Influence of void coalescence on spall evolution of ductile polycrystalline metal under dynamic loading

Zhang Fengguo; Zhou Hongqiang; Hu Xiaomian; Wang Pei; Shao Jianli; Feng Qijing

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0596-07

Volume 36 Issue 5

Oct. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2016 > 36(5): 596-602

LI Changlong, GAO Shiqiao, NIU Shaohua, LIU Haipeng. Parameters variation of solid tantalum capacitors used in fuze under high-g shock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 419-425. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0222

Citation:

Zhang Fengguo, Zhou Hongqiang, Hu Xiaomian, Wang Pei, Shao Jianli, Feng Qijing. Influence of void coalescence on spall evolution of ductile polycrystalline metal under dynamic loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(5): 596-602. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0596-07

Citation:

PDF( 1630 KB)

Influence of void coalescence on spall evolution of ductile polycrystalline metal under dynamic loading

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0596-07

1.
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2015-03-11
Rev Recd Date: 2016-01-20
Publish Date: 2016-09-25

Abstract

Abstract

In the present study, with a view to solve the spallation of ductile metal under intense dynamic loading, we develop a new void coalescence criterion accounting for the damage and void geometry based on the geometric relationship between voids. Following the principle of energy conservation, we reveal the physical mechanism explaining the influence of void coalescence on the growth of damage. The comparison between calculated results and experiment data indicates that void coalescence leads to rapid growth of damage, reduction of void numbers, and increase of average void size.
- solid mechanics,
- spallation,
- intense dynamic loading,
- ductile metal,
- void coalescence,
- damage evolution

