Numerical analysis of spall response in aluminum with helium bubbles

Zhang Fengguo; Hu Xiaomian; Wang Pei; Shao Jianli; Zhou Hongqiang; Feng Qijing

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0699-06

Volume 37 Issue 4

May 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2017 > 37(4): 699-704

WANG Zhen, ZHANG Chao, WANG Yinmao, WANG Xiang, SUO Tao. Mechanical behaviours of aeronautical inorganic glass at different strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 295-301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0186

Citation:

Zhang Fengguo, Hu Xiaomian, Wang Pei, Shao Jianli, Zhou Hongqiang, Feng Qijing. Numerical analysis of spall response in aluminum with helium bubbles[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 699-704. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0699-06

Citation:

PDF( 1671 KB)

Numerical analysis of spall response in aluminum with helium bubbles

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0699-06

1.
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2015-12-19
Rev Recd Date: 2016-05-23
Publish Date: 2017-07-25

Abstract

Abstract

The creation of helium atoms is one of the main damaging mechanisms in neutron irradiated metals and is therefore a major concern in related scientific research. Recent researches under static loading conditions showed that the creation of helium atoms in metals is of great academic significance, for their precipitation into bubbles can cause substantial deterioration of the mechanical properties of materials. In this paper, based on experimental results so far published, a damage model is adopted combining inertial effect, initial void size and damage, to investigate the influence of helium bubbles in aluminum on its dynamic spall properties. The numerical calculation results show that the damage growth is insensitive to the pressure inside the bubble and the temperature produced by plastic deformation; the inner stress decreases more quickly and the porosity increases more slowly with the increase of the initial damage; the damage increases more slowly with the increase of the initial size of the helium bubble due to the inertial effect. Therefore, the study on the spall response of metals with helium bubbles should focus on the initial size of the helium bubble, the initial damage and the inertial effect at high loading rates.
- helium bubbles,
- spall response,
- aluminum,
- numerical analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	Chen X, Asay J R, Dwivedi S K, et al. Spall behavior of aluminum with varying microstructures[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2006, 99(2):023528. doi: 10.1063/1.2165409
[2]	Trivedi P B, Asay J R, Gupta Y M, et al. Influence of grain size on the tensile response of aluminum under plate-impact loading[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 102(8):083513. doi: 10.1063/1.2798497
[3]	Escobedo J P, Dennis-Koller D, Cerreta E K, et al. Grain size and boundary structure on the dynamic tensile response of copper[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2011, 110(3):033513. doi: 10.1063/1.3607294
[4]	张凤国, 周洪强.晶粒尺度对延性金属材料层裂损伤的影响[J].物理学报, 2013, 62(16):164601. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.164601 Zhang Fengguo, Zhou Hongqiang. Effects of grain size on the dynamic tensile damage of ductile polycrystalline metall[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(16):164601. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.164601
[5]	Trinkaus H, Singh B N. Helium accumulation in metals during irradiation-where do we stand?[J].Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2003, 323(2/3):229-242. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022311503004033
[6]	Marian J, Wirth B D, Perlado M. Mechanism of formation and growth of 〈100〉 interstitial loops in ferritic materials[J]. Physics Review Letters, 2002, 88(25):255507. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.255507
[7]	Moreno D, Eliezer D. Structural changes in a copper alloy due to helium implantation[J]. Scripta Materialia, 1996, 35(12):1385-1389. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(96)00314-4
[8]	Singh B N, Leffers T. Implications of the variation in microstructure caused by changes in helium generation rate and other irradiation parameters[J]. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, 1987, 101(1):73-90. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1080/00337578708224737
[9]	Kubota A, Reisman D B, Wolfer W G. Dynamic strength of metals in shock deformation[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 88(24):241924. doi: 10.1063/1.2210799
[10]	Glam B, Eliezer S, Moreno D, et al. Dynamic fracture and spall in aluminum with helium bubbles[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2010, 163(1/2):217-224. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ce303b4124937f5f94fc151f79eb1df1
[11]	Glam B, Strauss M, Eliezer S, et al. Shock compression and spall formation in aluminum containing helium bubbles at room temperature and near the melting temperature: Experiments and simulations[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 65(4):1-12. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X13002030
[12]	Tonks D L, Zurek A K, Thissell W R. Coalescence rate model for ductile damage in metals[J]. Journal de Physique Ⅳ, 2003, 110(9):893-898.
[13]	彭辉, 李平, 裴晓阳, 等.动态损伤演化的空间不连续性实验研究[J].物理学报, 2013, 62(22):226201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.226201 Peng Hui, Li Ping, Pei Xiaoyang, et al. Experimental study of the spatial discontinuity of dynamic damage evolution[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(22):226201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.226201
[14]	Zhang F G, Zhou H Q, Hu J, et al. Modelling of spall damage in ductile materials and its application to the simulation of the plate impact on copper[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2012, 21(9):094601. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/9/094601
[15]	张凤国, 周洪强, 张广财, 等.惯性及弹塑性效应对延性金属材料层裂损伤的影响[J].物理学报, 2011, 60(7):074601. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wlxb201107066 Zhang Fengguo, Zhou Hongqiang, Zhang Guangcai, et al. Inertial and elastic-plastic effect on spallation damage of ductile metals[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(7):074601. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wlxb201107066
[16]	张凤国, 王裴, 胡晓棉, 等.爆轰加载下锡金属连续层裂损伤机理的数值分析[J].高压物理学报, 2017, 31(3):280-285. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201703009.htm Zhang Fengguo, Wang Pei, Hu Xiaomian, et al. Numerical analysis of high explosive-induced multiple layers in Sn metal[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2017, 31(3):280-285. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYWL201703009.htm
[17]	Johnson J N. Dynamic fracture and spallation in ductile solids[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1981, 52(4):2812-2825. doi: 10.1063/1.329011
[18]	Shao J L, Wang P, He A M. Compression-induced stacking fault tetrahedra around He bubbles in Al[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014, 116(16):163516. doi: 10.1063/1.4900784

