Influence of magnetic field on interaction of shock wave with R22 heavy gas column

Lin Zhenya; Zhang Huanhao; Chen Zhihua; Liu Ying

doi:10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0748-11

Volume 37 Issue 4

May 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2017 > 37(4): 748-758

WANG Jun-qi, WANG Liang, ZHANG Jie. Influencesofdilatancyonrockpropertiesundershockloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(3): 333-336. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)03-0333-04

Citation:

Lin Zhenya, Zhang Huanhao, Chen Zhihua, Liu Ying. Influence of magnetic field on interaction of shock wave with R22 heavy gas column[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 748-758. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0748-11

WANG Jun-qi, WANG Liang, ZHANG Jie. Influencesofdilatancyonrockpropertiesundershockloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(3): 333-336. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)03-0333-04

Citation:

PDF( 5571 KB)

Influence of magnetic field on interaction of shock wave with R22 heavy gas column

doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0748-11

National Key Laboratory of Transient Physics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2016-03-24
Rev Recd Date: 2016-08-23
Publish Date: 2017-07-25

Abstract

Abstract

To study the interaction process of the plane incident shock wave with the magnetized R22 heavy gas column, we numerically simulated the deformation process of the shock-wave-induced R22 heavy gas column resulting from Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) and Richtmyer-Meshkov (RM) instabilities under different initial conditions, and analyzed the jet focusing and inducing process by the transmitted shock wave. When the magnetic field was taken into consideration, the CTU + CT algorithm satisfying the divergence equation of the magnetic field at any time was adopted in the numerical simulation. The results show that the magnetic field is capable of restraining the instability of the shock-wave-induced R22 gas column. Both the normal magnetic field (vertical to the flow direction) and the tangential magnetic field (parallel to the flow direction) can inhibit the RM instability. However, the restraining of the normal magnetic field is more effective than that of the tangential one with regard to the KH instability, as it can not only inhibit the vortex train rolling up on the interface but also prevent the bound vortex from developing. Besides, it is found that the magnetic field has little influence on the jet, and the magnetic energy at the jet point can suppress the jet attenuation to some extent while the normal magnetic field can reduce the peak pressure and velocity when the transmitted shock wave is focused.
- magnetization gas,
- magneto-hydro-dynamics,
- magnetic field,
- instability,
- shock wave

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	Meyer K A, Blewett P J. Numerical investigation of the stability of a shock-accelerated interface between two fluids[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1972, 15(5):753-759. doi: 10.1063/1.1693980
[2]	Zhang Q, Sohn S I. An analytical nonlinear theory of Richtmyer-Meshkov instability[J]. Physics Letters A, 1996, 212(3):149-155. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(96)00021-7
[3]	Anuchina N N, Volkov V I, Gordeychuk V A, et al. Numerical simulations of Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instability using MAH-3 code[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2004, 168(1/2):11-20. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=faf4cdc7512f18529484c6b45fe5a4cc&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[4]	Ruev G A, Fedorov A V, Fomin V M. Development of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability upon interaction of a diffusion mixing layer of two gases with shock waves[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 2005, 46(3):307-314. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=33cb95fc5314ec07df6946d2ba77037c
[5]	Niederhaus J H J, Greenough J A, Oakley J G, et al. A computational parameter study for the three-dimensional shock-bubble interaction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 594:85-124. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=412d738c3ad78e224720d2313a46ddb5&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[6]	Thornber B, Drikakis D, Youngs D. Large-eddy simulation of multi-component compressible turbulent flows using high resolution methods[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2008, 37(7):867-876. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.04.009
[7]	Hejazialhosseini B, Rossinelli D, Bergdorf M, et al. High order finite volume methods on wavelet-adapted grids with local time-stepping on multicore architectures for the simulation of shock-bubble interactions.[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(22):8364-8383. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.07.021
[8]	Schilling O, Latini M. High-order weno simulations of three-dimensional reshocked Richtmyer-Meshkov instability to late times: Dynamics, dependence on initial conditions, and comparisons to experimental data[J]. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2010, 30(2):595-620. doi: 10.1016/S0252-9602(10)60064-1
[9]	Tian B, Shen W, Jiang S, et al. A global arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method for stratified Richtmyer-Meshkov instability[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2011, 46(1):113-121. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=23c103f293bda4adebcd35feaf542796&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[10]	Shankar S K, Kawai S, Lele S K. Two-dimensional viscous flow simulation of a shock accelerated heavy gas cylinder[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2011, 23(2):131. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=8036dad7385696611c022a99cb5bc7b7
[11]	Bailie C, Mcfarland J A, Greenough J A, et al. Effect of incident shock wave strength on the decay of Richtmyer-Meshkov instability-introduced perturbations in the refracted shock wave[J]. Shock Waves, 2012, 22(6):511-519. doi: 10.1007/s00193-012-0382-y
[12]	Chandrasekhar S. Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability[M]. Dover Publications, 1961.
[13]	Wheatley V, Pullin D I, Samtaney R. Stability of an impulsively accelerated density interface in magnetohydrodynamics[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2005, 95(12):125002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.125002
[14]	Wheatley V, Samtaney R, Pullin D I. The magnetohydrodynamic Richtmyer-Meshkov instability: The transverse field case[C]//18th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference. Australasian Fluid Mechanics Society, 2012.
[15]	Khan M, Mandal L, Banerjee R, et al. Development of Richtmyer-Meshkov and Rayleigh-Taylor instability in presence of magnetic field[J]. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research A, 2011, 653(1):2-6. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_arXiv.org_1101.3860
[16]	Cao J, Wu Z, Ren H, et al. Effects of shear flow and transverse magnetic field on Richtmyer-Meshkov instability[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2008, 15(4):445-514. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=c65ffb22c021910d193687d3d30e6647
[17]	Shin M S, Stone J M, Snyder G F. The magnetohydrodynamics of shock-cloud interaction in three dimensions[J]. Astrophysical Journal, 2008, 680(1):336-348. doi: 10.1086/529160
[18]	李源, 罗喜胜.黏性、表面张力和磁场对Rayleigh-Taylor不稳定性气泡演化影响的理论分析[J].物理学报, 2014, 2(8):277-285. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wlxb201408037 Li Yuan, Luo Xisheng. Theoretical analysis of effects of viscosity, surface tension, and magnetic field on the bubble evolution of Rayleigh-Taylor instability[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 2(8):277-285. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wlxb201408037
[19]	Saltzman J. An unsplit 3D upwind method for hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 115(1):153-168. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1184
[20]	Gardiner T A, Stone J M. An unsplit Godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 205(2):509-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.11.016
[21]	Haas J, Sturtevant B. Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 181(1):41-76. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=f857b28c6f0747bace4c970ef14bb4aa&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[22]	Chapman S, Cowling T G. The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
[23]	沙莎, 陈志华, 薛大文.激波冲击R22重气柱所导致的射流与混合研究[J].物理学报, 2013, 62(14):144701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.144701 Sha Sha, Chen Zhihua, Xue Dawen. The generation of jet and mixing induced by the interaction of shock wave with R22 cylinder[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(14):144701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.144701

