Investigation of the propagation modes for gaseous detonation at near-limit condition

YAN Bingjian; ZHANG Bo; GAO Yuan; LYU Shuguang

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2017-0167

Volume 38 Issue 6

Sep. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2018 > 38(6): 1435-1440

LUO Zongmu, LI Ke, CHEN Hao, ZHANG Yuwu, LIANG Minzu, LIN Yuliang. Acceleration response test and damage analysis of dummy head under explosion shock wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(12): 121435. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0242

Citation:

YAN Bingjian, ZHANG Bo, GAO Yuan, LYU Shuguang. Investigation of the propagation modes for gaseous detonation at near-limit condition[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1435-1440. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0167

Citation:

PDF( 1747 KB)

Investigation of the propagation modes for gaseous detonation at near-limit condition

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0167

1.
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
2.
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3.
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, United States

Received Date: 2017-05-11
Rev Recd Date: 2017-08-31
Publish Date: 2018-11-25

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, five kinds of hydrocarbon gaseous mixture were selected as working medium. By using high voltage spark ignition method and optical fiber probe, the propagation velocity of detonation wave in pipeline was measured near failure state condition. Experiments were conducted based on a self-made detonation pipeline, which includes a drive section and three different test sections with 1.5-mm, 3.2-mm and 12.7-mm inner diameter, respectively. Experimental results reverified that there are six different propagation modes, which are steady detonation, rapid fluctuation detonation, stuttering detonation, galloping detonation, low velocity detonation and detonation failure, respectively for pipeline detonation. Among them, gaseous mixtures C₂H₂+2.5O₂+70%Ar and C₂H₂+2.5O₂+85%Ar (both have low activation energy), have only three propagating modes, i.e. steady, rapid fluctuation and failure modes; while for other three gaseous mixtures C₃H₈+5O₂, C₂H₂+5N₂O and CH₄+2O₂ (with higher activation energy), there are six different propagating modes. The results show that besides gas composition and initial pressure, the activation energy of gaseous mixture may also affect the propagation state of detonation wave in pipeline.
- detonation wave,
- propagation mode,
- velocity fluctuation,
- activation energy

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	LEE J H S. The detonation phenomenon[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[2]	LEE J J, DUPRE G, KNYSTAUTAS R, et al. Doppler interferometry study of unstable detonations[J]. Shock Waves, 1995, 5:175-181. doi: 10.1007/BF01435525
[3]	CAMARGO A, NG H D, CHAO J, et al. Propagation of near-limit gaseous detonations in small diameter tubes[J]. Shock Waves, 2010, 20(6):499-508. doi: 10.1007/s00193-010-0253-3
[4]	MOEN I O, SULMISTRAS A, THOMAS G, et al. The influence of cellular regularity on the behaviors of gaseous detonations[J]. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1985, 106:220-243. doi: 10.2514/5.9781600865800.0220.0243
[5]	LEE J H S, JESUTHASAN A, NG H D. Near limit behavior of the detonation velocity[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(2):1957-1963. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.05.036
[6]	KITANO S, FUKAO M, SUSA A, et al. Spinning detonation and velocity deficit in small diameter tubes[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(2):2355-2362. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.119
[7]	CAMPBELL C, WOODHEAD D W. The ignition of gases by an explosion wave. Part Ⅰ. Carbon monoxide and hydrogen mixtures[J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1926, 129(129):3010-3021.
[8]	CAMPBELL C, WOODHEAD D W. Striated photographic records of explosion waves[J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1927:1572-1578.
[9]	CAMPBELL C, FINCH A C. Striated photographic records of explosion waves. Part Ⅱ. An explanation of the Strioe[J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1928:2094-2106.
[10]	MANSON N, BROCHET C, BROSSARD J, et al. Vibratory phenomena and instability of self-sustained detonations in gases[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 1965, 10:461-469. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0082078463800557
[11]	EDWARDS D H, HOOPER G, MORGAN J M. A study of unstable detonations using a microwave interferometer[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 1974, 7(2):242-247. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/7/2/308
[12]	HALOUA F, BROULLETTE M, LIENHART V, et al. Characteristics of unstable detonations near extinction limits[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2000, 122(4):422-438. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00134-6
[13]	MOEN I O, DOATO M, KNYSTAUTUS R, et al. The influence of confinement on the propagation of detonations near the detonability limits[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 1981, 18(1):1615-1622. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80165-8
[14]	MANZHALEI V I. Detonation regimes of gases in capillaries[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 1999, 28(3):296-302. doi: 10.1007/BF00749647
[15]	MCBRIDE B J, GORDON S. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications[R]. User's Manual and Program Description NASA Report, 1996, 19(4):443.

