Spall of Ti17 alloy induced by laser shock peening with multiple shots

WU Junfeng; ZOU Shikun; ZHANG Yongkang; SUN Guifang; NI Zhonghua; CAO Ziwen; CHE Zhigang

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2017-0082

Volume 38 Issue 5

Jul. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2018 > 38(5): 1091-1098

WU Junfeng, ZOU Shikun, ZHANG Yongkang, SUN Guifang, NI Zhonghua, CAO Ziwen, CHE Zhigang. Spall of Ti17 alloy induced by laser shock peening with multiple shots[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1091-1098. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0082

Citation:

WU Junfeng, ZOU Shikun, ZHANG Yongkang, SUN Guifang, NI Zhonghua, CAO Ziwen, CHE Zhigang. Spall of Ti17 alloy induced by laser shock peening with multiple shots[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1091-1098. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0082

Citation:

PDF( 7668 KB)

Spall of Ti17 alloy induced by laser shock peening with multiple shots

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0082

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China
2.
Science and Technology on Power Beam Processes Laboratory, AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing 100024, China
3.
School of Electro-mechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China

Received Date: 2017-03-16
Rev Recd Date: 2017-07-10
Publish Date: 2018-09-25

Abstract

Abstract

In order to investigate spalling response and the spall threshold of Ti17 alloy under laser shock peening (LSP), the surface of a 5 mm-thick sample was shocked by multiple laser shots with the shot number ranging one to eight shots. The laser employed has a repetition rate of 1 Hz, the pulse width of 15 ns, the pulse energy of 30 J, and the spot size of 4 mm×4 mm. The surface morphology, the internal damage and the spall morphology after LSP were characterized by non-contact optical profiler, ultrasonic nondestructive testing technique and scanning electron microscope, respectively. The results indicate that the increment of the shot number from four to five results in increasing the depression depth of the surface up to 64.5%. The spall threshold is reached by LSP with continuous five shots. The spall thickness observed after LSP with five to eight shots ranges from 280 μm to 310 μm. The spall mechanism is due to the nucleation, growth and coalescence of the ductile micro-voids, leading to intragranular failure and transgranular failure. This work may provide valuable information for the optimization of integrated blisk rotators with LSP.
- laser shock peening,
- Ti17 alloy sample,
- spall characteristic,
- spall threshold,
- ultrasonic nondestructive testing