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Fengguo, WANG Pei, WANG Yanjin, HU Jianbo. Improvement of void growth model and its application in simulating spallation experiments under different impact loading wave forms[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 051201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0218
[2]	ZHANG Tao, GU Yan, ZHAO Jibo, LIU Yusheng, WU Xing. Shock wave property on interface of wedge explosive and LiF window[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 549-554. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0318
[3]	Gao Fei, Wang Mingyang, Zhang Xianfeng, He Yong, Li Mengshen. A comment on the calculation models for reinforced concrete under intense dynamic loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 365-376. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0365-12
[4]	Zhang Fengguo, Zhou Hongqiang, Hu Xiaomian, Wang Pei, Shao Jianli, Feng Qijing. Influence of void coalescence on spall evolution of ductile polycrystalline metal under dynamic loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(5): 596-602. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0596-07
[5]	CHEN Qing-chou, JIANG Xiao-hua, LIMin, LU Xiao-jun, PENG Qi-xian. Ignitionandgrowthreactiveflow modelforHNS-Ⅳ explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(3): 328-332. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)03-0328-05
[6]	HUANG Xia, TANG Wen-hui, JIANG Bang-hai. Influencesofconstitutivemodelsonnumericallysimulatedresultsof X-raythermalshockwavesincompositematerials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(6): 600-605. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)06-0600-06
[7]	ZHAO Kai, WANG Xiao-jun, LIU Fei, LUO Wen-chao. Propagationofstresswaveinporousmaterial[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 107-112. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0107-06
[8]	DONG Jie, LI Yong-chi, CHEN Xue-dong. A phenomenological damage model of microvoids and its application[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 443-447. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0443-05

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	董军，蒋迪，孙亮，宋孟燕，陈飞，刘蒙莎，任义珂. 飞射物撞击预应力钢筋混凝土靶板试验研究. 兵工学报. 2024(S2): 176-185 .
2.	梁建刚，彭建，吴高峰. 大型商用飞机撞击载荷对核电厂管道的影响分析. 压力容器. 2021(06): 48-52 .
3.	冯尧，王洪涛，王晓欣，王海涛. 飞机撞击下高温气冷堆乏燃料厂房损伤研究. 原子能科学技术. 2020(03): 496-504 .
4.	王菲，刘晶波，韩鹏飞，宝鑫，王晓峰，李述涛. 核工程钢板混凝土墙防撞击贯穿实用计算方法. 爆炸与冲击. 2020(10): 122-133 . 本站查看
5.	方秦，吴昊，张涛. 核电站在大型商用客机撞击下损伤破坏研究进展. 建筑结构学报. 2019(05): 1-27 .
6.	张映玲，李志强，武子斌. 飞机撞击核电站欧洲区域最新研究进展. 产业与科技论坛. 2018(15): 90-92 .