Explosion suppression effect of CH<sub>4</sub>/air by combined porous materials in a container piping system

SHAO Jiwei; ZHUANG Chunji; WANG Zhirong; HUANG Yunan; LU Wenting

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2017-0064

Volume 38 Issue 4

May 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2018 > 38(4): 905-912

SHAO Jiwei, ZHUANG Chunji, WANG Zhirong, HUANG Yunan, LU Wenting. Explosion suppression effect of CH4/air by combined porous materials in a container piping system[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 905-912. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0064

Citation:

SHAO Jiwei, ZHUANG Chunji, WANG Zhirong, HUANG Yunan, LU Wenting. Explosion suppression effect of CH₄/air by combined porous materials in a container piping system[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 905-912. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0064

Citation:

PDF( 3234 KB)

Explosion suppression effect of CH₄/air by combined porous materials in a container piping system

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0064

1.
School of Safety Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
2.
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2017-02-24
Rev Recd Date: 2017-04-08
Publish Date: 2018-07-25

Abstract

Abstract

The combinations which were structured from three categories of porous materials including six sub-categories, were tested for studying the suppression effects of the porous materials on the explosion of the combustible gas. The combustible gas was the methane-air mixture. The porous materials were fixed in a closed container piping system by using a self-made thin iron hoop, then the explosion suppression effects of a thin iron hoop, single-layer porous materials, double-layer combination porous materials and three-layer combination porous materials were compared. The results show that the thin iron hoop could enhance the gas explosive intensity and the maximum explosion pressure was achieved behind the iron hoop. The explosion suppression effects of the porous materials were obvious, and the explosion suppression effects of the double-layer combination porous materials were more stable compared to those of the single-type porous materials and the three-layer combination porous materials. The optimized combination of the porous materials for explosion suppression turned out to be Al₂O₃ 10 mm/30 PPI+SiC 20 mm/20 PPI, and the optimized combination of the porous materials for explosion pressure suppression turned out to be Al₂O₃ 10 mm/30 PPI+Fe-Ni 10 mm/90 PPI+SiC 20 mm/10 PPI.
- porous material,
- CH₄/air mixture,
- container piping system,
- explosion suppression effect,
- explosion intensity index

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	崔克清, 张礼敬, 陶刚.化工安全设计[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2004:1-2.
[2]	ROBERT Z. Deflagration suppression using expanded metal mesh and polymer foams[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20(4):659-663. https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/deflagration-suppression-using-expanded-metal-mesh-and-polymer-foams-PeaLrTuryo
[3]	孙建华, 李艳霞, 魏春荣, 等.泡沫铁镍金属抑制瓦斯爆炸冲击波的实验研究[J].功能材料, 2013, 44(10):1390-1394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2013.10.005 SUN Jianhua, LI Yanxia, WEI Chunrong, et al. Experimental study on the porous foam iron-nickel metal inhibition of gas explosion wave[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2013, 44(10):1390-1394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2013.10.005
[4]	VASIL'EV A A. Near-limiting detonation in channels with porous walls[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 1994, 30(1):101-106. doi: 10.1007/BF00787892
[5]	DIAMANTIS D J, MASTORAKOS E, GOUSSIS D A. Simulations of premixed combustion in porous media[J]. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2002, 6(3):383-411. doi: 10.1088/1364-7830/6/3/301
[6]	JOO H I, DUNCAN K, CICCARELLI G. Flame quenching performance of ceramic foam[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2006, 178(10/11):1755-1769. doi: 10.1080/00102200600788692?needAccess=true
[7]	喻健良, 蔡涛, 李岳, 等.丝网结构对爆炸气体淬熄的试验研究[J].燃烧科学与技术, 2008, 14(2):97-100. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10141-2005070890.htm YU Jianliang, CAI Tao, LI Yue, et al. Experiment to quench explosive gas with structure of wire mesh[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2008, 14(2):97-100. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10141-2005070890.htm
[8]	NIE B, HE X, ZHANG R, et al. The roles of foam ceramics in suppression of gas explosion overpressure and quenching of flame propagation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192(2):741-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.083
[9]	魏春荣, 徐敏强, 王树桐, 等.多孔材料抑制瓦斯爆炸火焰波的实验研究[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2013, 42(2):206-213. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGKD201302007.htm WEI Chunrong, XU Minqiang, WANG Shutong, et al. Experiment of porous materials for suppressing the gas explosion flame wave[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2013, 42(2):206-213. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGKD201302007.htm
[10]	石油化工静电接地设计规范: SH/T 3097-2017[S]. 北京: 国家石油和化学工业局, 2000: 6.
[11]	尤明伟, 喻源, 蒋军成, 等.不同管长条件下连通容器预混气体的爆炸[J].燃烧科学与技术, 2012, 18(3):256-259. http://www.oalib.com/paper/5140604 YOU Mingwei, YU Yuan, JIANG Juncheng, et al. Premixed flammable gas explosion in containers connected by pipes with different lengths[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2012, 18(3):256-259. http://www.oalib.com/paper/5140604
[12]	CUI Y Y, WANG Z R, ZHOU K B, et al. Effect of wire mesh on double-suppression of CH₄/air mixture explosions in a spherical vessel connected to pipelines[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 45:66-77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272390393_A_high-precision_method_for_calculating_the_pressure_drop_across_wire_mesh_filters
[13]	ZHANG J, SUN Z, ZHENG Y, et al. Coupling effects of foam ceramics on the flame and shock wave of gas explosion[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(4):797-800. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.031
[14]	OH K H, KIM H, KIM J B, et al. A study on the obstacle-induced variation of the gas explosion characteristics[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2001, 14(6):597-602. doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(01)00054-7
[15]	韩丰磊. 多孔材料抑制火焰传播的实验研究及数值模拟[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2008: 27-34. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y1247906
[16]	SUN J, YI Z, WEI C, et al. The comparative experimental study of the porous materials suppressing the gas explosion[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 26:954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2262