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	Thomason P F. A view on ductile-fracture modelling[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 1998, 21(9):1105-1122. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229518515_A_View_on_ductile-fracture_modelling
[2]	Escobedo J P, Dennis-Koller D, Cerreta E K, et al. Effects of grain size and boundary structure on the dynamic tensile response of copper[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2011, 110(3):033513. doi: 10.1063/1.3607294
[3]	Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar[J]. Acta Metallurgica, 1984, 32(1):157-169. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X
[4]	Benzerga A A. Micromechanics of coalescence in ductile fracture[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2002, 50(6):1331-1362. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00125-9
[5]	Gao X, Kim J. Modelling of ductile fracture: Significance of void coalescence[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(20):6277-6293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.08.008
[6]	黄筑平, 杨黎明, 潘客麟.材料的动态损伤和失效[J].力学进展, 1993, 23(4):433-467. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gthjjs201304023 Huang Zhuping, Yang Liming, Pan Keling. Dynamic damage and failure of materials[J]. Adavances in Mechanics, 1993, 3(4):433-467. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gthjjs201304023
[7]	Pardoen T, Hutchinson J W. An extended model for void growth and coalescence[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2000, 48(12):2467-2512. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-3
[8]	Horstemeyer M F, Matalanis M M, Sieber A M, et al. Micromechanical finite element calculations of temperature and void configuration effects on void growth and coalescence[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2000, 16(7):979-1015. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=9b37e93469f2922e87ae03d47e0ed954
[9]	Seppala E T, Belak J, Rudd R E. Three-dimensional molecular dynamic simulation of void coalescence during dynamic fracture of ductile metals[J]. Physics Review: B, 2005, 71(6):064112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.064112
[10]	Thomason P F. Ductile spallation fracture and the mechanics of void growth and coalescence under shock loading conditions[J]. Acta Materials, 1999, 47(13):3633-3646. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00223-2
[11]	Tonks D L, Zurek A K, Thissell W R. Coalescence rate model for ductile damage in metals[J]. Journal de Physique Ⅳ France, 2003, 110:893-898. doi: 10.1051/jp4:20020807
[12]	Pardoen T, Scheyvaerts F, Tekoglu C, et al. Recent progress in micromechanics-based modeling of void coalescence[C]//The SEM Annual Conference. New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA, 2009.
[13]	Feng J P, Jing F Q, Zhang G R. Dynamic ductile fragmentation and the damage function model[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1997, 81(6):2575-2578. doi: 10.1063/1.363921
[14]	Jacques N, Mercier S, Molinari A. Void coalescence in a porous solid under dynamic loading conditions[J]. International Journal of Fravture, 2012, 173(2):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s10704-012-9683-5
[15]	Hosokawa A, Wilkinson D S, Kang J D, et al. Void growth and coalescence in model materials investigated by high-resolution X-ray microtomography[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2013, 181(1):51-66. doi: 10.1007/s10704-013-9820-9
[16]	Hosokawa A, Wilkinson D S, Kang J D, et al. Onset of void coalescence in uniaxial tension studied by continuous X-ray tomography[J]. Acta Materialia, 2013, 61(4):1021-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.002
[17]	Llorca F, Roy G. Metallurgical investigation of dynamic damage in tantalum[C]//13th APS Topical Conference on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter. Portland, Oregon, 2003: 589-592.
[18]	Lii G T G, Bourne N K, Vecchio K S, et al. Influence of anisotropy (crystallographic and microstructural) on spallation in Zr, Ta, HY-100 steel, and 1080 eutectoid steel[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2010, 163(1):243-258. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ad2df2e3a2e2ca5bf75978c7513272d1
[19]	Venkert A, Guduru P R, Ravichandran G. Effect of loading rate on fracture morphology in a high strength ductile steel[J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 2001, 123(3):261-267. doi: 10.1115/1.1371231
[20]	Brown L M, Embury J D. The initiation and growth of void at second phase particles[C]//3rd International Conference on the Strength of Metals and Alloys. London, England, 1973: 164-169.
[21]	Johnson J N. Dynamic fracture and spallation in ductile solids[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1981, 52(4):2812-2825. doi: 10.1063/1.329011
[22]	Zhang F G, Zhou H Q, Hu J, et al. Modelling of spall damage in ductile materials and its application to the simulation of the plate impact on copper[J]. Chinese Physics: B, 2012, 21(9):094601. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/9/094601
[23]	Jacques N, Mercier S, Molinari A. Effects of microscale inertiaon dynamic ductile crack growth[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2012, 60(4):665-690. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.12.010
[24]	张凤国, 周洪强.晶粒尺度对延性金属材料层裂损伤的影响[J].物理学报, 2013, 62(16):164601. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.164601 Zhang Fengguo, Zhou Hongqiang. Effects of grain size on the dynamic tensile damage of ductile polycrystalline metall[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(16):164601. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.164601
[25]	Trivedi P B, Asay J R, Gupta Y M, et al. Influence of grain size on the tensile response of aluminum under plate-impact loading[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 102(8):083513. doi: 10.1063/1.2798497

