
Citation: | ZHAO Shengwei, Zhou Gang, DING Yang, WANG Changli. Experimental investigation on deflagration to detonation transition of HMX/TNT/AL compositions at fast thermal ignition[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 032103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0396 |
Titanium carbide (TiC) is a typical transition metal carbide characterized by its high elastic modulus, low coefficient of thermal expansion, remarkable high-temperature strength, and superior resistance to abrasion and oxidation[1]. It is widely used in structural materials for cutting tools, abrasion resistance coatings, mechanical parts and other fields. In addition, transparent ceramics TiC can also be used as excellent optical materials. TiC has excellent thermal shock resistance, which is often used as a special refractory in reductive or neutral atmospheres. TiC based cermets possess high hardness, high strength, oxidation resistance, high temperature resistance and chemical stability, as well as good toughness[2]. As an excellent material, TiC has attracted wide attention all over the world and many researchers have used different methods to synthesize it. These methods mainly include carbothermal reduction method[3-5], direct synthesis method[6-7], sol-gel method[8], gas phase method[9-10], mechanical alloy[11], etc. In view of the fact that the research has not been carried out at home and abroad on the synthesis of titanium carbide by precursors directly driven by detonation shock of explosives, and it’s only reported that the synthesis of titanium carbide may require a high temperature and high pressure condition. So the detonation shock method is used to synthesize TiC in this paper.
The detonation shock synthesis is a new field of science and technology rising in recent years, and the instantaneous high temperature and high pressure condition provided by detonation shock process can make the properties of materials change complicatedly. At present, the detonation shock method has been applied to powder processing, synthesis of super-hard materials, sinter and weld of new materials, and other fields. In this paper, nanometer TiC powder was synthesized by detonation shock wave. The structure, morphological characterization and elemental composition of the as-prepared samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), respectively.
The schematic diagram of the experiment in a closed detonation reactor designed by our team is shown in Fig.1. HMX was selected as the pressure and temperature source. Detonation shock wave was adjusted by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA, density 1.18 g/cm3). The precursors are TiO2 and activated carbon. The HMX and the precursors were respectively pressed into a cylinder with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 5 mm. The density of HMX cylinder and the precursor cylinder are 1.8 and 1.5 g/cm3, respectively. By the end of detonation shock wave, black powder products were obtained, accompanied by the release of ammonia gas. The black powder turned brown after being soaked in aqua regia for 24 hours, then it was calcined in muffle furnace for 400 min at 400 ℃. Ultimately, the light grey powder was obtained.
Fig.2 shows the SEM diagram of the raw material. In the Fig.2(a), the activated carbon has a large layer and a flat surface. It has a obvious delamination and the edge is defective but not very large. Fig.2(b) shows that the particle size of titanium dioxide is very small.
In order to improve the pressing formability of HMX cylinder, the water suspension granulation method was used to coat HMX with fluoro rubber 2602 whose mass fraction is 3% as a binder. The shock pressure required for the experiment is theoretically calculated according to the attenuation model of detonation shock wave[12], which considers that the detonation shock wave decays exponentially during the propagation in the medium, and the attenuation relationship can be expressed by the following formula
p=ke−ax |
(1) |
where p is the output pressure after attenuation, k is the correction factor, which is related to the density of HMX, a is the parameter of organic glass material, and x is the thickness of PMMA plate.
The XRD instrument used in the experiment is the D/MAX-rBX ray diffractometer by Japanese Science. The test was processed by using the standard θ−2θ scanning method. The copper target Kα1 radiation (λ=1.540 56×10−10 m) was projected onto the powder. For each measurement, the machine was operated at 80 keV with a current of 100 mA, the scanning range is 20°−100° and the scanning rate is 4 (°)/min. The SEM instrument used in the experiment was Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN type of FEI Company of the United States.
Fig.3 is the XRD curve of the sample produced by the detonation shock wave in the pressure of 25 GPa. The mole ratio of the reaction precursor TiO2 and activated carbon is 1∶6. There appeared 13 distinct peaks among which the Numbers 3, 4, 8 and 12 correspond to the crystal surface (111), (200), (220) and (400), respectively. The Numbers 5, 9, 10 are the peaks of TiCx (x<1), and the Numbers 1, 2, 6, 7, 11 and 13 are the ones of TiO2.