Relative Articles

[1]	YANG Ke, LI Xuerui, JI Hong, ZHENG Kai, XING Zhixiang, JIANG Juncheng. Experiment on suppression of methane/air explosion in pipeline by modified coal gangue-sodium alginate powder[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(7): 075401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0399
[2]	JIANG Yuting, ZHONG Donghai, FANG Zehui, DING Yuanyuan, ZHOU Fenghua. Mechanical behavior of cuttlebone structure and its strain rate effect[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 043102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0142
[3]	CHEN Xiaokun, WANG Jun, CHENG Fangming. Research progress on hydrogen gas explosion suppression materials and their suppression mechanisms[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(11): 111101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0418
[4]	ZHANG Baoyong, TAO Jin, CUI Jiarui, ZHANG Yiyu, WANG Yajun, HAN Yonghui, SUN Man. Absorption characteristics of methane-air mixture explosion energyby foam metal with a corrugated surface against explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(11): 115401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0084
[5]	Effect of right-angle duct and its section variation on gas explosion prevention[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves.
[6]	WANG Jingui, HU Chao, LUO Feiyun, ZHANG Su. Experimental study on the effects of venting area on the structural response of vessel walls to methane-air mixture deflagration[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(4): 045102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0327
[7]	ZHOU Hui, REN Huiqi, WU Xiangyun, YI Zhi, HUANG Kui, MU Chaomin, WANG Hailu. A review of sacrificial claddings in multilayer protective structure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 111101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0280
[8]	JIA Hailin, ZHAI Rupeng, LI Dihui, XIANG Haijun, YANG Yongqin. Differences of premixed methane-air explosion in pipelines suppressed by three ultrafine water mists containing different salts[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 082201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0456
[9]	DUAN Yulong, WANG Shuo, HE Sen, WAN Lin. Characteristics of gas explosion to diffusion combustion under porous materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 095401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0009
[10]	HU Yang, YIN Shangxian, Bjørn J. ARNTZEN, ZHU Jianfang, LI Xuebing, Ragnhild Dybdal OIE, QIN Hansheng. Experimental study of multi-objective coupling synchronous control in gas/air premixed gas deflagration flow test system[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 094201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0312
[11]	ZHAO Qi, CHEN Xianfeng, DAI Huaming, YIN Shuhui, WANG Xiaotong, ZHANG Hongming, HUANG Chuyuan. Inhibition of explosion characteristic of premixed gases by filling patterns of rare earth metal materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 115404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0276
[12]	SUN Conghuang, QU Yandong, LIU Wanli, ZHAI Cheng. Influence of different ignition conditions on deflagration characteristics of a premixed mixture of H₂ and air in a closed pipe[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 622-631. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0309
[13]	ZHOU Ning, ZHANG Guowen, WANG Wenxiu, ZHAO Huijun, YUAN Xiongjun, HUANG Weiqiu. Effect of ignition energy on the explosion process and the dynamic response of propane-air premixed gas[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1031-1038. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0049
[14]	Zhao Huanjuan, J.H.S.Lee, Zhang Yinghua, Qian Xinming, Yan Yiran. Effects of boundary conditions on premixed CH₄+2O₂ detonation characteristics[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 201-207. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0201-07
[15]	Li Ying, Ren Guangwei, Zhang Wei, Zhao Pengduo, Zhang Lei, Du Zhipeng. Water mitigation effect under internal blast[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 1080-1086. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-1080-07
[16]	Cao Yong, Guo Jin, Hu Kunlun, Shao Ke, Yang Fan. Effect of ignition locations on vented explosion of premixed hydrogen-air mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6): 847-852. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0847-06
[17]	Cheng Guan-bing, Li Jun-xian, Li Shu-ming, Qu Hong-chun. An experimental study on detonation characteristics of binary fuels hydrogen/propane-air mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0249-06
[18]	Wang Peng-fei, Xu Song-lin, Li Zhi-bin, Hu Shi-sheng. Effect of micro-structure on the strain rate of cellular materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(3): 285-291. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0285-07
[19]	QIAN Hai-lin, WANG Zhi-rong, JIANG Jun-cheng. InfluenceofN2/CO2 mixtureonmethaneexplosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 445-448. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0445-04
[20]	CHEN Dong-liang, SUN Jin-hua, LIU Yi, MA Ye-feng, HAN Xue-bin. Propagation characteristics of premixed methane-air flames[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 385-390. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0385-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(12)