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	ZHANG Y K, LU J Z, REN X D, et al. Effect of laser shock processing on the mechanical properties and fatigue lives of the turbojet engine blades manufactured by LY2 aluminum alloy[J]. Materials and Design, 2009, 30(5):1697-1703. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.017.
[2]	PEYRE P, FABBRO R, MERRIEN P, et al. Laser shock processing of aluminium alloys:Application to high cycle fatigue behaviour[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 1996, 210(1/2):102-113. DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(95)10084-9.
[3]	BERGANT Z, TRDAN U, GRUM J. Effects of laser shock processing on high cycle fatigue crack growth rate and fracture toughness of aluminium alloy 6082-T651[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 87:444-455. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.027.
[4]	LU J Z, QI H, LUO K Y, et al. Corrosion behaviour of AISI 304 stainless steel subjected to massive laser shock peening impacts with different pulse energies[J]. Corrosion Science, 2014, 80:53-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.003.
[5]	LUO K Y, WANG C Y, LI Y M, et al. Effects of laser shock peening and groove spacing on the wear behavior of non-smooth surface fabricated by laser surface texturing[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 313:600-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.029.
[6]	SPANRAD S, TONG J. Characterization of foreign object damage (FOD) and early fatigue crack growth in laser shock peened Ti-6AL-4V aerofoil specimens[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 528(4):2128-2136. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.188.
[7]	罗新民, 马辉, 张静文, 等.激光冲击中的"应变屏蔽"和"约束击穿"[J].材料导报, 2010, 24(5):11-15. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cldb201005003 LUO Xinmin, MA Hui, ZHANG Jingwen, et al. "Strain-screening" and "constraint-breakdown" in laser shock processing[J]. Materials Review, 2010, 24(5):11-15. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cldb201005003
[8]	LIU Q, DING K, YE L, et al. Spallation-like phenomenon induced by laser shock peening surface treatment on 7050 aluminum alloy[C]//ATRENS A, BOLAND J N. Structural integrity and fracture: Proceedings of the International Conference, SIF 2004. Brisbane, Australia: School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering Publications, 2004: 235-240. DOI: 10.1142/9789812777973_0024.
[9]	LIU Q, YANG C H, DING K, et al. The effect of laser power density on the fatigue life of laser-shock-peened 7050 aluminium alloy[J]. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2007, 30(11):1110-1124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01180.x.
[10]	JARMAKANI H, MADDOX B, WEI C T, et al. Laser shock-induced spalling and fragmentation in vanadium[J]. Acta Materialia, 2010, 58(14):4604-4628. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.027.
[11]	LESCOUTE E, DE RESSEGUIER T, CHEVALIER J M, et al. Ejection of spalled layers from laser shock-loaded metals[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2010, 108(9):93510. DOI: 10.1063/1.3500317.
[12]	DALTON D A, BREWER J L, BERNSTEIN A C, et al. Laser-induced spallation of aluminum and Al alloys at strain rates above 2×10⁶ s^-1[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2008, 104(1):13526. DOI: 10.1063/1.2949276.
[13]	翟少栋, 李英华, 彭建祥, 等.平面碰撞与强激光加载下金属铝的层裂行为[J].爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(6):767-773. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0767-07. ZHAI Shaodong, LI Yinghua, PENG Jianxiang, et al. Spall behavior of pure aluminum under plate-impact and high energy laser shock loadings[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6):767-773. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0767-07.
[14]	TYLER C, MILLETT J C F, BOURNE N K. Spallation in Ti-6Al-4V:Stress measurements and recovery[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2006, 845(1):674-677. DOI: 10.1063/1.2263412.
[15]	BOIDIN X, CHEVRIER P, KLEPACZKO J R, et al. Identification of damage mechanism and validation of a fracture model based on mesoscale approach in spalling of titanium alloy[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(14/15):4595-4615. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.039.
[16]	FABBRO R, FOURNIER J, BALLARD P, et al. Physical study of laser-produced plasma in confined geometry[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1990, 68(2):775-784. DOI: 10.1063/1.346783.
[17]	GE M Z, XIANG J Y. Effect of laser shock peening on microstructure and fatigue crack growth rate of AZ31B magnesium alloy[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 680:544-552. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.179.
[18]	张建泉, 陈荣华, 强希文, 等.激光产生的激波在靶材中的传播及层裂效应[J].中国激光, 2002, 29(3):197-200. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-7025.2002.03.002. ZHANG Jianquan, CHEN Ronghua, QIANG Xiwen, et al. Propagation and spall effect of shock wave induced by laser in targets[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2002, 29(3):197-200. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0258-7025.2002.03.002.
[19]	CELLARD C, RETRAINT D, FRANÇOIS M, et al. Laser shock peening of Ti-17 titanium alloy:Influence of process parameters[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2012, 532(1):362-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.10.104.
[20]	HERASYMCHUK O M, KONONUCHENKO O V, MARKOVSKY P E, et al. Calculating the fatigue life of smooth specimens of two-phase titanium alloys subject to symmetric uniaxial cyclic load of constant amplitude[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 83:313-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.002.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Jinchun, WANG Yuying, SUN Ni. Numerical simulation of dynamic response of reinforced masonry wall strengthened with polyurea under gas explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(10): 101405. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0077
