥云，姜锡权. 大直径SHTB实验装置数值模拟及混凝土细观骨料模型动态直拉研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2020(09): 18-31 . 本站查看
10.	万林林，邓泽辉，邓朝晖，戴鹏. 基于脆性材料的SHPB实验研究与展望. 材料科学与工程学报. 2019(02): 316-324 .
11.	刘波，程祥利，杨荷，叶海福，焦敏，韩萌萌. 基于Hopkinson杆的加速度传感器测试系统仿真与测试研究. 实验力学. 2019(06): 1027-1034 .
12.	袁璞，马芹永，马冬冬. 端面不平行对岩石SHPB测试结果的影响分析. 爆破. 2018(02): 26-31+106 .
13.	梁书锋，武宇，刘殿书，李晓璐，张会歌. SHPB恒应变率加载试验技术研究. 郑州大学学报(工学版). 2018(02): 50-55 .
14.	袁璞，马芹永. SHPB试验中岩石试件的端面不平行修正. 爆炸与冲击. 2017(05): 929-936 . 本站查看