Material failure models in SPH simulation of debris cloud

DI Dening; CHEN Xiaowei

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2017-0328

Volume 38 Issue 5

Jul. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2018 > 38(5): 948-956

DI Dening, CHEN Xiaowei. Material failure models in SPH simulation of debris cloud[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 948-956. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0328

Citation:

DI Dening, CHEN Xiaowei. Material failure models in SPH simulation of debris cloud[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 948-956. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0328

DI Dening, CHEN Xiaowei. Material failure models in SPH simulation of debris cloud[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 948-956. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0328

Citation:

DI Dening, CHEN Xiaowei. Material failure models in SPH simulation of debris cloud[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 948-956. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0328

PDF( 5946 KB)

Material failure models in SPH simulation of debris cloud

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0328

DI Dening¹,
CHEN Xiaowei^{2, 3
,
,}

1.
Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, Sichuan, China
2.
Advanced Research Institute for Multidisciplinary Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date: 2017-08-26
Rev Recd Date: 2017-11-08
Publish Date: 2018-09-25

Abstract

Abstract

The smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method is widely used in debris cloud simulation under hypervelocity impact. The SPH solver in AUTODYN was employed to investigate the effects of the no-failure model, the Grady failure model and the maximum tension failure model on the simulation results of debris cloud. When using the no-failure model, the simulation result and material response were not consistent with the experiment. Compared with the Grady model, the material under the maximum tension model was more difficult to fail, which would slightly weaken the expansion of debris cloud, produce less but heavier debris because of particles gathering, and thus improve the penetration performance of debris cloud. Similarly, by increasing the failure stress threshold, the above result was also obtained. Considering the material response and debris distribution, the simulation result by the Grady model was closer to the experiment. However, the difference between the Grady model and the maximum tension model was related to the impact condition, and more complete fragmentation of the material would lead to a smaller difference.
- failure model,
- SPH method,
- debris cloud,
- debris distribution,
- hypervelocity impact

FullText(HTML)

References(8)

References

[1]	LIU G R, LIU M B.光滑粒子流体动力学: 一种无网格粒子法[M].韩旭, 杨刚, 强洪夫, 译.长沙: 湖南大学出版社, 2005: 12-32.
[2]	GROENENBOOM P H L. Numerical simulation of 2D and 3D hypervelocity impact using the SPH option in PAM-SHOCK^TM[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 20(1/2/3/4/5):309-323. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(97)87503-3.
[3]	张伟, 庞宝君, 贾斌, 等.弹丸超高速撞击防护屏碎片云数值模拟[J].高压物理学报, 2004, 18(1):47-52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2004.01.009. ZHANG Wei, PANG Baojun, JIA Bin, et al. Numerical simulation of debris cloud produced by hypervelocity impact of projectile on bumper[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2004, 18(1):47-52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2004.01.009.
[4]	HIGASHIDE M E, KHISHCHENKO K V, LEVASHOV P R. Hypervelocity impact modeling with different equations of state[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 33(1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12):625-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.078.
[5]	李宝宝, 汤文辉, 冉宪文.两种物态方程在超高速碰撞数值模拟中的比较[J].航天器环境工程, 2010, 27(5):576-580. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2010.05.006. LI Baobao, TANG Wenhui, RAN Xianwen. Comparison of two kinds of equation of state in numerical simulation of hypervelocity impact[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2010, 27(5):576-580. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2010.05.006.
[6]	PIEKUTOWSKI A J. Formation and description of debris cloud produced by hypervelocity impact: NASA CR-4707[R]. USA: NASA, 1996.
[7]	GRADY D E. The spall strength of condensed matter[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1988, 36(3):353-384. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(88)90015-4.
[8]	PIEKUTOWSKI A J. A simple dynamic model for the formation of debris clouds[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1990, 10(1/2/3/4):453-471. DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(90)90079-B.