It is seen in Fig.3 that under the instantaneous high temperature and high pressure provided by detonation shock wave, C in activated carbon was used as a reducing agent to reduce TiO2 to obtain crystalline TiC and TiCx (x<1), and a few unreacted TiO2 were found in the samples. Sen[13] used thermodynamic methods to determine the possibility of using carbothermic method to obtain TiC by calculating the relationship between the reaction enthalpy and temperature of C and TiO2, and the relationship between the Gibbs free energy of the reaction and the temperature and pressure. In addition, according to the C-Ti binary equilibrium phase diagram, it is known that TiC is non-stoichiometric, and the range of the atomic ratio of C to Ti is from 0.49 to 1.0 with the continuous change of reaction conditions, which explains the existence of TiCx (x<1) in the sample. In Fig.3, the TiC characteristic peak deviates from the standard value, which is mainly due to the formation of lattice defects caused by the instantaneous high temperature and high pressure. Besides, the molar ratio of C and TiO2 also has some effect on the deviation of the characteristic peaks, which is consistent with the references[13-14]. There is no peak of C in its elemental form due to the oxidation of partial C into CO gas. The remaining activated carbon is soaked in aqua regia and calcined at high temperature for 31 hours during the purification process, and is released in the form of gaseous CO2. TiO2 is not completely removed in the purification process because of its stable physical and chemical properties and remains in the sample ultimately.
Fig.4 is the SEM images of the samples. In Fig.4(a), there are particles distributed evenly with a size less than 50 nm. It shows that a small number of micron-sized spherical aggregates are attached to the nano-particles and band-shaped substances in Fig.4(b). The band-shaped substances should be residual of anatase TiO2 according to the reference [15].
Table 1 and Table 2 show the results of the EDS spectrum of the samples. It is showed that four elements of Si, O, Al and Fe appears, besides C and Ti. According to the XRD results, TiC, TiCx (x<1) and TiO2 were found in the samples. The element Si is derived from the organic glass filler, the sheath of detonator’s lead and the adhesive tape during the experiment. Under the instantaneous high temperature and high pressure of the detonation shock, element Si is oxidized rapidly to amorphous SiO2, which is consistent with the reference[16]. A small amount of metallic elements in the sample mainly came from the detonator and inner debris of reactor vessel. These metallic elements produced stable metallic silicates in the sample during the experiment. It can be concluded from Table 2 that the composition of spherical aggregates is complex, which may be due to the co-agglomeration of TiC, TiCx (x<1), amorphous SiO2, TiO2 and metallic silicates,and the mechanism of agglomeration needs to be explored further.
Element | Line | Weight/% |
C | K | 23.36 |
O | K | 12.51 |
Al | K | 1.67 |
Si | K | 18.87 |
Ti | K | 42.20 |
Fe | K | 1.39 |
Total | 100.00 |
Element | Line | Weight/% |
C | K | 28.14 |
O | K | 22.87 |
Al | K | 2.11 |
Si | K | 6.91 |
Ti | K | 36.33 |
Fe | K | 3.64 |
Total | 100.00 |
In the traditional carbothermic method to synthesis titanium carbide, the order of forming product is Ti4O7, Ti3O5, Ti2O3, TiO, TiC, and Ti with the increasing temperature[13]. The reaction of TiO to TiC has the lowest Gibbs free energy in the six reactions above, which indicates that TiC can be generated at a higher reaction temperature. Theoretical calculation shows that the reaction temperature of TiO to TiC is 1 271 ℃ at normal atmospheric pressure, and the heat required for the reaction is above 500 kJ/mol. So when the TiC powders are synthesized by detonation shock, the reaction mechanism is different because of the characteristics of high temperature, high pressure and short reaction time. In this paper, the detonation parameters of HMX possess the pressure of 30 GPa, the temperature of 3 800 K, the heat of 1 697 kJ/mol, and the action time of detonation shock wave is only a few microseconds. Combining with analysis of the XRD patterns, the synthesis process of TiC powder under detonation shock wave was discussed preliminarily. When the shock wave acts on the precursors, the products of titanium dioxide by carbothermic method does not undergo the process of Ti4O7, Ti3O5, Ti2O3, but directly to TiC and CO. This is the reason why no other forms of titanium oxides are observed in Fig.2 except the residual titanium dioxide. Since the properties of titanium carbide and titanium dioxide are similar, the purification method is the focus of work in the future.