1.	关文玲，矦逸飞，任常兴，董呈杰，张网. 多孔材料对泄爆管道LPG爆炸抑制效应的影响研究. 中国安全科学学报. 2024(06): 82-89 .
2.	杜昌华，王麒翔，李世宪，雷世林. 多孔材料下瓦斯爆炸反向扩散火焰演化行为研究. 能源与环保. 2024(09): 38-44 .
3.	边振华，李小萌. 封闭巷道挡板对爆炸冲击波传播的影响研究. 煤矿安全. 2023(01): 70-76 .
4.	郑露露，龙凤英，温子阳，李泽欢，段玉龙. 多孔材料-CO_2对CH_4/H_2抑爆失效研究. 安全. 2022(09): 24-30+36 .
5.	丁淇德，韩向军，雷欣涛，牛长军，王立志. 基于LabVIEW的管道甲烷气体监测系统设计. 能源与环保. 2022(10): 229-234 .
6.	唐毅，员亚龙，李开源，陈先锋，袁必和，贺云龙，黄楚原. 球形非金属材料对甲烷掺氢爆炸抑制机理研究. 高压物理学报. 2022(06): 182-189 .
7.	何昆，石英杰，李孝斌，田国兵. 惰性气体抑制丙酮蒸气爆炸实验对比研究. 消防科学与技术. 2021(01): 16-19 .
8.	张龚. 工业气体爆炸事故原因分析及应急救援. 化工设计通讯. 2021(09): 147-148 .
9.	严灼，穆朝民，袁树杰，李重情，齐娟. 空腔长宽比对瓦斯爆炸冲击波传播规律的影响. 煤炭学报. 2020(05): 1803-1811 .
10.	段玉龙，王硕，王文和，邓智迅，赖帆，张晏华. 多孔陶瓷结构抑制甲烷爆炸实验研究. 消防科学与技术. 2020(06): 746-749 .
11.	段玉龙，王硕，贺森，万琳. 多孔材料下气体爆炸转扩散燃烧的特性研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2020(09): 113-121 . 本站查看
12.	路长，王鸿波，张运鹏，朱寒，余明高. 氮气幕对瓦斯爆炸进行阻爆实验. 化工进展. 2019(07): 3056-3064 .