Measuring the detonation reaction zone structure ofJOB-9003 explosive using PDV

QIN Jincheng; PEI Hongbo; HUANG Wenbin; ZHANG Xu; ZHENG Xianxu; ZHAO Feng

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0101

Volume 39 Issue 4

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2019 > 39(4): 041404

WANG Chun, ZHANG De-liang, JIANG Zong-lin. Numerical investigation of detonation sweeping an interface of inert gas and its decoupling[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(6): 556-561. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)06-0556-06

Citation:

QIN Jincheng, PEI Hongbo, HUANG Wenbin, ZHANG Xu, ZHENG Xianxu, ZHAO Feng. Measuring the detonation reaction zone structure ofJOB-9003 explosive using PDV[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0101

Citation:

PDF( 1272 KB)

Measuring the detonation reaction zone structure ofJOB-9003 explosive using PDV

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0101

Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, Sichuan, China

Received Date: 2018-03-28
Rev Recd Date: 2018-06-22

Available Online: 2019-04-25

Publish Date: 2019-04-01

Abstract

Abstract

In order to obtain the chemical reaction zone of HMX based JOB-9003 explosive, experimental measurements on the detonation wave profile of solid explosives using photon Doppler velocimetry (PDV) have been performed. Planar detonations were produced by impacting the explosive with sapphire flyer launched from a powder gun. Particle velocity wave profiles were measured at the explosive/window interface. LiF windows with very thin vapor deposited aluminum mirrors were used in the experiments. The time resolution of PDV is about 1 ns, and the velocity uncertainty is less than 2%. The measurements show distinct end to the reaction zone indicating a CJ point in JOB-9003. The results show that the reaction time of JOB-9003 is (11±2) ns, and the corresponding reaction length is (0.075±0.014) mm. The CJ pressure is (35.6±0.9) GPa, and the pressure at Von-Neumann spike is (47.9±1.2) GPa.
- detonation reaction zone,
- HMX,
- CJ pressure,
- laser interferometric method