Relative Articles

[1]	QIAN Bingwen, ZHOU Gang, CHEN Chunlin, MA Kun, LI Yishuo, GAO Pengfei, YIN Lixin. Measurement and analysis of stress waves in concrete target under hypervelocity impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0181
[2]	REN Siyuan, WU Qiang, ZHANG Pinliang, SONG Guangming, CHEN Chuan, GONG Zizheng, LI Zhengyu. A study of damage characteristics caused by hypervelocity impact of reactive projectile on the honeycomb sandwich panel double-layer structure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(7): 073302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0272
[3]	MA Kun, LI Mingrui, CHEN Chunlin, SHEN Zikai, ZHOU Gang. The application of a modified constitutive model of metals in the simulation of hypervelocity impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(9): 091406. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0315
[4]	LIAO Huming, LI Bo, FAN Jiang, JIAO Lixin, YU Shuaichao, LIN Jianyu, PEI Xiaoyang. OTM analysis of debris cloud under hypervelocity impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(10): 103301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0275
[5]	CHI Runqiang, DUAN Yongpan, PANG Baojun, CAI Yuan. Effects of gas pressure on the front wall damage of pressure vessel impacted by hypervelocity projectile[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(2): 021404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0310
[6]	WANG Xiaofeng, TAO Gang, REN Baoxiang, PANG Chunqiao, FAN Qiang, LIU Long. Mechanical parameters of the overwhelm process of fluted liner for 30 mm rifled gun based on SPH method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 012201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0291
[7]	ZHANG Pinliang, SONG Guangming, GONG Zizheng, TIAN Dongbo, WU Qiang, CAO Yan, LI Yu, LI Ming. Shielding performances of a Whipple shield enhanced by Al/Mg impedance-graded materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(12): 125101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0461
[8]	JING Lin, HAN Liangliang, ZHOU Pengtao. A numerical simulation of railway axles subjected to ballast impact based on SPH method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 603-615. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0265
[9]	Zhao Jian, Zhang Guicai, Xu Yiji, Zhou Yi, Wang Ruiying, Xing Xueyang, Li Jianbo. SPH-based numerical simulation and experimental study on rock breaking by particle impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 479-486. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0479-08
[10]	Sun Xiaowang, Zhang Jie, Wang Xiaojun, Li Yongchi, Zhao Kai. Application of SPH in stress wave simulation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 21-26. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0010-05
[11]	Qiang Hongfu, Fan Shujia, Chen Fuzhen, Liu Hu. A new smoothed particle hydrodynamics method based on the pseudo-fluid model and its application in hypervelocity impact of a projectile on a thin plate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 990-1000. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-0990-11
[12]	Feng Chun, Li Shi-hai, Liu Xiao-yu. A 2D particle contact-based meshfree method and its application to hypervelocity impact simulation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(3): 292-299. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0292-08
[13]	YangYang, XuFei, ZhangYue-qing, MoJian-jun, TaoYan-hui. Hypervelocityimpactexperimentontwo-dimensional plain-wovenC/SiCcomposites[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 156-162. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0156-07
[14]	ZHANG Wei, XIAO Xin-ke, WEI Gang. Constitutiverelationandfracturemodelof7A04aluminumalloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 81-87. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0081-07
[15]	ZHANG Xiao-tian, JIA Guang-hui, HUANG Hai. Simulationofhypervelocity-impactdebrisclouds usingaLagrangeFEM withnodeseparation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 499-504. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0499-06
[16]	CUI Wei-feng, ZENG Xin-wu. Simulation investigations on debris cloud impact damage potential[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(4): 434-438. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)04-0434-05
[17]	ZHANG Wei, MA Wen-lai, GUAN Gong-shun, PANG Bao-jun. Numerical simulation of non-spherical projectiles hypervelocity impact on spacecraft shield configuration[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(3): 240-245. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)03-0240-06
[18]	ZHANG Yong-qiang, GUAN Gong-shun, ZHANG Wei, PANG Bao-jun. Characteristics of debris cloud produced by normal impact of spherical projectile on thin plate shield[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(6): 546-552. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)06-0546-07
[19]	XU Zhi-hong, TANG Wen-hui, LUO Yong. Applications of the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method to hypervelocity impact simulations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 53-58. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0053-06
[20]	JIA Guang-hui, HUANG Hai, HU Zhen-dong. Simulation analyse of hypervelocity impact perforation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 47-53. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0047-07