Relative Articles

[1]	CUI Shitang, ZHAO Hongyu, DONG Fangdong, ZHANG Yongliang. Effect of phase transformation on wave speeds in TiNi alloy thin-walled tube[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(9): 091425. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0368
[2]	ZHANG Yongjie, CHEN Li, XIE Puchu, TANG Baijian, SHEN Hanjin. Rate correlation of the ABAQUS damage parameter in the concrete damage plasticity model and its realization method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(10): 103103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0464
[3]	SU Xingya, ZHOU Lun, JING Lin, DENG Guide, ZHAO Longmao. Dynamic compressive mechanical properties and constitutive models of flexible polyurethane foam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(9): 091410. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0201
[4]	CHONG Tao, MO Jianjun, ZHENG Xianxu, FU Hua, CAI Jintao. Elastic-plastic transition behaviors of HMX crystal under ramp wave compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(5): 053101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0071
[5]	CUI Shitang. Propagation of combined wave with phase transformation in pseudo-elastic TiNi alloy thin-walled tubes[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(1): 013201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0108
[6]	LEI Jingfa, XU Meng, LIU Tao, XUAN Yan, SUN Hong, WEI Zhan. Static/dynamic mechanical properties and a constitutive model of a polyvinyl chloride elastomer[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(10): 103103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0249
[7]	Li Yinglei, Ye Xiangping, Wang Zhigang. Dynamic characteristics of the γ→α phase transition of cerium at room temperature[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 459-463. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0459-05
[8]	Jia Dong, Huang Xicheng, Hu Wenjun, Zhang Fangju. Fracture behavior of magnesium alloy MB2 under quasi-static and dynamic tension loading based on Johnson-Cook model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 1010-1016. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-1010-07
[9]	Nie Liangxue, Xu Jinyu, Liu Zhiqun, Luo Xin. Dynamic constitutive model of concrete after salt corrosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 712-718. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0712-07
[10]	Liu Hongyan, Yang Yan, Li Junfeng, Zhang Limin. Dynamic damage constitutive model for rock mass with non-persistent joints based on the TCK model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 319-325. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0319-07
[11]	Hou Hai-zhou, Hu Yi-ting, Peng Jin-hua, Jin Jian-wei. Dynamic behavior and constitutive model of phenolic cotton fabric material under impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 858-863. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0858-06
[12]	Cui Shi-tang, Tang Zhi-ping, Zheng Hang. Experimental study on dynamic behavior ofthin circular plate of TiNi alloysubjected to transversal impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(4): 444-450. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)04-0444-07
[13]	Liu Yong-gui, Tang Zhi-ping, Cui Shi-tang. Experimental study on temperature evolution of TiNi alloy during shock-induced phase transformation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 679-684. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0679-06
[14]	ZhaoGuang-ming, XieLi-xiang, MengXiang-rui. Aconstitutivemodelforsoftrockunderimpactload[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 126-132. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0126-07
[15]	TAO Jun-lin, LI Kui. Athermo-viscoelasticrate-dependentconstitutiveequation forcementmortarwithdamage[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(3): 268-273. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)03-0268-06
[16]	LIU Ming-shuang, LI Yu-long, TAO Liang, XU Fei, CHENG Lai-fei. A strain-rate-dependent dynamic constitutive model of 2D-C/SiC composites[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 421-426. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0421-06
[17]	XU Xin-sheng, DUAN Zheng, MA Yuan, CHU Hong-jie. A symplectic method and dynamic buckling of elastic cylindrical shells under both axial impact and internal or external pressure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(6): 509-514. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)06-0509-06
[18]	TANG Zhi-ping, LU Jian-chun, ZHANG Xing-hua. Experimental study of the dynamic behavior of TiNi cantilever beams with phase transformation subjected to transversal impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(4): 289-295. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)04-0289-07
[19]	ZHANG Xin-hua, TANG Zhi-ping, XU Wei-wei, TANG Xiao-jun, ZHENG Hang. Experimental study on characteristics of shock-induced phase transition and spallation in FeMnNi alloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(2): 103-108. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)02-0103-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