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	DUFF R E, HOUSTON E. Measurement of the Chapman-Jouguet pressure and reaction zone length in a detonating high explosive [J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1955, 23(7): 1268–1273. DOI: 10.1063/1.1742255.
[2]	张宝坪, 张庆明, 黄风雷. 爆轰物理学 [M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2001: 151−153.
[3]	TASKER D G, LEE R J. The measurement of electrical conductivity in the detonating condensed explosives [C] // Proceedings of the 9th International Detonation Symposium. USA: Office of Naval Research, 1989: 123−126.
[4]	LEE R J, GUSTAVSON P K. Electrical conductivity as a real time probe of secondary combustion of solid-fuel additives in detonating explosives [C] // Shock Compression of Condensed Matter 2003. USA: American Institute of Physics, 2004: 1273−1276.
[5]	赵同虎, 张新彦, 李斌, 等. 用光电法研究钝感炸药JB-9014反应区结构 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2002, 16(2): 111–119. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2002.02.005 ZHAO Tonghu, ZHANG Xinyan, LI Bin, et al. Detonation reaction zone structure of JB-9014 [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2002, 16(2): 111–119. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2002.02.005
[6]	LOBOIKO B L, LUBYATINSKY S N. Reaction zones of detonating solid explosives [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2000, 36(6): 716–733.
[7]	SHEFFIELD S A, BLOOMQUIST D D, TARVER C M. Subnanosecond measurements of detonation fronts in solid high explosives [J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1984, 80(8): 3831–3844. DOI: 10.1063/1.447164.
[8]	SEITZ W L, STACY H L, ENGELKE R, et al. Detonation reaction-zone structure of PBX-9502 [C] // Proceedings of the 9th International Detonation Symposium. USA: Office of Naval Research, 1989: 675−682.
[9]	GUSTAVSEN R L, SHEFFIELD S A, ALCON R R. Detonation wave profiles in HMX based explosives [J]. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 1998, 429(429): 739–742. DOI: 10.1063/1.55674.
[10]	GUSTAVSEN R L, SHEFFIELD S A, ALCON R R. Progress in measuring detonation wave profiles in PBX9501 [C] // 11th International Detonation Symposium. USA: Office of Naval Research, 1998: 821−827.
[11]	GUSTAVSEN R L, BARTRAM B D, SANCHEZ N. Detonation wave profiles measured in plastic bonded explosives using 1550 nm photon Doppler velocimetry (PDV)[C] // Shock Compression of Condensed Matter 2009. USA: American Institute of Physics, 2009: 253−256.
[12]	BOUYER V, DOUCET M, DECARIS L. Experimental measurements of the detonation wave profile in a TATB based explosive [C] // EPJ Web of Conference. France: EDP Science, 2010: 378−384. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20101000030
[13]	BOUYER V, HEBERT P, DOUCET M, et al. Experimental measurements of the chemical reaction zone of TATB and HMX based explosives [C] // Shock Compression of Condensed Matter 2011. USA: American Institute of Physics, 2012: 209−212. DOI: 10.1063/1.3686256
[14]	BOUYER V, SHEFFIELD S A, DATTELBAUM D M, et al. Experimental measurements of the chemical reaction zone of detonating liquid explosives [C] // Shock Compression of Condensed Matter 2009. USA: American Institute of Physics, 2009: 177−180. DOI: 10.1063/1.3295096.
[15]	董海山, 周芬芬. 高能炸药及相关物性能[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1989: 126; 130; 301.
[16]	裴红波, 黄文斌, 覃锦程, 等. 基于多普勒测速技术的JB-9014炸药反应区结构研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(3): 485–490. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0379 PEI Hongbo, HUANG Wenbin, QIN Jincheng, et al. Reaction zone structure of JB-9014 explosive measured by PDV [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 485–490. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0379
[17]	STRAND O T, GOOSMAN D R, MARTINEZ C, et al. Compact system for high-speed velocimetry using heterodyne techniques [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2006, 77(8): 083108. DOI: 10.1063/1.2336749.
[18]	项红亮, 王建, 毕重连, 等. 光子多普勒速度测量系统的数据处理方法 [J]. 光学与光电技术, 2012, 10(2): 52–56 XIANG Hongliang, WANG Jian, BI Chonglian, et al. Data processing of photonic Doppler velocimetry system [J]. Optics & Optoelectronic Technology, 2012, 10(2): 52–56
[19]	LIU S, WANG D, LI T, et al. Analysis of photonic Doppler velocimetry data based on the continuous wavelet transform [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2011, 82(2): 593–599. DOI: 10.1063/1.3534011.
[20]	赵万广, 周显明, 李加波, 等. LiF单晶的高压折射率及窗口速度的修正 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(5): 571–576. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.05.010 ZHAO Wanguang, ZHOU Xianming, LI Jiabo, et al. Refractive index of LiF single crystal at high pressure and its window correction [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(5): 571–576. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.05.010
[21]	JENSEN B J, HOLTKAMP D B, RIGG P A, et al. Accuracy limits and window corrections for photon doppler velocimetry [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 101(1): 523–454. DOI: 10.1063/1.2407290.
[22]	FRITZ J N, HIXSON R S, SHAW M S, et al. Overdriven-detonation and sound-speed measurements in PBX-9501 and the " thermodynamic”Chapman-Jouguet pressure [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1996, 80(11): 6129–6141. DOI: 10.1063/1.363681.
[23]	MADER C L. Numerical modeling of detonation [M]. Berkely, California: University of California Press, 1979: 69−70.
[24]	MENIKOFF R. Detonation waves in PBX 9501 [J]. Combustion Theory & Modelling, 2006, 10(6): 1003–1021. DOI: 10.1080/13647830600851754.
[25]	TARVER C M. Detonation reaction zones in condensed explosives [C] // APS Topical Conference on Sccm. American Institute of Physics, 2006: 1026-1029. DOI: 10.1063/1.2263497
[26]	SHEFFIELD S A, GUSTAVSEN R L, ALCON R R, et al. High pressure Hugoniot and reaction rate measurements in PBX9501 [C] // AIP Conference Proceedings, 2004, 706(1): 1033-1036. DOI: 10.1063/1.1780414
[27]	DICK J J, MARTINEZ A R, HIXSON R S. Plane impact response of PBX 9501 and its components below 2 GPa: LA-13426-MS [R]. USA: Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, 1998.
[28]	Marsh S P. LASL Shock Hugoniot Data [M]. Berkely: University of California press, 1980: 83.