The solid state chemical reactions undergo diffusion, formation of new crystalline phases and grain growth. First, a product layer is formed on the surface of the reactant. The subsequent reaction depends on the diffusion of the reactant in the product layer and the rate of chemical reaction of the reactants. For solid state reactions, the diffusion rate is usually very slow. So in most cases, the diffusion of particles plays a controlling role. However, the time of detonation shock wave is very short and the diffusion degree of their mutual reaction can only reach 0.1 nm when the powder is synthesized at the diffusion rate of 10−8 cm2/s[17]. It is inferred that nano-TiC powders can hardly be obtained in this processing, which was not consistent to the results confirming the existence of nano-TiC. So it is clear that the reaction by shock wave follows the solid state reaction, but it is quite different from the solid state reaction under normal conditions, for it has the characteristics of faster diffusion process and shorter reaction time. According to the detonation shock wave theory, a large number of dislocations produced by shock wave in materials will cause the decrease of diffusion activation energy. In addition, the plastic flow and deformation of materials will lead to the formation of slip bands and vortices at the interface, so that the atoms diffuse following the dislocations, twinning, and slip bands, which makes diffusion coefficients of solid materials increase significantly under the action of shock waves.
It was showed that the powder synthesized produce a lot of defects and lattice distortion by detonation shock waves[18]. Theoretically, the density of lattice distortion can reach 1012 to 1013 cm-2 by the detonation shock waves. These defects can reduce the Gibbs free energy of nucleation and accelerate the formation and growth of the nucleation. Moreover, CO gas is released, and the heat transfer rate of gas is higher than that of solid material, which improves the mixing of reactants and promotes the powder synthesized to a certain extent.
The nano-TiC and TiCx (x<1) with the particle size of less than 50 nm were synthesized by detonation shock method. It is believed that although the mechanism of synthesizing nano-TiC by detonation shock wave follows the solid state reaction, it is quite different from the traditional solid state reaction because of the high temperature, high pressure and short action time of detonation shock wave. Compared to the traditional carbothermic method, the reaction by detonation shock wave of nano-TiC does not go through the order of Ti4O7, Ti3O5, Ti2O3, but directly to TiC and CO. The effect of detonation shock wave leads to dislocation, slip band, vortex, defect and lattice distortion in the precursors, and CO gas was produced in the reaction process. These promotes the synthesis of nanometer TiC to a certain extent.
[1] |
Evaluation experiment of nonnuclear ammunition about Fatalness: MIL-STD-2015C [S]. 2003: 47−52.
|
[2] |
MACEK A. Transition from deflagration to detonation in cast explosives [J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1959, 31(2): 162–167. doi: 10.1063/1.1730287
|
[3] |
GRIFFITH N, GROOCOKE J M. The burning to detonation in solid explosive [J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1960: 4154–4165. doi: 10.1039/jr9600004154
|
[4] |
MCAFEE J M, ASAY B W, CAMPBELL A W, et al. Deflagration to detonation in granular HMX, ignition, kinetics and shock formation[C]//Proceedings 10th Symp(Int) on Detonation. Maryland: NSWC, 1993: 716−720. DOI: CDSTIC.DOE.10162277.
|
[5] |
LEURET F, CHAISSE F, PRESLES H N. Experimental study of the low velocity detonation regime during the deflagration to detonation transition in a high density explosive[C]// Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Detonation//Snowmass, Colorado, 1998: 693−701.
|
[6] |
GIFFORD M J, TSEMBELIS A K, FIELD J E. Anomalous detonation velocities following type II deflagration to detonation transitions in pentaerythritol tetranitrate [J]. Journal of J Applied Phys, 2002, 91(4): 4995–5002. doi: 10.1063/1.1462415
|
[7] |
SANDUSKY H W, GRANHOLM R H, BOHL D G, et al. Deflagration to detonation transition in LX-04 as a function of loading density, temperature, and confinement[C]//13th International Detonation Symposium. Norfolk, VA, United States, 2006: 1−9.