[2]	ZHANG Suoshuo, NIE Jianxin, ZHANG Jian, SUN Xiaole, GUO Xueyong, ZHANG Tao. Sympathetic detonation of explosive charge in confined space and its protection[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(8): 085101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0456
[3]	ZHAO Xiaohua, LIU Shucan, FANG Hongyuan, SUN Jinshan, SHI Mingsheng. Protective effect of polymer layer on reinforced concrete slabs under an underwater contact explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 125102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0033
[4]	MA Yinliang, ZHANG Pan, CHENG Yuansheng, LIU Jun. Design of corner connection structures of box-type cabins subjected to internal blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(12): 125102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0437
[5]	ZHENG Zhihao, REN Huiqi, LONG Zhilin, GUO Ruiqi, CAI Yang, LI Zhijian. A study on impact compression mechanical properties of PP/CF reinforced coral sand cement-based composites[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 073104. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0297
[6]	YU Qing, ZHANG Hui, YANG Ruizhi. Numerical simulation of the shock wave generated by electro-hydraulic effect based on LS-DYNA[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(2): 024201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0214
[7]	WANG Ziguo, WANG Songtao, KONG Xiangzhen, SUN Yuyan. Anti-penetration capability of pre-stressed confined concrete with truncated cone[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(10): 103303. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0030
[8]	SONG Guangming, LI Ming, WU Qiang, GONG Zizheng, ZHANG Pinliang, CAO Yan. Debris cloud characteristics of graded-impedance shields under hypervelocity impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(2): 021405. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0299
[9]	WU Kai, WANG Xianhui, ZHOU Yunbo, BI Zheng, LI Mingxing. Optimization of vehicle protection components based on reliability[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(3): 035101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0126
[10]	SONG Ge, LONG Yuan, ZHONG Mingshou, WANG min, WU Jianyu. Similarity relations of underwater explosion in centrifuge and pressurizing vessels[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 024102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0321
[11]	ZHANG Yongkang, LI Yulong, TANG Zhongbin, YANG Hong, XU Hai. Dynamic response of aluminum-foam-based sandwich panelsunder hailstone impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 373-380. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0232
[12]	Li Rujiang, Chai Yanjun, Han Hongwei, Liu Tiansheng. Protective performance of explosive reactive armor with composite rubber armor as front or back plate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 637-642. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0637-06
[13]	Chen Mingsheng, Chun Hua, Li Jianping. Simulation of blast waves interaction for multiple cloud explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 81-86. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0081-06
[14]	Li Li-sha, Du Jian-guo, Zhang Hong-hai, Xie Qing-liang. Numerical simulation of damage of brick wall subjected to blast shock vibration[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 459-466. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0459-08
[15]	Li Ru-jiang, Han Hong-wei, Sun Su-jie, Liu Tian-sheng. Ballistic resistance capabilities of explosive reactive armors encapsulated by ceramic layers[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 47-51. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0047-05
[16]	Zhu Jun, Yang Jian-hua, Lu Wen-bo, Chen Ming, Yan Peng. Influences of blasting vibration on the sidewall of underground tunnel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(2): 153-160. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)02-0153-08
[17]	WuHe-xiang, LiuYing. Influencesofdensitygradientvariationonmechanicalperformances ofdensity-gradedhoneycombmaterials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 163-168. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0163-06
[18]	LAI Ming, FENG Shun-shan, HUANG Guang-yan, BIAN Jiang-nan. Damageofdifferentreinforcedstructures subjectedtounderwatercontactexplosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(6): 599-604. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)06-0599-05
[19]	TIAN Yu-bin, LI Zhao, ZHANG Chun-wei. Dynamicresponseofreinforcedmasonrystructureunderblastload[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(6): 658-662. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)06-0658-05
[20]	CHEN Yong, HUA Hong-xing, WANG Yu, GOU Hou-yu. Protective effects of hyper-elastic sandwiches coated onto metal boxes subjected to underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(4): 395-400. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)04-0395-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	杜明燃，陈智凡，陆少锋，梁进，李基锐，王尹军，王天照，陈宇航. 供风量与气泡帷幕层数协同下水中爆炸冲击波的削波效果. 高压物理学报. 2024(01): 165-173 .
2.	郭军，米鑫程，冯国瑞，白锦文，文晓泽，朱林俊，王子，皇文博. 基于液电效应的高压电脉冲岩体致裂特征及机理. 煤炭学报. 2024(05): 2270-2282 .
3.	农志祥，吴红波，王尹军，李基锐，马成帅，叶风明，徐君. 多层气泡帷幕对水下爆炸防护能力的研究. 工程爆破. 2024(03): 136-142 .
4.	陆少锋，吴红波，马成帅，王尹军，李基锐. 不同孔间距的气泡帷幕对水中冲击波衰减特性的影响. 爆破器材. 2024(04): 52-57 .
5.	范怀斌，陆少锋，莫崇勋，刁约，覃才勇，黄国松. 多层差异性气泡帷幕对水下爆破冲击波的衰减效应的试验研究. 爆破器材. 2023(02): 48-55 .
6.	范怀斌，陆少锋，程扬帆，覃才勇，刁约. 组合帷幕阻波帘对水下冲击波的防护特性分析. 科学技术与工程. 2023(17): 7520-7526 .
7.	陆浩然，孙海亮，马强，李海涛，于丽晶，马明辉，孙宇新. 水下环境爆炸对方形水池冲击载荷数值模拟研究. 强度与环境. 2022(05): 12-19 .
8.	司剑峰，钟冬望，李雷斌. 基于气泡形态影响的水下气幕对冲击波衰减效果分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(07): 71-79 . 本站查看