[29]	BAER M R, ROOT S, DATTELBAUM D, et al. Shockless compression studies of HMX-based explosives [C] // American Institute of Physics Conference Series. American Institute of Physics, 2009: 699−702. DOI: 10.1063/1.3295235
[30]	GIBBS T R. LLNL handbook of high explosives [M]. Berkely: University of California press, 1980: 259−262.
[31]	池家春. 非均匀炸药未反应冲击雨贡纽关系的压力对比测量技术 [C] // 第二次全国爆轰学术会议论文集(3). 南京, 1983: 134−140.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Xuping, DONG Jinlei, LYU Chao, LUO Binqiang, WANG Guiji, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng. Mechanical response of NiTi alloys with different initial phase transition temperatures at high strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 053102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0257
[2]	ZHANG Xiaoyang, TAN Shifeng, LIU Zeyu, ZHAO Piao. Mechanical property of metallic foams under dynamic tension with constant high strain rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(1): 013105. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0128
[3]	ZHAO Sihan, GUO Weiguo, WANG Fan, LI Xinxin, CHEN Longyang, LI Xiaolong, WANG Ruifeng. On a bidirectional bending Hopkinson tension test method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(11): 114101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0427
[4]	DU Bing, GUO Yazhou, LI Yulong. A novel technique for determining the dynamic Bauschinger effect by electromagnetic Hopkinson bar[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 081101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0050
[5]	WEN Zhu, QIU Yanyu, ZI Min, ZHAO Zhangyong, WANG Mingyang. Experimental study on quasi-one-dimensional strain compression of calcareous sand[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 033101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0015
[6]	PAN Hao, WANG Shengtao, WU Zihui, HU Xiaomian. On strength of aluminum under high pressure and high strain rate based on crystal plasticity theory[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 023102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0084
[7]	LIU Yu, XU Zejian, TANG Zhongbin, ZHANG Weiqi, HUANG Fenglei. A high-strain-rate shear testing method based on the DIHPB technique[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 104101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0301
[8]	LI Chenghua, JIANG Zhaoxiu, WANG Beiqiao, ZHANG Zhen, WANG Yonggang. Nonlinear mechanical response of PZT95/5 ferroelectric ceramics under high strain rate loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 707-715. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0329
[9]	ZHANG Weiqi, XU Zejian, SUN Zhongyue, TONG Yi, HUANG Fenglei. Dynamic shear behavior and failure mechanism of Ti-6Al-4V at high strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1137-1144. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0107
[10]	Shen Haiting, Jiang Zhaoxiu, Wang Beike, Li Chenghua, Wang Lili, Wang Yonggang. Full field strain measurement in split Hopkinson tension bar experiments by using ultra-high-speed camera with digital image correlation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 15-20. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0015-06
[11]	Li Shunping, Feng Shunshan, Xue Zaiqing, Tu Jian. Mechanical properties of PTFE at high strain rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 1046-1050. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-1046-05
[12]	Shi Fei-fei, Suo Tao, Hou Bing, Li Yu-long. Strain rate and temperature sensitivity and constitutive model of YB-2 of aeronautical acrylic polymer[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 769-776. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0769-08
[13]	Zhang Long-hui, Zhang Xiao-qing, Yao Xiao-hu, Zang Shu-guang. Constitutive model of transparent aviation polyurethane at high strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1): 51-56. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0051-06
[14]	TangTie-gang, LiuCang-li. Ontheconstitutivemodelforoxygen-freehigh-conductivitycopper underhighstrain-ratetension[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6): 581-586. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0581-06
[15]	SUO Tao, DAI Lei, SHI Chun-sen, LI Yu-long, YANG Jian-bo. MechanicalbehaviorsofC/SiCcompositessubjectedtouniaxialcompression athightemperaturesandhighstrainrates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(3): 297-302. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)03-0297-06
[16]	TANG Tie-gang, LI Qing-zhong, CHEN Yong-tao, GU Yan, LIU Cang-li. An improved technique for dynamic tension of metal ring by explosive loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 546-549. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0546-04
[17]	GUO Wei-guo, LI Yu-long, HUANG Fu-zeng. Deformation and mechanical property of aluminium foam at different strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(4): 289-292. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)04-0289-04
[18]	WANG Li-li, DONG Xin-long, SUN Zi-jian. Dynamic constitutive behavior of materials at high strain rate taking account of damage evolution[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 193-198. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0193-06
[19]	TAO Jun-lin, CHEN Yu-ze, TIAN Chang-jin, CHEN Gang, LI Si-zhong, HUANG Xi-cheng, ZHANG Fang-jü. Investigation of the effect of strain rate history on the stress-strain curves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 80-84. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0080-05
[20]	LI Yu-long, SUO Tao, GUO Wei-guo, HU Rui, LI Jin-shan, FU Heng-zhi. Determination of dynamic behavior of materials at elevated temperatures and high strain rates using Hopkinson bar[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 487-492. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0487-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	徐沛栋，倪萍，杨宝，蒋震宇，刘逸平，刘泽佳，周立成，汤立群. 用于软材料的中应变率LSHPB系统及应用. 爆炸与冲击. 2025(03): 3-12 . 本站查看
2.	叶想平，南小龙，段志伟，俞宇颖，蔡灵仓，刘仓理. 样品粗糙度对材料SHPB动态压缩性能的影响. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(01): 53-59 . 本站查看
3.	杨智程，刘龙飞，刘炼煌，殷鹏志，吴志强. 外部爆炸载荷下表面粗糙度对45钢柱壳剪切带行为的影响. 高压物理学报. 2022(04): 114-126 .
4.	赵志豪，付应乾，周刚毅，舒旗. 三维打印GP1不锈钢动态拉伸力学性能研究. 机械制造. 2022(09): 54-57+84 .