Relative Articles

[2]	SHEN Fei, WANG Hui, WANG Jintao, YU Wenli, WANG Xuanjun. Detonation driving energy release characteristics of laminated composite charge of DNTF-based aluminized explosivesbased on cylinder tests[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(11): 112301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0085
[3]	CHANG Lihua, WEN Weifeng, RAN Maojie, HUANG Wenbin, WANG Xu, HE Hui, GAO Peng. Study on ultra-high speed photoelectric framing photography of the multi-point initiation of explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(4): 044101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0201
[4]	LYU Haicheng, HUANG Xiaolong, LI Ning, WENG Chunsheng. Transmission and reflection characteristics of gaseous detonation waves impacting on gas-solid interface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 112101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0523
[5]	NI Jing, PAN Jianfeng, JIANG Chao, CHEN Xiang, ZHANG Shun. Effects of hydrogen-blending ratio on detonation characteristics of premixed methane-oxygen gas[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 042102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0237
[6]	LI Hongbin, LI Jianling, XIONG Cha, FAN Wei, ZHAO Lei, HAN Wenhu. Numerical investigation on detonation diffraction and re-initiationprocesses in a supersonic inflow[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0464
[7]	WU Yuwen, CHU Chi, WENG Chunsheng, ZHENG Quan. Experimental research on the influence of orifice plate perturbation on detonation cellular structure characteristics[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 112102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0482
[8]	Yu Jianliang, Zhang Dong, Yan Xingqing. Influences of blocked obstacles on propagation of gaseous detonation in pipeline[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 447-452. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0447-06
[9]	Miao Yusong, Li Xiaojie, Wang Xiaohong, Yan Honghao, Chen Xiang. Munroe effect of detonation wave collision[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 544-548. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0544-05
[10]	Wang Li, Han Feng, Chen Fang, Ma Xiaoqing. Fragments' velocity of eccentric warheadwith double symmetric detonators[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 69-74. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0069-06
[11]	Chen Qiu-yang, Yu Ming. Application of relaxation method for calculating detonation in condensed explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 785-791. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0785-07
[12]	PAN Zhen-hua, FAN Bao-chun, GUI Ming-yue, ZHANG Xu-dong. Numericalsimulationofdetonationwavepropagationinaflowsystem[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(6): 593-597. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0593-05
[13]	DONG Gang, FAN Bao-chun, ZHU Min-ming, CHEN Yi-liang. An application of in situ adaptive tabulation method in numerical simulation of gaseous detonation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(1): 75-79. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)01-0075-05
[14]	TENG Hong-hui, Lv Jun-ming, JIANG Zong-lin. Downstream detonation initiation induced by interaction between shock wave and obstacle in combustible gas mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(3): 251-258. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)03-0251-08
[15]	LIU Yu-cun, WANG Jian-hua, LU Chun-rong, LIU Deng-cheng, YU Yan-wu. Influences of particle size of HMX on detonation waves propagation of HMX and HMX/F2641[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(6): 562-566. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)06-0562-05
[16]	YU Lu-jun, FAN Bao-chun, DONG Gang, GUI Ming-yue. Numerical simulation of the process on a pulse detonation engine[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(6): 522-527. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)06-0522-06
[17]	DAI Shu-lan, XU Hou-qian. Numerical simulation of standing oblique detonation wave using parallel computation method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(6): 572-576. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)06-0572-05
[18]	TENG Hong-hui, ZHANG De-liang, LI Hui-huang, JIANG Zong-lin. Numerical investigation of detonation direct initiation induced by toroidal shock wave focusing[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 512-518. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0512-07