1.	向怡霖，邱爽，郭辉，陈玉，周自荣. 透明聚脲-玻璃复合件在冲击荷载下的动力学性能研究. 包装工程. 2024(19): 125-133 .
2.	刘小根，QI Shuang，WEI Shaoshan，WAN Detian，JIN Chunxia. Bending Strength of Glass Materials under Strong Dynamic Impact and Its Strain Rate Effects. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Materials Science). 2024(06): 1358-1364 .
3.	郝贠洪，胡臻，郭鑫，吴日根. 冲击荷载下钢化夹层玻璃薄板的动力学响应研究. 应用力学学报. 2023(04): 883-892 .
4.	陆晓华，张柱国，张迎春，左洪福. 飞机风挡不同位置遭遇轻型无人机高速碰撞损伤敏感性研究. 振动与冲击. 2023(23): 284-292 .
5.	牛欢欢，闫晓鹏，罗浩舜，陈佳君，李志强. 不同应变率下蓝宝石透明陶瓷玻璃的力学响应. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(07): 74-83 . 本站查看
6.	杨鹏慧，王衍行，李现梓，韩韬，李家满，朱治国，祖成奎. 玻璃抗均布载荷特性研究进展. 硅酸盐通报. 2022(11): 4036-4048 .
7.	朱慧玲，汪海涛，杨磊. 直升机风挡透明件弯曲性能分析. 直升机技术. 2022(04): 27-30 .
8.	赵景云，颜悦，霍钟祺. 电加温热载荷对直升机风挡玻璃的影响. 机械科学与技术. 2021(07): 1143-1148 .
9.	陆华成，熊雪梅，钟东海，郑宇轩，周风华. 端面摩擦对玻璃压缩强度的影响. 硅酸盐通报. 2021(10): 3511-3515 .
10.	刘小川，王彬文，白春玉，惠旭龙，陈熠，张宇. 航空结构冲击动力学技术的发展与展望. 航空科学技术. 2020(03): 1-14 .
11.	马棋棋，熊迅，郑宇轩，周风华. 无机玻璃动态压缩破坏的离散元模拟. 高压物理学报. 2019(04): 63-73 .
12.	孙晓波，高玉波，徐鹏. 冲击载荷下Al_2O_3陶瓷的失效与破碎特性. 高压物理学报. 2019(05): 114-122 .
13.	刘信超，徐亚芳，王露晨，陆晓华，左洪福. 运输类飞机风挡鸟撞位置影响分析研究. 振动与冲击. 2019(17): 95-102 .
14.	王振，索涛，李玉龙，王祥，王银茂. 退火及化学钢化硅酸盐玻璃的动态弯曲力学行为研究. 北京理工大学学报. 2019(10): 1006-1011 .