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(17)

1.	陈兴，徐大富，刘占芳，卫国宁，卢永刚. Ti/Al/Mg阻抗梯度结构超高速撞击数值模拟. 国防科技大学学报. 2025(01): 136-146 .
2.	李鑫冰，赵翼飞，吴彼. 超高速撞击蜂窝夹芯板的弹丸形状效应数值模拟研究. 装备环境工程. 2024(07): 112-123 .
3.	陈兴，徐大富，刘占芳，卫国宁，卢永刚. 冰粒超高速撞击蜂窝夹层板二次碎片云分布特性分析. 弹道学报. 2023(01): 1-7 .
4.	刘文近，张庆明，龙仁荣，龚自正，任健康，任思远，武强，宋光明，陈川，张品亮. 超高速动能撞击密实小行星的动量传递规律. 深空探测学报(中英文). 2023(04): 420-427 .
5.	申泽斌，何起光，陈小伟，武晨阳. 盘形弹超高速正撞的碎片云及危险碎片的特征研究. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2022(05): 1-7 .
6.	马坤，李名锐，陈春林，沈子楷，周刚. 修正金属本构模型在超高速撞击模拟中的应用. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(09): 100-112 . 本站查看
7.	邢柏阳，赵建霞，陈亮，胡爱虔，朱福林，刘建禄，郭锐，侯云辉. 爆炸成型弹丸垂直穿透钢板靶后破片飞散特性. 北京理工大学学报. 2022(10): 1026-1033 .
8.	彭芸，邓勇军，刘筱玲，姚勇，黄洁. 超高速正撞击下弹丸形状效应对碎片云分布特征的影响规律. 空间碎片研究. 2022(04): 35-48 .
9.	袁小雅，马天宝. 超高速碰撞下蜂窝夹层板结构优化设计研究. 兵器装备工程学报. 2021(01): 179-184 .
10.	王云天，曾祥国，陈华燕，杨鑫，王放，祁忠鹏. 钽靶板在冲击下层裂过程的数值模拟. 高压物理学报. 2021(02): 90-103 .
11.	董新刚，郑凯斌，喻琳峰，吴玉燕，李岩芳. 爆炸冲击作用下绝热挡环破碎性能研究. 应用力学学报. 2021(04): 1309-1317 .
12.	王云天，曾祥国，陈华燕，杨鑫，王放，祁忠鹏. 延性金属层裂自由面速度曲线特征多尺度模拟研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2021(08): 139-153 . 本站查看
13.	Ken Wen，Xiao-wei Chen，Yong-gang Lu. Research and development on hypervelocity impact protection using Whipple shield: An overview. Defence Technology. 2021(06): 1864-1886 .
14.	刘昕，邓勇军，彭芸，姚勇. 球形弹丸超高速斜撞击薄板的碎片云和侵彻特征仿真分析. 航天器环境工程. 2021(06): 615-624 .
15.	荣凯，杨军，陈占扬. 土介质挡墙对爆炸冲击波衰减规律研究. 工程爆破. 2021(06): 1-8 .
16.	Chun-bo Zhang，De-ning Di，Xiao-wei Chen，Ken Wen. Characteristics structure analysis on debris cloud in the hypervelocity impact of disk projectile on thin plate. Defence Technology. 2020(02): 299-307 .
17.	邸德宁，陈小伟，文肯，张春波. 超高速碰撞产生的碎片云研究进展. 兵工学报. 2018(10): 2016-2047 .