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Fengguo, WANG Pei, WANG Yanjin, HU Jianbo. Improvement of void growth model and its application in simulating spallation experiments under different impact loading wave forms[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 051201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0218
[2]	ZHANG Shiwen, JIN Shan, CHEN Yan, GUO Zhaoliang, DAN Jiakun, LIU Mingtao, TANG Tiegang. Influence of a cushion on dynamic expansion and fracture of an explosively-driven metallic cylinder[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 083102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0456
[3]	HU Yang, YIN Shangxian, Bjørn J. ARNTZEN, ZHU Jianfang, LI Xuebing, Ragnhild Dybdal OIE, QIN Hansheng. Experimental study of multi-objective coupling synchronous control in gas/air premixed gas deflagration flow test system[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 094201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0312
[4]	ZHANG Yunfeng, LUO Xingbai, SHI Dongmei, ZHANG Yuling, LIU Guoqing, ZHEN Jianwei. Failure behavior and energy release of Zr-based amorphous alloy under dynamic compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 063101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0114
[5]	YI Haibao, ZHANG Xiliang, YANG Haitao, LI Ming, GAO Qiqi, JIN Ke. Goaf collapse vibration analysis and disposal based on a experiment of heavy ball touchdown[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(7): 074101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0160
[6]	DU Bojun, LIU Zeqing, WANG Yalin, XU Yong, LI Qianwu. A test method of motion parameters of static explosion based on high-speed photography[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 094101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0175
[7]	Yi Xiangyu, ZHU Yujian, YANG Jiming. Mechanism of early-stage drop deformation in shock induced flow at limited Weber numbers[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 525-533. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0269
[8]	FENG Song, RAO Guoning, PENG Jinhua, WANG Bin. Experimental study of bubble pulsation by underwater explosion of CL-20-based explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 855-862. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0093
[9]	Yi Xiangyu, Zhu Yujian, Yang Jiming. Early-stage deformation of liquid drop in shock induced high-speed flow[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 853-862. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0853-10
[10]	Zhang Fengguo, Hu Xiaomian, Wang Pei, Shao Jianli, Zhou Hongqiang, Feng Qijing. Numerical analysis of spall response in aluminum with helium bubbles[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 699-704. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0699-06
[11]	Yang Yang, Xu Fei, Zhang Yue-qing, Tang Zhong-bin. Numerical simulation on low-speed impact response of 2D plain-woven C/SiC composite[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1): 22-28. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0022-07
[12]	Jiang Tao, Zhan Fa-min, Zhou Fang-yi, Ma Gui-yi. Effects of water medium on charge mass for demolishing steel plate underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1): 89-93. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0089-05
[13]	Huang Yong-hui, Liu Dian-shu, Li Sheng-lin, Li Xiang-long, Wang Jia-lei. Numerical simulation on pin-point blasting of sloping surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(4): 495-500. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)04-0495-06
[14]	ZHANG Hong-liang, HUANG Feng-lei. StudyontheDn()relationfortheRDX/TNTandHMX/TNTratesticks[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 495-500. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0495-06
[15]	LIU Wen-xiang, LI Jie, ZHONG Fang-ping. Application and analysis of a combinational equation of state for detonation products[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 209-212. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0209-04
[16]	SUN Wei, WANG Jian-guo, JIANG Shao-fei. Reduction of high-speed train-induced building vibrations by protective trenches[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 155-161. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0155-07
[17]	ZHOU Jun-xiang, XU Geng-guang, WANG Ting-zeng. A simplified model of energy release for aluminized explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 309-312. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0309-04
[18]	LI Yong-chi, YAO Lei, SHEN Jun, HU Xiu-zhang. Insulation effect of the cavity on stress wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(3): 193-199. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)03-0193-07
[19]	LI Jian, CHANG Li-hua, TAN Xian-xiang. Model 1000 ultra-high speed rotating mirror framing camera and applications[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 574-576. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0574-03
[20]	LI Ben-ping. Numerical analysis on pore pressure of clay under shock load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(3): 281-284. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)03-0281-04

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	叶紫阳，吴红波，杨仕春，黄菓树，李天浩，孙翼，马成帅，任梦雨. 延期状态下电子雷管电子控制模块的高过载加载实验. 高压物理学报. 2025(01): 100-110 .
2.	王家乐，李洪伟，王小兵，梁昊，周恩，苏洪，赵金耀. 冲击载荷作用下钽电容的电压瞬变特性及微观机理. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(04): 17-25 . 本站查看
3.	李洪伟，王家乐，郭子如，鹿华雨，柳祥威. 冲击载荷下液态铝电解电容失效规律研究. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 36-41 .
4.	刘波，杨荷，赵慧，吴学星，李华梅，程祥利. 单轴静压条件下高压多层陶瓷电容的容值变化. 兵工学报. 2023(06): 1858-1866 .
5.	贾丰州，牛少华，孙远程，陶逢刚，刘天国. 冲击载荷作用下的固体钽电容力-电响应特性. 探测与控制学报. 2022(05): 20-25 .
6.	李波，张宏翔，李世中，张亚. 极端温度条件典型引信电参数变化规律和失效机理. 装备环境工程. 2022(11): 34-40 .
7.	伍权，郑跃，舒启佳，田东斌. 钽电容器高频振动结构可靠性分析与设计. 电子元件与材料. 2021(04): 339-343+349 .
8.	张美云，石庚辰，刘强，张力，邱强强. 侵彻硬目标引信侵彻信号获取与处理技术. 制导与引信. 2020(03): 1-10+24 .