|
[8] |
TARVER C M, GOODALE T C, SHAW R, et al. Deflagration to detonation transiton studies for two potential isomeric cast primary explosives[C] //6th Symposium (International) on Detonation//Coronado, California, 1976: 231−250.
|
[9] |
CHUZEVILLE V, BAUDIN G, LEFRANCOIS A, et al. Detonation initiation of heterogeneous melt cast high explosives[C]// 41st International Pyrotechnic Seminar, EUROPYRO, 2015: 1−5. DOI: 10.1063/1.4971467.
|
[10] |
RAO P T, GONTHIER K A. Mesostructure dependent reactive burn modeling of porous solid explosives[C]//50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, 2014: 1−10. DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-3810.
|
[11] |
RAO P T, GONTHIER K A. Analysis of compaction shock interactions during DDT of low density HMX [J]. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, 2015: 1–7. doi: 10.1063/1.4971610
|
[12] |
TRINGE J W, VANDERSALL K S, REAUGH J E. Observation and Modeling of Deflagration to Detonation Transition (DDT) in Low Density HMX [J]. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, 2015, 1793(1): 060024. doi: 10.1063/1.4971580
|
[13] |
BODARD S, LAPÉBIE E, SAUREL R. Experiments and modeling of dynamic powder compaction in the scope of deflagration to detonation transition studies [J]. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, 2015, 1793(1): 040029. doi: 10.1063/1.4971523
|
[14] |
Dattelbaum D M, Sheffield S A, Gustavsen R L. A comparison of the shock initiation sensitivities, and resulting reactive flow of several 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene-based explosives [C]// Fifteenth International Detonation Symposium, 2014: 740−749.
|
[15] |
孙锦山. 含能材料的燃烧转爆轰研究 [J]. 含能材料, 1994, 2(3): 1–12
SUN Jinshan. Study of deflagration to detonation transiton in energetic materials [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 1994, 2(3): 1–12
|
[16] |
张超, 马亮, 赵凤起, 等. 含能材料燃烧转爆轰研究进展 [J]. 含能材料, 2015, 23(10): 1028–1036
ZHANG Chao, MA Liang, ZHAO Fengqi, et al. Review on Deflagration to detonation transition of energetic materials [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015, 23(10): 1028–1036
|
[17] |
王平. 凝聚相炸药DDT的实验研究与数值模拟[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 1992: 30−45.
WANG Ping. Experimental study and numerical simulation for deflagration to detonation transition about condensed explosives[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 1992: 30−45.
|
[18] |
文尚刚, 王胜强, 黄文斌, 等. 高密度B炸药的燃烧转爆轰实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2007, 27(11): 567–571
WEN Shanggang, WANG Shengqiang, HUANG Wenbin, et al. An experimental study on deflagration to detonation transition in high denstity compositon B [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2007, 27(11): 567–571
|
[19] |
赵同虎, 张新彦, 李斌, 等. 颗粒状HMX、RDX的燃烧转爆轰实验研究 [J]. 含能材料, 2003, 11(12): 187–190 doi: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2015.10.021
ZHAO Tonghu, ZHANG Xinyan, LI Bin, et al. Experimental study on the deflagration to detonation transition for granular HMX, RDX [J]. Energetic Materials, 2003, 11(12): 187–190 doi: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2015.10.021
|
[20] |
杨涛. 高装填密度火药床燃烧转爆轰的实验研究和数值模拟[D]. 南京: 华东工学院, 1995: 8−22.
YANG Tao. Experimental study and numerical simulation for deflagration to detonation transition in high packed propellant bed[D]. Nanjing: East China Institute of Technolagy, 1995: 8−22.
|
[21] |
段宝福. 新型钝感工业炸药的燃烧转爆轰研究[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2009: 55−62.
