Chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021

Zhang Tao; Gu Yan; Zhao Jibo; Liu Yusheng; Wu Xing

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0415-07

Volume 37 Issue 3

Apr. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2017 > 37(3): 415-421

Zhang Tao, Gu Yan, Zhao Jibo, Liu Yusheng, Wu Xing. Chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 415-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0415-07

Citation:

Zhang Tao, Gu Yan, Zhao Jibo, Liu Yusheng, Wu Xing. Chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 415-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0415-07

Zhang Tao, Gu Yan, Zhao Jibo, Liu Yusheng, Wu Xing. Chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 415-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0415-07

Citation:

Zhang Tao, Gu Yan, Zhao Jibo, Liu Yusheng, Wu Xing. Chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 415-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0415-07

PDF( 2111 KB)

Chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0415-07

Zhang Tao¹,
Gu Yan^{1
,
,},
Zhao Jibo¹,
Liu Yusheng¹,
Wu Xing²

1.
Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, Sichuan, China
2.
Institute of System Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, Sichuan, China

Received Date: 2015-09-17
Rev Recd Date: 2015-10-21
Publish Date: 2017-05-25

Abstract

Abstract

In this work we used the laser velocity interferometry for measuring particle velocities and the wedge-shaped test explosive to study the structure of the chemical reaction zone of JBO-9021, a new insensitive high explosive (80 weight% TATB explosive, 15 weight% HMX explosive, 5 weight% binder). We conducted an experiment to achieve the in-situ particle velocity histories of a thin aluminium film between the test explosive and the LiF window that were introduced to obtain the particle velocities at different positions in the wedge-shaped test explosive after detonation. The CJ point of the particle velocity histories for JBO-9021 were derived from a second time derivative of the velocity history of particles from which we successfully obtained the chemical reaction structure, including the chemical reaction duration and the chemical reaction zone length. The results show that the chemical reaction duration of JBO-9021 is (238±13) ns and the chemical reaction zone length of JBO-9021 is about (1.52±0.09) mm. Additionally, they also show that the CJ point obtained from a second time derivative of the particle velocity histories is effective.
- JBO-9021,
- insensitive high explosive,
- laser velocity interferometry,
- chemical reaction zone length

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	Armstrong M R, Crowhurst J C, Bastea S, et al. Observation of off-hugoniot shocked states with ultrafast time resolution[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Detonation Symposium. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratory, 2010: 366-373.
[2]	Mattsson A E, Wixom R R, Mattsson T R. Calculating hugoniots for molecular crystals from first principles[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Detonation Symposium. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratory, 2010: 537-544.
[3]	黄奎邦, 陈永丽, 于鑫, 等.JB-9014炸药的化学反应率参数及应用研究[J].爆炸与冲击, 2013, 33(增):140-144. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BZCJ2013S1025.htm Huang Kuibang, Chen Yongli, Yu Xin, et al. Parameters and application research of reaction rate for JB-9014 explosive[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013, 33(suppl):140-144. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BZCJ2013S1025.htm
[4]	Bouyer V, Doucet M, Decaris L. Experimental measurements of the detonation wave profile in a TATB based explosive[C]//EPJ Web of Conferences 10. DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20101000030.
[5]	Tarver C M. Detonation reaction zones in condensed explosives[J]. Aip Conference Proceedings, 2005, 845(1):1026-1029. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc885771/
[6]	Hansen J S, Nowakowski B, Lemarchand A. Molecular-dynamics simulations and master-equation description of a chemical wave front: Effects of density and size of reaction zone on propagation speed[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2006, 124(3):034503. doi: 10.1063/1.2161209
[7]	Pulham C R, Millar D I A, Oswald I D H, et al. Pressure-cooking of explosives: The crystal structure of a high-pressure, high-temperature form of RDX as determined by X-ray and neutron diffraction[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Detonation Symposium. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratory, 2010: 395-400.
[8]	Bouyer V, Hebert P, Doucet M, et al. Experimental measurements of the chemical reaction zone of TATB and HMX based explosives[C]//Biennial International Conference of the Aps Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter. 2012, 1426(1): 209-212.
[9]	Bouyer V, Sheffield S A, Dattelbaum D M, et al. Experimental measurements of the chemical reaction zone of detonating liquid explosives[C]//16th APS Topical Conference on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter. The American Physical Society, 2009, 54(8): 177-180.
[10]	Utkin A V, Mochalova V M, Zav'yalov V S, et al. Influence of powder dispersion on the reaction zone structure for pressed RDX and HMX[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Detonation Symposium. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratory, 2010: 194-198.
[11]	Plaksin I, Rodrigues L, Plaksin S, et al. Effect of the reaction light absorption on the formation of the detonation reaction zone 3D-structure in PBXs[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Detonation Symposium. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratory, 2010: 241-250.
[12]	Engelke R, Sheffield S A, Stacy H L. Chemical-reaction-zone lengths in condensed-phase explosives[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16(11):4143-4149. doi: 10.1063/1.1804552
[13]	Jensen B J, Holtkamp D B, Rigg P A, et al. Accuracy limits and window corrections for photon Doppler velocimetry[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 101(1):013523-013523-10. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=78866ffa12d40d8d8d2419579d334ddb
[14]	LaLone B M, Fat'yanov O V, Asay J R, et al. Velocity correction and refractive index changes for[100] lithium fluoride opticalwindows under shock compression, recompression, and unloading[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2008, 103(9):093505-093505-7. doi: 10.1063/1.2912500
[15]	Mader C L. Numerical modeling of detonation[M]. Berkely, California: University of California Press, 1979:48.
[16]	Carter W J. Hugoniot equation of state of some alkali halides[J]. High Temperatures-High Pressures, 1973, 5(3):313-318.
[17]	Seitz W L, Stacy H L, Engelke R, et al. Detonation reaction-zone structure of PBX-9502[C]//Proceedings of the Ninth International Detonation Symposium. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratory, 1989: 675.
[18]	Tarver C M, Breithaupt R D, Kury J W. Current experimental and theoretical understanding of detonation waves in heterogeneous solid explosives[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth International Detonation Symposium. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratory, 1985: 692.
[19]	Sheffield S A, Bloomquist D D, Tarver C M. Subnanosecond measurements of detonation fronts in solid high explosives[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1984, 80(8):3831-3844. doi: 10.1063/1.447164

Relative Articles

[1]	cover[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(2): .
[4]	cover[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(4): .
[6]	cover[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(5): .
[7]	contents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, (3): 1-2.
[9]	contents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, (5): 1-2.
[16]	contents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, (1): 1-2.
[17]	contents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, (2): 1-2.
[19]	cover[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): .