DUAN Baofu. Study on deflagration to detonation transition for new style deterred industrial explosive. Beijing: China Waterpower Press, 2009: 55−62.
|
[22] |
张超, 赵凤起, 金朋刚等. p(BAMO-AMMO)热塑性高能推进剂燃烧转爆轰试验研究 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2016, 39(04): 92–96
ZHANG Chao, ZHAO Fengqi, JIN Penggang, et al. Experimental study on deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) in p(BAMO-AMMO) thermoplastic high energy propellants [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2016, 39(04): 92–96
|
[23] |
陈晓明, 赵瑛, 宋长文, 等. 发射药燃烧转爆轰的试验研究 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2012, 35(4): 69–72 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2012.04.018
CHEN Xiaoming, ZHAO Ying, SONG Changwen, et al. Experimental study on deflagration to fetonation transition of gun propellants [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2012, 35(4): 69–72 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2012.04.018
|
[24] |
秦能. 一种RDX-CMDB推进剂危险性能研究 [J]. 含能材料, 2011, 19(06): 725–729 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2011.06.027
QIN Neng, PEI Jiangfeng, WANG Mingxing. Hazard property of the RDX-CMDB propellant [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2011, 19(06): 725–729 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2011.06.027
|
[25] |
秦能, 裴江峰, 王明星. 几种典型固体推进剂的燃烧转爆轰实验研究 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2010, 33(04): 86–89 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2010.04.022
QIN Neng, PEI Jiangfeng, WANG Mingxing. Experimental study on deflagration to detonation transition of several typical solid propellants [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2010, 33(04): 86–89 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2010.04.022
|
[26] |
冯晓军, 杨建刚, 徐洪涛, 等. AP和Al含量对DNTF基炸药燃烧转爆轰的影响 [J]. 含能材料, 2016, 24(08): 752–756 doi: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2016.08.005
FENG Xiaojun, YANG Jiangang, Xu Hongtao, et al. Effect of content of AP and Al on the deflagration to detonation transition of DNTF-based explosives [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2016, 24(08): 752–756 doi: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2016.08.005
|
[27] |
陈朗, 王飞, 伍俊英, 等. 高密度压装炸药燃烧转爆轰研究 [J]. 含能材料, 2011, 19(06): 697–704 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2011.06.022
CHEN Lang, WANG Fei, WU Junying, et al. Investigation of the deflagration to detonation transition in pressed high density explosives [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2011, 19(06): 697–704 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2011.06.022
|
[28] |
代晓淦, 王娟, 文玉史, 等. PBX-2炸药加热条件下燃烧转爆轰特性 [J]. 含能材料, 2013, 21(05): 649–652 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2013.05.017
DAI Xiaogan, WANG Juan, WEN Yushi, et al. Deflagration to detonation transition characteristics for heated PBX-2 [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2013, 21(05): 649–652 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2013.05.017
|
[29] |
金韶华, 松全才. 炸药理论[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2010: 288−304.
|
[30] |
兵器工业第二零四研究所. 混合炸药及其发展[M]. 西安, 2008: 52−56.
|
[31] |
兵器工业第二零四研究所. 火炸药手册[M]. 西安, 1987: 200−201.
|
[32] |
九零三所情报室. 高能炸药性能数据手册[M]. 四川绵阳, 1982: 65−66.
|
[33] |
成大先. 机械设计手册[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004: 3−15.
|
[34] |
赵生伟, 周刚, 初哲, 等. 快速热作用下带壳铸装梯黑铝炸药热响应实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 30(S2): 302–308 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2009.08.003
ZHAO Shengwei, ZHOU Gang, CHU Zhe, et al. Experiment investigation on thermal response of cast TNT/RDX/AL [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 30(S2): 302–308 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2009.08.003
|
1. | 熊玮,张先锋,李逸,谈梦婷,刘闯,侯先苇. 活性材料冲击压缩及反应行为模拟方法研究进展. 北京理工大学学报. 2023(10): 995-1015 . ![]() | |
2. | 王云天,曾祥国,陈华燕,杨鑫,王放,祁忠鹏. 钽靶板在冲击下层裂过程的数值模拟. 高压物理学报. 2021(02): 90-103 . ![]() |
Element | Line | Weight/% |
C | K | 23.36 |
O | K | 12.51 |
Al | K | 1.67 |
Si | K | 18.87 |
Ti | K | 42.20 |
Fe | K | 1.39 |
Total | 100.00 |
Element | Line | Weight/% |
C | K | 28.14 |
O | K | 22.87 |
Al | K | 2.11 |
Si | K | 6.91 |
Ti | K | 36.33 |
Fe | K | 3.64 |
Total | 100.00 |